||Lord Chancellor (Page created Feb. 1997)
others on Line and publish your Statement of Facts and the
Evidence you have. Use your rights in law [*Link] and ACT with others against the
offenders who Act In Contempt of the Law. Work towards the case FOR CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY [*Link
to how extensive the fraud through abuse of the courts facilities, in contempt of
Visitors are invited to access the site we point to & THEY MUST THEN access the explicit page where we reveal what transpired after we set about
challenging the denial of rights to the targeted, discarded father & dildo. Hell
broke loose after the gestation vessel went for a different dildo. She was simply being
used by the organisers of the RAMPANT FRAUD (on) & CORRUPTION (of) SOCIETIES THROUGH
ABUSE OF THE COURTS FACILITIES, evidently with the blessings of ALL Public Servants and
'the citizens(?) representatives in Parliament
On the right / main window, images & the text
of our two page letter to the Lord Chancellor in August 1998. [*Link]
|We publish below an article from The Times of
18th April 1996; it covers MORALS
Submissions covering Legal Aid
Facilities added to the 'page' in the panel bottom-left.
another article from The Times of 27th May 1997
Public to help choose judges' qualifies
referred to the Home Office by the Prime Minister in November 1999. *Link from here to our letter of 18th December
1998 to the Home Secretary & consider the simple fact that the issues referred and
pointed to were CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES by alleged Public Servants who engaged in BLUNT FRAUD
on the taxpayers & the national Budget, hence the reasons why the Prime Minister
directed that the submissions to 10 him, at Downing Street be forwarded to the Home
Secretary / Home Office..
(Back to Police: letter from Tony Blair National
from Prime Minister (above)
|We thanked the Prime Minister for recognising that
criminal activities are matters for the police to investigate and for referring the issues
to the Homer Secretary / Office.
The FAX below was called for after the member of the
human-rights.org Community on Line, had been informed that 'three judges, who looked at
the application to the ECHR, had determined that the case had not been concluded in the
UK. The author of the letter informed the member, also, that the documented
evidence lodged at the ECHR would be destroyed in a year's time. Arrogance or a joke? Read
below our submissions to the promoter of the proposition to destroy the evidence. READ OF
YOUR RIGHTS - the law applicable to the facts and to the proposed action.
Link to the TEXT
in HTML for links to and from the content of the explicit content / document.
|The response, below is from the European Court of Human Rights.
The exceptional action taken by the ECoHR staff came
about as a result of unacceptable assertions & appropriate challenges by us. [*Link]
The article below is from the Daily Mail of 24th May 2003.
Just a typical example of the services arranged by the Protection Racket Operators.
For more examples that DO ESTABLISH the validity as to Facilities For Rampant Fraud
Through The Courts we invite visitors readers researchers to access FOUR briefly
stated comparable cases that exhibit more than enough. [*Link]
November 1996, in the news ongoing attempts
to change the record, at the European Court of Human
Rights, attached and arising out of the activities of solicitors & barristers engage
in with the blessings of judicial chair occupants, police and Ministers in control of the
judiciary & police.
[*Link from here to THE challenges attached to one of the cases
pointed to, in the letter to Lord Mackay, published in this page]. *Link from here,
also, to the image of a letter we sent to the abusers of the Legal Aid facilities in one
of the cases pointed to the Lord Chancellor. The text of the letter in HTML format for
links to and from is published in the page *linked to from here
||Page last revised: June 20, 2012.
reconstruction for better navigation. Ongoing improvements and additions to existing
PAGE HIGHLIGHT: Lord Irvine addressing the Home Affairs Select Committee on 2nd November 1999.
"I would be the first to admit that Legal Aid has
not been the most popular public social service. What my party won the general
election on was the proposition and the pledge that we put schools and hospitals first,
not legal aid first." [*Link to the relevant page]
VISITORS ARE URGED to access and READ THE IMPORTANT
update and ADDENDA we were obliged to introduce in January 2002.
We had no choice but to REPORT THE CRIMES TO THE TREASURY;
our observations and knowledge of the constructive frauds made us accessories if we kept
quiet, like the alleged victims who work towards the implementation of the schemes by the
abductors and rapists of Justice, the Goddess; it was such a person who had been wasting
out time and securing support through many a crocodile tear. You will find the
addenda statement at the top of the Updated Pages File. We are sure that you will share
with us our concerns and most profound disappointment at and with persons who adopt and
promote activities which they know are nothing but downright crimes.
We refer to our exclusive page where we expose (as
conscientious, law abiding citizens) the Confidentiality Between
Fraudsters that exists care of the BEST OPEN SECRET.
|Guidelines on Navigating through the extensive material: access instructions.
As part of the reconstruction process our new pages
(and pages where changes and additions have been implemented, the improved / amended
pages) are endorsed with the link 'Page Changes and the date of the last changes, at the
top of the left column/margin, below the file name (*....xxxxx.htm *). The link takes
visitors to a List of the changes implemented in the page. These include new material and
links from relevant paragraphs to other or new relevant material in the page and or
in other pages. For further clarification email: webmaster@
Home-Page for The Lord Chancellor
and his office
Access and read the letter to Lord Mackay, in October 1995
and consider the images of articles in the press, thereafter, reproduced in this page
This and other associated pages are dedicated to matters arising out of the free for all practices
through which the violations of the rights of citizens in the course of court proceedings
by the legal professions. Entertained, and or freely aided, and abetted by the staff
of the courts; also in many an instance by persons who purportedly act in a JUDICIOUS
(do note the word your Lordship) capacity and not merely through the much revered, and
relied upon, independence of the restraints of law, while in judicial office for
and in pursuit of other goals and other ulterior motives. Such
'mentalities' were exposed in the Downing Street Years* when their Lordships determined that copyright law existed not
and that the threatened infringement of copyright ought to be allowed in order to
generate, thereafter, more work for the legal boffins and the circles from within which
our judiciary rise to public office, allegedly as independent, unbiased and impartial
'judicial persons' who ought not to ignore the principles of the laws they are meant to uphold and apply in all instances before the
advise below to French judges. Cross refer the issues raised through Mr Geoffrey
Harold Scriven's affidavit*. It covers the activities of Legal/Judicial Cabals (as
their victim coined) that operate freely in the United Kingdom. Consider the responses
citizens get from the Lord Chancellor's department and or office. The rights in law of the
citizens ARE violated systematically in UK courtrooms, and fair comment IS called for*,
such as we make through our pages in respect of the 'routine - responses' from
the Lord Chancellor's department.*
|1995, in April 'The Times', reports
that in FRANCE the judges are directed by the Ministry of Justice
NOTE the closing
three lines and OUR SUGGESTION (left hand box with scanned 'Times' article on the
right). For over FOUR years we were presenting facts and realities to many in public
office and to THE MEDIA.
NO ONE CARED. All were and appear to be serving other plans in
contempt of 'THE LAW'. No one cared about the facts of life within Local
Authorities, where the staff had been / were / are operating their own Housing Benefit
scams and organised frauds on the taxpayers and helpless landlords, abandoned to the
whims of fraudsters in control of public services and the legal system, the retired
citizens with a small income from their investment in a residential, ex matrimonial /
family home.>>> The citizens' own PENSION rights to the products of their
Now we are told the Lord Chancellor is acting AT LAST, as
in the marquee below qualified. The police, promised to
bring about prosecutions against persons who worked with and WERE USING others for their
own distribution schemes for the Housing Benefit Funds. The funds were/are ENTRUSTED TO
LOCAL AUTHORITIES by Central Government to meet the costs for the occupation of
properties, belonging to private landlords, by claimants. WE await to see how other public
servants are to behave now and how they are treated by the participating in and benefiting
from the scams, defaulting police authorities.
1995, June-July, The FESTIVAL OF RIGHTS
LONDON INTERNATIONAL EVENT
In the course of the Festival
of Rights (1995) Mr Andrew Yiannides submitted that: -
public needs a right by law, whereby any citizen can object to the appointment of any
person to judicial office by stating the grounds upon which the person should not be
appointed. When such a 'safety valve is in place' persons aspiring to judicial office will
know that the public is looking over their shoulders and in the course of their legal
services career will think twice before acting improperly when representing members of the
public". [*Link to a press release 2 years after these submissions by Mr A
Yiannides, in the course of the debate 'Can We Trust The
Judges', The Festival of Rights, Westminster, London]
submissions were made in the course of the debate 'Can We Trust Our Judges?' [*Link from here to
and were repeated in a letter to the Rt. Hon. Paul Boateng who received also the
abridged copy of "The Breeding Grounds - case"* published in our
pages. It was also later submitted to the Stephen Lawrence* Inquiry; Permission was
sought by and granted to the Legal Action Group to use the stated case, in their
Back cover of the programme for the Festival. It points to the
ideals behind the need for the creation of 'The Alternative Press' (TAP) & the
'Citizens Alternative Precedent - cases'.
