Crime - Organised -Institutionalised - Corruption - Fraud - Protection Rackets, run and managed by judicial chair occupants, in a free-for-all state of abundance. Note the all-embracing guarantee, in place, in contempt of all law:
WHERE IS JUSTICE? Read >>> "The court has inherent jurisdiction to stay an action which must fail; as, for instance an action brought in respect of an act of State" <<< Rule of LAW ?  (For the root contact)
And by extension any act of any public servant who is appointed, retained and maintained by other public servants for all of whom, the state, as employer, is ultimately [*L] responsible, including abusers of judicial chair occupancy. Hence, the billions paid out as covered in the exclusive affidavit* that visitors can link-to directly [*L] from here. *Link also from here [*L] to the founder's conclusions as of 1972-75 when the great Metropolitan police were seen to be nothing but accessories to and abettors of the rampant fraud and corruption organised by the legal circles and ongoing through the courts, while Members of Parliament were promoting waffle -as they still do- their utterances amounting to nothing with the exception of 'contempt for the rights to [protection under the law, allegedly assured to the coitizens'; in short 'independence of the judiciary to act in contempt of ALL LAW, in a pseudodemocracy* so long as they serve undeclared plans for the serfs (*F1).

[*Link [*L] to founder's tribulations and experiences at the hands of the criminals operating in the Royal Courts of Justice, throughout 1972-75]

With such facilities in place (the words we point to above) and arrogant abuse of public office, can anyone assert that Mr Andrew Yiannides, the founder of human-rights, was not right to determine that Justice has been abducted and that she is held captive in the dungeons maintained by her abductors who rape her daily in their courts? NOTE : ALL Member States of the European Union are subject to the ruling which visitors, readers and researchers can access in the explicit page /yourrights.htm
>>>[*Link from here [*L] to the realities : In due course, also, a link to an indirect hint that was & is very clear for thinkers to recognise.
>>> On 3rd March 2008 - someone's birthday <<< we released a House of Lords PRECEDENT CASE and reveal deliberations by their Lordships in respect of >FRAUD< - >DECEPTION< - >CONSPIRACY< & >IMPLIED LIES BY KEEPING SILENT< in respect of any wrong imposed on any other with intent to cause damages. >>> IN THE MEANTIME WE HAVE BEEN NAMING AND SHAMING a number who know of & do much more than just approve of wrongs imposed on millions of 'serfs' in our allegedly civilised country / state / province / district of the European Union, which, allegedly, protects 'citizens from FRAUD & CORRUPTION*. Link from here [*L] to part of the 'official policy' of the 'European Community'. Needless to say the Precedent Case we released, entailed activities and practices by solicitors such as Mr Andrew Yiannides had been subjected to, decades after the House of Lords rulings we point to. The offending solicitor was just an old school friend, Mr Kypros Nichola of Nicholas & Co., an allegedly honourable officer of the Supreme Court. Mr Kypros Nichola bluntly abused the trust placed in him and indulged, in tandem with others, in criminal activities intended to cause the damages that were imposed on the targeted 'serf' by accredited - by the Law Society & Bar Council - allegedly Honourable Officers of the Supreme Court, criminals. All and everything through the courts maintained by successive elected governments in the United Kingdom, one of many pseudodemocracies, as the founder Mr Andrew Yiannides has been pointing out ever since the bitter experiences he had to endure as a result of and because he sought Justice, while unaware of the facts and the relaities covered in our pages. In due course another revelation relevant to the arrogant 'inherent jurisdiction', through which to deny & obstruct justice in order to IMPOSE ALL MANNER OF CRIMINALLY CREATED STATES on 'the serfs', who are taxed for the cost of maintaining criminals in public office, in pseudo-democracies]

RESPONSIBLE FOR THE STATE OF AFFAIRS, successive irresponsible Lord Chancellors and Home Secretaries who ignored all complaints and submissions irrespective of the evidence and the law pointed to, by the victims of it all, the citizens who are called upon to pay taxes for the maintenance of criminals in public office. [*Link from here to our exclusive page, covering confidential fraud as arranged THROUGH THE BEST KEPT OPEN SECRET in alleged democracies, European States. Elsewhere the foundations and corner stone upon which the operatives built the societies of their making using the bricks and mortar we cover in this and other pages. The visitor should not be under any illusion that the stars in the theatrical productions, covered in our pages were by any stretch of the imagination 'humans' who were / are gifted with any attributes that distinguish 'true humans' (thinkers) from animals]

* Information FOR victims who wish to co-operate* [*L] by EXPOSING & CHALLENGING abusers of Public Office *

December 2006 - SUMMONS ISSUED & SERVED IN RESPECT OF FRAUDULENT & CORRUPT ACTIVITIES IN FAMILY COURTS
[*Link from here to evidence. *Link also from here to a case when the abusers of the courts' facilities abandoned their plans for another targeted family]

IMPORTANT INFORMATION for all victims of malpractice - misconduct - negligence, etc. TO NOTE

In the civil justice system in England and Wales, a judge presides over the proceedings that are argued by the opposing sides through the adversarial process. The process enables the court, judge, to reach a conclusion as to the truth of the facts in dispute. Thereat it is for the judge to apply the law to the facts proven, established at court.

