* * |
|
IMPORTANT
INFORMATION for all victims of malpractice - misconduct - negligence,
etc. TO NOTE
In the civil justice system in England and Wales, a judge presides over the
proceedings that are argued by the opposing sides through the adversarial process. The
process enables the court, judge, to reach a conclusion as to the truth of the facts in
dispute. Thereat it is for the judge to apply the law to the facts proven,
established at court. |
The system
as evolved is covered in the page 'English Legal System'
and remains the same after the Woolf reforms.
An explicit
Affidavit plus exhibits
and
letters to a
Chief Inspector of Police,
one
to solicitors and
another to the Lord Chancellor
Spell ORGANISED CRIMES (read the letter to the police in September 2006) |
| Access & read from one of a number of
: * I believe that New Labour will deliver
us from the wrongs we have been suffering for far too long. Use of our resources in terms
of human potential and capabilities can and should be channelled through rights not
wrongs, through positives not through negatives. It is our produce and ingenuity we can
sell to others not the minefields of corrupt and bankrupt public services. * [*Link to the page, note the steps taken to ensure the Prime Minister
forwarded / delegated submissions received at 10 Downing Street to the right Minister /
Ministry because
*Link thereafter to the Prime Minister's reference to the issue of
Organised Crime in June 2005] |
|
Read of [*Link to image & text] |
Announcement- July 2002
1.
Court Proceedings ARE PUBLIC RECORDS. 2.
Beware of Mischief Makers operating as
maintenance engineers of the Divide & Rule Brigade. Do not be misled by
self-appointed 'gurus' such as we cover in the explicit pages /2lipstalk.htm - /4deceit.htm - /corruptcourts.htm
- /convicti.htm - /chaldep1.htm
- /ukmm.htm &
other organised groups who only aim to help themselves & serve the Fraudsters Club as
in this page we cover, either from
within or as guided (by the abductors and rapists of Justice) accomplished mischief makers
and recruits to CIUKU Enterprises. Such persons come up with all sorts of poor excuses, as
to why victims ought not to act as their
in law provide, namely: - REPORT CRIMES & CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES. [*Link to
relevant law & provisions]
|
confraud.htm
KEY Page Changes 8 Oct. 2006 |
|
Confidential Fraud *Page Created October 1999* (page dedicated to the LIPS crowd/mob, the UKMM & the FnF) |
This
Page is DEDICATED  HELP US TO HELP YOU Please (*Link to plea).
Use your rights in law (link) and
ACT with others against the offenders. Join others and chip in for the creation of the
mass of evidence against abusers of public office : the abductors and rapists of Justice.
You can then benefit from THE FACTS & THE EVIDENCE that you will help establish. It
can all be used in any action, severally or jointly with others, as the case may be .
Crimes against humanity are not ruled out when a large
number of citizens can come up with evidence and as victims concur and or expand upon on the FACTS STATED & The VIOLATIONS PLEADED as LODGED at the ECoHR,
already. |
Read first in this page the statement in respect of the case
as submitted to the court and how / what we were prepared for, in order to establish one's
and for all the elements and the evil forces at work. [*Link) |
Read the Statement of
facts & Legal Argument by and for the Chairman of Live Beat Dads UK (*Link to www.lbduk.org. Do
not fail to note the rights pleaded under par. 5.a & 5.b in the
case of a relationship gone astray, merely because the other side felt the urge and need
for a change of dildo/ partner. Thereafter ONE & ALL decided to use the innocent
children as the vehicle for use in and for the conversion of assets through the courts, as
targeted by the operators of the Divorce Industry, a division of CIUKU Enterprises!
THE ABOVE IS DEDICATED TO
ALLEGED LEADERS OF VICTIMS of Family Courts. To all others who FAILED to co-operate
& WILFULLY INTERFERED IN ORDER TO OBSTRUCT & MAINTAIN the system of
operations, which includes their parts as MAINTENANCE ENGINEERS (see below).
We invite you to take part
in DATA collection in the areas covered by The CAMILA Project.
Your own contributions are and will be of value to all victims who are active now & to
all others who, like you we hope, will be challenging the offenders by using the rights we
point to, assured in law. Link to exclusive USE OF SUCH
MATERIAL for VERY SUCCINCT CHALLENGES that caused abusers of the courts facilities to
abandon their plans for a targeted victim - family. |
Victims of the family
courts can refer to the cases we point to, above and they can invite us as witnesses to
any court proceedings IF THEY FIRST STATE THEIR OWN CASE IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN thereby
indicating their own approval & participation in the declared AIMS of our founder as
other victims adopted. |
Interesting Press Release! It was
published months late in the local press. The release months AFTER submissions to the
Treasury, to the Prime Minister and press barons.