- WE state above the founder's attendance and his submissions.
We welcomed the news in May 1999 about cowboy lawyers (*Link to page - Press Release).
- We have published an explicit letter to his Lordship (that
was submitted also to some media editors).
- The demands in the letter very clear.
- The parts that court officers and Legal Aid Board (now Legal
Services Commission) PLAYED AND PLAY in the promotion of CIUKU Enterprises, ongoing as we
type these words.
- The long letter to the Lord Chancellor, with our founder's
demands in July 1999, covers much and specific cases / court file - records.
- The letter appears in thumbnail images in the left column;
the content is published in HTML for and because of the facility to link to and from words
in the content.
- Compare the exposures and the challenges in our pages and
the pages at other web-sites that we point or link you to.
- Consider the defaults and omissions by and from within
movements / organisations and others who allegedly work for and on behalf or in the
interest of the citizens / victims, that we point to
- Consider the defaults, the omissions and the deceitful and
behind the scenes 'blunt activities' by persons who contacted us (were directed /
introduced to us) AS challenging victims of the rampant FRAUD THROUGH THE LEGAL SYSTEM AND
ABUSE OF THE COURTS PROCESSES AND FACILITIES.
- Consider the convenient defaults by the media barons and
their editors, who systematically throw dust in the eyes of the citizens and or offer half
baked potatoes as information, to the naive, the gullible and the misinformed as of junior
- PREPARE for the revelations and crystal clear truths and
realities going back thousands of years that could not and ought not to have been ignored
by 'allegedly moral leaders of humans'. We hinted at what was to come in the course of the
Extraordinary General Meeting that the leaders of the LIPS crowd/mob convened in 1999.
- Many an attempt and 'tempting (as the mischievous fraudsters
saw things) invitations and suggestions, in the main TO SIMPLY CASH IN, through knowledge
of the system (all were referred to Andrew's reply to 'the judge who reviewed the
activities of one and all 'in 'The Breeding Grounds - case' (*Link
) following submissions to the Lord Chancellor's Private Office, in 1992, as with
submissions in 1997 when the Lord Chancellor announced the Bill of Rights (*Link and read first the last Order demanded on appeal before you read
Our submissions to the Home Secretary in
December 1998, produced results from the government [*Link from here to the evidence
including the results as reported in the local press].
Haringey Council received extra funds to cope with the blatant invitations to 'refugees
and asylum seekers to the land of milk and honey*, which is how Haringey is
marketed by many. The promoted influx to the land of the free for all; dishonesty and
deception as practised by public servants, within our Law Enforcement Agencies sphere of
influence and blessings [*Link from here to case stated via appeal].
We expose some of the facts in our Local Authority pages and we publish the evidence, FORGERIES used and relied upon in order to steal and
misappropriate Housing Benefit funds. The relevant county court officers were aware of the
practices by Council staff and officers; they ignored, statements and evidence attached to
other affidavits besides the one we now publish with the attached exhibits. The letter
from the Legal Aid Board, exhibit arose out of abuses in the case that we referred to in
the Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority pages.
The Chief Superintendent of the police,
within Haringey division, and Sir John Stephens QPM will presently be challenged to
account for the performance of the officers under their command, and for other public
servants who misconduct in public office. The police seen to be 'ignoring 'The LAW'
and the evidence, particularly after other public servants imposed also criminal damages
to the properties of targeted citizens. Such activities (and convenient defaults in the
performance of their public duties) in the promotion of their choice of society.
We refer to the society founded and resting
on dishonesty, deceptions, fraudulent misrepresentations and BLUNT FORGERIES.
Forgeries and false instruments lacking material facts and accountability by the authors.
Of such facts and documented evidence the practices 'in the free for all areas we cover in
our web-site'. All care of 'the relevant county court services' in the fraudulent
distribution arrangements of the Housing Benefit funds, rents secured for and belonging to
others. And reliance on such services by and from the 'relevant county court' referred to
in a letter from a member of staff at Haringey Council who wrote with impunity in March
1996 (*Link to the
Following exchanges with the
Prime Minister and his private office we wrote on 25th January 2000
to the Lord Chancellor and demanded of his 'dedicated team' (which the Lord
Chancellor set up in his department) to call in to their office the county court file
pertaining to the Housing Benefit Funds, constructive fraud attempts and the indulgences
of all participants in the National Scandal within Haringey, in North London. We demanded
that the dedicated team lists all documents the architects of 'their kind of services'
provide to the unsuspecting; to the public who fall victims to ILL legal services as we
quote in the dedication panel at the top of most pages of our web-site. GREED*
and no respect for the rights in law of others. No respect to LIFE, as the targeted
victims AE ENTITLED TO without impositions by criminals, let alone public servants who
misconduct in public office and operate as 'automatons in states founded on BLUNT
DICTATORIAL and feudal practices by self appointed Lords and Masters operating from within
Right to a life of ones choice recklessly
STOLEN and abducted by the dishonest and deceitful who misconduct in public office*
in contempt of the evidence and 'The LAW'* thereby forcing the citizens (not serfs)
into a life wasted in front of the very offenders who steal/abducted their rights in law
and their lives away, just as the very same circles abducted the Goddess
Justice in order to rape her daily in their theatres of 'No Recordings - No Cameras'
because they need to protect themselves from the facts and the realities of THEIR VILE
|1995 July, Opposition's
Spokes-Person for Legal Affairs in the House of Commons, appreciates
- The letter on the right with Mr Yiannides'
compliments to all converts-to & lovers of the system of operations through abuse of
the courts' facilities. (*F4 most important)
- We refer to persons who crossed our paths
or were sent along, with malice aforethought; all acting as maintenance engineers and as
lovers of fraud aplenty on the taxpayers, the cash under the table*(LB) as arranged and organised by the managers and
controllers of the legal system, the courts..... WAKE UP SERFS, access the explicit
revelations in our exclusive page from here.
- The taxpayers kept in the dark while
their contributions to the national budget are simply plundered through abuse of the
courts' facilities, with victims of the bluntly organised fraud electing to keep it
all under their hats. (*F5 for
developments in 2010)
- All lovers the most offensive of the
black economy running amok which NO ONE HAS EVER ADDRESSED.
- Their objective, to entice or cause Mr
Andrew Yiannides to adopt their evil ways.
- We expose and name some, in explicit
pages, because they were not content to go away but WILFULLY SET ABOUT INTERFERING IN OUR
WORK & OBJECTIVES. Operating in the background, as the evil within them and or above
them, dictate/d/s to such fraudsters.
- Visitors to these pages, victims chasing
Justice, readers of the material we make public and researchers should access first the
page where we make public the arrangements in place, as created & organised by the
representatives of the citizens and the administrators of Law.
- Arrogant abuse of trust and the courts'
facilities for RAMPANT FRAUD on the taxpayers, 'the serfs' who are kept in the dark about
such arrangements. The 'citizens' kept in the dark, not merely by the abusers of Public
Office and judicial chair occupation, or simply the media barons and the Intellectual
Prostitutes retained and maintained by the last, BUT BY MANY AN ALLEGED VICTIM -
CHALLENGER WHO CONVERTED TO LOVERS OF THAT WHICH THEY SET OUT TO COMPLAIN OF & ABOUT
IN THE FIRST INSTANCE.
- We refer to persons who elected to and ARE
operating as *Fraudsters Club Recruits*, to persons who sold their soul (conscious) to the
devil. To persons who made and make it their business to assault and insult the
intelligence and integrity of persons who did not succumb to the blackmail or go for the
baited hook that lands morons and illiterates in law in the nets of the criminals behind
it all and in control of pseudo-democracies. (*F3)
Short & to the point, a letter from an active Politician /
professional with legal background.
A legal professional and politician of stature, reads submissions he received from Mr.
Andrew Yiannides, the creator of this website, with interest, Dreamers, converts to and
lovers of the abused court facilities, as persons who serve other interests than what they
promote to victims of the legal circles and the Law Enforcement Agencies in the United
Kingdom, assert and distribute all manner of maligned diatribe as part of their
co-operation with and services to abusers of trust and public office.
|In October 1995 an explicit and succinct,
on many issues, letter to the Lord Chancellor. Arrogant abuse of the Courts'
facilities and gross contempt for rules of procedure, evidence and THE LAW applicable.
