Attention
is drawn to the title of this page, in red characters above. It is
imperative that visitors to these pages and web-site, are made aware of the most important
and crucial factor, upon which rests and is founded the perpetuation of the rampant fraud
and corruption in our society / country. Most persons who have looked into the issues that
victim-citizens relate to them (to reporters and
Members of Parliament, for instance) may well resolve
to accept the problems as complex and not within their understanding or capabilities
because of luck of knowledge of the legal issues that attach to the complaints. We urge
that visitors should read the extract from a letter that a solicitor sent to a client [*Link to the extract] wherein the solicitor covered the arrangements between the
administrators and the executive. References to the realities of life, as imposed on
society by the creators and managers of CIUKU Enterprises, abound in our pages. [*Link to the founder's conclusion
over 30 years ago. *Link to a barristers own conclusions about the
administrators of Justice and the courts. *Link to the arrogant
provision, an illegal facility, by the judicial chair occupants in the UK, whereby
they determined that the serfs in the United Kingdom should have no access to justice or
redress when public servants, (state employees) cause damages to the citizens, the said
facility, naturally, in contempt of all law, national and international]..
However, the simple fact happens to be 'the
attitudes of those who are seen to be nothing but the frontline soldiers who promote the
existing practices through the dual roles they engage in:-
- A. On the one hand they
simply relate the problems and difficulties they encountered/encounter with: -
1. Their legal representatives /
solicitors by far the main culprits; also issues arising out of the manner with which
barristers retained and presumably/allegedly instructed by their solicitors, acted in the
course of hearings. (*F1).
2. Police officers
(right up to area Commanders) who invariably come up with such inexcusable assertions as a
'victim', Mr G Ebert was running around promoting and 'selling' to all manner of victims
and gullible 'serfs'. We refer to the letter from Charring Cross police Station in London,
which you can access in our pages (*Link to left margin scans). There you can read also of the results when that promotional material was
challenged as the situation commanded. Mr G. Ebert may have denied Andrew a copy of that
disgraceful letter but the matter was taken up by Mr Norman Scarth, as Andrew discussed
with him, because Norman Scarth who, as Secretary of the Litigants In Person Society, was
provided with a copy.
3. Promotions of whatever their MP
(Member of Parliament) and any Minister they apparently wrote or write to, threw / throws
back at them. For the purposes of the submissions in this page it is most important that
the reader / visitor does not loose sight of the fact that the vast majority of such
'fraudsters club recruits' (*Link to the facility in place for blackmail and 'buying
consciousness'), charlatans and stooges. Such persons,
those who were sent along or introduced to Andrew, the founder of *human-rights* knew of
and had been informed of the fact that in 1992, Andrew successfully challenged fraudulent
in intent practices and activities at a County Court (*F2). The very persons who were sending
along their tutored stooges, contacted Andrew in the first instance and offered
co-operation for the creation of the data bank 'The CAMILA Project' specifically was
intended for. The persons, Mr. Peter Hayward and Mrs. Philomena Cullen, NEVER acted as
they allegedly were in a position to do. It should be noted that all were informed, later,
of the fact that in July 1995, Andrew benefited from an acknowledgement (*Link to main window) in respect of THE FRAUD IN THE LEGAL SYSTEM. No one ever bothered
to enquire what preceded that event and as a result of what work or submissions to the
Prime Minister in waiting, the Rt. Hon. Tony Blair, lead to the Spokes Person on Legal
Affairs for the Opposition to concede / acknowledge the practices. Peter Hayward and
others from within the LIPS crowd/mob (as we prefer to refer to the fraudsters) had only
one goal in mind; to use the needs of the victims of the rampant fraud and corruption
(through the courts) for personal gain and pecuniary advantage. MOST ALARMING WAS THEIR
APPARENT APPROVAL OF THE ARRANGEMENTS IN PLACE for the double fraud (*F3) on
the 'serfs', the taxpayers.
B. On the other
hand as sold-to-the-devil souls and as 'fraudsters club recruits' they carry on ranting
about the rampant fraud in and through the courts. They do so AS CONVERTS to the facility
in place, for the double fraud on 'the serfs', 'the the taxpayers', those whom they wish
to treat as irrelevant shitizens. They just carry on 'promoting the practices by the
system's operators' because they are simply serving those interests:
1. Their main objective is to
ensure that victims they target are used, exactly as they were used, and for one goal
only. The reward under the table for those who endorse the system as is. One such
charlatan and 'fraudsters club recruit' / lover, Mr Norman Scarth even declared, in an
email, that what he stumbled upon was 'legal'. It never occurred to him that what he
had agreed to be party to was to keep quiet, take what was on offer under the table and
'be party to, as an ,
BECAUSE HE AGREED TO KEEP QUIET ABOUT IT ALL" - hence his failures to proceed as
he allegedly committed himself to do when he joined the Community on Line. NOTE:
No one should be under any illusion that the web-site created by Mr Andrew Yiannides AFTER
the dreamer arranged to end up in prison IN ORDER TO CREATE / SET-UP Law Centres in order
to use inmates and their grievances for more abuse of the courts facilities by ILLITERATES
IN LAW & FRAUDSTERS WHO JOINED AS OPERATIVES OF THE EXISTING SYSTEM & PRACTICES.
2. Such persons, thereafter, simply using / helping / guiding
others to go for and down the same avenue. Norman Scarth, the allegedly honourable
Secretary of the LIPS crowd/mob did receive a copy of the explicit affidavit that we
publish in our pages, AS A WARNING SHOT [*Link to the affidavit].
Johan Foenander attempted but failed to entice a member of the human-rights.org
Community on Line, into the LIPS crowd/mobsters area of activities, but Mr Norman
Scarth succeeded in sucking the very pro-active member of the Community On Line, Roz
Kellett, to go down the same avenue and to 'remove all of her material (stated facts
plus evidence) & to delete her personal web-site; '. Norman and others who were / had
embarked on the same path, at the time, were not told of our plans for such fraudsters
and the operators of the system. He and his like-minded mates (from within the LIPS
crowd/mob and other groups / movements and organised fraudsters he and the others were
rubbing shoulders with in private) ignored the fact that their intentions were known to
us. Mr Andrew Yiannides had been invited to be party to their schemes/plans 'to help
victims of the legal circles' (persons they were/are targeting) as THE NEW GURUS who
learned how to play the field. Most had been made aware of the fact that for years Andrew
was looking into THE REASONS, such as WHO / WHAT were / ARE behind the perpetuation of the
established practices, , OR at about 1700 years ago, when the
editors/creators of 'The Gospel According to St. Luke' were putting together 'The New
Testament' [*Link]. Another charlatan, who had declared himself to be 'A Born Again
Christian', Mr Maurice Kellett (no relation to Roz Kellett) was one of the
recipients of copy of the same affidavit. Recipient of copy of the very affidavit was also
the person who submitted his thoughts in the email we publish below, Mr. Paul
Talbot-Jenkins. The last joined the Community on Line as an endorser of the statement
of intent "OUR AIMS", but he had other plans in mind and set about serving
undeclared interests from day one. [*Link].
We refer, above, to
persons who, like the second fraudster we list in this paragraph, after going for the
carrot in place, decided that 'it was & is all within their expectations and
understanding of the law' and, therefore, legal. That is precisely what the chum of
Johan Michael Richard Foenander, Mr. Norman Scarth, the allegedly Honorary Secretary of
the LIPS crowd/mob also determined, as one of the many who went for the carrot
dangling on a string for persons who endorse the double fraud on the taxpayers'. Such
persons, thereafter, acting as bought and sold souls, blackmailed into endorsement of it
all, stooges, who make it their business to obstruct any other from challenging and
exposing the arrangements in place FOR RAMPANT FRAUD ON THE TAXPAYERS & THE CORRUPTION
OF MORONS & I5 ILLITERATES IN LAW, and, all because they set up business as legal
advisors following in the footsteps of the Hussein's and the Lou Foleys [*Link 1 - *Link
2]. We request that visitors access and read the
letter the fraudster Johan M. Foenander wrote to Mr Geoffrey Harold Scriven which we
publish in support of our statement "Institutionally Organised Fraud and
Corruption". The copy we reproduce [*Link to the text for links to and from] was given to Andrew (in order to impress him) while the fraudster
was of the opinion that he was playing with a mouse. We request of visitors / readers to
also access Andrew's response to an invitation [*Link
from here to exchanges with a judge in court] and the evidence relevant to Andrew's stance on the issue of 'no
association with persons who rub shoulders with the criminals who are in control of the
legal system, the courts'. [*Link also to another page with documented evidence in
support of another invitation].
