JOIN a Network, a   Community on Line. Work with others for the Common Good & A Better World. Challenge & Expose Fraud & Corruption. REPORT criminal activities as YOU ARE duty bound to do. Do so in the Public Domain. Name all Public Servants who act in contempt of Parliament's Law Consider the ruling we point you to and ask: "WHAT BE THE OVERALL AIM OF OUR INTENTIONS, for publishing such truths and realities as we report and expose and as the victims of abusers of Public Office experience?

Publish your Statement of Facts and the Evidence you have. Use your rights in law (link) and ACT with others against the offenders. Join in a class action.

Affiliated Sites For The Above Projected Action   lbduk.org (File update)

JOIN the Community On Line and publish your Statement of Facts and the Evidence you have. Use your rights in law (*Link) & ACT with others against the offenders. It is in the victims' interest to work with and for each other's successes through the mass of evidence. All can benefit by creating the data of common practices, as  in the member's case  you can access details of, as we invite you, below.

ACCESS a member's case as registered in June 2002 at the European Court of Human Rights. THE FACTS and THE VIOLATIONS as pleaded by us should be compared with your own experiences. Point to the submitted work by using the links we provide you here. If you refer to or copy the work, ensure that you do qualify the source of the intellectual property. READ of the latest CHALLENGES & EXPOSURES necessitated after the childish assertions by persons who allegedly serve 'Justice'.   (ABDUCTED and raped daily by the very public servants). IF YOU wish to know of why and what is behind it all and the FOUNDATIONS for the rampant abuse of the legal systems in CIVILISED(?) democracies(!) that allegedly rest and are founded on LAW and ORDER YOU MUST access the new site.

ACCESS the member's site for additional information and how solicitors and courts did act in contempt of the LAW.

Join in the creation of the mass of evidence against the offending public servants. It will support actions you and others can instigate jointly and or severally. We cover In our pages such rights, & the laws breached and violated by the state through the public servants who defraud citizens of their rights in law and their assets / properties. Access the relevant page and consider our invitation and your rights.

READ the content of this page very carefully and recognise how each of the protagonists was after self-promotion while at the same time agreeing over what was to come from within their circles, as a mob organised at deceit with undeclared intentions and 'stitch you up, behind your back mate', as fast learners care of the facilities we cover in the exclusive and clearly stated page: * /confraud.htm *

DO Note, both protagonists in this page were proclaiming their intentions to join in the exposures warranted and accepted as the only avenue through which to inform the world, THE JURY AT LARGE, of the facts and the realities of life in the legal system.
NEITHER proceeded to such activities. Both used contact with *human-rights* for other purposes than just their alleged intentions 'to expose the fraudulent activities at and  within the courts / legal system'.
Their main pre-occupation was to use alleged intentions, to publish it all on the Internet, as a lever and to cause the authorities to deal with claims to compensation, sooner rather than later.
Failing to act as honourably and openly, as the Community On Line members do and as the case stated and lodged at the European Court of Human Rights, was never within 'the make-up of the two, actors. Submitting to the ECoHR as 'OUR AIMS' statement of intent cover and as the law provides  was never within  their idea of: "Justice To Be Seen To Be Done & In Open Courts". The 'confidential' settlement under the counter, the constructive frauds on the Taxpayers, their only target.
Fast learners, indeed. Followers of the practices they adopted as their modus operandi, too.
Both went for undisclosed parts in, and endorsement by them both, of the realities we cover elsewhere. In fact the Honorary Secretary of the LIPS crowd / mob declared, in an email that ...... it is all legal!