BLUNT FRAUDULENT ACTIVITIES & use of the courts at the RCJ for conversion of
targeted assets to legal costs* [*Link from here to the creme de la creme case
when A BLUNT FORGERY was created and introduced, in High Court proceedings, by the legal
boffins as part of their invisible services to fraudsters who indulged in commercial fraud.
Of such activities the creation of Crimes Incorporated United
Kingdom Unlimited >>>.CIUKU Enterprises
3 October 1995
Lord Mackay of Clashfern
The Lord Chancellor
Houses of Parliament
LONDON SW1A 0AA
My Ref. : 30THJOTJ
Your Ref. : Judicial (?) Services
STRICTLY FOR THE LORD CHANCELLOR’S PERSONAL ATTENTION (Delegate not)
Any person opening mail for the Lord Chancellor to ensure HE RECEIVES THIS LETTER (Suppress
Recorded Delivery No. DY 7024 99319GB
Enclosed herewith the following self explanatory copies of
communications / documents:-
- My explicit and succinct letter of 29th August 1995 to Master Dyson
- A reply to the above, from a Mrs J Cole(?), dated 4 September 1995.
- My junior brother’s explicit and succinct letter dated 15th August 1992 (to
which reference is made in the first letter) as was perused by Master Dyson on 23rd
- Copy of the Originating Summons as was secured from the Courts Records.
- Copy of my letter of 2 October 1995 to Mrs Theresia Williamson and Miss Mary Winch.
I hereby demand that you personally
initiate enquiries of the relevant Department(s) and respond to the following demands:-
||WHERE BE the relevant Court seal (*F5) [Link
from here to the page where the facts behind the case are
partly stated] and fee endorsements on the Originating Summons? WHAT
IS GOING ON AND HOW ARE COURT PROCESSES being used ?
||You will duly note that in the response dated 4
September 1995 MR C JOANNIDES (my junior brother) merited no consideration, he was WRITTEN
OFF by those who systematically abuse the Court’s processes for personal gain (I draw
your attention to the Old Testament ? HOW was Adam’s paradise (Nirvana) terminated by
God? Who used Who?
I beg to refer you personally to earlier communications from my person
in respect of other abuse4s of the Courts’ processes and blatant breaches of Public
Office and DUTY attached to violations of the most fundamental of Human Rights : JUSTICE,
a non existent element in our courts. One and all are of the opinion that the Courts are
simply THE vehicles through which those practising within can create income generating
conditions for one another at the expense of the public at large. Your office received
copy of a telegram from "The Fleecing of the Legal Aid Funds – case" (A Mary
Winch Affair in the making at about the same time as her case was going on in another
Court and another part of the UK). Your office received Copies of FORGERIES as endorsed on
High Court Documents (Order, Notice of Appeal, etc.,) and part of an Affidavit by a
solicitor endorsed with blatant invitation (indirect) to a Judge to deny Justice and to
obstruct, corrupt and pervert it through the usual machinations and ploys, such as the
denial to access copies of the relevant Affidavits in the case at hand in order to create
further COURT APPLICATIONS until such time as the challenger runs out of funds, THEN to be
denied also LEGAL AID through CREATED technicalities (as happened in the Mary Winch
Affair) leading to the silencing of the lambs who enter the slaughter houses of our
Judicial System, fraught with criminal activities.
AND I beg to draw your attention to the following facts, which YOU
should be able to recognise as giving rise and concerns as attached to my need to apply
for the relevant copies of the documents perused at Court by the legal boffins and the
experts at fleecing the public of funds THROUGH perpetual APPEALS and Court applications
BY DESIGN and through abuses of the need to revert to Court proceedings only to find out
that there is no such thing as Justice, simply a net and web of machinations and
theatrical productions. DO NOTE my junior brother’s reference to DECADENCE !!!! Fail not
to seek clarification from Master Dyson as to how he overlooked that statement and SEEK OF
HIM TO JUSTIFY his assertions about my brother not liking me (Furnish please copies of
Master Dyson’s Psychology Diplomas / Degrees). I fail to see, recognise such element in
my junior brother’s letter; therein, however he makes reference to one of the cases I
will be exposing through publication of my explicit work on THE machinations by the legal
Reference is made in my letter AS ARGUED before Master Dyson) to my
younger brother and an alleged and or presumed mental condition. THE only person
recognised and referred to by the Court (presumably by the legal boffins) is my younger
brother’s EVE. That Eve had been separated from my younger brother for over FIVE YEARS.
Whilst it may argued that if there had been no divorce proper, she was still his next of
keen, IF CERTIFIED. THE IMPLICATION in this instance being that Master Dyson RECOGNISED(S)
that one and all in the alleged HIGH COURT Action / proceedings were using THAT EVE for
their own financial gain and benefit as events proved subsequently in 1992/3. (Master
Dyson’s notes on 23 August 1995 should qualify his observations and thoughts on the
THE FACT IS AND REMAINS that I have been denied copies of the relevant
affidavits as attached to and perused in the course of those Court proceedings(?). Such
failures and activities amount to OBSTRUCTION TO JUSTICE. Seeking to create, through such
obstructions and denials of rights (of the right to KNOW WHAT was asserted to the Court in
the course of the ALLEGED(!) Court proceedings) need for Appeals and further abuses of
Court Time and funds (through legal costs and fees) in itself amounts TO
CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS by persons who should know better.
YOUR LORDSHIP IF THERE BE NO GROUNDS TO COVER UP CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES
by the so called honourable officers of the High Court then YOU will ensure that the
relevant copies of the affidavits perused and adduced to Court by the legal boffins WILL
BE MADE AVAILABLE TO ME FORTHWITH and without any waffle and or excuses. I did
forward to the Department a copy of my reactions to the income generating practices and
conditions as arose out of the Judgement in "The Downing Street Years". THE
injunction application by The Sunday Times. Copyright Law exists NOT(!) and if it does, it
is in invisible ink, see and know of it NOT(!). The case and judgement as I wrote to
Andrew Neil at the time, was not a matter of ‘a thief’s charter (his words) but like
that of the parents (author / copyright owners) of a child (book) held at knife point with
threats to cut the child to pieces (extracts) by a criminal (Daily Mirror), the parents
calling upon the police (the COURTS) to save (stop the threatened infringements of
copyright) the child AND THE POLICE REFUSING TO DO SO (not within their power ??) but
proceeding to ASSERT "Let him kill the child WE CAN THEN HAVE A TRIAL FOR
MURDER". And that your Lordship sums up our judicial services. INCOME GENERATING
PRACTICES for one another whilst overlooking Parliament’s Laws. IGNORING APPLICATIONS,
DISREGARDING EVIDENCE and going against the grain of common sense and natural JUSTICE,
so long as the criminals who are licensed CAN MAKE THEIR KILLINGS in our courts.
In the past YOUR OFFICE received communications, as stated in my letter
of response to Miss Mary Winch and Mrs Theresia Williamson. I refer of course to the rogue
builder case, which fir the purposes of my work and exposures will be presented as 2The
Breeding Grounds – case"; it involved THE POLICE, THE CIVIL AND MAGISTRATES’
COURTS and YOUR DEPARTMENT. The rogue builder was aided, abetted and PROTECTED throughout
by one and all. EVEN FORGERIES (false statements in writing, later COUNTERED / CHANGED)
were eventually submitted by COURT OFFICERS (Magistrates Court) in order to wrongly and
with intent support FALSE ASSERTIONS BY THE POLICE. THE USUAL practices when the Law
Enforcement Agencies (Investigative / Administrative) treat the citizens as
presumed morons and or serfs of the Middle Ages, and not as citizens with HUMAN RIGHTS.
I demand proper and appropriate attention to this letter; I expect
co-operation and above all dedication TO JUSTICE. I DEMAND COPIES OF THE AFFIDAVITS as
applied for. I expect no further obstructions to JUSTICE and NO FURTHER IMPOSITIONS
FOR AND OR NEED FOR ENDLESS COURT APPLICATIONS AND OR APPEALS(!) as habitually imposed on
the unsuspecting public by those who simply aid and abet the silver lining of the pockets
of the dishonest who abuse the Court’s processes at the expense of the revenue victims
THE ISSUE IS SIMPLE:- "If the only recorded person
FAILED TO INFORM THE COURT OF THE SEPARATION between the two defendants in the action
(AND HER SOLICITORS WERE FULLY AWARE OF SUCH FACTS) then FRAUD On the
Court itself WAS PERPETRATED. Refusal, therefore, to allow access to the
affidavits Implies and Signals that the Court Itself was aware of the fraud and Master
Dyson was consciously seeking to obstruct and hinder JUSTICE. As in "The Downing
Street Years" and the myriad of court cases, the judiciary serve no justice but the
FINANCIAL interests of those from whose circles they arose to public office. In my letter
to Mary Winch, wherein I seek permission to use a letter disclosing MALPRACTICE (by the
Public Trustee solicitors) I stated that I refuse to accept Master Dyson had never heard
of her case and or, for that matter, that of Miss Peggy Wood.