And the victims(!) who just default to act as law abiding citizens, aim for membership of
the fraudsters' club, we cover in this page. Joining in the scams, as seasoned and tutored
recruits for more of the same with new victims in the scripts prepared for them. The
enterprising who are in control of Law Enforcement in our country as contemptuous of the
law as the criminals they were / are retained to deal with. Do access the Divorce Lawyer
Admits Fraud page/file. Then consider that the victim in that case indulged in many a
deception and theatre. More facts and evidence are to be published in our pages. It was
but a typical example of the scenarios enacted by such persons through the courts, care of
the TRIAD in control of it all. Through the exclusive
exchanges with another who had other plans for the system which they allegedly were
all out to expose and raise the red flags for, both as far removed from the exposures as
the earth from the centre of the universe. Neither one was all out for that which they
were asserting and alleging in private. Both after the scenario covered in this page.
Seasoned mimics and creators of theatrical scripts. |
Below, a typical
example of HOW SOLICITORS WORK with one another and use clients in order to
engineer constructive frauds on the budget through the scheme & arrangements in place
which we cover in this page.
Their audacity
knows no bounds.
One solicitor to another "Oh, no, we do not want an offer from you for the damages
you caused to our client. We expect of the taxpayers to make good the damages AND OUR
CLIENT AGREES WITH US. He decided to join 'the
fraudsters club' for the usual operations through the courts. We can all (the legal
circles) point him to our victims, just as we pointed Mr. Hussein, the one who initiated
him - Mr Johan M R Foenander -
to our system of operations.
Let the above realities be
a lesson to non-legal Members of Parliament and to other charlatans whose plans are to
cash in / use the system as is just like the fraudsters club recruits we name in our
pages. |
Above
what one convert to and lover of the blunt fraud on the taxpayers engaged in. Below just
another dreamer who engaged in many theatrical productions, simply for the creation of
false instruments with the attached legal costs charges. The obvious hinted at to the
fraud of an alleged victim - challenger. Intriguing she too, conveniently DID NOT proceed
with the exposures she agreed to engage in with assistance in order to attend to her
OBLIGATIONS to society, the taxpayers as provided for under Article 6 of the European
Convention on Human Rights [*Link to the relevant provisions under Art. 6] 
*Link from
here to the page where we state the parts of the dreamer who was acting in tandem with
the legal circles. She also failed to report a blunt PERJURY, on affidavit, by the
solicitor who was representing, on S.I.F instructions, the solicitors the dreamer
instigated proceedings against.
Legal blunder
or organised FRAUD on the taxpayers?
Access the article
in HTML (Links to & from) in the main window, read it all, also the FOUR comparative cases that we point to in the FOOTNOTE. CONSIDER
then the parts of the Fraudsters Club Recruits we expose and covered in this page. In the
final analysis one MUST CONSIDER the self created roles of the judiciary to act as the
Protectors Of CRIMINALS (*Link to proof).
|
BELOW two explicit articles
both of which mainline news AFTER we reported to the government the activities in which a
victim(?) of the legal circles and the abusers of judicial chair occupation, WAS OBSERVED
& NOTED TO HAVE BEEN PLAYING THE FIELD FOR THE RAMPANT CORRUPTION AS COVERED IN THIS
PAGE. (*Link to the page where we cover the activities
& publish evidence that establishes the victim's parts in the constructive frauds
& Link to an affidavit covering the billions paid out
annually as rewards in many instances to persons who play the field in tandem with the
legal circles).
Access the realities as to how and when the press release, below, by the
government.
Access also the proof we publish relevant to the fact that
politicians in allegedly civilised states agreed to suppress the criminal in intent abuse
of the legal system and the courts FOR RAMPANT FRAUD ON THE SERFS & THE TAXPAYERS IN
GENERAL, as we point to in this exclusive page, while the media barons and the
INTELLECTUAL PROSTITUTES THEY RETAIN AND MAINTAIN CARRY ON ACTING AS BLIND DEAF AND
MONKEYS AS THE ABUSERS OF PUBLIC OFFICE INDULGE. |
We
point above to a press release by the government. A front page article
published in 'The Independent' some months AFTER we reported, to the government our
observations in respect of the part of yet 'another LIPS fraudster. She consciously
engaged in the DOUBLE FRAUD exclusively EXPOSED by us in this page (*Link to the proof). Through the courts, constructive Frauds on
'the budget', on 'the serfs', on 'the taxpayers'. She had given us more than enough
grounds to raise the alarm and to REPORT THE CRIMES AS INTENDED BY HER AND THOSE SHE WAS
WORKING WITH. Defaults aplenty and PREMEDITATED ACTIVITIES.
|
BELOW THE HEADLINES COVER
WRONGDOING AND TAXES FOR COMPENSATION ARISING OUT OF UNACCEPTABLE PRACTICES BY PERSONS IN
PUBLIC OFFICE, THE POLICE.