The email exchanges below should be read in
conjunction with: -
A. The email submissions to Ormila, that
follow below the exchanges with Mr. Paul Talbot-Jenkins.
B. The references linked to (in other pages) from both email documents
were/are called for because of other elements that cannot be shoved in the dark corners of
any 'decent and law abiding citizen's mind'.
> Andrew,
> Every time I visit the "Human-Rights" web site I can
never find any links to my pages.
Links Paul are introduced to BOOK MARKS or Anchor points, as
you should know. You were asked umpteen times to provide some, both in telephone
conversations and by email, but you did NOT co-operate. You want visitors to JUST ACCESS
the site and towards that goal there are more than enough links and pointers to the
*fame97* site from *human-rights*. I look forward to information about links from *fame97*
to *human-rights*. (The evil fraudster NEVER introduced any links from fame97 to
human-rights. Obviously he did not wish to upset HIS MASTER & CONTROLLERS.
Hypocrites of his calibre come at a penny a million, in Andrew's book)
YOU WERE ASKED (Maurice too, for that matter (*F5)) to consider introducing BOOKMARKS / ANCHOR POINTS to as many
specific issues such as the ones that were covered & introduced at human-rights
through the page:
http://www.human-rights.demon.co.uk/blunket1.htm
(NOTE: URL changed because the demon site / account was closed for a number of
reasons)
I SUGGEST that you visit the page and then come back with any
information pointing to LINKS to ANY OF THE ISSUES in the *fame97* pages. (I mean to
specific paragraphs that cover the same subject matters which the article from 'The
Observer' gave grounds, TO ME, for the creation of the stated *human-rights* page. DO I
NEED TO REMIND YOU THAT THE ISSUE WAS FRAUD... FRAUD... FRAUD…. FRAUD? Am I to assume
that, as the free masons are not involved in such matters, IN ACCORDANCE WITH YOUR
PERFORMANCE, that YOU, THEREFORE, NEVER INTENDED TO MISLEAD visitors to *fame97*? Or is it
at all possible that like 'THE HUNTER' (Aesop's fable) you do not want to take risks, such
as a claim from 'the innocent of such wrongs'?
>Is
that because it exposes Freemasonry for exactly
EXACTLY?… exactly??…. exactly???
Consider the above VERY CAREFULLY & TREAT IT ALL AS A CHALLENGE, Paul. [*Link from here to Footnote below]
Get on with it; introduce links to the relevant paragraphs. After all,
you have the ammunition and the military training'; go to war on your terms and not just
with your ammunition but with that which WE ARE SURE that Maurice, Rita and such others
who co-operate and work together diligently will be providing to you! I will be there too,
IF & WHEN Maurice can establish and prove that the lawyers, the barristers and the
judges in the cases that I will pass details to him were/are:
1. Simply free masons acting as their instruction manuals, which
HE & YOU are going to produce at court as incontrovertible evidence!
In the meantime CONSIDER THAT, WHICH THE CASE (just released) COVERS,
chum. I released the details for ALL victims everywhere to access it on the Internet,
and no longer JUST for / to *CO-OPERATING* (co-operating *I*S* the
word, Paul) Community On Line members. The last statement leading on to my
stated way ---> the rungs <--- that included the non-event
of a Challenge to suspects ---> "Where is it Maurice? Did you EVER really
bother with such a document?"
2. Free to indulge in criminal activities through
abuse of the legal system & ACTED / WERE ACTING IN CONTEMPT OF THE
LAW & THE EVIDENCE. Yes Paul free -Masons- building the
societies and a world in accordance with the teachings of the God they follow (by examples
stated) ALONG WITH THOSE who are enrolled to serve their masters, the string-pullers
controlling the 'fraudsters club recruits'. (My way, intended to lead to the
common factors and much further / higher, chum - read the paragraph, introduction to the
site with links, as YOU DETERMINED) for your intended battles... with whom / which parties
though, also how and for what ends?
>what it is,
Is that what the *human-rights* site is about? Refer please to the issues
that I raise with you above. Incidentally, I did not know that you were the designer or
planner of the *human-rights* pages or the Community On Line, concept.
>and you do not
want to look at the reality
I am dealing with THE REALITIES MY WAY, Paul. Access and read the
submissions to government in the page:
http://www.human-rights.demon.co.uk/theyknow.htm
&
NOTE that in my letter to the Rt. Hon. Frank Field MP, I did not
incorporate the evidence of WORK TOWARDS THE INTENDED GOALS. Do not overlook the *plural*
used (in goals). The released material and THE PARTICULARS PLEADED, arising out of abuse
of the Housing Benefit facilities at Local GOVERNMENT level (mate) through the public(!)
servants(?) (mate) who instigated it all (note above re: 'publicly
funded bodies and organisations, of which YOU KNOW), VERY CLEAR. You have
recently been made aware of such 'enriched uranium rods' for the nuclear reactor of the
submarine (Community On Line) that I launched years ago.... and Norman was inviting
me to go row (with him) his dingy through the stormy oceans that are infested with sharks
(legal boffins) and killer whales (judges) to Bristol, with him, in order to watch the
theatrical productions.... the trial of Robert Ashman, the chap who could only react
as you were suggesting.... 'Let's storm the Law Society, better still the OSS buildings.'
just like the great show at and with the Treasury on the very day when I was delivering my
succinct letter to the Prime Minister, on 8th December
1999. Access it and read it at *human-rights*, Paul.
- *Link from the web-site page (where these
submissions are now published) to the copy of the relevant letter at *human-rights*.
- The issue of the criminal activities that Mr Paul Talbot-Jenkins &
HIS ASSOCIATES ARE FULLY AWARE OF, were/are clearly covered in the letter to the Prime
Minister.
- Now, through this page, the additional challenge to Mr Paul
Talbot-Jenkins & his affiliates / associates / supporters: -
- "You received a copy of the letter to the Prime Minister at the
time.
- Come along, now, and produce ANY EVIDENCE that you ever attempted to deal
with the rampant fraud and corruption at, in and through the courts (over the years that I
have known of your 'case').
- At the same time explain away your arrogant failures to co-operate on the
issue of links between Community On Line web-sites, WHERE VICTIMS ARE STATING &
COVERING SIMILAR ACTIVITIES.
- All victims of the rampant fraud through the legal system / at and in the
courts SPEAK & WRITE OF SIMILAR BREACHES OF LAW. Can you please point out where is the
common factor that leads to your (and your like-minded mates) psychosis with the masons?
- Eventually, all are made aware of the fact that the issue of abuse of the
courts' facilities, by judicial chair occupants who simply misconduct in public office, IS
THE CORE ELEMENT.
- Anyone who professes, like you do, to know of the relevance of the law,
should know that such persons (judicial chair occupants) simply act in contempt of the
evidence before them.
- Even worse, they act in contempt of the law they were/are retained (on
behalf of 'the serfs', the taxpayers) to administer.
- You are not being asked to explain your ostrich acts in respect of the
page where *human-rights* HAS BEEN EXPOSING THE CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS through abuse of the
legal system and the facilities of the courts. Visitors to this page can access the facts
stated and the arrangements in place, as created by the abductors and rapists of Justice,
the Goddess (*Link).
- Your defaults and omissions made it clear that (like the others who have
been behaving as if blind, deaf and dumb actors, out there) YOU TOO happen to be a person
who converted to 'the system as is' years ago.