Your Lordship, in the course of a debate (Can We Trust The Judges? -
Human Rights Convention, Westminster June 1995) I pointed out that until such time when
the ordinary citizen be afforded the opportunity AND RIGHT to challenge the appointments
of persons to Judicial office (thereby causing those who aspire to such positions to
beware of the public looking over their shoulders) Justice in the United Kingdom will
remain in the gutter where it is now. A power in themselves ? No your Lordship.
Through Independence of the Judiciary simply FREE TO INDULGE and create, as in £"1
suit breeds 20"; such a wise observation was not borne of fickle minds but of
observers of THE PRACTICES as freely indulged into from within.
As THE Supremo of JUDICIAL SERVICES I expect and demand of YOU
personally TO Supervise and Justify to the author of this letter THE PRACTICES of YOUR
SUBORDINATES, otherwise act and furnish the copies of the Affidavits. Seek not to go down
the road of the Constructive Frauds :- "Apply to Court" etc., for my chosen
route is simpler and will expose one and ALL FOR WHAT THEY ARE. None will have ANY
Defence; they cannot plead and or rely on ignorance of the law because of their own
65 Abbott’s Park Road
London E10 6HU
Copy to Lord Justice Woolf.
the letter above and then [*Link to the page where the images of copy of the letter, as
sent, are published]. Do
note that the letter was delivered by Recorded Delivery post to the Houses of Parliament
NOT to the Lord Chancellor's Department and IT WAS FOR HIS PERSONAL ATTENTION. At the
page, where the link takes one, some of the elements covered are expanded upon.
Visitors, readers and researchers should consider the simple fact that one was DEALING
WITH ORGANISED CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES in the name of Justice. Read of the tip of the iceberg
and HOW followers of the teachings from the most vile of works, ever to have been
presented to mankind, engage in the very practice and the element we point to in one of
our pages; just one of the many extracts which diligent persons, who STUDY, not simply
read the work of *the crafty ones*, should refer to, before misrepresenting it 'through
their conditioned and indoctrinated states' as the creators of it all arranged and
organise(d) for sale to the naive and gullible, 'to the sons of men on planet earth' by
the agents & affiliates of the creators, also blind followers of such works.
In 1996, a year
after the above challenges to the Lord Chancellor with the pointers to the facts of life,
Lord Mackay was reported to be doing the rounds in Europe. Evidently he was seeking
Pan-European alignment with the practices in the UK courts, as the headline below
qualifies. Only morons could possibly fail to note that the challenges in October 1995,
related to arrogant abuse of public office by the police and judicial chair occupants. The
denial of rights part of *intended damages to the targeted serf*. Needless to
say it was all part of and in line with the imposition of the PLANNED-FOR, *DICTATORSHIPS
THROUGH THE COURTS IMPOSED*, as covered in the words / conclusions of Mr Andrew Yiannides
over 20 years earlier. [*Link from here to the extract from a
letter to a senior politician on the very issue]
*Access from here the page where we published the criminal
activities indulged into as organised enterprises by alleged servants of the law
and Justice : the police, the courts and alleged Public Servants operating out of the
Department run and managed by non-elected Lord Chancellors for centuries. Read of the
arrogance of the police, the convenient and criminal in essence defaults, omissions and
the promotion of false states and blatant lies by County Court Staff & Officers &
WAKE UP 'SERFS'.
from here the page where we publish another appeal (on
the same violated principles as the one in the above link) and recognise the modus
operandi, the endemic system of operations instigated and operated by alleged
Officers of Justice & the Law, the police, solicitors, barristers and abusers of
judicial chair occupation. NOTE the ORDERS SOUGHT on Appeal, then recognise why the
Court subsequently told the agents / legal representatives of Enfield Council to enter, of
their own, a non suite case. Readers & Researchers, taxpaying 'serfs' should take
on board our concerns and consider the root causes -plural intended- for our concerns,
after accessing and reading also of the arrangements in place for fraud aplenty on 'the
taxpaying serfs' and the corruption of conditioned morons who endorse 'the constructive
frauds industry, instigated, processed and executed through abuse of the courts facilities
as we cover and expose in the exclusive page we point to below.
*Access from here the page where we relate and cover the
ARROGANT ABUSE OF THE COURTS FACILITIES by alleged servants of the public and
purported / promoted officers of the Law, the Courts & Justice. Recognise,
after choking on the criminal in intent activities we point to, WHY WE NAME &
EXPOSE -in our pages- a number of alleged victim-challengers who were not
simply ready to endorse the criminal activities by going for the cash under the table
-undisclosed, suppressed, not freely accessible to, nor passed on or pointed to the
taxpayers- and organising themselves in affiliated networks of alleged legal
experts and gurus. One and all, most eager and ready to use new conditioned
victims of the legal circles and the Law Enforcement Agencies -officers of the abused
court facilities- for MORE OF THE SAME, FRAUDULENTLY CREATED REWARDS TO PERSONS WHO ADOPT
the New World Order Code of Ethics by endorsing and suppressing 'the confidential
plundering of the national budget, covered and exposed in our pages.
*Access from here the page where we relate the constructive
frauds on a woman victim of abused court activities in a divorce case after she
had been subjected to earlier fraudulent court proceedings in a matter of a constructively
engineered court case intended to lead to a property repossession, care of the scripts and
the scenarios a firm of solicitors set in motion when acting for her, acting also for her
father / parents and for a building society too. In the course of both scenarios false
instruments lacking accountability, and a blunt falsification, a FORGED document after she
had signed it, which criminal activity the police confirmed (after the events) on
investigation. YET THE POLICE FAILED TO BRING ABOUT ANY PROSECUTIONS, in the usual manner
when it comes to ORGANISED FRAUD BY THE LEGAL CIRCLES. While at the page the links take
one to, SCROLL down to the part where 'the organised fraud through the courts instigated
and by the courts endorsed, processed and executed are covered / clarified. From the first
test, the alleged victim was put to, she established beyond any doubt that she was just
another aspiring 'fraudsters-club-recruit', simply a stooge who was introduced by the LIPS
crowd/mob simply seeking and aiming for assistance to secure the usual REWARD to the
conditioned victims of the legal circles and the courts so long as they agree to keep
it all under their hats and BETTER STILL TO KEEP IT ALL in the family closet, the family
of the fraudsters-club-recruits, the club she aspired to join, like those who introduced
her to Andrew Yiannides, the founder of human-rights.org and
|1997, May, main
headline news for 'The Times', proposals relative to judicial appointments
And the maligned, evil fraudsters club recruits, who made contact
with offers of co-operation for the DATA warranted (see / read
'The CAMILA Project') carried on failing to deliver upon their promises and
undertakings, well over two years by then. Worse, despite such an important announcement
from the government, when over 80 of 'the organised / guided / used morons' received a
simple invitation [*Link] to co-operate in the matter of "No more theatrics and blunt
suppression of the truth, what goes on within the confines of the courts", each and
EVERY ONE FAILED TO ACT AS THE INVITATION REQUESTED. Time was of the essence, because ALL
were aware of the reasons, the grounds and the purposes for the explicit request. Six
years later, in March 2003, one of their soul-mates wrote to Mr Andrew Yiannides,
asking for assistance on the very issue which he and his mates contemptuously
ignored in 1997
|The news, miraculously after 'morons', received the simple
invitation to act as their managers had undertaken.
'The Times' article by David Panic QC - 'Why the Lord Chancellor is right'. The author
informs the readers of such conclusions following Lord Irvine's speech at the annual
conference of the solicitors. [*Link
from here to the appeal posted to Lord Irvine at the House
of Lords & consider the realities in the background. Then enquire of the alleged
victim-challengers we name & expose WHY they elected to ignore the challenges released
in the Public Domain, IF their only interest was not and remains to cash in on the
facilities for FRAUD through abuse of the courts].
readers and researchers should click on the image on the left and read the article when it
is blown up to a size well in excess of the width of most normal video display units.