Below an email from Johan to Andrew. READ IT and consider five important aspects.
(1) Why did 'J' fail to use the judgement and appeal the Order of the day? He did, after all, contact and instruct a firm of solicitors who, he stated would not flinch to even  take the government on!  'J' boasted so, following 'the dismissal of the application as set down by 'J' and as presented to the court by 'J's mentor Mr Lewis (Lou) Foley, who was also the mentor of the old age pensioner, whose case was covered in the Daily Mirror article below, in September of the very year. Read the article and draw your own conclusions as to the roles of such persons for and in the scenarios promoted by Norman and 'J' about their playmate as another of 'the fraudsters club recruits' and 'activist', alleged challenger.
(2) Why did 'J', his mentor and his new solicitors choose NOT TO APPEAL, also the new dismissal?  Why indeed default to proceed to an appeal of the order resting on the application as advocated, settled and presented to the court  by 'J's mentor on the day? The answer, simple ; the scam was simply, theatre for the naive and gullible.
The answer to the above question, lay in the fact that 'J' raised(!) funds FOR payments to the solicitors he had acted against, because of the issues pleaded in the Appeal we publish in our pages. At that point in time Andrew knew that the negotiations for which 'J' engaged a NEW FIRM OF SOLICITORS, were ONLY to settle the 'fraudulent charges' (the FIRST FRAUD, by the legal circles,  through abuse of the courts' processes and facilities). It was clear that the agreed settlement was in accordance with the provisions of Article 38. SETTLEMENT concluded meant THE PARTIES who abused the courts' processes for asset striping and transfer to their circles ( constructive frauds) WERE TO BENEFIT from the conversions. It also meant that 'J' was dreaming of further abuse of Andrew's time, and that much more had been in his plans with others. 'J', after all, attempted, to pass HIS NEW SOLICITORS as the right firm to challenge 'public servants who abuse public office and steal / plunder the citizens' assets / properties.
Read the Appeal. Acquaint yourselves with the realities of life in the legal system.
Prepare for more factual revelations, in due course.
(3) Why fail to contact the Lord Chancellor and lodge substantial submissions to his Lordship, instead of promoting 'the new wrongs' by word of mouth only to other victims?
(4) 'J', after all was aware of the content of a succinct letter the Lord Chancellor wrote in respect of the issues that evolved out of Mr G. H. Screen's case. In the letter his Lordship very clearly stated that he had set up a special team to look into matters of 'judicial conduct' .(Link)
(5) WHY did 'J' fail to confirm if he contacted the European Court Of Human Rights to add the ongoing violations by and in the courts as a gross breach of the provisions of Article 1 of the First Protocol? Andrew HAD, after all, pointed to that violation and provision which his mates within LIPS, evidently knew not of just like both of his mentors, past and present (at the time)!
The email:
"Andrew, The tape that you dropped at my house, I am unable to transcribe the Judgement you recorded, I will make a copy for you later and a copy for the Lord Chancellor if he so requests one.
Many thanks for your efforts to help me and others that are not given a fair hearing in our so called Courts,  by their determined actions to conceal evidence and hold hearings in closed court rooms, and for abusing our rights to legal representations by Mackenzie friends.
Johan F. "
ASK : ' WHY assert 'IF' the Lord Chancellor requests for one? A wronged party who had already petitioned the ECoHR then establishes through his telephone call & vile attempts that he was ready to go along the path that the party, assisting and guiding the old age pensioner (see article below) AND the person he called ('N') ALSO eager that the procedure to be followed was the dead end alley.  In other words 'NO APPEAL and NO route to Strasbourg, BY choice! BOTH, oblivious to the fourth dimension FOR  Abraham Lincoln's famous assertion "...' and there are some people YOU can never fool at any time". AY 1956 ).

The same fraudster was also promoting lies by alleging that affidavits were altered by Andrew before publication on the Internet. The fraudster, the person he called or the authors of the allegedly altered affidavits NEVER raised such issues with Andrew, simply because the FRAUDSTER WAS FABRICATING TO HIS HEART'S DELIGHT.
(*Link)

£100,000 chasing abducted justice

and the victims of the experts multiply as the advocates and promoters of theatrical productions take their victims down the dead end alleys of abducted Justice with promises for an eventual settlement under the scheme we expose [*Link to] in our exclusive revelations.
Joining in, is the new class of experts that 'J' and 'N' knew of, perfect specimens, as recruits in 'the fraudsters club' both. The article above was published at least three weeks before the two crafty engaged in the exchanges we publish in this page. BOTH knew of the simple fact that the alleged legal expert was but an earlier victim of the legal circles and a convert to the new codes of morals imposed by and through the arrangements in place (*Links List). Note the issue and prepare for more revelations. We point to the words used by Norman, giving it all away. 
Johan was to rely on the very expert who was guiding and assisting the old age pensioner. The exchanges between the two LIPS members qualify and clarify, through the double-talk they engaged in, more than enough. (Link)

R28. Read the succinct letter from the Legal Aid Board that covers simple facts AND WHY Andrew was interested in Johan's 'J's' case. The solicitor 'J' spoke of was one of  the two who took part in the attempt to convert and misappropriate  Housing Benefit funds through 'the relevant county court's FREE 4 ALL facilities. THEFT of rents owing to a targeted victim (Link), as had been arranged through the invisible services industry - part of the CIUKU enterprises.
Odds are that the person who sent 'J' to *human-rights* and to Andrew was aware of the challenges that put an end to the attempts by the solicitors and the county court staff and officers to indulge in the usual 'theatrical productions'. The targeted victim will be publishing a succinct affidavit. THE POLICE who negated in their public duties while offering invisible services through their defaults and omissions will be challenged, yet again, to state IF IT BE THEIR INTENTION TO BRING ABOUT PROSECUTIONS of at least two criminals they have been harbouring for years now.

R11. The victims multiply, and of that there is no doubt. In preparation for the warranted exposures and the realities that arose as of the day when 'J' (Mr Johan M. Foenander) visited Andrew after he returned from a trip to Australia contacted *human-rights*  'N' (Mr Norman Scarth) and two other victims received, from Andrew copies of an explicit and succinct affidavit that had been settled and lodged at a County Court, years earlier. It covered much more than the recipients expected and the content / pleadings covered the very issues, that our succinct *Conrad* page covers.
The transmitted copies WERE MEANT AS A WARNING SHOT to actors who were playing a dangerous game as alleged 'challengers & victims of the legal circles / the system of LAW APPLICATION.