- It was evident, that you too, was aiming and working FOR NO CHANGES &
FOR MORE FRAUD ON THE PUBLIC / TAXPAYERS. I keep in mind your disappointment with
Philomena, Peter & co., who introduced Mr Peddy to Lou Foley and not to you! (*Link to the page where the facts stated and a newspaper
article cover the issue of the pensioner who was being used by such 'gurus').
- All converts have been acting as 'retained fraudsters club recruits'. All
have been relishing in the spreading of the gospel FOR THE NEW MORAL CODE', through their
parts in the subliminal indoctrination tactical assaults on the naïve and gullible, you
all target. The issue, as you know, was adequately covered in my exchanges with the
dreamer who was sent along last year to sell a dead duck. It has since been published in
the explicit page: /theproof.htm
- http://www.uk-human-rights.org/theproof.htm
- All other lovers of your type of promotions and activities / convenient
defaults, should refresh your memories by accessing the page /theproof.htm (*Link to the above page, at this site, now).
THERE the puke-production machine, James Todd and a couple of others
who, like you, have been stuck on their psychosis with the masons…. the masons…. the
masons WITHOUT ANY EVIDENCE by any of you. All ignoring the breaches of law which
activities you endorse now, by conveniently defaulting to apply yourselves to the
realities EXCLUSIVELY EXPOSED in the relevant page by me).
Will you please come back and tell me that the page is not dealing with
realities after you have read the material published at *human-rights* as in the letter
you are pointed to above? I do not need to remind you that YOU RECEIVED A COPY OF THE
LETTER at the time.
The FULL PARTICULARS and the evidence, in support of my submissions to
the government, is all about a stooge's part (a LIPS introduction fraudster) busy at and
in the constructive frauds through the courts. The very issues you and others, in this
list, do not want to see an end to, for reasons that I have had more than adequate hints
and observations of persons who engage in such blunt and direct activities. I have had also PLENTY of recklessly childish defaults to go by, in
reaching MY CONCLUSIONS.
WHERE IS YOUR CONTRIBUTION and links to the
realities, such as the above, at and in the *fame97* pages, Paul? (I refer to links FOR
CONNECTION to the file/page at.. demon.co.uk/theyknow.htm - there plenty of *BOOK MARKS
that you know EXIST, as *realities* for victims of the rampant FRAUD AT & THROUGH THE
COURTS, Paul).
AGAIN I ASK:
"Is it because such elements are alien to the targeted group at and by *fame97* which
cause you to disregard the issues raised in such pages AND PROOF at *human-rights*?
Maurice was asked umpteen times to introduce JUST ONE BOOK MARK / ANCHOR
POINT and he persistently defaulted to do so. He can confirm or deny this fact; the choice
is his. He can also tell us if at any time he was denied assistance and to tell us also
how many links to stated law and other bookmarks he was given over the years. I refer to
links that were enhancing his postings in newsgroups, and IN PLACE, in order to assist
members of the public and victims all over the world. I refer to the needy of assistance
'NOT OF THE NEEDY WHO ARE BEING USED BY CHARLATANS', simply for fun and games. Should I
clarify: "As and by 'puke production machine', James Todd?" Or should I be blunt
and emphasise "For greens - plenty of dosh', as by and for the users of the old age
pensioner that we both know of, and in particular more about that victim, than stated at
*human-rights*", Paul.
>of it?
You know perfectly well that I am covering issues from another angle AND IN
PARTICULAR the international scene. You received more than just the copy from the cover of
a book. (Over 500 pages in Greek, with information about its contents. You never even
acknowledged that fact, even though I informed you that the author and I are discussing
future work in the areas that I have been researching for over 50 years). Compare the
reminder in the brackets with your personal approach and mentality on similar issues and
possibilities, which you could never deny.
>You
want people to become members of "YOUR"
Way off the mark and the suggestion is an outright and naive attempt to
place me in your shoes Paul.
The implication of personal (in the 'singular' as you are implying) is inexcusable and
unjustified. COMMUNITY implies PLURAL. My contributions (plural and no personal cry wolf
ranting) are out there, in terms of facts and applicable law; where be YOURS?
I systematically and persistently refer to and write of 'we'. I now request that you
provide evidence that you have EVER done so, apart from just one isolated instance that
actually left me speechless.
>community on
line but only on your terms
I invite you AGAIN to furnish information upon which you can found the
assumption / assertion. Recognition of your work on the issues covered at and by
*human-rights*, such as BREACHES OF LAW & VIOLATIONS OF RIGHTS exist at
*human-rights*. POINT TO such elements in your community on line *fame97* web-site, from
where you introduced links to *human-rights* and to which others can link.
You have done your best to maintain an isolated web-site. A web-site
that, 'by design', is not relating to any other web-sites or issues, presumably because
you do not want to risk facing claims by the Freemasons who you, indirectly, hint are
NOT involved and or they do not engage in the activities we cover at *human-rights*!
BY failing to co-operate and provide links to the specific issues (for which we have
evidence) you kick in two elements, both of which are against you:
(a) You do not like to co-operate with any other UNLESS THEY ARE DOING
SO UNDER YOUR TERMS & CONDITIONS. Yet you dare attempt to put my feet in your shoes!
(b) By failing to co-operate in the issues we cover at human-rights and
for which the evidence exists, you wilfully went about blocking development (*Link to your other parts) of
arguments in relation to 'cases stated'. SHOULD I HAVE TO CLARIFY: "Stated like Helen
Patey's case, ONLY within the family… ? See refer to the other addenda in this version).
BLOCKING & OBSTRUCTING, therefore, any connection between the practices and your
target, IS YOUR WAY. The very element smacks of the failures of Maurice to get on with the
challenge, the 'DECLARATION' that he was to make available to one and all (from his
web-site) for downloading / printing by visitors and for submission to all suspects.... intended
to lead us to the very element that put ALL DEFAULTING CHARLATANS & STOOGES who failed
to address the issues covered by *human-rights* in the exclusive page:
http://www.human-rights.demon.co.uk/confraud.htm (NOTE the demon.co.uk was closed by us in March 2006 the link points to this
web-site as of then)
I do not have to point out that the FAILURES FOR LINKS also deprived you
and denied us the opportunity to introduce links to such pages at *fame97* in my explicit
letter to the Rt. Hon. Frank Field MP, ex Minister. THE SUBMISSIONS to the government,
DEALING WITH THE RAMPANT FRAUD AT & THROUGH THE COURTS, the *human-rights* way!
Do refer to the letter to Frank Field MP and produce evidence that IT
WOULD HAVE BEEN POSSIBLE, for me, to incorporate JUST ONE LINK to any of the issues you
could have created bookmarks / anchor points to at *fame97*. You know darn well that you
adamantly refused and defaulted to co-operate. Your choices, your world; only your views
and your dictates so please do not try forcing your shoes on my feet; my feet are too
small for your large shoes, Paul.
>and with
content that suits your aims.
Paul you know darn well that the shoes are on the other's feet.
I suggest that you have a darn good look at the pleadings released to the general public and
NOTE that the main document IS IN HTML, ready for links to ACTUAL POINTS and not the
site... the site.... the site.... which is YOUR WAY... YOUR TERMS....
&
While on the subject of the allegation that amounts to 'selfish' terms, I
suggest that you get in touch with Helen Patey (an obvious neighbour of yours) who could
not possibly have not heard of you or the 'Rotland Mercury'. Ask her WHY SHE REFUSED TO
PUBLISH the whole of her STATED FACTS / CLAIM on the Internet, as a member of the
Community On Line? Then you come and tell us, all, why did I offer to help her (if you
cannot see it as a case of casting my nets, baiting my hook and dropping it in her area)?