Using the scroll facility at the bottom of the screen facilitates access to all columns. NOTE: In due course we are to release the text of the article in
HTML format for links to and from the content.
|1997, in December
Lord Chancellor Irvine of Large ANNOUNCED THE BILL OF RIGHTS
The government's intentions to
introduce such an Act was no surprise to Andrew, bearing in mind that TWICE the Lord
Chancellor's office and Department had been challenged to point to an Act of Parliament
whereby successive governments as of 1948 - 1951 EVER ACTED SO, indicating the governments
(of any political coloration) to honour the United Kingdom's commitments, as signatory to
the European Convention on Human Rights, from 1948 to 1998.
In the meantime fraudsters who sought and made contact with Mr
Yiannides THREE YEARS EARLIER, made promises and undertook to co-operate in and for the
creation of the DATA WARRANTED; also to participate in and for the creation of
documentaries in video format. All simply busy, in organising themselves as the
alternative legal services. Such persons, as victims of 'the system in operation',
all ready, willing and in a position to create a new school of actors raring to go and
participate in theatrical productions in the courts. All aiming to use victims, they were
/ are pointed to, as the managers / organisers of the LIPS crowd/mob who contacted Mr
Andrew Yiannides soon after the lodging of the explicit appeal at Bow County Court, had
been pointed. Alleged victims(!) of the master-minds behind the creation of the biggest
fraud on the taxpayers, the frauds if not instigated just organised / reorganised and
taken to fruition through the legal circles and the courts. In short ORGANISED CRIMES
ongoing through the courts with the blessings (not tacit approval) of Ministers as of, the
time of the delivery of the New Testament, to the naive and gullible by the ARCHITECTS OF
We urge victims, readers and researchers to access and consider
the element that raises the big question at the top of most of our pages. We
refer to the alleged inherent jurisdiction of judicial chair occupants to create of their
own and use such a facility through which to absolve public servants (used, as far as we
are concerned by successive governments) to defraud the serfs of their assets and rights
in law, which rights, the judiciary themselves as alleged guardians of PARLIAMENT'S LAW
are sworn to uphold, in allegedly civilised Democratic States, States that allegedly rest
and are founded on Law & Order..... the judiciary's perverted creations born of FALSE
No prizes for guessing WHY Lord Chancellor Irvine spoke of and
stressed that MORALS & MORALITY were to be the foundations upon which Justice was to
be 'dispensed with by the judiciary, care of the provisions the Bill was to incorporate
from the CONVENTION RIGHTS, only a mere 50 years after signing up to it.
1998, we posted explicit submissions to the new Lord Chancellor, Lord Irvine
On the right, images of copy of our two-page letter to Lord Irvine, the Lord Chancellor,
in August 1998. Anyone who cannot see why in December of the same year the government
acted, as soon as the Home Secretary received our letter, should seek help. [*Link from here to the
succinctly stated realities, as submitted to the Home Secretary].
Lordship did receive a copy of the exclusive appeal we settled which the targeted private
Landlords lodged at Edmonton County Court, the previous year. In the meantime as we were
still casting our nets in the direction / area of those we recognised to have been
deceitful fraudsters club recruits [*Link
from here to list of exposed], we did not release full details of the Housing Benefit
fraudulent claims by the Local Authority. We elected so to act, simply because not one of
the alleged victim / challengers who contacted us asked to have access / read the appeal,
as lodged. However, all were informed at which County Court the arrogant denial of rights
and blunt obstructions to Justice. [*Link from
here to the appeal]
December the public is informed that the Judges were up in arms against reform....
Most impressive the performance of those who set about
reforming the structure of British Society. They, who acted in breach of and arrogant
violation of the rights of the citizens [*Link to the right violated, as determined and
directed by the government of the day] were up in arms and against any reforms in the
administration of Justice. We need only point to the explicit UNCONSTITUTIONAL &
UNDEMOCRATIC prerogative which the criminals in control of the courts created for
themselves as absolute Lords of the Realm and Masters of 'the serfs', otherwise
referred to as 'subjects'..... subjected to the whims of the corrupters, the
corrupt and the corrupted, as the founder of Human-Rights recognised during
the tribulations he was subjected to by the legal circles, abusers of judicial chair
occupation, the police and the member of Parliament purportedly representing the victim of
The MP may well have been justified and excluded from any accusations /
allegations that he was acting in contempt of 'The Law' and the rights assured to the
'citizens of ALL European states and nations' [*Link
from here to an Article of the E.U assuring citizens protection from fraud and
corruption through the Combined Treaties]. The MP, Mr O'Haloran was not of a legal
background and in fact he was the only MP who never opened his mouth in the House of
Commons. He did so, however, when he crossed the floor after announcing that he was
joining the gang of four who were disillusioned with the Labour Party's performance at the
submissions to the Legal Aid Board; documented evidence, & copies of
the FORGERIES USED BY THE CRIMINALS WERE
DELIVERED in support of and as proof of the scams operated at a much higher level within
the Local Authorities. The Legal Aid Board was informed that other evidence
existed / exists* in support of our submissions.
Below the FAX as transmitted to the staff at the European Court of Human Rights
We release the content in the public domain, for and in the
interest of the victims of the rampant free-for-all that abounds in pseudo-democracies. We
act, as we do, in order that our Lords (judicial chair occupants) and Masters (Public
Servants and the legal circles) might begin to recognise that the law is no ass and that
'the 'subjects' do have rights, secured and assured in law'. There exists, however, a
simple proviso: "Provided, of course that the 'subjected' are not treated as 'serfs'
and that they are duly informed by those who know of and accept the founder's simple and
realistic proclamation that:
"The law is no ass;
an ass is the person who believes it".
opinion by a young student who was reading 'The Pickwick Papers' by Charles Dickens while
at Secondary Grammar School. As a business man after recognising the rampant abuse of the
legal system and the courts' facilities at the disposal of criminals, in the United
Kingdom, the obvious that had to be pointed to and added to the above proclamation
"However, it would appear
that it is administered by asses".
The elements covered in and the implications arising out of the
facts and the realities stated in the FAX submissions, below, should
suffice and clarify many issues. It should also be used / thrown at the promoters and
stooges who, after joining the fraudsters club (*F1), brandish about letters (*F2) such as the member of the
Community On Line, Jesus Rosalia Baldwin Del Castillo, received from Strasbourg. (NOTE: - More facts and
revelations in due course. For the time being consider the challenges that we made of the
person who wrote to the petitioner, the member of the *human-rights.org Community on
Line*. Do not overlook the fact that the Petitioner benefited from prompt dispatch
received, by Courier Service the submitted documents lodged at the European Court of Human
Rights by Mr Andrew Yiannides who travelled, by coach, to Strasbourg in order to lodge the
Petition personally after settling the application, as copied in our pages).
|FAX from: http://www.uk-human-rights.org
||ECHR - Strasbourg (Ref.:
||(0033) 3 88 41 27 30
||Andrew Yiannides - London - UK
||Converted 18/09/03 Created: 24
||Ms J.R. Baldwin Del Castillo
||Folders : CoL / Affiliates / Gov.
Attention K Reid Fourth
||¨ Please ACT
||¨ Please Comply
||¨ Please acknowledge
||¨ Please Recycle
Re: Baldwin v United Kingdom
Application no: 19229/02
Your communication of 29th July 2003, has been
referred to us by the above named, who is a member of the human-rights.org Community On
The Petitioner's request was clear. She requested for the return of the
bundle of documents that were delivered to the court with her petition last year. The
documents were lodged for the sole purpose of a ruling by the court in respect of the
clearly stated facts leading to the violations that were succinctly pleaded in her
petition. In accordance with the information, at hand, the petitioner received a
communication from the court, in late February. At the time she was informed that in
accordance with the views of the judges, who applied themselves to the case before the
Court, her case did not qualify for a review by the Court, apparently, because her case
had not been processed to extinction of domestic remedies. [*Link from here to the reality and what
subsists behind such presentations]
In view of the above the Petitioner
quite rightly wrote to request for the return of her bundle of the documented evidence in
order that she should proceed by way of submissions to the appropriate government
department and Minister. In accordance with the documented evidence, the warranted claims
arose out of the reckless behaviour of public servants albeit persons who were/are
retained to serve Justice and the citizens, within the restraints of law.