WE EXPECT OF THE PERSONS WHO CONSIDER
IT THEIR DUTY TO PUBLICISE HOW TAXES ARE USED FOR COMPENSATION TO THE VICTIMS, TO
SIMILARLY INFORM THE TAXPAYERS OF THE FACTS AND REALITIES WE PUBLISH IN THIS EXCLUSIVE
PAGE. THE TEXT OF THE ARTICLE WAS OCR'd THIS IMAGE ALSO IN THE PAGE YOUR-TAX WITH THE
OCR'd ARTICLE FOR LINKS TO ^ FROM OTHER PAGES AND WEB-SITES, WHERE THE PRACTICES OF AND BY
PUBLIC SERVANTS ARE REPORTED / EXPOSED. (*Link to new page) |
deceit / deception
deception ? Could any
citizen, who benefited from a very positive first meeting with any solicitor and then
arranged for the transfer of his/her papers from another member of the Law Society,
another solicitor who failed him/her, and then found himself /herself in the same
stranglehold, consider how he/she was caused to transfer to the new solicitor as nothing
else but the results of deception ? One only has to consider the tribulations of the
divorce victim's case as stated in the appeal published in our HomePages at: /corruptcourts.htm
'duplicity' 2purposes? Can any citizen whose legal representatives (acting
as agents in court proceedings through their subcontracted and appointed by the agents,
barristers, who then act as agents for the agents at court) indulging in private and
undisclosed blunt arrangements with the opposition's agents, be anything else ?
Especially when both sides, in any dispute, are securing 'pecuniary advantage over their
respective clients through and with the blessings of judicial chair occupants as covered
in the material facts and with the documented evidence being published at:
law.society.complaints
pretender' pretender ? Could any citizen who has been accosted / approached by alleged
victims of the system, seeking help and or offering assistance, subsequently seen to have
been acting exactly as those the alleged victims complained about, and fail to do their
duty, to report to the authorities the crimes they were/are victims of with the documented
proof the victims brandish about to persons they wish to impress, while promoting
letters from the police (to others) and or from their own MP's that indicate 'the
criminal activities are condoned by one and all', including 'the victims' who then fail to
use their rights to join with others to expose, on the Internet, the rampant fraud and
corruption, be anything else, especially when 'the victims' are seen to have joined the
club as covered in this page? Access the explicit page /2lipstalk.htm
where more than enough evidence will be published about persons who made contact with us
only to behave as deceitfully and with plenty of duplicity of/in purpose as the exchanges
between the 'two victim challengers aspiring to and or making a career out of the
discoveries they made while in the nets of the licensed fraudsters'.
'racket' Could be the only word the citizens can use to describe the activities of
the staff and officers of the Solicitors' Complaint Bureau and complain to its successor,
the Office for the Supervision of Solicitors (both of which were/are maintained by the Law
Society and its members. Both run and managed by 'solicitors'). Could there be
another more apt word ? Let us have your own opinions and submissions besides our
definition that has long been accepted and endorsed by the majority of their victims: 'The
pinnacle of the money laundering enterprises, run by the scavenging parasites'.
*sham* (link) sham? Could any report and or purported attendance to the
issues referred to the Law Society that then refers the citizens to the OSS the officers
of which then assert 'having looked into (!) the matters raised' without any reference to
the evidence submitted to the blind and deaf, at all material times, be anything but a
sham ? Access the material at: /shame.htm where
material will be published covering exchanges with the blind and deaf third rate actors
the law society and its members rely upon to build their world.
|
|
|
 |
Page Revised: May 30, 2009 : Introduced links to page
from the page where we challenge & expose one Maurice Kellett, a self-promoting
alleged expert on the parts of 'The Brotherhood', the contributions of Freemasons in
'building the society' he has been bolstering for over 10 years that we know of.
|
| Site re-construction for better navigation and inclusion of additional
material. |
Guidelines for Navigating the
extensive material: access instructions. |
| As part of the re-construction process our new pages and pages where
changes and additions have been or are so to be improved - amended are endorsed with the
link 'Page Changes and the date of the last changes. The link takes visitors to a List of
the changes implemented in the page. This includes new material and links from relevant
paragraphs to other / new relevant material in other pages. For further
clarification email: webmaster@ |
NOTE: The message below
succinctly qualifies and clarifies the fact that citizens in the
United Kingdom, and more than likely in other European countries and allegedly civilised
West Influenced Pseudodemocracies, meet the cost of the rampant fraud covered in this
page/file, through taxes AND THEY ARE KEPT IN THE DARK BY
THE GOVERNMENTS THEY ELECT, to manage (on their behalf) *their country's affairs*.
There exists an even darker side to the concept and the 'plans for the serfs in all
pseudodemocracies'; victims of the legal circles and public servants (including the
judiciary) entertain the invitation we point to below and themselves, thereafter, join
the organisers of it all in and for 'the plundering of the family silver'. (*F3)
In effect the
arrangements in place, 'the condition' we point to below, amount
to blackmail and it leads to conscious acquiescence of blunt frauds through the courts.
Compensation paid to persons who succumb to the blackmail stipulation that we cover in
this page constitutes also acceptance of fraudulently created demands on the budget, by
the legal circles and judges who actively engage in the type of activities, such as we
cover in another page. In that instance (as with other cases that we were made / are aware
of) THE ACTIVITIES AMOUNT TO CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS : the defaults, omissions and contempt for the evidence and the law leading to the compensation
paid to the victims merely because judicial chair occupants freely indulge in contempt of
the law and the rights assured through it.