I.33.  The meeting referred to by Johan:'J' was one that Norman: 'N' knew of. 'N' had been party to undisclosed secret arrangements. As the pre- appointed' Honorary Secretary of the Litigants In Person Society, he knew much more. Andrew had not been invited to the meeting.
The 'controllers and organisers of much the same shambles, for years, as 'J' complained of to 'N'  nonetheless, new LIPS members were directed to *human-rights* and to Andrew for assistance, as happened with and in the case with 'J', himself. For days before the meeting, another member of LIPS was  telephoning Andrew and persistently 'demanded' of Andrew to telephone the self- appointed President of the LIPS crowd . The caller insisted that Andrew should put proposals to the 'Life President' for members to discuss at the meeting. Andrew flatly refused to get involved and told the caller that he would only attend as an observer in order to report any 'LIPS' developments in the Internet Newsgroups, IF the meeting did not turn out to be another sham as the two fiascos in Birmingham in 1998, when in fact the persistent caller himself had been given cause to walk out 'disgusted' as he stated then.
The previous year, Andrew had been invited and was able to attend only the second meeting. At the time Andrew called upon the organisers, for the umpteenth time (since they invited Andrew and The CAMILA Project' to join LIPS as Affiliates) to consider going on line, as other organised groups were doing. The second meeting had been convened solely for the LIPS crowd to select a steering committee with a brief to plan and steer the 'crowd' out of the wilderness.
On that occasion, as soon as the 'life President' walked in, she told Andrew that he should not / could not address the meeting, unless invited by the chair!  Andrew responded by clarifying that he was attending as an invited person who was not prepared to waste his time by going through the same 'cry over each other's shoulders' and tell us what happened to you shams, THE ANNUAL farce that had been on-going for far too many years. IF any of the attendees were there for similar performances, Andrew pointed out, THEN the invitation was misleading and an abuse of other people's trust and time.
The word had been that the self appointed life president was to resign, and a steering committee was to be elected in order to 'plan for the future'. On that basis Andrew was attending that meeting and was to act as observer and reporter on the all important changes.
As sure as the sun rises every day the pantomime was in full swing within minutes. The president who was going to resign did not, on the grounds that there was no quorum. The 'president' was to stay on until a meeting when enough members were to attend and vote in persons who could steer the 'crowd' out the frozen capsule it had been for years. It was but another farce of a gathering, just as the organisers had arranged a few weeks earlier for a Channel 4 documentary on the legal services. Very disappointing results all round with C4 securing and using nothing of substance.Andrew asked the 'president' simply: "How many invitations had been sent out to 'members' and IF it was possible to provide him with a copy of the Articles of Association, the charter or the Statement of Intent of the crowd known as the Litigants In Person Society, and he pointed out that it was something he had been asking, of the president and her lieutenants for years. Andrew then pointed out that 'The CAMILA Project' had delivered, years earlier, to the crowd's  leaders such and to the day he  never received the essential documents.  MORE TO FOLLOW.

IT IS clear that the caller set out to interfere in our work. He used a number of ploys, in his attempts, to bring about an end to the co-operation between 'N' and Andrew.
The two scans, below, do evince the fact that there was continued 'common interests work'. The leaders of the LIPS crowd / mob had introduced other victims to.
One such 'victim (?) / challenger'(?) had been involved in numerous court applications. After one such 'production / presentation' at the RCJ, Strand, London, which Andrew attended, there followed a private meeting at the victim's residence. Persons from the LIPS crowd, who had been assisting the victim, were present. Andrew pointed out that:"As the issues were of a criminal nature, a Section 9 Statement should be prepared, signed and then delivered to the police. It would then be a matter FOR the police to act as their retainers entail.
The victim and his LIPS  assistants, subsequently attended the police at Charring Cross, London after another failed / rejected court application.
We were later informed that in a letter the police sent to the victim, the police were stating that INSTRUCTIONS from the Lord Chancellor and his Lordship's Department 'forbade the police to interfere in the work of the judges'.
That was what Andrew was told by the victim, WHO then refused to hand a copy of the letter from the police to the victim'. We hasten to add that the 'victim' had 'joined(?) the Community On Line and qualified that he was to act as 'OUR AIMS' statement of intent clarify.
The victim, Like 'N' & 'J' never acted in that direction. All three were good at theatrics intended to impress 'victims and others they had been & are targeting'.
The letter from the police we publish here, IS FROM A FAXED copy that Norman Scarth, in his capacity as the Honorary Secretary of LIPS, received from the victim(?).
Recognise the fact that co-operation existed far beyond the telephone call attempts evinced in this page. Such went on and was  to be the situation (until July 2001) despite many more vile activities, behind the scenes by and from 'victims' operating from within the LIPS crowd / mob.

READ below Norman's letter to the Lord Chancellor's Department and note that 'N' sent a true copy by post to Andrew at *human-rights*.
Do not fail to note the fact that the issue was PERJURY - false statements on OATH in order to defeat / pervert and CORRUPT Justice (as if she had been released by her captors and rapists). Norman did what had to be done. He was co-operating at the time with human-rights and acted as the occasion commanded.