You come back and tell us, all, WHY SHE SET OUT TO deny me the opportunity to
assist in dealing with / challenging any attempts by the courts to deny her, her rights
(as in the case released generally)? We all know that such elements - subsequently- arose
in 'her case': NO RIGHT TO A FAIR HEARING of her grievances! She simply wanted to 'keep it
all in the family closet' and thereafter to be FREE to allege that she was denied 'fair
hearings', NOT IN OPEN COURTS HEARINGS but in and for theatrical productions, ALL for
consumption by the targeted, the gullible, impressionable 'serfs' and the targeted
'shitizens'. Do I need to re-state: "The 'shitizens' who are
called upon to meet the cost of the theatrical productions for the two frauds as organised
through the choices of Helen Patey & Co., the charlatans that I have known of and
about for the last 25 years plus? Need I have to 're-state': "The 'shitizens'
who are called upon to meet the cost of the second fraud 'as organised by all who
co-operate in and FOR SUCH arrangements, through CIUKU Enterprises, because of 'BY DESIGN'
alleged unfair hearings NOT IN OPEN COURTS?" (I am still waiting for the
actress to produce evidence as to how the struck out claims were re-instated, if at all
factual all that she was asserting in her email postings).
I STRONGLY URGE YOU to access the pleadings in the case recently
released by human-rights. In particular you should look up the COUNTERCLAIM & THE
APPEAL in that case. It was released for the world to access and refer to, under the terms
stipulated at the bottom of every page. The page is no longer just available to
*co-operating* (is the word) Community On Line members, Paul. (Are you receiving the
message Marisa? Pass it on to the LIPS crowd/mob).
After she declined / adamantly refused to co-operate, can you tell me
that I owed her any duty to use my time for just another selfish and egocentric abuser of
it? Such elements on top of intentions to steal knowledge and guidance on law PLUS my
knowledge of all the dirty tricks and abuse of the courts facilities, as THE CASE THAT I
HAVE RECENTLY RELEASED PROVES, Paul?
>You make offending comments about people
Any comments about anybody ARE FOUNDED ON FACTS, EVENTS and WORDS used by
the persons. If anyone does not like honest opinions and fair comment THEY SHOULD BE
CAREFUL WHAT THEY DO (and conveniently they do not do with intent)
AND WHAT THEY SAY OR WRITE. There's the remedy for the offended! (WE
are back to the scenario with the offended client of the Privy Council(!) solicitors who
hold the toilet roll for Her Majesty when she uses the loo, chum).
Consider the scenario about the client of the solicitors who wrote to
threaten ME, with 'puke production machine' chipping in while you knew of it all. Do I
need to remind you that it was all about the material at *fame97* which the solicitor's
client found *allegedly, offensive as if not true* and therefore actionable?
You pride yourself on calling a spade a spade as far
as free masons are concerned (even without direct link /
proof to events and persons far removed from activities). You now seek to deny me the
right to act likewise despite indisputable facts, events and convenient defaults, like the
puke production machine's spiteful and maligned (as far as I am concerned) default to
publish MY REPLY to the TOILET ROLL PAPER HOLDING solicitors. As YOU full well know, they
set about threatening me, and he, 'puke producing machine, James Todd', rushed in to
ASSIST THEM by INTIMIDATING ME. And all, allegedly, because some material in a Community
On Line web-site was offending the client of illiterates in law! The very solicitors,
according to 'puke production machine', were going to destroy me, as the *big shot Privy
Council boffins* they were, who nonetheless needed his help and he rushed in to lend a
helping hand!
WOW!
Some scenario / script, Paul!
>with whom you disagree and rather
than contribute
MY WORK & CONTRIBUTIONS ARE OUT THERE, including the results, if you do
not mind. I am entitled to more than just an explanation for such inexcusable, unjustified
and way-out assertions.
>to a cohesive
Paul I hereby invite you to inform us all as to WHY YOU FAILED /
defaulted to proceed in a direction we had agreed three years ago. May I remind you
that it was a case of working together with *YOU* LEADING the team (there were 8 of us)
for an action against the Law Society? (Re: issuing practice certificates to criminals
& maintaining an alleged complaints department that was just covering up, all-manner
of constructive frauds).
WHAT caused you to 'run away' / 'turn yellow' /
'withdraw', Paul? [*Link to the challenges to
the Law Society]
May I remind you that you did receive copy of a letter received by the
Chief Executive Officers of both 'wings of 'the Merchants of Misery' (copyright words
between quotes) and it was sent by one of the eight persons?
Was it, by any chance, a letter that you disapproved the contents of, OR
was there some other problem or obstacle?
As I recall you never made any comments about the content of the letter,
and, you did not come back to me on the subject matter. And you speak of cohesion and
co-operation Paul?
>organisation
you drive people away.
Have it your way. I have and I am now going to use evidence about abusive
wasters of my time and good nature, especially when they bluntly engaged in the rampant
constructive frauds industry, at and through the courts.
Such persons came along on retainers and CRAFTILY were attempting
to entice me in fraudulent activities, which I turned down umpteen times. (By the way I
have just published a page/file which I will dedicate to 3-4 such fraudsters because the
evidence against them is crystal clear (*Link)).
You now imply that I turn people away. You do so, presumably, BECAUSE
SUCH CRIMINALS should be dictating to me, by the general tone of your posting Paul. It is
as if the purpose for setting up *human-rights* was to take people to the cleaners, just
like others do (*Link); to secure pecuniary advantages
from 'the serfs' and 'the shitizens', being targeted. Exactly as the situation was when
the managers of the LIPS crowd/mob were sending along Johan and others to me or
introducing the old age pensioner to another 'admirer and user of the facilities,
available to the craft(y), the dishonest and deceitful, who join the fraudsters club for
such activities.
I refer you to 'OUR AIMS' [*Link to the human-rights.org statement of intent] and request that you inform me as to WHY I should waste my time
with people who never had any intention to challenge the criminals in control of the legal
system, THE COURTS. All too happy to dance cheek to cheek with the abusers of judicial
chair occupancy, just like the legal circles do while fleecing Mr & Mrs average!
It is they (judges and the fraudsters club recruits) who indulge in
FALSE INSTRUMENTS which they dare refer to as legitimate material and even 'sound' court
orders, Paul. Without such facilities, by
judicial chair occupants, no lawyer or barrister could get away with
the criminal activities they all indulge in, and you know it.
>Most of us are
working diligently
I never commented and I would never do on the work of any other unless
invited, and you know it. (I could point to a scenario when a Community On Line member was
to benefit from diligent work and co-operation, as you know (*Link).
I do not propose to drop further down the slide of disgraceful behaviour by others, Paul).
However, I do point you to what was released recently. I also invite
you to inform me if you ever bothered to access the stated facts that were submitted to
the European Court of Human Rights?
'Right to life arguments' were pleaded, mate. [*Link to
application as lodged at the European Court of Human Rights]
Apply your diligence to the very element when fraudsters set about
interfering in the work and LIFE PLANS of others; they bluntly ACT AS DICTATORS, in which
area I class wilful and criminally motivated defaults and omissions. In that
classification, persons who cover up crime just like Johan did. He, like Ebert, promoting
crap about the lack of interest by the police!
Get to know your law or apply it PROPERLY instead
of waffling like the solicitors and barristers, Paul.
YOU were one of the first persons that I contacted and I specifically
pointed you to the fact that there were plenty of book marks, READY FOR ANY ONE TO LINK
TO, from their sites to the links at the Community On Line member's site. MATCH THAT for
'diligent co-operation' through deeds and REAL ACTS and activities you and those you state
'diligently work together', assert and claim. Provide me with, and
publish details, Paul, PLEASE.
DID YOU ever contact me for details because you wanted to link to any
SIMILAR ACTIVITIES (stated facts) that you were the victim of?
NO!
WHY?
Simply, because you do not approve of any collaboration between victims! You do not wish
for any cohesion, and you apparently OBJECT TO PRECEDENT CASES as PROOF for COMMON FACTORS
(in almost all cases that you know of the elements arise) when raising issues with MPs and
Ministers!
>in our own ways
Where do you cover examples of 'some of the diligent and cohesive work
between YOU (plural) which I would love to have sight of and come back to you with details
about links between the various sites?