Following on from the above we beg to remind you that under United
Kingdom legislation it is a criminal offence to destroy evidence and or to obstruct
justice. By the very nature of the court's earlier communication to the Petitioner, her
case is very much alive. The very submissions rendered the documents, which are part
of the evidence against the offending government / state agents and employees relate to
protected work and documents warranted and essential for and in the Petitioner's demands
for justice. We take the view that we ought not to have to point out to you such
fundamental issues and principles, bearing in mind that your retainer, as a public
servant, is to serve Justice and the citizens, and no other interests.
You are, hereby requested to comply with the Petitioners requests, to
consider her rights in law and to refer this communication to the President of the
Court. You are requested to point us to any Article of the Convention, or to any
provisions under any court rules, from within any civilised country or state, whereby the
destruction of evidence in an ongoing case, at and in any court, is acceptable and or
endorsed as appropriate and excusable through the type of promotion that you submitted to
The Petitioner repeats through us her request for immediate return of
the bundle of the documented evidence, as presented to / lodged with the court in support
of her legally sound Petition. The Petitioner also repeats her readiness to meet in
advance, if necessary, the cost of the dispatch and the delivery to her of her properties
constituting the evidence in support of her legitimate claims.
We beg to draw your attention to the fact that the preparation of and
the cost for the creation of the bundle of the documented evidence was not born by the
court or anyone from within the United Kingdom section / representatives. We reiterate
that the case is neither dead nor finished as you or any other may have set out to create
through obstructions and ill-founded assertions. The documented evidence which you assert
the right to destroy rather than return to the legitimate owner constitutes possible
wilful obstructions to Justice, maligned impositions to additional costs and the continued
abduction of a life (the use of the time of the citizen who lodged a Petition with the
court) bearing in mind that the reasons given by the court for failing to address the
legitimate issues make it very clear that you and the court are dealing with an alive case
In view of the above you are requested to reconsider your ill-founded
assertions, to ensure that your section / the court arranges for the return of the bundle
of documents to the citizen and to cease all attempts to treat the bundle of the
documented evidence as trash can material in contempt of the fact that you and the court
are dealing with an alive case.
Andrew Yiannides NDD., ACFI., ATI., FNAAAS.
*human-rights * (NGO)
London - UK
Important UPDATE Below
- We point (direct from
other pages and the access buttons) visitors to the
above 'challenges' to the ECoHR for the simple reason that we are very familiar with
the ploy promoted for the umpteenth time. Visitors, readers and researchers should
consider the changes in practice - REPORTING PETITIONS & SETTLEMENTS REACHED and the
earlier case stated in one of the images whereby the taxpayers are informed BY US, that
the case after a private settlement was removed from the court's list. WHO BUT THE SUCKERS
/ TAXPAYERS PAID & PAY FOR AGREED SETTLEMENTS IN THAT AND EVERY OTHER CASE?
- Assertions that the case, at hand, did not finish in the
United Kingdom, allegedly, because it did not go all the way to the House of Lords, imply
another scenario and we will cover it at some later date.
- Visitors, who wish to familiarise themselves WITH THE
VIOLATIONS PLEADED in the above applicant's case, should link to the facts
stated << apologies for the broken link, please access the explanation below
at <<< after
reading the facts as stated in the application to the European Court of Human Rights
(repeated at this website at). We link visitors, who took
time to read the above challenges, from here to the reply from the
European Court (above in the left margin / window /
- We released, in April 2006, more relevant information in
respect of the realities behind the ploy - dust in your eyes suckers, taxpayers. [*Link]
- We need only state that in the Stated Facts there was ore
than enough covering ALL violations, in order to deal appropriately with 'the usual ploy'.
She was informed that we would be doing so the Strongest Possible terms and that the
challenges would be published in our pages and that it would all be released to the
world's 'targeted serfs'.
- We need to inform visitors that the applicant failed to
proceed with execution of the Power of Attorney instrument that Mr Andrew Yiannides
settled for her to execute/endorse.
- Some months later the applicant came back with an
alternative Power of Attorney that was suggested by a solicitor she used for the sale of
her flat in London. At the same time she was informing us that the Local Authority were
chasing her for non-payment of Council Tax, for periods AFTER the sale / occupation of the
flat by another. FOOD FOR THOUGHT as to the likely scenario ladies and gentlemen.
- n the meantime, because the agreement for the work done for
the applicant included handing over ALL of the documents, in her case, to Mr Yiannides and
to human-rights, the applicant complied. She had been informed that the application to the
ECoHR entailed putting one's foot in the door, at the ECoHR in a way that the compensation
could not be evaded by governments that maintain Rampant Corruption Jockeys* (*definition) in the courts.
- Because of obstructions
and interference in our work for the Community on Line, by persons we are naming, and
others we shall be naming in due course, we are making other arrangements for the
essential exposures & challenges to the wolves, the organisers of the lives of 'the
sheeple' : the sucker-serfs in a pseudodemocracy.
- We refer, above, to the work of co-operating members (and ex-members) of the
human-rights.org Community on Line, also, to other pro-active citizens who state their
experiences in pseudo-democracies, thereby covering and exposing the facts of life in
permanent pages on the Internet.
- We will be introducing links to important material, thereby informing the citizens who
have taxes imposed on them by persons who are very much aware of the ORGANISED CRIMES :
the subsisting states [*Link from
here to list of sites].
- Read below of email
exchanges with 'a concerned(?) sucker-serf(!) who ignored the elements, the practices and
the legal issues we have been challenging and EXPOSING WITH THE ESSENTIAL & WARRANTED
PROOF. We refer to the proof attached to the criminal activities : to THE RAMPANT
CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUD IMPOSED ON THE TAX-PAYERS through abuse of the courts facilities.
[*Link from here to the exclusive page & to proof]
- We have been pointing to
and EXPOSING THE CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES, at this website, care of Andrew Yiannides' research
and investigations (ongoing for over 38 years).
- Readers, researchers and
victims should access the exclusive page (use link above) and consider the simple fact that the person seeking information
as to WHY the human-rights.org Community on Line free websites went down, like all other
charlatans and dreamers NEVER CONTACTED US or Mr Andrew Yiannides in order to raise any
interest or express any concerns about the obvious : the CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUD ORGANISED
& IMPOSED on the tax-payers through abuse of the courts facilities by alleged servants
of the public, servants of the law and Justice..... just another product of the society
that 'reared him'.
|EMAIL addressing the suppressed / ignored issue of ORGANISED CRIME: -
Fri, 15 October 2010 12:59:31
Subject: WWW.HUMAN-RIGHTS.ORG DOWNTHE ENQUIRY in October 2010: -
Hi does anyone know why free website space
WWW.HUMAN-RIGHTS.ORG has gone down?
THE RESPONSE: > with minor corrections to errors as edited
below <: -
Who wishes to know friend?
The owner of the domain name KNOWS and informs you
herewith APPROPRIATELY. The owner is now in command and made the necessary changes
following 11 years of foul of the law experiences with charlatans and fraudsters.
Collectively they established much through their ACTIVITIES AND MOST CONVENIENT FAILURES,
without any room for doubt.
In the first instance, it was the officers, the executives and members
of staff of the USA Corporation Northsky.com. They entered into a contract with the
owner.... "to provide the free spaces under the control of the proponent and
creator of the 'Community on Line', LONG BEFORE, myspace, facebook,
etc. friend", and it was not long before the owner / creator WAS FACED
WITH BREACHES OF CONTRACT and 'the abduction of HIS PROPERTY, as he allowed the abusers to
use it, for their VILE / EVIL ENDS... because he had HIS plans for abusers of trust and
arrogant dreamers, charlatans and stooges / fraudsters.
THE OWNER, ALSO, had to put up (for years) with 'alleged
victim-challengers', who failed to co-operate with the creator / owner of THE SPECIFIC
INTERNET PRESENCE & DOMAIN. In other words persons who signed up for the free
web-sites facility JUST IGNORED THE REASONS & WERE ACTING IN CONTEMPT OF THE
PROVISIONS (stipulations goes without saying) as covered in the
The last three URLs relate to and address the parts of LOVERS of the
facilities in place for REWARDS to persons who agree to keep quiet about the REWARDS
FROM STOLEN TAXPAYERS CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE NATIONAL BUDGET. The very fraudsters,
dreamers, charlatans and stooges just promoting the powers that be, through subliminal
indoctrination / conditioning scripts. One and all simply working with the abductors and
rapists of Justice…. >>> by TARGETING new victims of the abusers of the courts
facilities, AS DIRECTED / POINTED TO THE NEW VICTIMS by the controllers & managers OF
THE BLUNT & ARROGANTLY ORGANISED CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS [*Link to an explicit case / letter]. All and everything as ARRANGED by the abusers of the public facilities,
clearly covered in the page number 4, above..... and THE MANY who failed to act as invited
to co-operate.... simply obliged & provided the warranted evidence (Refer to the House
of Lords ruling published at www.uk-human-rights.org).