NOW ogle over the reply from the Lord Chancellor's Department below. Work out for yourself IF we were and are correct in our conclusions that what victims are faced with: IS, No More, No Less, Organised, Institutionalised  FRAUD AND  CORRUPTION that is serviced and promoted by fraudsters of the calibre we expose.
You should recognise, WHY WE SAY: "It Is High Time the Home Secretary and the Lord Chancellor got their act together". They should act as the citizens' servants, they are meant to be.
We particularly expect of our elected representatives TO ACT as COMMANDED in such situations and as the Prime Minister and the Parliamentary Spokes Person on Legal Affairs stated what a NEW Labour Government was to do when in office.
The actions taken at government level SOON AFTER WE contacted the Treasury, were evinced in Press Releases. The move to the Treasury and Ministerial office for the Rt. Hon. Paul Boateng indicate that we are in for real changes. At least that is how we interpret  the cabinet changes. Time and MORE exposures by victims will bring about THE CHANGES. Below copy of the letter from the Metropolitan police to Mr G Ebert, who declined and failed to let us have a copy, or even to have sight of It, after promoting the 'news from the police'..
Mr N Scarth, also heard of it, asked for and received, by fax, a copy. He agreed with us that the issues it raised were fundamental. Our stance on the issue of POLICING / investigation of AND PROSECUTION of CRIME has been well known among the crowd / mob LIPS that he represented. As the Honorary Secretary of LIPS Mr Scarth exchanged the two letters published  above with the Lord Chancellor's Department.
It is for the average citizens to draw their own conclusions and to recognise WHY we persistently refer  to directors and  actors in matters legal, judicial and policing.
We should emphasise the fact that Mr G Ebert signed up as a member of the Community On Line (*Link) he benefited from coverage of a hearing at the Royal Courts of Justice. Many of the LIPS crowd/mob attended. Among them the two in conversation in this page.  Mr Ebert did not publish anything in his free web-site. Evidently, he and the rest of the LIPS crowd were/are only interested in dancing cheek to cheek with the abductors and rapists of Justice in the quicksand all dare refer to as 'Justice Halls' - courts. All have been playing badly tuned musical instruments and drumming up the issue of "NO JURY - no fair hearings...",   in personal exchanges ONLY. The mob apparently DID and DO NOT WISH (like the media barons)  FOR THE PUBLIC TO KNOW OF THAT WHICH THEY SING & DANCE ABOUT in private. All they ever were interested was and remains HOW TO USE THE ARRANGEMENTS IN PLACE for the constructive frauds we cover (*Link to an exclusive page). Like others who are leading figures in other 'organised / set-up or taken over FOR deception aplenty groups (*Link to solicitors acknowledgement of such roles in societies that allegedly rest & are founded on principles of law and order). The mobs  simply do not want the public    RECOGNISE THE CAPABILITIES OF THE TRIAD controlling CIUKU Enterprises, that many aspire 'to serve in' for personal gain and other undisclosed reasons/benefits.

The above letter makes clear that in so far as the POLICE are concerned THEY HAVE NO DUTIES to perform and their supremo is not the elected MP who accepts the position of Home Secretary but a non-elected 'appointee' who acts as Cabinet Minister for Justice and MASTER OF CEREMONIES For The Theatrical Productions In Our Courts.
Apparently the police asserted that they are under instructions and the control of the Lord Chancellor! An all too familiar allegation by the police who have other priorities, like 'freebies' (Link). Organising Investigations FOR Tangent Exercises, all about their defaults to comply with and or to attend properly to their duties and retainers is their other great asset. Neither activity falls within INVESTIGATION & PROSECUTION OF CRIMES

THE LETTER we publish below was sent by FAX to Andrew. It is from the Lord Chancellor in response to an MP and relates to issues that arose in the case of Mr G. H.. Scriven (*F1 for background)

Page 2.

Below, the fax we were caused to transmit to St. Luke's Hospital in Bradford evinces  our concerns about Norman after the attempts to have him certified, were reported to us by one of his mates from within the LIPS crowd / mob. It was also a case of putting the facts reported to us on record.

We publish in HTML the text in order to introduce links to and from the content(*Link to text)

The image below is from a leaflet which the creator of the Campaign for a Fair Hearing - Suzon Forscey- Moore with help from others, (including Andrew, the founder of human-rights) were handing to the public during the picketing of the courts in connection with 'The Secret Briefings', YEARS BEFORE the stooge and fraudsters' club recruit, Johan M Richard Foenander entered the scene. He was sent along, like a good little lap dog, to mess around with our time and to abuse Andrew's good will and readiness to assist all victims of the TRIAD [*Link]. Little did the fraudster know that Andrew was and HAD BEEN  RESEARCHING, (looking into) THE ELEMENTS & REASONS WHY for 2000 YEARS since the words of Christ (*Link) the ongoing abuse of The Law [*Link]. He benefited from much information about the said work, stretching to over ten years by then. He was told that the research  evolved around fraudsters who were/are gifted with the mentalities of the two in conversation in this page. He was informed of the fact that the 'guru' who was using the Pensioner [*Link] had been identified for that which he was engaging in 'CHILDISH THEATRICS IN THE COURTS'. In fact both of the stooges (in conversation here) were fully aware of the guru's activities and the exchanges recorded by the fraudster Johan M Foenander covered and gave away unwittingly, much [*Link].