OUR
attempts (on several occasions) to publish the facts stated below, in the newsgroups,
benefited from the attention of the moderators who used their guillotine & scissors.
Arrogant violations in contempt of our rights to publish and act, as we do, in the public
interest and as international law provides. Others, who frequent
the newsgroups, also obstructed and interfered with the aforesaid rights; they do so
either as the stooges of the offenders or as their partners in the deception and the
constructive fraud industry we cover in this page/file.
Below the REASON behind the propagation and perpetuation of fraud and corruption in and through
our legal system. Most probably the same scenarios apply in other signatory
countries of the European Convention on Human Rights.
RECOGNISE THE
FOUNDATION STONE, upon which rests the silence* of 'the real shysters' from within the United Kingdom. [*Link from here
to a House of Lords precedent case when their Lordships addressed the
issue of conspiracy and what silence amounts to in
matters of deception & FRAUD]. Consider
therefore the REAL reasons why:-
- 'alleged victims of the system'
- engage, behind the scenes, in many an
act of 'hypocrisy and sycophancy',
- they relish in 'evil-mongering'
behind the scenes and,
- in private, they promote and
assert 'many a foul word about the treatment they were/are subjected to, to new victims
they meet and target!!!
- And CONVENIENTLY the poor dears DO
NOTHING ABOUT THEIR COMPLAINTS, while
- seeking to entice others in
new-found areas of deceitful and fraudulent activities (*Link)
- through which (activities) the
perpetuation of that which they set out to raise complaints about in the first instance,
including lodging their complaints to the ECoHR.
The all important and crucial word, in the part we publish below, happens to be:
*** "confidential"
***
In other words:
- "YOU MUST NOT
DISCLOSE THIS" ! [*Link
from here to a House of Lords ruling on
'conspiracy', secret agreements]
- "YOU MUST KEEP QUIET ABOUT THIS
SETTLEMENT" !! [*Link
from here to ]
- "The taxed contributors to the funds we are using -
THE SUCKERS, must not get to know of this facility" !!!
- "Remember
we have just BOUGHT YOUR SILENCE" !!!!
- "*** WELCOME TO THE
FRAUDSTERS CLUB !!! ***" !!!!!
- "Remember, THE SYSTEM, IS
SUPPORTED BY THE MEDIA. [*Link to promotion of falsehoods & sold to the system
stooges]
Friends get to know of the
fact that Article 38 - provides:
- "1. If the court declares the application admissible* (*F), it
shall:
- (a) pursue the examination of the case, ...........
- (b) place itself at the disposal of the parties concerned with a
view to securing a friendly settlement of the matter on the
basis of RESPECT FOR HUMAN RIGHTS as defined in the
Convention and the protocols thereto.
- 2. PROCEEDINGS CONDUCTED UNDER PARAGRAPH
1.b
SHALL BE 'confidential'."
>>> We underlined, above, the words 'respect for human rights' for the simple reason that the craft-y
who 'allegedly' were concerning themselves with such elements COULD NOT CARE LESS about
the rights of the citizens who are called upon to meet, through taxes, the constructive
frauds on Mr and Mrs Average for the maintenance of public servants who entertain the
corrupt and fraudsters who operate in our courts freely and as the police endorse and
promote through defaults and omissions. <<< (*F5)
In a nutshell
- YOU, friends,
pay taxes for THE FAT SALARIES of those who are RETAINED, ON YOUR BEHALF, and meant to
protect you from crime and criminals.
- THEY, your servants,
simply indulge in criminal activities with persons who operate from within the legal
circles.
- AS JUDICIAL CHAIR
OCCUPANTS, they are very familiar with the facilities & arrangments we disclose and
EXPOSE in this page.
- Appointed by public
servants to judicial chair occupation they engage in endorsing all manner of criminal
activity, they themselves had been allowed to indulge in, when serving the public as
solicitors or barristers, both branches of the legal system allegedly Honourable
Officers of the Supreme Court, of Justice.
- YOU,
friends, then fork out for the silence of their new 'silent
partners in the sharing of the budget funds, earmarked for the 'best legal system in the
world, part of the CIUKU Enterprises, in the hands of the best organised STINGRAY
OPERATORS.
ALL
care of those who hold the all important positions of:
- Minister for the police - Home Secretary
- 'Minister' for Judicial & Court Services -
Lord Chancellor
- AND
- The Attorney General,
- The Director of Public Prosecutions,
- The Crown Prosecution Service,
- The Serious Fraud Office
- The Public Auditors
- The *fraudsters club recruits* we name and expose
in our pages
NOT FORGETTING of course:
- The Condescending MEDIA BARONS
- AND THEIR STOOGES = reporters/editors [*Link to FOOTNOTE where we cover very important cases that establish
duplicity of purpose and if not organised crimes against humanity simply the element of
free for all by split personalities who know not the rudiments and basic principles of law].