>and with others
to bring about changes
Like the changes announced by the Prime Minister whom Maurice is blaming
for the criminal activities that he was the victim of, even though the Prime Minister was
not in the position he is now? YET, we have Maurice doing exactly the opposite of what he
should be doing, NOW! Even though the Prime Minister is attempting to deliver what he
promised in 1995, as he was being coaxed through submissions (also to Ministers and to
MPs) over the years and in particular the last 6 years.
>in the system -
do not denigrate people unjustly
Puke production machine wilfully elected to SUPPRESS OUR (note I am not
using the first person even though you played no part) STRENGTHS (plural BECAUSE I STOOD
LIKE A ROCK by you). Do you suppose that I acted so (stood by you) because of your
contempt to and for my requests for links or is it at all possible that uppermost in my
mind and MY PRIORITY was to challenge the solicitors? Indeed, as I did, I also put James
Todd in a spot when I pointed areas of law he could not fathom. Are my statements about
CHARLATANS & STOOGES coming through, now that I have reminded you of such realities,
Paul? Or is it possible that you need to revert to some other boffins and gurus on
matters legal that arise out of INDISPUTABLE FACTS?
In any event was 'puke production machine', James Todd, justified, to
suppress the *human-rights* strengths in accordance with your logic, Paul?
If that be the case, the situation is akin to the time when four LIPS
charlatans went about co-operating or selling to me a concocted scenario (the choice is
yours) whereby the great hero… our hero… our hero was to be sectioned as a loony (an
officially certified one). And because I acted (*Link to documented evidence), one of the 'conniving and evil
ones' came up with vulgarities and adjectives that I do not propose to publish here, for
good reasons.
And what of the stupid intimidation by and from 'puke production
machine'?
With friends like him who needs enemies? (I can
name a few more Paul). He does his best to promote groups that are approved by the
organisation that has been depriving and denying you your rights to deal with your
children's inheritance, however. And just like 'The Times' and 'The
Guardian' he does promote quite a few questionable 'activities', and charlatans.
We both know why such organisations benefit from public funds, Paul.
Simply ------> part of the Institutionally Organised Fraud
& Corruption, the very elements declared at the top of every page at human-rights,
just as the reasons for the perpetuation of it, Paul, in the ADDENDA at the top too.
The last person who was introduced by the Loonies In Person Society,
like Johan, simply abusing my time. She was playing at cat and mouse (in which games and
tactics Norman also indulged AFTER they enticed him / bought his commitment to work
against the *human-rights* concept). ALL were/being introduced to another language, by the
followers of the God of the Old Testament. Every
one, working for and preparing ONLY, with others, to work within and FOR the Lord
Chancellor's new avenue for MORE (*Link to his Lordship's scheme and what sort of persons waiting
in the sidelines) FRAUD ON THE 'SERFS' and 'SHITIZENS' --->
'THE TAXPAYERS'.
And I am supposed to turn a blind eye and play daft?
>Andrew for by
doing so you are no better than the enemy!
Paul I hate having to point out that the shoes are on the other's feet. Persons like Johan, the last LIPS stooge from Plymouth, other converts, and the
'puke production machine', James Todd, ARE THE ENEMY and they are worse than the original offenders, as Cicero
pointed out!
>Paul@fame97
>>
>>From: Andrew Yiannides
The email exchanges and submissions below, refer to matters that Paul
of: www.fame97.human-rights.org
busied himself in, behind the scenes and we leave it to visitors to these pages to draw
their own conclusions, as to his true colours. The issue of the recurring negatives, in
his undertakings must be read also in conjunction with Paul's silence when he, Paul,
received copies of Andrew's exchanges with the solicitors who threatened to instigate
legal proceedings, on behalf of 'an allegedly offended client of theirs' because of Paul's
material and allegations about the solicitor's client. (*Link to explicit submissions to a group of lovers of the system as
is, the carrot dangling at the end of the tunnel,
for asses).
We publish and release also, exchanges and submissions to another 'victim' who was
introduced to human-rights and Andrew by the LIPS crowd/mob. The person was/is none other
than the one who defaulted to proceed with the preparation of the necessary Statement /
Affidavit from the recording referred to in the page 'Two LIPS Talking' [*Link]. Visitors to these pages can read of the
'convenient failures by the time-wasting abuser of trust. As an accomplished 'jumping
jack', she was jumping into action only for the parts she engaged in (or as she was
tutored / instructed in) just like the rest of the LIPS crowd/mob circles engaged and
engage in.
The email exchanges below stand as submitted to the actress:
Date: Fri, 28 May 2004 04:01:05 +0100
To: "urme bhopal"
<urme_23@yahoo.com>
From: "Andrew Yiannides"
<andrew@human-rights.demon.co.uk> Add to Address Book
Subject: Re: your posts on forumhub
Thank you,
THIS IS AN OPEN RESPONSE and you are invited to re-consider the
realities stated below. Above all, you must deal with the issue of YOUR ATTITUDE AND
DEFAULTS THROUGHOUT.
YOUR ASSUMED RIGHTS TO ABUSE MY TIME FOR & THROUGH YOUR
INEXPLICABLE BEHAVIOUR, TO-DATE, IS APPARENT. It is seen as nothing but activities in and
for which you took part READILY and not as states that were imposed by others, alone,
intended to be seen (by those you contacted / contact) as maligned actions against you. In
other words you are seen to have come along WITH 'preconceived notions and or plans',
solely intended to lead to dead ends WHICH YOU ORGANISED WITH OTHERS, always in the
background, THROUGH YOUR VERY CONVENIENT DEFAULTS & OMISSIONS.
Congratulations, in case you fail to deal with the issues!
OR
You are invited to prove that you are made of the staff that it takes
to make a true HUMAN SPIRIT, as opposed to a manipulated or indoctrinated slave of that
which is in place for the naive to suckle at as an infant. I add, also, 'the moronic who
are seen to be dangling on the strings of the manipulators as puppets, or as marionettes
in the hands of the abusers of public office and their agents in pseudo-democracies, that
allegedly rest and are founded on law and order.
WAKE-UP if you are(!) a genuine victim as you allege. Carry on
slumbering in a lethargic state and or relish in your dream-state and enjoy your
masochistic pleasures. Any 'abused' human who suffers at the hands of Sadists ACTS if not
a pleasure seeking masochist!
WAKE-UP.
Do you realise that your response NOW, implies
that you just came (were sent along / introduced by the LIPS agent,
the mischief making stooge Johan M.F) for other purposes than those
you were promoting to me? Do you not recognise that your actions
(when using my time) and your convenient defaults (whenever PROPER activity was called for
by you) establish that you also came along with plenty of words without substance, simply
as a time-waster?
NO PROPER ACTIONS WERE EVER TAKEN BY YOU, in order to establish (NEVER, as it appears now) the validity or TRUTH OF THE
MATTERS YOU WERE ASSERTING, or should it be ALLEGING, to me!
NO EVIDENCE of any statements, which you
allegedly made to the police (*Links to the
case of Mr G Ebert who happily was running around SIMPLY TO PROMOTE 'the system as is'
to the naive and gullible. Read all three communications in the left margin you are linked
to for the full picture; also the case of two women who benefited from the letter we
settled for them, READ THE LETTER you are linked to and
recognise use of the law that exists), ABOUT the man who, you
said/alleged, mislead and abused your trust, Mr. Paul Talbot Jenkins! He, not long ago,
all of a sudden, alleged (in a posting) that it was the police who wiped out your pages /
your published material, IN YOUR PRIVATE & PERSONAL human-rights web-site.
He asserted that it was because of racist content and racially
motivated allegations by you. Funny, how it took him three years to concoct and come up
with that new excuse.
And all the while (for over two years) YOU WERE JUST OUT THERE IN THE
WILDERNESS, after wasting my time because of the issues that arose FOLLOWING THE WIPING
OUT OF YOUR MATERIAL FROM YOUR PERSONAL web-site.