The above leaflet relates to an UMBRELLA Organisation. It, the Campaign For Fair Hearing, existed for years. Long before the charlatan, stooge,  fraudsters club recruit, Johan M Foenander came along as a tutored, by others, stooge. He was simply guided by the gurus who were controlling (with their affiliates and associates) the members of the Litigants (loonies) In Person Society.

Access the evidence that we publish in our pages [*Link]. The stooge had seen it all, just as he saw the evidence about his solicitors who engaged in invisible services to criminals. They were involved in the Housing Benefit fraudulent conversions instigated by staff and officers of Haringey Council [*Link].  

A. The persons below NEVER reported - published IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN the very issues that the caller Johan Michael Foenander did put in a letter to Mr Geoffrey H Scriven, very clearly [*Link]

B. The very person, as with others that he shared much in common, engaging in the relentless promotion of the powers that be FOR & in the  SUBLIMINAL SUBJUGATION programme of 'the serfs'.
C.  INDOCTRINATION tactics with the additional promotion that the police and the media simply take no interest in the crimes which they, reported in order to simply promote the type of letter that Mr. G. Ebert was brandishing about AND DENYING US the right to challenge the crap he was selling to the naive & gullible (*Link to how Mr Norman Scarth acted after Andrew asked of him to challenge the promotions by G. Ebert)

D. NOTHING BUT THEIR love for more of the same and emulation of that which they set about to complain about, in the first instance. Adopting the facilities and tactics for the DOUBLE FRAUD ON THE 'SERFS' their new-found moral code.
1. Johan Michael Foenander
2. Peter Hayward
3. Philomena Cullen
4. Norman Scarth
5. Marisa Sarda
6. Nicholas Stamoulakatos
7. Nick Haralabidis
8. Bryan Hudson
9. Lou Foley
10.    art 3.
(For their silence access the reasons *Link)

A three-page letter was sent by a fraudsters club recruit to Mr. Geoffrey H Scriven, a victim of the Divorce Industry. Researchers and readers / visitors are urged to acquaint themselves with the facts stated by the fraudster, in a typical LOVE LETTER, intended only for the usual promotions of the system 'as is' BY MAINTENANCE ENGINEERS and lovers / participants in the DOUBLE CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS on the taxpayers. Visitors, readers, researchers are urged to access the letter from here and to acquaint themselves with the ploys.

Extremely important in this page: Read the email, in November 1999, from Mr. Johan Michael Richard Foenander (hereinafter identified as 'J') to Andrew of *human-rights* [*Link from here to the email  in the left margin pane] for it betrays the person's true colours, to anyone who uses grey material, Question:- WHY assert "If the Lord Chancellor asks for...". Recognise 'the relationship' and benefits that 'J' secured [*Link] as a tutored mischief maker and or as another actor who contacted Andrew, on directions from one Peter Hayward of the LIPS crowd/mob and others who were / are guiding such charlatans, as legal gurus -and as intellectuals- covered in the page /protocol.htm. 'J' contacted Mr Andrew Yiannides for and with other agendas, on a mission to accomplish. False promises aplenty, false undertakings which he never intended to act upon, as a lover of the existing ARRANGEMENTS IN PLACE FOR RAMPANT FRAUD (through organised abuse of the courts facilities) ON THE TAXPAYERS (national budget) AND CORRUPTION OF SUCH SHYSTERS & BLOATED STOOGES as the two lousy actors (the stars in this page) who engaged and engage in many undeclared parts' FOR the promotion of the corrupt and fraudulent activities in, at and THROUGH THE COURTS.  

IMPORTANT introduction to parties and page: Victim 'J' was directed to *human-rights* by the manager of the LIPS crowd/mob, Mr Peter Hayward. Andrew did not seek the identity of 'the director' at the time. 'J' later introduced another 'LIPS' member/person, Miss Ormila Bhopaul who NEVER disclosed to Andrew that she HAD been assisted by Mr Norman Scarth who was operating from Leeds at the time as the allegedly hono(urable)rary Secretary of the crowd/mob [*Link to his capabilities, as a fraudsters club recruit]. The latter was assisted initially by 'J' and subsequently by Andrew with 'J' party to, and witness to Andrew's part. One problem the new victim was facing, at the time of the introduction, was the need to recover bundles of documents (*F4) from the courts. The bundles were essential in and for the preparation of 'an intended application to the European Court of Human Rights. Not all the bundles were traced, by the court staff at the RCJ, and one bundle in particular was found to be lacking a substantial number of pages/copies.[*Link to an exclusive letter to the European Court of Human Rights in respect of the 'need to recover documents', and find out HOW and WHY the ECoHR complied with the demands submitted by human-rights].