- Access the case STATED at the
European Court of Human Rights and recognise the scenario. We have publishing particulars and an important challenge arising out of the
evidence 'the stooge of a victim' provided us with the solicitors and the courts she was
working with while of opinion that they could all go on fooling us as they fool all
others. The affidavit used by the fraudsters and other applicable evidence in the case did
lead to our submissions to the Treasury in February 2002. Three properties were being
converted to legal costs through theatrical productions over a few years; in one instance
a FORGERY was used and plenty of False Instruments that were lacking accountability (by
the authors / creators) used for the conversion / theft of the properties. ALL THE WHILE
THE ALLEGED VICTIM part and parcel of the activities and as an ass, abusing our time
wilfully negating on her agreement with us. She was simply using our assistance and
facilities only for the reward under the table; one whose aims were to work as just
another maintenance engineer of the arrangements in place, like those who sent along and
guide the LIPS crowd/mob. Testing our resolve and patience, using our facilities for her
and their fraudulent activities, her evil objectives. [*Link to the page we released in 2004. There we publish the
evidence against her and those she had been and was working with as a lover of the
practices and as a committed 'fraudsters club recruit, like her mates from within the LIPS
crowd/mob].
Now, consider those you knew and know of, WHO ACCUSE Mr and Mrs
Average as shysters, because Mr and Mrs Average do not take up arms to challenge the
maladministrators/operators of the legal, system in our country! In the meantime the
'shyster', name calling advocates', know full well that no
one bothers to inform Mr and Mrs Average, of that which the advocates and the media
barons shove under the carpets and or in the family closet. In the meantime some of the
shyster name-calling 'gurus' [*Link to a page where we cover some aspects and a minor
part of our experiences with one such guru'] having joined the fraudsters' club, we cover above, busy
obstructing others from exercising their rights in
law, to INFORM & EDUCATE the uninformed and kept in the dark 'serfs', the taxpayers.
The most fundamental of rights such 'gurus' obstruct and object to, just the EXPOSURES AND
THE EVIDENCE WE ARE (AND
THEY SHOULD BE) PUBLISHING FOR
THE WORLD TO NOTE and recognise the unacceptable activities of the criminals who are in
control of our legal system, the courts and the police. [*Link from here
to an explicit extract from the work of the late Stephen Knight, 'The Brotherhood'].
You read, above, the explicit and succinct
provisions of Article 38 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Consider, therefore
why there exist among those who
- visit the newsgroups,
- blow their trumpets about 'the
system',
- proclaim their disaffection and
- 'disgust at the practices' in the
courts,
- in order to attract / phish new
victims to whom they
- assert
personal knowledge and experiences,
- YET FAILED AND OR FAIL TO PUBLISH
ANY EVIDENCE
- in ANY WEB-SITE, through which to
- inform and prove to
- Mr and Mrs Average of that which
they profess knowledge of!!!
- YET they fail to challenge &
expose abusers of judicial chair occupation and the courts facilities, as we do.
- In the meantime, and for over 12
YEARS, the leaders / managers of the LIPS crowd/mob ignoring provisions of The Criminals
Justice Act 1988, we pointed them to, as soon as they contacted Andrew, when they got to
know of 'The CAMILA Project'. [*Link from
here to the page where we publish the relevant Sections of the Act that clarifies :
the commission of the crime irrelevant if through an ACT OR AN OMISSION].
|
WHO BUT THE REAL
SHYSTERS, are party to the above fraud on YOU, Mr and Mrs Average?
Read the article from the
North London weekly Post (Link) and consider that
persons who run around promoting the abuse of the courts' facilities are just promoting
the criminal activities when they default at the same time to challenge the obvious, in
the public domain. When they promote also the defaults and omissions by and from other
public servants AND OFFER to assist any victim it is a sure sign that the promoter /
volunteer is but an endorser of the wrongs and criminal activities. In the circumstances failing
to challenge and expose the wrongs IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN leads to 'conscious accessories
and abettors to new criminal activities especially because they offer to assist any
other to benefit from the arrangements covered above.
WE DO HAVE EVIDENCE that
one such person was more interested in persuading a victim, who was publishing the facts
of life on the Internet, to remove the evidence. The culprit acted deviously and promoted
falsehoods about a mate of his; none other than Johan, the telephone call instigator and
the Rt. Hon. Secretary of the LIPS crowd/mob Norman Scarth. The latter, had joined the
fraudsters club and he later persuaded the publishing victim to remove the evidence from
the Internet. At the same time he deceived(?) and caused(!) the victim, who benefited from
much, to interfere in our work. Another, victim, was also caused to join in the scam
orchestrated by the 2 LIPS protagonists in deception.
OF SUCH PERSONS His Lordship was speaking when he was addressing the Home Affairs Select
Committee in November 1999, about his baby, the Legal Services Commission the wolf (Legal
Aid Pack) re-packaged as the Legal Services Commission.