Refer please to the proof of posting cards in the page number 5, above.
DO MAKE SURE THAT YOU READ ALL OF THE MATERIAL in the page, number 5. DO NOT FAIL TO NOTE
how the owner, whose Community on Line concept was treated with blunt contempt by alleged
victim-challengers, used the letter from one of the many dreamers, alleged
victim-challengers who, as an accredited FRAUDSTERS-CLUB-RECRUIT, failed, on far too many
instances to co-operate…. with the exception that he WAS co-operating with others who,
like him, were / are targeting and using new victims FOR MORE OF THE SAME CASH UNDER THE
TABLE (the conditional) REWARDS covered in the page number 3, above.
DO READ all of the material in the page number 6, above, and CONSIDER
THE ARROGANCE OF THE ONE who contacted the owner of the domain, the PROPONENT / CREATOR of
the COMMUNITY-ON-LINE concept..... AFTER he had agreed to keep it all in the family closet
(the family of fraudsters) as his solicitor wrote to another solicitor.... [*Link
from here to the proof - to the solicitors letter, chum]
AFTER you have swallowed that reality, do access and read the telephone
exchanges between that dreamer / fraudster and the one whose letter was used to create the
page number 4, above. READ the transcript of the telephone exchanges, and note the
words 'wasting knowledge'. THERE & THEN RECOGNISE WHY THE EXPRESS USE OF THE WORD
>>> WASTING <<< (if not for gain..... for THE REWARDS ON
OFFER AT THE END OF THE LINE, clearly covered in the page number 4, above???).
The telephone exchanges / transcript you should access at: -
READ IT all, for as a whole the material….. PLUS THE EVIDENCE released in the page
SHOULD CAUSE TRUE HUMANS.... to consider WHY was the owner of the domain and creator of
the Community on Line, TARGETED for and with the idiotic attempt related in the page:
CONSIDER THIS RESPONSE and the information imparted herewith; consider
also the attached evidence released and pointed to in the public domain... thereby
ESTABLISHING THE OBVIOUS..... as to WHY & WHAT FOR, the human-rights.org Community on
The realities / realisations YOU ARE POINTED TO, ONLY TRUE HUMANS could
/ can recognise; more specifically TRUE HUMANS as thinkers, as users of grey matter,
SHOULD RECOGNISE as to WHY the attempt related / covered in the page number 8, above.
TRUE HUMANS could NOT fail to consider the simple fact that THE REWARDS
TO ALLEGED VICTIM-CHALLENGERS who fell and fall in love with the arrogantly organised
CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUD ON THE TAXPAYERS were / are IMPOSING DEBT-LIABILITIES on fellow
'sheeple' and on their own successors...... as the morons, zombies and conditioned
ill-educated non-thinkers each and every person who failed to co-operate and COLLECTIVELY
EXPOSE & CHALLENGE ABUSERS OF THE COURTS FACILITIES and public office as 'shitizens'
established themselves to have been / be.
Access also the material in the page:
READ of the foundations / of the root of the divide and manipulate & control 'the sons
(no daughters) of the men (no women) on earth, as concocted by the creators of the Old
Testament RUBBISH .... the very RUBBISH promoted by affiliates, associates and followers
of the RUBBISH for some 2300 years... as of the days when the rubbish was introduced to
mankind. Do access and read the article by Sir Frederick Kennyon, which you SHOULD find
FINALLY, do consider the extract, below, from the work of Isocrates 'Aeropagiticos'.
Thereafter let me know IF mankind (*the sons of men*), needed the RUBBISH, for 2300 years
promoted as alleged Holy Scriptures, when in fact those of and about whom Isocrates wrote
in his ‘Aeropagiticos’ work: - 'WERE CHERISHING JUSTICE IN THEIR SOULS', unlike the
creations of the alleged creator of all and everything was / has been creating judges FOR
SPECIFIC PURPOSES as covered in the Old Testament RUBBISH, too.
Do access the page: XXXXXXXXXXXX
READ the words attributed to Jesus Christ by the creators / editors of 'The Bible' (where
they also included the Old Testament RUBBISH for users of grey matter to take on board and
conclude accordingly as TRUE HUMANS / AS THINKERS / AS USERS OF LOGIC.
Andrew Yiannides NDD., ACFI., ATI., FNAAAS
'the rampant FRAUD & CORRUPTION' that abounds in most allegedly 'civilised states',
access the exclusive page:
Presently also firstname.lastname@example.org
Profile at Live Dot Com: http://yiandrew-human-rights.spaces.live.com/default.aspx
For PROOF of the collaboration, between the
Executive & the Administrative, in such states / the UK, read below the explicit
arrangements for 'the serfs': -
court has inherent jurisdiction to stay an ACTION which MUST FAIL; as for instance, an
action brought in respect of an act of State."
The above qualify 'Criminals are in control in pseudo-democratic states'.
Enlightenment for the products of the system : the
fraudsters-club-recruits & maintenance engineers of the system who seek to offend and
obstruct genuine challengers who EXPOSE the criminals: - "But
in fact, they thought, virtue is not advanced by written laws but by the habits of
every-day life; for the majority of men tend to assimilate the manners and morals amid
which they have been reared. Furthermore, they held, that where there is a multitude of
specific laws, it is a sign that the state is badly governed; for it is in the attempt to
build up dikes against the spread of crime that men in such a state feel constrained to
multiply the laws. ***
Those who are rightly governed, on the other hand, do not
fill their porticoes with written statutes, but only to cherish justice in their souls;
for it is not by legislation, but by morals, that states are well directed, since men who
are badly reared will venture to transgress even laws which are drawn up with minute
exactness, whereas those who are well brought up will be willing to respect even a simple
From Isocrates' Aeropagiticos:-
is dedicated to ALL abusers of Andrew Yiannides' time and the trust they were allowed to
benefit from while their activities and most convenient defaults / failings were being
In October 2010, the coalition's Attorney General, in an interview
published by 'COUNSEL' specifically spoke of the police distancing themselves
from cases of (small-fry) fraud and asserted that he was
making that element his department's priority. IT REMAINS TO BE SEEN, WHAT the
coalition of the Con-LibDems, THE GOVERNMENT OF THE DAY WILL IN FACT ATTEND TO THE RAMPANT
FRAUD, and IF IT WILL DEAL with the criminals who abuse public office, especially
when faced with appropriate submissions and claims that will be delivered in due course.
Visitors/readers are urged to read the article published in the London Evening Standard,
as settled by the Rt. Hon. David Blunkett, Home Secretary in 2003 [*Link from here
to the article we reproduce in another webpage and consider "Why tolerate the
arrogance of the legal circles who had and have the audacity to assert to the lawmakers
that the y, the lawmakers have nothing to do with the law"].
While there, above it, the explicit letter to
ex-Minister, the Rt. Hon. Frank Field MP, delivered a few days earlier. ALL alleged
victim-challengers who contacted Andrew Yiannides, by the time the letter was sent to the
Minister, received copy of the letter just as they received copies of other letters
submitted to government maintained Ministers and other official appointees to public
office. Accessing the material pointed to from the letter (URLs) is of utmost importance.
It should assist 'recognition of the citizen's rights at work', when called upon properly
in truly democratic states. The above in 2003; there were other 'submissions' and among
such civilised and, within the law, approaches by citizens that led to the right actions
by governments, the explicit challenges when we set about exposing one of the most evil of
alleged victims of the legal circles to have ever contacted us [*Link to our explicit submissions to (a) the Prime
Minister, (b) the Chancellor / Treasury, (c) the Home Secretary. WE acted so after we had
secured more than enough evidence about the parts of an alleged victim whose only
interests were (i) the rewards under the table FOR KEEPING QUIET about the ORGANISED FRAUD
THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS' FACILITIES and (ii) her parts in blunt attempts that were
intended to discredit the person she was sent along to mess about with, Mr Andrew
Yiannides]. Access please the
letter to the Home Secretary, the Rt. Hon. Jack Straw, in December 1998 [*Link*
[*L] from here to the letter] and note the results
evinced in the newspaper article (Hornsey Journal) also within days of the letter reaching
its destination. Many the charlatans and stooges -lovers and 'promoters of the system as is'- on the
job for decades; one and all acting as sold souls always do [*Link [*L] from here to the evidence we
point to relative to the parts of one of a number of sold to the system fraudsters who
were sent along / introduced to Andrew Yiannides by the managers / organisers of the LIPS
crowd / mob].