The system as evolved is covered in the page 'English Legal System [*L] remains the same after the Woolf reforms.

An explicit Affidavit* [*L] plus exhibits and
    letters to a Chief Inspector of Police* [*L],
        one to solicitors* [*L] and another to the Lord Chancellor [*L] evince
            ORGANISED CRIMES by abusers of public office (access letter to the police* [*L] in September 2006)

Andrew and THE BACKGROUND to it all

Andrew is a British citizen of colonial extraction; born in Nicosia Cyprus; educated at the English School Nicosia. Throughout his secondary education he learned of, admired and respected the much publicised and proclaimed virtues of the British Democratic System and the world famous attributes of British Fair Play. Such teachings and practices were part of school life; particularly in the numerous sports activities where one was taught to be a fair sport and a true Brit, never to kick someone when down and or hit below the belt. But those were the teachings, the proclamations and the practices in a colonial environment. Not so life in the U.K.

Since 1956 Andrew has lived in London. Over that span of time he has observed and lived through a gradual deterioration of morals and civility in the United Kingdom; all is beyond recognition with no respect for family let alone neighbour or other citizens. Not that life in London ever matched the civilities and manners instilled in Andrew through his upbringing and his social and spiritual background; also through the teachings at a fine educational establishment. Over 50 years of life in London, a city that has gradually become a true European cosmopolis, Andrew can state that only on one single instance the Law Enforcement Agencies truly applied themselves to the law as the law provides without bias, favouritism and or prejudice and discrimination. On that single instance the detective constable, who was assigned to the case, was of Afro-Caribbean origins and the criminal was of Far Eastern origins. On every other occasion and instance the police defaulted to act and/or to exercise their public duties as the law provided. The events depicted in "The Breeding Grounds - case" [*Link]. can safely be treated as a typical example of the practices and the failings of both Law Enforcement Agencies. The operations of the system have gradually been demoralising the country and its population; the citizens reverting a ones proud respected and much admired nation into free individuals with no respect for any law, society and or any other but one's self; leading to and creating new jungle rules because the person with no respect for any law and or any other citizens is protected while the victims are scorned and abandoned by a great nation and a self proclaimed democratic modern civilisation. In a true Democracy, however, the freedoms of the individual should not be through impositions and or the deprivation of the rights of other citizens.

The public at large can draw its own conclusions as to 'the system' and the operations of the Law Enforcement Agencies maintained by the United Kingdom. When individuals, who know of and are charged to apply the law, flagrantly breach it in order to offer protection to others who have themselves breached national laws (of which they are and should be fully aware) why should the ordinary citizen himself act any different?  When ministers in charge of the police and the Judiciary are 'conveniently protected' by their subordinates, because they elect to cover up complaints directed at and raised with the Ministers themselves, through suppression of the facts and or through incompetent responses* the final question is "WHO governs?  And How?"

Is the answer : " Through Juniors and Dereliction of Public Duty ? "

Read "The Breeding Grounds - case*"; download and print it, if you wish to use it as a C.A.P case. In that case because the police failed to take the necessary steps, called for from the onset, THEY SIMPLY promoted and encouraged crime.   Through their defaults they ALSO simply promoted and encouraged the problems and AS always INTENDED the services of the legal circles to which one and ALL have close affinity. The first young constable ignored the victim and in true Metropolitan Police practice HE simply wished to generate work and income for solicitors'*; a very common direction by public servants.*  The young constable determined that threats to property and life, violence, blackmail and intimidation were just civil matters.  In ordering the victim to spend funds with solicitors the constable just exhibited the malaise from within the LAW enforcement agencies.  In the UK the law exists ONLY WHEN YOU CAN AFFORD TO BUY your rights, unless some other can outbid you through the manipulations of the legal system the operatives from within offer to the highest bidder. The UK is, after all, an alleged Democracy where CAPITAL and money ARE THE ONLY COMMODITIES that count.  Humans are simply vehicles to be used by manipulative public servants and the dishonest and the criminally orientated and or motivated. Those who ARE ENCOURAGED by the state and public servants, especially from within the Law Enforcement Agencies, to feel free and to act as they please, at the expense of others.

Read the letter from an illiterate* in English, in law and in court practice, member of staff from within the Lord Chancellor's department. Draw your own conclusions. WHO, from within the United Kingdom, care to apply themselves to the Laws of Parliament?  Consider carefully the CoA ruling and our comments in respect of 'The Downing Street Years'*.  That august body, through blatant defaults to consider the law applicable in the case before them, elected instead to OFFER the usual service to the circles from within which they arose to public (judicial - most certainly but not judicious) office. Nothing but the usual from within the confines of UK courts. Denial of rights in law to THE CITIZENS and promotion of the cancerous growth industry (legal services) care of the merchants of misery (lawyers).