• Recordings were made of telephone conversations with the court staff confirming the fact that documents were missing.
• At the time the court staff were blaming other parties for what, in law, would amount to 'tampering with the evidence', indictable offences.
• The recordings of the exchanges with the court staff were made by Andrew from 'J's residence.
• The original tape recording was handed to the victim. 'J' was asked to make a copy of the recording and clear instructions were given to the 'victim of those circumstances'.
• The victim was to transcribe the telephone conversations and to submit a signed and witnessed copy to 'J', who would then proceed, with Andrew, to confirm the factuality of the transcript (by listening to the copy of the tape recording).
• 'J' and Andrew would then submit their own statements of facts/truth, with a copy of the relevant telephone bill that would confirm date, time, where to and duration of call/calls.
• That which is stated below should be read in conjunction with the facts and realities that 'arose' in connection with the other 'victim's part, Miss Ormila Bhopaul, as enacted after she was introduced to *human-rights* and to Andrew by the agent of the 'LIPS' crowd/mob, the maintenance engineer of the system, in place, which he, Mr. Johan Michael Richard Foenander and his like-minded affiliates, fell in love with. [*Link to]
•  

Both LIPS 'victims' defaulted to act as had been discussed and agreed. Months later 'J' handed to Andrew the copy of the tape, after declaring that the other LIPS member was a waste of time and a hopeless case. 'J' expressed concerns, like Andrew, at the waste of roll upon roll of FAX paper because of endless and useless material the other victim was transmitting to both 'J' ('J' alleged he had been / was the recipient of such invasions but he never produced any evidence in support of such assertions) and to Andrew. Over a year later, in May 2001, Andrew had been given cause to refer to the copy of the tape because of inexcusable and unjustified assertions the other LIPS victim, Miss Ormila Bhopaul was making about all persons who tried to assist her, including Andrew who had made it possible to that victim to go on line and to benefit from a free *human-rights* web-site. It was at that point in time that Andrew realised the tape, given to him (by Johan M.R.F) contained another recording from which part of the tape the transcripts, below, made in late September 2001.

It should be noted that Andrew was never told of, or made aware of the exchanges and the opinions expressed by the parties to the conversation transcribed below. At no time was Andrew invited to express any views on the assertions and or the issues that relate to and should be / were / are of concern to him. In the circumstances Andrew afforded an opportunity to 'J' to justify and or to explain blunt falsehoods and unjustified assertions 'J'  was making, in the course of the telephone exchanges, with the other member of LIPS, about the material and the pages published at *human-rights*. Reference to the material could easily establish that 'J' was simply seeking to create and or generate problems between two persons who *had common cause and goals to work for" and HAD BEEN co-operating, for some considerable time by then. [*Link to the foundations of and for such activities behind the scenes. A new web-site, where Andrew reveals it all, is under construction. Andrew sets off with revelations about the God that persons of Johan Michael Richard Foenander's morals, worship and follow the teachings of. 'J' was and remains a perfect specimen of, as a follower of the 'teachings by examples stated', in the most vile of works ever presented to 'the sons of men'].  

It goes without saying that 'J', allegedly, had similar goals and aims, whereas the exchanges published below establish, otherwise. ALL ASSERTIONS AND MISCHIEVOUS PRONOUNCEMENTS by 'J' will be dealt with appropriately with and through links to other material and more than adequate documented evidence will be used /pointed to [*Link from here here to an email in the left margin]. The material will cover the machinations and the real aims and intentions of the LIPS crowd. 'J', as an agent provocateur and through duplicity of purpose he was playing at cat and mouse, intending that Andrew could be treated as a mouse, by 'J' and his colleagues within the LIPS crowd/mob. The targeted mouse has been establishing since release of the material in this and other pages that while the 'cat' was playing and benefiting - while testing Andrew's resolve / patience and Andrew's knowledge and grasp of *the practices* within the system - the presumed mouse was grinding his tiger's teeth while looking into the activities of persons of Johan's mentality to other citizens and in particular 'the element of *THE RAMPANT FRAUD (on the taxpayers) THROUGH THE COURTS' as he, Mr. Johan Michael Richard Foenander was not simply aware of, BUT AN ACTIVE PARTY TO and a conscious playmate in the very area of criminal activities FOR MORE OF THE SAME CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS ON THE TAXPAYERS. [*Link to the funds under the table facility, the REWARDS FOR PLAYING THE FIELD - proof. *Link also from here to the arrangements in place to fall for. *Link to persons, like 'J' and 'N' who run around using victims of the system; they act so ONLY FOR MORE FRAUD THROUGH THE COURTS, as 'N' wrote of after it was so organised that he should end in correction & mental institutions for him to set-up 'Law Centres'. All as 'organised and planned for by the Lord Chancellor', who spoke of such facilities when he addressed the House of Commons Home Affairs Select Committee in November 1999. *Link to the confidential arrangements for cash under the table - proof on affidavit. *Link to 'J's' knowledge that what he had been subjected to AND HE WAS ENGAGING IN were criminal activities click on the images of each of the 3 pages and THEREAFTER link to the page where we have published the letter in HTML format, for links to and from its content. The author relates to the activities and THE PARTS OF the chap, Hussein, who introduced him ('J') to the use of the other victims game as the Hussein chap did when he initiated 'J' in the practices which another known *fraudsters club recruit*, Johan's chum Lou Foley was engaging in, too. Just like 'N' and other *fraudsters club recruits* who operate as the LIPS crowd/mob, also their affiliates within other organised groups and movements engage in. The HTML text of the letter can be accessed in the page .org/someploy.htm where the appeal covering some of the activities 'J' was subjected to, is published. HE CHOSE TO SUPPRESS THE FACT & REALITIES as a moron (who was drawn to the system as is) and or as a blackmailed fool who elected to treat the criminal activities (in the courts) as immaterial in THE WORLD OF THE FRAUDSTERS WHO ENGAGE IN THE DOUBLE CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS ON THE TAXPAYERS consciously. Visitors can Link from here directly to a page where we expose another LIPS crowd/mob fraudster and her parts in the evil world of CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY, through the courts, as maintained in pseudo-democracies with the evidence in the page for all concerned, and in particular the victims and the taxpayers to access].