We urge all
conscientious citizens, who have suffered damages, at and through the courts, because
of the rampant FRAUD IN THE LEGAL SYSTEM, to consider their rights and to act as the law
provides. Access the page for information on how to challenge, expose and claim back
rights denied & obstructed as part of a group who has seen light. [*Link from here to page with information]
Go To:
http://www.government.uk-human-rights.org/attempts.htm & read
the APPEAL (specifically the last order sought on appeal) because it caused the Lord
Chancellor and the Government to announce the Bill of Rights in 1997. Such FACTS &
REALITIES while the persons who contacted Andrew, as leaders and managers / organisers of
the LIPS crowd/mob, were just looking forward to AND WORKING
FOR MORE OF THE SAME, using others for the conscious and
intended double constructive frauds on the taxpayers that we point to, expose and
cover exclusively in this page.
If you have the evidence
against the offenders, you can publish it in your personal web-site as your rights in law
provide.
Every
citizen is duty bound to report crime and if the police ignored or ignore you, USE YOUR RIGHTS, EXPOSE THE OFFENDERS who act in contempt of the law.
Visit
the Stephen Lawrence page (Link)
and note how Parliament provided for your rights, yet, our Law Enforcement Agencies simply
ignore such provisions. They fail to protect you as the law and their duties provide.
Through their defaults and blunt omissions, in the exercise of their public duties, they
actually torment and torture you, the victims of crime. Precisely as they did in the
Stephen Lawrence shameful fiasco. Their failures to prosecute the playmates of the local
authority, the scoundrels who steal and misappropriate Housing Benefit funds, through
false instruments is but a typical example of 'which parties they serve in an alleged
democracy, one that is sold to the world (through
self promotion) as one that allegedly rests and is founded on 'Law & Order'.
READ OF
SUCH PROVISIONS and exercise your rights! Challenge and EXPOSE THE VILE OFFENDERS,
who endorse and promote crime through defaults and omissions in the purported exercise of
their public duties, AS YOUR SERVANTS.
Remember:
"Do for, by and with
yourself that which satisfies you, so long as that which you do, does not infringe upon
and or violate the rights of any other". © A.Y, 1972-1975 'The Years of Discovery'.
- CAN the parties who fall within the above
category, ever, really justify and or explain their conscious part in the constructive
frauds industry?
- CAN 'the real shysters' STATE IF, before
electing to join 'the fraudsters club' THEY CONSIDERED THE ABOVE SIMPLE FOUNDATION FOR ALL
LAW & HUMAN RIGHTS, as defined by the founder of *human-rights* the Non Governmental
Organisation?
- 'One Begins With Logic' : Heraclitus'
principle as interpreted by Andrew when a teenager, and ever since the basis of all that
touched his life. (In Greek: sounds like "N R He In Oh Law-was")
- We publish in the left margin/window the
names of allegedly concerned citizens. The majority, if not all, have been serving the
system as is as 'Subliminal Indoctrination Agents' for 'the system as is' and the
subconscious promotion of 'the powers of the abductors and rapists of Justice'. We
explain: 'They bombard the victims they target (inclusive of postings in the News Groups)
in order to draw their readers' attention to 'their views'. The opinions' they promote,
relentlessly, simply act as indirect 'conclusive proof' that there is nothing 'the serfs'
can do. The proof lays in the obvious messages that are derived from their repetitious
promotions of: "Do not do as I did and do, because they -the criminals who ARE in
control in pseudo-democracies- will do to you, what they did to me'. The best and classic
example being none other than the puke production machine, James Todd of 'VOMIT' repute.
| records: Addenda in the
right lower corner of the box |
|
|
Readers & researchers are requested to access the
pages where we expose named lovers and promoters / users of the arrangements in place for
more of the same.
This link takes visitors to such a scenario, a letter in the left
margin. Read the evidence in the form of a letter from one solicitor to another and note
the implied arrogance of the solicitor. DO NOTE THE FAIR COMMENT warranted and DO NOT
OVERLOOK THE SIMPLE FACT that 'the victim' in that instance was contacted by another
fraudster who was sent along by solicitors in order to initiate that moron to the system
of operations as covered in this page. the circumstances. Victims, researchers
are invited to contact the founder of human-rights, Mr Andrew Yiannides for
additional information. The addenda in the right hand lower corner covers the elements
this page relates to. [NOTE: Readers should consider
the above before accepting promotions by alleged victims whose cases allegedly were thrown
out by the ECrtHR]
|
ALL law abiding citizens who object to being treated as serfs of the
Middle Ages or as slaves of earlier times, all family persons who have been struggling to
raise their off-spring, all creative and aspiring peoples everywhere, are invited to read
very carefully the content of this page and access also the challenge to the European
Court of Human Rights [*Link] after reading the entire content of this page.