You did assert/allege inability to state your cases in your private web-site,
thereafter but YOU HAVE HAD PLENTY OF HOURS TO promote the powers that be... the powers
that be.... the powers that arranged to pay shysters and fraudsters under the table (you,
young lady, were/are among 'the alleged victims' WHO PERSISTENTLY DEFAULTED AND ARE
FAILING TO ADDRESS THE ISSUE OF THE DOUBLE FRAUD ON THE TAXPAYERS. Never let that issue
just 'slip into oblivion', for I AM NOT ignoring it, not for a moment.
Wake up. ONE BEGINS WITH LOGIC.
Should I have to repeat, in this email, that which I stated on many
instances? ALL assertions and allegations about the wrongs imposed on victims who,
CONVENIENTLY, DO NOT USE THEIR RIGHTS TO REPORT THE CRIMES THEY COMPLAIN OF AND ABOUT, but
engage in private exchanges and in other areas WHERE THEY SIMPLY 'promote the powers that
be .... the abuse of public office..... ARE SEEN BY ME AS NOTHING ELSE BUT SUBLIMINAL
INDOCTRINATION agents.
Such persons, as you know, simply seek to
influence their readers (JUST LIKE James Todd, the puke production
machine of VOMIT fame) of 'the powers of the abusers of public office' including the
courts' facilities. In other words, young lady, you have been doing nothing
else but promotion of the subliminal message intended to subjugate
the masses TO YOUR PREACHING :
"Do not challenge them, it is useless, just
accept it all as part of the 'N.W.O', and get on with your life in serfdom. You will not
succeed".
In the meantime no mention, anywhere, about the web-site that allegedly
was wiped out by Paul Talbot-Jenkins, at the time of the events which you promoted to me.
And, two years on, he comes along to allege that it was the police who did it. I suggest
that you access the page I point to below and set off with the following query, in your
mind:
"Why was there apparent failures to contact Andrew and
human-rights about the alleged grounds for the killing of my allegations?".
You might then benefit from 'your own common sense' answer and
understand, also HOW the material at the page (below) EXPOSED ALL THE STOOGES and
charlatans of those events:
http://www.uk-human-rights.org/theproof.htm
There you will read of the fact that I WAS NOT
WILLING TO SELL MY SOUL and become part of the established way of administering law and
'Justice'. You should also get to grips with the fact that 'the childish attempts by
charlatans, stooges and ACTIVE AGENTS OF THE CRIMINALS WHO ARE IN CONTROL, failed. All
were/are operating precisely as SUBLIMINAL INDOCTRINATION EXPERTS. Read it all, at the
page, and NOTE:
A. HOW solicitors were used, not to mention the
puke production machine, James Todd, subsequently. Both aiming to scare me and cause me to
remove the waffle (albeit well presented case BUT NOT ALL) from and by Paul Talbot Jenkins. I AM EMPHASISING the simple fact that we are
talking of and dealing with his own human-rights.org web-site, as an alleged
*human-rights* Community on Line activist!
B. HOW all failed to cause me to act in the manner they were dreaming
of; anticipating that I would be scared into doing.
Presumably, had they (dreamers) succeeded, Paul Talbot-Jenkins (just another agent FOR the
subliminal indoctrination policy and the plans in place) MIGHT HAVE BEEN PUT in a position
to claim that I interfered with his rights to publish the facts of life and, therefore,
instigate proceedings against *human-rights* and me personally; the grounds: that I
violated his rights under national and international law. I DO REFER TO THE LAW, whereby
ALL ARE OBLIGATED TO REPORT CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES (if not party to the crimes -
self-incrimination facilities in place). That was the case, as I understood it to be, in
your situation when you decided to join the human-rights Community on Line.
Need I to re-iterate that ALL DECENT LAW ABIDING CITIZENS ARE MEANT TO
REPORT ANY CRIME THAT THEY ARE AWARE OF?
Reporting TRUTHFULLY TO THE AUTHORITIES, beginning with THE POLICE,
that which all LAW ABIDING CITIZENS (not sold to the devil souls) are aware of and know to
be CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES. I include, here, the police, to whom you and Paul Talbot-Jenkins,
allegedly, stated your respective waffle about the events (those you both came back to me,
with) 'CONSEQUENTIAL TO THE ARRANGEMENTS FOR YOUR CASE TO BE KILLED'. You (a victim?) WERE
SILENCED, AS AN ALLEGED VICTIM, were you not under the scenario you presented to me?
YOU, an 'assumed' pro-active member of the
Community on Line, SIMPLY CHOSE TO LIVE WITH THAT SCENARIO, under the self-imposed
delusionary state you sunk in, while of the opinion that it was all sold to, and bought,
as the script spun by 'two dreamers'.
C. HOW ALL FAILED: (i) solicitors, (ii) James Todd
of VOMIT, (iii) Paul Talbot-Jenkins (an non co-operative member of the Community on Line)
&
a fourth, THE CHARLATAN (Sharon) who
gave me grounds and cause to state the events that exposed ALL dreamers). She WAS SENT ALONG in order to play the usual tunes with the badly tuned guitar
she was armed with. Just another ILLITERATE IN
LAW tool of the manipulators and a playmate of the abductors and
rapists of DEMOCRACY (true and factual reporting is an absolute essential ingredient) the
Goddess. I include, in the manipulators, the agents they retain for
such services as well as those who indulge as accomplished Sadomasochists, just like the
great hero, Norman Scarth, the self proclaimed (as arranged with other fraudsters' club
recruits) Honorary(?) Secretary of the LIPS crowd/mob.
Reverting to YOUR PART, as an alleged victim who simply carried on as a
person who made it your business to just promote (as others do) the waffle that allegedly
represents your/their suffering as victims(?) of the Institutionally Organised Crimes
Against Humanity (with fraud and corruption the kink-pin).
I hasten to clarify that I DO BASE MY THOUGHTS ON YOUR ACTIVITIES and YOUR VERY....
VERY.... VERY CONVENIENT DEFAULTS, OMISSIONS.
Fair comment founded and resting
on the facts you could never write off.
YOU, young lady, simply acted (or should I say, indulged) as just another
accomplished/retained, FOR the subliminal indoctrination scheme and facilities
(stooges/fraudsters club recruits) in place. ALL, of course, consequential to the killing
of your case - the 'very convenient disappearance of your personal web-site material......
You never contacted me UNTIL AFTER I cast my nets and baited my hooks,
young lady!
So, consider the chain of events and, IF YOU CAN, get out of that
scenario as things evolved. It was I who CAUSED YOU TO COME FORWARD WITH THE hatched up
script you presented to me, thereafter. A script / scenario CREATED FOR THE OCCASION to
explain (persons without intellect or foresight could fall for such childish
presentations) the disappearance of the material and the promoted (hatched up) excuse for
alleged inability to reinstate / restate YOUR alleged state and case, as an allegedly
long-suffering victim....... a masochist?
At the same time the person who allegedly wiped out your material
(because you gave him your passwords) promoted excuses and justifications for the scenario
you presented to me, and both of you to sleep on the laurels of your success!
Paul, allegedly took control of your computer WITHOUT YOUR PERMISSION (a simple enough
excuse for an alleged(!) victim(!) such as you.
BUT YOU THEN (as an ongoing
victim?) DID NOTHING about reporting such crimes to the world, in permanent pages ON THE INTERNET....
WOW!
You NEVER sold that herring to me young lady. Your failures, as of then, spoke louder than your recent defaults and omissions,
when you repetitiously failed to address the DOUBLE FRAUD ON THE TAXPAYERS as covered in
the exclusive page:
http://www.uk-human-rights.org/confraud.htm
CONGRATULATIONS are in order for your part IN APPROVING AND ENDORSING
THE CRIMES EXPOSED by *human-rights*. You simply did and ARE DOING SO, through your
repetitious defaults and omissions to address the obvious crimes, to which YOU WERE
POINTED umpteen times.
A law student?
Or just a trainee in the art of
maintaining that which has been in place, at least as of the times of the creation /
editing of the New Testament?