BOTH  persons, had been wronged by the legal circles and the courts. As one reads through their explicit exchanges one cannot but note the manner in which each covered the issues of concern and interest to them. In the process both exposed their individual traits and 'the duplicity of purpose inherent in the activities they engaged & engage in as maintenance engineers and lovers / users of the system as is. [*Link from here to the explicit page where we expose such persons as nothing else but fraudsters club recruits'].

The first one ('J') instigated the telephone call at a time when the former was under a lot of pressure. A third person had approached 'J' out of the blue some years earlier, one Hussein Saheed of whose activities Johan ('J') wrote an explicit letter to Mr Geoffrey Scriven, another Divorce Industry victim of the courts and the legal circles. Hussein's appearance on the scene occurred in much the same fashion as others were, care of the organisers of the lives of 'the serfs' in the United Kingdom:-

• Mr. Norman Scarth. *Link from here to an explicit page exhibiting his chosen area of activities as an abuser of trust and as an accomplished and committed to the system, as is, fraudsters club recruit]
• Mr. Johan Michael Richard Foenander. *Link from here to an explicit page covering some of his parts & participation in criminal fraud on the taxpayers.
• Mr. William Spring. *Link from here to a page where we copied the Home Page from his personal human-rights.org Community on Line, website. Victims, visitors, readers and researchers should have no difficulty to recognise why the false promotions by the victim who benefited from an Order granting him Leave to Appeal, even though he had not lodged such an application at Court. It should noted that the order, intriguingly, sprung out of the blue as soon as he announced, in the newsgroups, that he joined the human-rights.org Community on Line & that he fully intended to expose and challenge >>> IN & THROUGH THE PUBLIC DOMAIN <<< the abusers of the courts processes & facilities. Needless to say after he received the Leave to Appeal Order he simply took up residence in the cave where the LIPS crowd/mob have been congregating for years. The LIPS crowd/mob AS an organised group of FRAUDSTERS CLUB RECRUITS had and have only one interest. Their aims were and remain to act and operate as alleged legal gurus WHO ACCOST & ASSIST TARGETED (pointed to) VICTIMS CREATED THROUGH FRAUDULENT COURT PROCEEDINGS, BY THE LEGAL CIRCLES & COURTS. The LIPS crowd/mob only interest was and remains to coerce and guide the victims they are pointed to and target, to go for the REWARDS UNDER THE TABLE, to persons who, like him, subscribe to the stipulation that amounts to blackmail because the aim is to suppress the criminal activities from the taxpayers, as the media Barons, through the Intellectual Prostitutes the Barons retain and maintain have been organising and arranging for decades. *Link also from here to the disputed, and prophetic plans of the abductors and rapists of both Democracy and Justice, as researched and presented by the creator of this website, Mr. Andrew Yiannides.  
• Mr. Nick Haralabidis Party to the attempt to cause us to publish uncalled for racist element which Lord Irvine introduced in a letter [*Link to the letter] which were attributed to Mr Geoffrey Harold Scriven and we never heard of before we will release a FAX to Mr G H Scriven which he failed to respond to, leading to the conclusion that he was party to the vile ploy.
• Ms. Marisa Sarda [*Link to a page where we expose her parts in attempts to create false instruments that could assist the fraudsters from within the Inland Revenue to use her evil lies which she wilfully made sure WITH HER ACCOMPLICE Mr. Patrick Cullinane were not for their target to know of].
• Ms. Anita Tierney
• Mrs. Veronica Beryl Foden and many other affiliates and associates of the LIPS crowd/mob all of whom proved to have been deceitful charlatans and fraudsters. All seen to be lovers and aspiring users of the ARRANGEMENTS IN PLACE FOR THE TWO CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS ON THE TAXPAYERS.
• Not forgetting the charlatans who were/are fronting the UKMM and the FnF, both groups known to targeting and using victims of the family courts and the Divorce Industry. The front men of the UKMM. one Barry Worrall and one Ian Kelly, sent an unsolicited invitation to Mr Andrew Yiannides (the founder of human-rights) and both failed to respond to explicit requests / demands. In the meantime, for years the UKMM's alleged legal gurus, recognised to be using many victims of the divorce industry for their own personal ends. (Evidence will be released at the right time in respect of the unsolicited invitation by and the failures to respond to requests / demands made of the UKMM's front line maintenance engineers of the system as is).
• Visitors, readers, researchers are urged to access the page .org/4deceit.htm where we publish proof that the managers / gurus of the LIPS crowd/mob when it came to delivering upon their promises, as alleged challengers, they simply proved that which their activities and propositions had already established over the previous five years. We emphasise that Mr Andrew Yiannides, was contacted by them soon after the explicit appeal we publish in our pages was lodged by him at BOW County Court (*FXXXXX). The alleged victim-challengers of the system of operations through the court, as lovers of the rewards under the table (suppressed from the taxpayers as covered in the page our visitors can link from the above URL) they simply   cash in on the facilities in place FOR REWARDING LOVERS & PROMOTERS / USERS OF THE SYSTEM. The page we point to links to an explicit paragraph where the obvious cannot be overlooked by the victims of the free-for-all Administrator / 