- The challenge was called for after the
Court, through its UK section staff and officers wrote to inform a victim of the organised
RAMPANT FRAUD THROUGH THE LEGAL CIRCLES & THE COURTS IN THE UNITED KINGDOM, that the
three judges, who looked at the case (after the rapporteur passed the case file on)
determined that not all avenues had been exhausted in the United Kingdom, the case could
not be accepted. [*Link to the process in respect of the admissibility and
who / how determines - note singular]
- The petitioner was also informed, by the court,
that the submitted documents / file would be destroyed in a year's time, HENCE THE
CHALLENGES to the Court .
- The petitioner had been informed
that the pleadings were presented to the court in a way that after the door had been
opened (court received the petition) the usual smoke-screen could not be applied.
- AFTER the challenge was received and the
documents were rushed back to the 'victim'(!), the petitioner was asked to issue a
Power of Attorney to Mr Andrew Yiannides in order that the case could be progressed
accordingly, at national level & within Europe.
- The petitioner 'honoured her agreement
with Mr A. Yiannides', the founder of human-rights by delivering up to him all of her
documents, and left the United Kingdom without ever bothering to issue the warranted and
agreed upon Power of Attorney, which Mr Yiannides needed in order to proceed as HE HAD
PLANNED at the time when he was settling the pleadings which he personally delivered to
the European Court of Human Rights by travelling all the way to Strasbourg, by coach. (No prizes for guessing why)
- A STATEMENT by Mr. Andrew Yiannides will
be released in due course because the promotion and propositions by the English Section at
the European Court were more than out of order when one considers THE PLEADINGS AS
DELIVERED TO & LODGED AT THE COURT, WITH THE SUPPORTING EVIDENCE.
- Readers / researchers and or any person
who takes an interest in the matters we cover in this page & specifically any media
baron or conscientious reporter who wishes to assist with promotion and exposure of the
realities covered in this page should read the copyright notice at the bottom of all pages
at this web-site and contact Mr. Andrew Yiannides / the webmaster. (Read below the provisions and practice under Article 28
before the UK was caused to introduce the Bill of Rights after a Local Authority was
challenged for its parts in arrogant fraud on targeted citizens because of its liabilities
/ duties to assist in the creation of the melting pot as determined and commanded by
non-elected 'dictators' of the most obnoxious and evil kind - followers of the
pre-determined plans for the sons of men -humans- of planet earth).
|
|
FOOTNOTE SPECIAL
relative to the above material and evidence
Readers & researchers are pointed to the fact that the United Kingdom, at the
conclusion of World War 2 hostilities, had to borrow funds from the USA banking leeches in
order to rebuild and restructure the country and society. Loans with USA government
support; the usual guarantees to the leeches from and by 'the representatives of the
serfs' in all pseudo democracies; governments (agents of the citizens), committing the
serfs to meet the cost of all interest charges and the capital (borrowed funds) through
taxes. In the instance at hand the funds were called for and warranted in order for the
government of the day to proceed with its plans for these islands and its inhabitants. WE
SIMPLY POINT OUT THAT THE LOAN WAS NOT PAID OFF UNTIL 2007, some 62 years later. THE SERFS
ARE REMINDED REGULARLY (by the media and the opposition of the respective political
coloration representatives of the day) THAT THE STATE / COUNTRY IS RUN & MANAGED ON
EXTENSIVE BORROWINGS granted by the leeches..... and WE HAVE FRAUDSTERS CLUB RECRUITS
RELISHING & WORKING FOR THE PLUNDERING OF TAXPAYERS CONTRIBUTIONS THROUGH THE
ORGANISED RAMPANT CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS FACILITIES WE POINT TO
IN THIS PAGE. We publish and point - in other pages- to additional evidence applicable to
the blunt and arrogant criminal activities such persons engage in as 'the dancing partners
of the abusers of the courts facilities' >>> a typical example the letter from
one solicitor to another in the left margin / window linked to from here [*L1]. The very solicitor, years earlier, engaged with another
solicitor in attempts to convert rents owing to a landlord care of organised fraud
instigated through abuse of public office by staff and officers (in charge of the
organised disorganisation in full swing at Haringey Council, a Local Authority / Local
Government, in North London) linked to from here [*L2].
|
| Legal blunder or organised FRAUD on 'the
taxpaying serfs' ? |
Daily Mail, Saturday, May 24, 2003 - the John Palmer: Timeshare scam
Legal blunder ?
Error ?
Goldfinger' to keep £33m in legal blunder
By Alexandra Buller |
|
ONE of Britain's most
notorious criminals will be allowed to pocket more than £33 million from his timeshare
scams because of an error by judges.
John `Goldfinger' Palmer was jailed for eight years in 2001 for tricking
thousands of holidaymakers out of their life savings.
He was ordered to pay back the haul but appealed and was allowed to keep the
money after the judge's confiscation order was overturned by the Appeal Court last July.
Yesterday Lord Woolf, Britain's most senior judge, ruled that this decision
was wrong and that the appeal judges had `misunderstood and misapplied the law'.
But Palmer can still keep the fortune he made from the Tenerife timeshare scam
because the original decision to quash the confiscation order cannot legally be
overturned.