The CAMILA Project (concept 1981) Aims and Areas of Complaints / List and links to relevant material, web-pages and affiliated web-sites

The Breeding Grounds - case the police, the county court, the Lord Chancellor and his office, the Home Office, the Commission for Racial Equality ALL engaging in contempt for the law and the rights allegedly assured to ALL citizens(!) in a pseudo-democracy. Crime IMPOSED & ENDORSED by public servants, collectively on 'the serfs' in allegedly civilised states as organised by the master-craftsmen of the biggest and longest ongoing fraud on planet earth. Read the explicit appeal where the link takes readers and recognise why the offending abusers of public office ABANDONED THEIR PLANS FOR THE TARGETED SERF. Another appeal and the challenges 'thrown to an agent of the Lord Chancellor lead to the announcement of the Bill of Rights. In the meantime 'fraudsters club recruits' carried and carry on ignoring such positive results and simply aim for more of the same while promoting all manner of misrepresentations and FRAUDULENT IN INTENT ASSERTIONS to the victims they are pointed to or contact them care of the promotions the fraudsters club recruits benefit via the media's Intellectual Prostitutes. 

The Downing Street Years - case fair comment warranted AFTER the Court of Appeal exhibited its real role in an allegedly civilised pseudo-democracy where the courts are used in order to impose FRAUDULENTLY CREATED PECUNIARY ADVANTAGE TO THOSE from whose ranks the judiciary arise to public office as alleged judicious persons, serving the citizens through their presumed knowledge and RESPECT FOR THE LAW. A simple observation & REALITIES for students of law and the victims of the legal circles, the courts and all other public servants. [Refer to the words we point to at the top of most pages at this site - *Link] 

Letter from an illiterate public servant; marvel at the fraudulent representations by an alleged servant of the public who either knew not of the law or he was simply acting as an automaton, a programmed robot that could only forward a response from and on behalf of the Lord Chancellor as an illiterate in English, let alone the provisions of Law that applied in the matters related to..... decide for yourself reader: Was the person a robot or a moron? 

Juniors and Dereliction of Public Duty

The Confidential Fraud we expose exclusively, as the most offensive of fraud on the tax payers. Arrogantly organised constructive FRAUDS (plural intended) with the blessings of the police, Ministers, Media Barons and the Intellectual Prostitutes they retain and maintain in order to peddle and spread falsehood after falsehood in the longest running of frauds on humanity, the sons of men, the naive and gullible who are conditioned to act and behave like the 'fraudsters club recruits we are naming and exposing in our pages.

The creator of this website invites victims to access URrights & join him with other victims to expose & challenge abusers of trust & public office

• Every single person we name and expose in the above pages elected to ignore THEIR OBLIGATIONS TO REPORT (to 'the serfs' = 'the taxpayers'), THE ABUSERS OF PUBLIC OFFICE & PUBLIC FACILITIES. All were/are relying on the Intellectual Prostitutes, from within the media, to keep it all in the family closet.
• All, as typical twin-tongue hypocrites carry on complaining about the media for failing to report & for suppressing the facts and the realities they allegdely reported to the hard of hearing, to the otherwise committed angels blowing their silent trumpets for decades, all ready and gearing to welcome the expansion of the New World Order.
• Of such parts the contributions from and failings of the persons we name and expose, AS IF THEIR OWN SILENCE, THEIR FAILURES  & THEIR BLUNT OBSTRUCTIONS to the work and other actions by the creator of this website, Andrew Yiannides, treated by one and all as if non-existent with the execption when the wily Norman Scarth, set off to abuse the trust he was allowed to benefit from, while his parts and questionable activities / performance were under scrutiny. 
• One and all acted and act so because of their love for the rampant fraud on the national budget (on the uninformed taxpayers) as covered in the exclusive page, the page* [*L] EVERYONE SIMPLY IGNORED.
• Not one ever bothered to address the issues we expose in the explicit page, despite the fact that we have been pointing all of our contacts, since May 1992, to it all.
• Visitors, readers and researchers are urged / invited to access and read the letter which the Hon. Secretary of the Litigants In Person Society, Mr. Norman Scarth sent to the founder of human-rights, Mr. Andrew Yiannides, reproduced in the page .org/4deceit.htm* [*L].
• The author's statements, such as 'what for and why seek additional assistance', thereby spelling out his parts as a lover of it all.
• Common sense dictates, that he should have directed his request to his partners in deceptions aplenty, all of whom engage in fraudulent misrepresentations AND TO HAVE, WILFULLY, BEEN SUPPRESSING, FROM THE TAXPAYERS, THE FACTS OF LIFE RELATIVE TO THE RAMPANT ABUSE OF THE COURTS FACILITIES.
• All the while one and all were / are engaging in the scenarios we cover in the exclusive page, which page the author Mr Norman Scarth, and his partners in fraud aplenty, simply shoved in the dark corners of his/their perverted / corrupted mind(s).