Johan M R Foenander was sent along (introduced) by Mr. Peter Hayward 'the manager / director of the LIPS crowd/mob in late July / early August 1999. After a theatrical production on 11th November 1999 (purporting to be an appeal from the sham of an alleged hearing on 1st October 1999 before an R.C.J Master), the fraudster, Johan, thereafter retained a new firm of solicitors for the distribution of the funds secured through the arrangements we cover in the exclusive page the very page which NONE OF THE ABOVE FRAUDSTERS ever addressed; their failures establishing beyond any doubt that the BLUNT ABUSE OF THE COURTS FACILITIES (through contempt of all law and evidence) FOR CONSECUTIVE FRAUDS ON THE TAXPAYERS are acceptable to such persons. Throughout the hearing at the RCJ the fraudster Johan Michael Foenander was 'the silent star' while the guru assisting him, one Lou (Lewis) Foley, (as he discussed with the person he telephoned, as visitors to this page will be reading below) engaged in uncalled for mannerisms leading to the expulsion, from the court, of the guru who 'knew best'. Nothing but dust in your eyes productions as organised by charlatans who engaged & engage in such activities and scenarios; all intended to lead to additional 'costs awards to solicitors, as in many other cases we were called upon to attend 'and witness'. Nothing but the usual arrangements with and through co-operating mentors (maintenance engineers and users of the system as is) and new victims 'sucked into the system. Such persons acting as seasoned lovers of the provisions and the conditional rewards, under the table, to idiots who consciously elect to act in contempt of the law, knowing full well that the rewards in such circumstances constitute bluntly organised fraud on the budget / the taxpayers and NOT COMPENSATION PER SE.

The background to the introduction of Mr Johan Michael Richard Foenander prior to him being sent along 'to play as a cat plays with a mouse (such were the games all LIPS crowd/mob fraudsters indulged in after contacting Mr Andrew Yiannides) was born of claims against solicitors who were party to the usual abuse of the courts facilities in the course of Divorce Proceedings primed and cultured by public servants. The proceedings against the solicitors were settled and issued by one Hussein who was sent along (out of the blue) apparently in full possession of the facts attached to and arising out of the fraudulent activities at, in and through the courts imposed on the 'victim'(!) Johan Michael Richard Foenander. The visitor / mentor offered to 'the victim of the solicitors' his services as a Barrister who, allegedly, was operating out of solicitors offices. With the victim's collaboration the visitor instigated (drafted/settled and issued for 'J' proceedings against a firm of solicitors who had acted for 'J'. That action was struck out, on application to a Master, by solicitors who were acting for the insolvent (as we knew to be the case) Solicitors' Indemnity Fund on behalf of the solicitor and THE LAW SOCIETY'S PROTECTION RACKET FOR IT'S MEMBERS, the OSS. There arose the need to challenge the striking out of the action and 'J' ..... allegedly needed assistance while a petition of his, to the European Court of Human Rights had been / was benefiting from the rewards under the table facility..... and the condition to silence..... the suppression of the facts from the taxpayers, care of such fraudsters and the media barons with the Intellectual Prostitutes the barons retain, acting precisely as stated by John Swainton over a century earlier.... and as covered in 'the plans for the sons of men on planet earth' millennia ago'. [*Link from here to the explicit letter the 'victim-convert and lover of the operations through the courts wrote to another victim-convert in February 2000]

We should point out that Mr. A Yiannides had been shown originals and copies of letters and other documents that confirm the opening statements (above) made by Mr Johan Michael Richard Foenander to Mr Norman Scarth. The aforesaid disclosures and access to documented evidence, after the hearing on 1st October 1999. The said production / scenario, alleged hearing before a Master, simply intended to lead to 'the planned-for application' by the alleged guru, the known vexatious litigant Lou-is / Lew-is Foley. And such activities / scenarios in contempt of the provisions FOR APPEALING DECISIONS ENTERED BY ANY COURT TO A HIGHER AUTHORITY. Between them, mentor and alleged victim, recklessly oblivious to the fact that Mr.Yiannides observed and noted more than enough, on 1st October at the RCJ and at the residence of the fraudster who miraculously was being represented at the time (in other matters but not for the application / scenario / scripts on 1st October) by the firm of solicitors Anton & Co. in Haringey, north London. Mr. Yiannides had challenged the aforesaid solicitors for their parts (in collaboration with another solicitor) in the National Scandal Activities born of and resting on the Housing Benefit Scams and Constructive Frauds, through the courts, that we cover in our pages. Intriguing was the fact that the aforesaid solicitors had written to one of the  many offending solicitors (who allegedly had represented the fraud of a victim-come