Visitors are urged to access the page where we expose the most blunt and arrogant of
Institutionally Organised Crime, that of Constructive Frauds through abuse of the courts
facilities. At the page we point out to more than the arrogant parts which Public(!)
Servants(?) take on and execute while Acting IN CONTEMPT OF ALL LAW. Theft of
assets through False Instruments* [*Link] in the order of the day. False instruments being ANY COURT ORDER that is
issued in contempt of the evidence adduced to and perused at court, by judges who elect to
ignore the evidence and applicable law. Similarly when the evidence establishes a criminal
act, as for instance in the case of FORGERIES CREATED & USED for fraudulent gains (such
as the documents used and relied upon by Haringey Council staff and officers [*Link to proof], in order to steal and cause to be
converted, Housing Benefit funds due and owing to a targeted family whose property was
occupied by 'the New World Order imports' (used refugees). And judicial chair occupants
acting contrary to the evidence (the blunt Forgeries) IN CONTEMPT OF THE APPLICABLE LAW. The
PAGE WE POINT TO, from here, covers the element of
VICTIMS OF THE COURTS (of judicial misconduct as covered herein-before) WHO MANAGE TO
LODGE PETITIONS TO THE EUROPEAN COURT of HUMAN RIGHTS, are invited and caused to entertain
a confidential pact whereby they are REWARDED FOR BEING PARTY TO MAINTAINING SILENCE ABOUT
THE ABUSE OF THE COURTS FACILITIES FOR CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS BY THE LEGAL CIRCLES. And all
with the blessings of the police, and successive governments for God knows as of when. [*Link
also from here to the page where we expose the parts
of organised fraudsters club recruits. We refer to persons who engage in fraudulent abuse
of the courts' facilities and processes as one Johan Michael Richard Foenander was
initiated in by another 'conscript to fraud aplenty through the courts executed IN
CONTEMPT OF ALL LAW & the taxpayers deliberately kept in the dark in an
allegedly civilised society. A society that allegedly rests and is founded on principles
of law & order, according to the media Barons and the Intellectual Prostitutes they
retain and maintain in order to promote the false states which they have the audacity to
refer as Democratic States. ALL CARE OF THE SILENT ONE'S, the conditioned &
programmed robots who fall to the bait of the BLACK ECONOMY operated through the abused
courts, while Members of Parliament ignore their constituents' representations and
complaints;*link from here to the page where we released
an explicit House of Lords precedent case dating back to 1940 when their Lordships
addressed such issues of applicable law].
2. Many the maintenance
engineers and promoters of the rampant fraud through the courts. Most intriguing and naive
the activities of persons who run around brandishing and promoting letters from abusers of
public office. One such person was a Mr G. Ebert; apparently he was furnished with a
letter from Charring Cross police station, whereby the police were informing him that
allegedly / apparently HE HAD THE RIGHT TO INFORM THE PUBLIC that the police had been
instructed by the Lord Chancellor / his office NOT TO ENTERTAIN COMPLAINTS RELATIVE TO
PERJURED STATEMENTS IN THE COURTS, the judicial chair occupants apparently free to ignore
all manner of criminal acts in their courts. The aforesaid gentleman set about to impress,
with that rubbish of an allegedly legal and binding assertion, also Mr. Andrew Yiannides
the founder of human-rights. The promoter of that rubbish was politely asked to furnish Mr
Yiannides with a copy of the impressive document BUT the promoter flatly refused to make
available the requested copy. Mr. Yiannides thereafter requested for assistance and
arranged with Mr. Norman Scarth (who would co-operate in such areas because it suited his
personal and undisclosed agenda) to secure a copy of the offending promotional material.
Visitors can link to what followed thereafter AND RECOGNISE the wisdom of the adages
'Empty Tins Make Loud Noises' & 'All That Glitters Is NOT GOLD'.
3. *Link from here to the
exclusive page*, where we cover the parts of an alleged victim-challenger who abused
Mr Andrew Yiannides' time and trust with evil intent. The need arose to expose the
actress, Veronica Beryl Foden, for her deceitful ways and maligned intentions; the same
applied to her associates from within the LIPS crowd / mob and their affiliates,
individuals and organised groups. We need to emphasise that EVERYONE WE NAME &
EXPOSE WAS NOTED TO HAVE BEEN A CONVERT-TO & LOVER OF THE RAMPANT FRAUD THROUGH THE
COURTS INSTIGATED, PROMULGATED & EXECUTED. Not victim-challengers, but lousy
actors of the worst denominator, not far below the directors of the shows they took and
take part in. *Link also from here to the page
(.org/confraud.htm) where we cover and expose the facilities in place, the
baited hook for converting conditioned morons to lovers of silver through the cash
under the table facility : UNDECLARED REWARDS *income* as clarified in the very page.
*Link also from here to another page where we
published a letter sent to the FRAUD DEPARTMENT of the Social Services (Work &
Pensions) in respect of CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUD on the National Budget (*Social
Security funds*) attached to and arising out of the use of Housing Benefit
provisions. Funds handled by FRAUDSTERS EMPLOYED AND USED BY LOCAL AUTHORITIES, who
WERE & ARE USING *Asylum Seekers and Refugees* rushing to the land of milk and honey,
*to the United Kingdom where the FREE-FOR-ALL-FACILITIES* rule supreme, AS ORGANISED BY
ALLEGED SERVANTS OF THE PUBLIC, the public they are meant to serve in accordance with the
law and NOT pursuant to undeclared policies that never were part of any 'ticket /
manifesto' the serfs voted for and in in favour of. All care of promotions by the
media Barons and the Intellectual Prostitutes the Barons retain and maintain, for such
scenarios at the cost of the targeted 'sons of men on planet earth'. The REALLY
concerned can access from here a scenario which we reproduce for the 'taxpayers and
victims' to read in order to awaken to the plans of the founding fathers of most, if not
all, of man's inhumanity to man related / recorded in 'The Old Testament'.
4. *Link from here to the page Andrew created on receipt of a
letter from Mr Norman Scarth, when Mr Scarth set out, in October 2003, to justify his
abuse of the time and trust of Mr. Andrew Yiannides. Mr. Scarth had, for years, been
promoting views in respect of his alleged concerns born of the experiences he
benefited from as a victim of the abused legal system / court facilities. We
cover the method of operations in the courts in an exclusive page (.org/confraud.htm) and
we urge all visitors, readers and researchers, especially VICTIMS TO ACCESS THE
PAGE and get to know how 'victims of the legal circles' CONVERT TO LOVERS OF THE FRAUD
they were victims of to begin with. The element of utmost importance in the
matter at hand is Mr Scarth's alleged 'Cause For Concern'. He wrote of such matters in
a 'book' he created covering his experiences and his stance as 'a hero', who, nonetheless,
'fell in love with the fraudulent abuse of the courts' facilities, as can be adduced by
his behaviour and activities as of the days he agreed to assume the position of Honorary
Secretary of the LIPS crowd / mob in the course of a meeting (at his place of residence)
that was attended only by other converts-to and USERS OF THE SYSTEM OF OPERATIONS in the
courts. So it was and remains the situation with all of his associates from within the
LIPS crowd / mob and their affiliates. Mr Norman Scarth who invariably considered himself
to be a cut above every other victim of the legal circles and would take it upon himself
to dispense with advise to Andrew such as, "Use the KISS principle Andrew : Keep It
Simple Stupid'. It goes without saying that Mr Scarth looked upon these pages and website
as if material intended for simpletons and illiterates in English, by arrogantly failing
to address the fact that this website WAS & IS FOR THE ABUSERS OF PUBLIC OFFICE and
*trust*, the last including persons of his mentality to every other citizen &
5. Access from here the images of the pages in the October issue of
'COUNSEL' for the interview given to David Wurtzell by the Attorney General, Dominic
Grieve QC MP when he specifically spoke of his PRIORITIES and high on the list the issue
of FRAUD which the police through contempt for the law ignopre and through their contempt
for the blunt criminals activities the founder of human-rights, Andrew Yiannides
recognised way back in 1972, NOTHING BUT PROMOTION & EXPANSION OF THE ARROGANT ABUSE
OF THE COURTS FACILITIES, many an alleged victim-0challenger fell in love with as we
expose and point to in our pages