If not genuine the words attributed
to Jesus Christ in accordance with the Gospel credited to St. Luke (for which you SHOULD
ACCESS and read the words, in the quotes page) at least the creators / editors of the New
Testament (320 AD onwards) knew of the state of affairs AS FAR AS THE ADMINISTRATORS OF
LAW - lawyers - goes. Do not simply shove your head in the sand again, like a typical
ostrich, if not a FRAUDSTERS CLUB RECRUIT and hireling who came along to abuse and waste
my time, just like the stooge who introduced you to me. Accept that SHOULD I HAVE
SURMISED/CONCLUDED as I state now about your part (in connection with my wasted time)
BOTH, Paul and you, PROVIDED ME with the right ammunition about the offenders that I set
out to investigate, well over 12 years ago.
Be advised that I determined to act as I state in
the last statement of the above paragraph, BECAUSE of the words attributed to:
(a) Aeschylus, [*Link]
(b) Charles Dickens, [*Link]
(c) Jefferson, Thomas, [*Link]
(d) Jesus Christ, [* Link]
(e) Montesquieu, Charles Louis the French
Jurist, [*Link]
(f) William Shakespeare, [*Link]
AND COUNTLESS OTHER DIGNITARIES.
Should you have bothered to acquaint yourself with
my work and research, in particular the FACTS STATED at:
http://www.family.uk-human-rights.org
YOU SHOULD HAVE RECOGNISED that I am a quick
learner. As of a young age I THINK FIRST and then I act, AFTER digging into the truth and
the balance of probability, USING LOGIC, (analysis of the given/ researched factors)
before I jump in with any waffle.... waffle..... waffle like those who introduced you to
me and those who, LIKE YOU, use the yarns that are spun at every corner when the criminals
who are in control ARE CORNERED.
Wake up.
You most certainly appear to have co-operated with
those you allege have denied you OR VIOLATED YOUR RIGHTS. One of the persons that you
complained about, TO ME ONLY, as far as I am concerned (no proof whatsoever that you
complained elsewhere) APPARENTLY / ALLEGEDLY set about OBSTRUCTING THOSE WHO WERE TO
REPORT, OR REPORTING (you) THE FACTS ON THE INTERNET, in personal web-sites!
Earlier you, also, alleged that Johan M. F set about to influence you
in whatever you were proposing to do with my assistance as a presumed genuine Community on
Line member (false declarations of intent to me?).
Later, you simply allowed Paul (allegedly) to help himself in and WITH YOUR RIGHTS TO
FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION, FAIR COMMENT and to report crimes *against you*!
WOW!
You, thereafter, DOING NOTHING in your own case, within your
rights as assured in international law irrespective of my assistance and the facilities at
your disposal that WERE/ARE PROVIDED TO VICTIMS BY *human-rights* (NGO). You, young lady,
chose / elected to ignore your rights (as if nothing happened or no progress HAD been made
in respect of your complaints/claims, BUT, as an accomplished masochist, you carried on
promoting the powers that be.... the powers that gave/give so much pleasure to....
masochists!
Young lady, unlike the media barons, and all those others that you know
of and have been complaining of and about, in private exchanges, ALL *human-rights* and
Community on Line activists, ARE NOT part of the organised crimes against humanity
fraudsters you have been associating and or rubbing shoulder with, for years; at least
since you were introduced to *human-rights*.
The grounds and YOUR reasons FOR FAILING TO ACT as deemed absolute and
essential?
Simply because Paul, allegedly, another stole/took over your computer; as if no other
facilities were open or available to you. USE (or should I say blunt abuse) OF MY TIME, in
order to deal with the squabbling that evolved out of your naive trust in him, who took
such liberties with your rights (as you promoted your story to me).
I refer to rights that you asserted/alleged to me, were
violated/breached by him, 'when your statements were/are taken as true events and that NO
OTHER background shenanigans were part of 'the whole scenario of the times'.
NOW, you come along with a childish excuse through which to absolve
yourself of any responsible acts that were commanded of you TO DO, AS FROM DAY ONE,
provided of course that you were/are the victim of THE CRIMES that you alleged throughout
and still assert to have been AND BE the victim of.
Ormila, NO STRAIGHT THINKING PERSON, who was done in, as you asserted
and were alleging, WOULD WALK AWAY, from it all, UNLESS NEEDING A BREATHER AND INTENDING
TO COME BACK REFRESHED IN ORDER TO FIGHT A DECENT BATTLE. You did no such thinking or
thing, but you came back, at a very interesting juncture of my work while researching and
investigating THE STOOGES & PARTNERS OF THE CRIMINALS WHO ARE IN CONTROL, simply to
abuse my time, yet again.
I suggest that you access the only page (at the
moment) that is released for all to read:
http://www.uk-human-rights.org/chaldep1.htm
The above page covers the parts the stooge and
fraudsters club recruit was playing as a dreamer of a 'legal brain' who was, had been, is
aiming to assist others FOR & IN THE DOUBLE FRAUD ON THE 'SHITIZENS', just like Norman
Scarth and his associates from within the LIPS (crowd/mob) had been, were aiming for!.
Below copy-paste of the latest NEWSLETTER that members of the Community
on Line received.
++++++++++++++++++++
25th May 2004
=============
Human-Rights Organisation Community on Line
NEWSLETTER - 2004/My/006
======================
Friends
I. Your attention is drawn to the new version of the page:
http://www.uk-human-rights.org/corruptcourts.htm
You will note that there is plenty of scope in the page for links to
material and evidence published in our pages. We do not need to invite you to submit links
to (bookmarks and anchor-points) in your pages. If you need advice on how to create
bookmarks and or anchor points, in your pages, contact us or someone who can help you.
Contact, also others who you know might wish to have links to their pages ON THE ISSUES WE
COVER IN THE ABOVE PAGE. We remind one and all that we co-operate with ALL GENUINE
challengers who are stating the facts of life and publishing the evidence upon which they
rely to establish 'abuse of public office and misuse of the facilities available at, and
through the courts'.
II. We copy-paste below a self-explanatory letter that
member (!) Simon Muller of lancashire.human-rights.org will be posting to
the Rt. Hon. David Blunkett, Home Secretary.
We stress and emphasise the simple fact that Mr Muller had to resort to
a court application FOR Judicial Review of a decision by the Home Office. We are sure that
the Home Secretary was not and has not been kept informed of the activities by alleged
public(!) servants(?), who indulged at the expense of the targeted and ignored victim, for
over a decade now. Mr Muller, as webmaster for the Lancashire area, will be acting as all
genuine victims and those who object to the practices should do; in other words he will be
reporting and exposing the full sordid story of his life in the public domain.
A reporter from a national newspaper (The Guardian) attended the
hearing/presentation on 29th April 2004. At the time the reporter indicated that newspaper
editors and reporters 'would rather '. We pointed to the victim and the reporter the 'clearly stated facts of
life, as acknowledged by an insider:
1. http://www.uk-human-rights.org/media.htm#words
Present at the time was a victim, for whom the paper produced only a
half-baked potato in his case. He, we are informed, has been preparing for his own
exposures on the Internet. We look forward to his march and onslaught on the offending
abusers of facilities through the public services and the courts.
III. We have published a simple statement of facts
arising out of the disputed Protocols of the wise men of Zion. Common sense and
realisations founded and resting on historical facts, also published and promoted
religious teachings and works are but the solid ground upon which we rest our fair
comments and sound views. The page we release can be accessed at:
2. http://www.uk-human-rights.org/protocol.htm
The page should be read in conjunction with the material and the
introduction to 'the family of man' which can be access at:
3. http://www.family.uk-human-rights.org
For the above web-site Andrew needs to secure a copy of a video
production, by Clive James (Watchmaker 1999) believed to be 'The Night Of A Thousand
Years'. Use of an Old Master, a painting depicting the Garden of Eden expulsion event was
part of the backdrop to a scene in the TV production. Andrew needs to study the Old
Master's presentation / interpretation of that biblical event. We are sure that you will
have noted the references to the biblical story, in the page we have now up-graded. We
have done so in order to meet with our strategy and plans, as to, 'how best to expose and
challenge abusers of public office and the trust placed in them by the naive and
gullible'. Any assistance leading to securing a copy of the video production and or leads
that could secure a good photographic reproduction of the Old Master, as used for the
above Television production, will be greatly appreciated.
The draft of the letter, as settled for the member of the Community on
Line, follows:
Mr Simon Muller
38 Houghton Close
St Anne's
Lancs
FY8 3NA
22 May 2004
The Rt. Hon. David Blunkett
The Home Secretary
Cabinet Office
Downing Street
London SW1A
OPEN LETTER - FOR PERSONAL ATTENTION
Your Ref: Elected to serve the people
My Ref: Obstructions to / Denial of Rights Assured in International Law
Honourable Sir
Re: Attached, self-explanatory, copies of communications.
As with this letter all are executed / transferred in Braille for your personal attention:
1. Letter to the Administration Court / office at the Royal Courts of Justice, London,
dated...........
2. Letter to the Mechanical Records Department at the Royal Courts of Justice, London,
dated........
3. Letter to the Civil Appeals office at the Royal Courts of Justice, London,
dated.........
4. My letter of ............., to my Member of Parliament, the Rt. Hon. ........., who, I
have been informed, has communicated his concerns, to you personally.
I beg to refer and draw your personal attention to the following
material that is published on the Internet at:
A. http://www.uk-human-rights.org/office.htm
where an explicit letter to the Rt. Hon. Frank Field MP, ex-Minister, is published. The
letter points to a number of very serious issues indeed.
In particular the material facts and the evidence pointed to in the
pages/material, published at the site and other web-sites, leads one to conclude that the
free-for-all, and fraud on the public, is systematically imposed through the legal
circles. An abused legal system and the courts services, wherein THE ADMINISTRATORS ACT IN
CONTEMPT OF THE EVIDENCE PRESENTED TO & BEFORE THEM and, alarmingly, IN CONTEMPT OF
PARLIAMENT'S LAWS!
Democratic governance,
resting and founded on law
and
order?
B. http://www.uk-human-rights.org/chaldep1.htm
There the activities and participation of the alleged victim, in the rampant DOUBLE FRAUD
ON THE TAXPAYERS, was and will be seen in all its magnificence when all the evidence will
be released for the public and the world at large to access. I was given to understand
that the alleged victim was ONLY INTERESTED IN THE CASH UNDER THE TABLE that is covered in
the exclusive page:
C. http://www.uk-human-rights.org/confraud.htm
There THE FACILITY FOR THE RAMPANT DOUBLE FRAUD ON THE TAXPAYERS is exposed. Billions of
taxpayer's funds distributed through organised crime via the courts and the legal system.
In the meantime genuine victims of the abusers of public office shunned and relegated to a
pittance of an existence. Forced labour imposed, because of the need to chase abducted and
raped daily, (up and down the country) in our courts, Justice. Surviving on Social
Security (because of the maligned abuse of position by public servants) while 'licensed
criminals' silver-line their pockets through abuse of the legal system with the blessings
of the police (the main culprits in the destruction of my family life and health).
D. http://www.uk-human-rights.org/camilahp.htm
There Parliament's provisions, under the Criminal Justice Act 1988 are pointed to. TORMENT
& TORTURE THROUGH ACTS OR OMISSIONS, defined clearly.
Sir, I have no doubt that you meant every word in your article, which
the London Evening Standard published, as reproduced at and by human-rights in the first
page (URL) that I point to above. I am also sure that the Rt. Hon. Prime Minister and
other members of the cabinet will duly consider the wrongs imposed on me through abuse of
public office, just as I am sure that New Labour WILL DELIVER JUSTICE out of the dungeons
of the much abused courts and legal services.
Thanking you, in anticipation of your considered approach and
directions to your subordinates, and to the police, whose prime duty HAS ALWAYS BEEN, TO
INVESTIGATE CRIME PROPERLY, before presenting inexcusable and unjustified 'cases for
prosecutions' to the Crown Prosecutions Service.
There is no doubt in my mind that by far the worst of elements in all
that I was subjected to was 'the gravy train facility' THROUGH WHICH THE LEGAL CIRCLES
WERE SILVER LINING THEIR POCKETS through abuse of the Legal Aid funds while ruining and
destroying my life.
Sincerely
Simon Muller
ENCL. As text.
/ends
+++++++++++
NOTE PLEASE that we will gladly incorporate a small image, the same
size as the one we use at the top (left margin) in most of our pages. Provide us also with
a link to your material and a few words by way of introduction (for inclusion in our
FOOTNOTES) and we will incorporate it in the new version of the /corruptcourts.htm page.
Andrew Yiannides
*human-rights* (NGO)
London - UK
25th May 2004
/end of Newsletter to members of the Community On Line
==========================================
Ormila,
IN VIEW of the above clearly stated facts, I suggest that YOU DO ACCESS the web-site that
covers the family of man. There I deal with THE CORNER STONE & THE FOUNDATIONS OF
MANKIND'S PROBLEMS.
<>WHEN you have recognised the issues and cryptic messages that I POINT TO, and or
IF you are in a position to acknowledge such realities and realisations, AND, IF you
resolve that you are a decent person who HAS A DUTY TO REPORT CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY, and
if you were/are a victim of circumstances (as others imposed on you) and IF you have had a
good hard look at the things YOU WERE complaining of and about, and IF you reflect back on
your use (abuse of my goodwill and nature) and that you are willing to do something about
it all, you might perhaps contact me with a fresh look at things.
IGNORE THIS POSTING IF YOU WISH and let things rest EXACTLY AS I COVER
HERE & NOW.
You NEVER ACTED AS YOU SHOULD HAVE DONE, starting from the transcript
of the recording made BY ME covering the issue of the NON available / removed documents
from the folders you HAD lodged at the RCJ [*Link to the recording, as covered in the page
/2lipstalk.htm from here]. You did have time to waste (yours), and YOU DID USE
MY time (abuse in reality, as others so indulged too) for all sorts of problems pertaining
to your computer etc., BUT YOU NEVER MADE TIME ABOUT THE ISSUES THAT YOU CAME TO ME
SEEKING ASSISTANCE FOR the very issues were / happen to be, also, matters that other
victims(?) of the abused courts facilities(!) indulged in. Most, WERE INTRODUCED to
human-rights BY THE VERY SAME Litigants In Person Society, the 'sing and dance about it
all' experts! Those who, like you, did nothing, *e*v*e*r* (spelling it out for you) TO
CHALLENGE OPENLY THOSE you all were/are 'puking about in private exchanges'.
You were assisted, I PREPARED IT ALL FOR YOU (computer and all else),
you set off doing what you came to seek help about
and
THEN........
NOTHING.
<>Obviously, those who sent you along (and introduced you to human-rights) sent
along another time wasting abuser and or just a guided / used stooge, if not a person who
they anticipated / expected to be JUST A SELFISH & OR EGOCENTRIC 'waffler' who waffles
and waffles...... BUT DOES NOTHING CONSTRUCTIVE IN THE RIGHT AREAS of activity...... just
as you established through your actions AND MORE IMPORTANTLY through your 'very convenient
INACTION, numerous defaults that attach and arise out of DEFAULTS & OMISSIONS ON YOUR
PART.
Let me remind you that it was you who ALLEGED THAT:
1. Johan, THE CHAP WHO INTRODUCED YOU TO *human-rights* (and to me) HAD BEEN
ADVISING YOU IN PRIVATE, as to how you should treat me, 'NOT TO TRUST ME..... and you
apparently chose to keep quiet about his 'wise counsel', for months. In the meantime YOU
WERE FULLY AWARE of the simple fact that HE WAS USING MY READINESS TO ASSIST VICTIMS. [*Link
from here to the Appeal in Johan's case - good
enough to put pressure on the offending legal circles as far as the fraudster Johan and
his mates were concerned and for dust over your eyes crap as in the exchanges with the
other Fraudsters' Club Recruit Norman, in this
page evince]. Do read the appeal that I published in and about his case. DO consider the
fact that I have more evidence at my disposal about 'that fraudsters clu |