Last night Norman Brennan, a serving police officer
and director of the Victims of Crime Trust, said: `Who has got any faith left in the
British criminal justice system?
`Who said crime doesn't pay? It's never paid so well for Palmer.
`A lot of vulnerable people, who worked hard all their lives lost their life
savings and at the end of the day his sentence, eight years, was not that long anyway.
`Now Palmer is sticking two finger up to all of us and the courts are allowing
him to do it.'(*Link to other
arrogant fraudsters that we wrote of in late 1999, who were sticking their two fingers
up to the taxpayers who pay taxes to maintain criminals in judicial chairs and
contemptuous of the law 'Law Enforcing Agents').
Palmer, 53, was ordered to pay back
£33,243,812 after being convicted at the Old Bailey of conspiracy to defraud thousands of
victims - mainly elderly people.
But this order was overturned by the Appeal Court on the basis that there had
been crucial flaws in the procedure followed.
Lord Woolf, the Lord Chief Justice, yesterday said the case had been 'wrongly
decided' and Palmer was not entitled to the money. But the crook will still be able to
keep it because the appeal judges last November blocked an attempt by the Director of
Public Prosecutions to take the case to the House of Lords - the only court with power to
quash the ruling.
The decision in Palmer's case sparked panic in prosecution circles and Lord
Woolf said there had been `at least ten' test cases on the issue.
He ruled that Palmer's case had been wrongly decided, during a hearing of
another confiscation case involving VAT fraud before a specially constituted five-judge
Appeal Court.
Lord Woolf said: `This Court considers that the law was misunderstood and
misapplied in Palmer.'
He said it was `not a course to be taken lightly' for a court to rule that a
`series of cases' had been decided wrongly, but said he hoped that this would `put an end
to the string of appeals' against confiscation orders sparked by the Palmer case. (*F4)
Palmer earned notoriety and the nickname `Goldfinger' after being acquitted
of handling gold from the Brink's-Mat robbery at Heathrow in 1983.
After his acquittal he moved to Tenerife and set up the time-share business
with his lover Christine Ketley, of Brentwood, Essex, who was also convicted of conspiracy
to defraud.
His victims in the timeshare fraud handed over more than £30 million, but
never received their share of a holiday home in the sun.
Palmer's wealth was estimated at around £270 million last year by the Sunday
Times Rich List, making him one of Britain's wealthiest men.
He is a close friend of Kenneth Noye and is believed to have flown him to the
safety of the Spanish coast by helicopter after Noye stabbed Stephen Cameron to death on
the M25 in 1996.
a.buller@dailymail.co.uk © Associated
Newspapers Ltd. |
Convention & Protocols to it, a list of States & Dates
of Recognition of The Rights Of Citizens As INDIVIDUALS TO SUBMIT PERSONAL PETITIONS TO
THE ECHR
|
- On the left image of the
cover of the 1996 edition of the Convention as posted to petitioners by the Commission. On
the right image from page 8 where Article 28 made clear the Commission's practice. All
had been and was in conformity with the universal declaration and COMMITMENT TO THE
PRINCIPLE THAT JUSTICE SHOULD BE SEEN TO BE DONE. [Read below]
- The principle simply
shoved under the carpets, the media barons and the Intellectual Prostitutes we contacted
over the years (as of 1972), have been shoving their heads in
the sand and acting as accessories and abettors by suppressing the realities born of the Constructive
frauds through abuse of public office as we cover also in the Housing Benefit
organised fraud, by staff and officers of Local Authorities.
- Worse, alleged victims who
knew and know of the blunt confidential plundering of budget funds as covered in this
page, contemptuously suppressing their own knowledge of the abused facility AS LOVERS
& USERS OF IT ALL from, "Challenge
the abusers of the courts' facilities, to active participants and promoters / users of the
system as is'.
|
The provision and the practice under Article 28 very
clearly stated in 1996. The fundamental principle as practised at and by the Commission
MAKING IT VERY CLEAR THAT THE TAXPAYERS WERE DULY INFORMED OF PETITION & RESULTS
|
Article 28 |
| 1. In the event of the Commission
accepting a petition referred to it: |
- a. it shall, with a view to
ascertaining the facts, undertake together with the representatives of the parties an
examination of the petition and, if need be, an investigation, for the effective conduct
of which the States concerned shall furnish all necessary facilities, after an exchange of
views with the Commission.
- b. it shall at the same time place itself at
the disposal of the parties concerned with a view to securing a friendly settlement of the
matter on the basis of respect for human rights as defined in this Convention.
|
| 2. If the Commission succeeds in
effecting a friendly settlement, it shall draw up a report which shall be sent to the
States concerned, to the Committee of Ministers and to the Secretary General of the
Council of Europe for publication. This report shall be confined to a brief statement of
the facts and of the solution reached. |
|
ABOVE PROOF THAT OUR SERVANTS AGREED & ARE PARTY TO SUPPRESSION OF
THE FACTS relative to the 'organised frauds on the taxpayers' care also of the many
stooges and lovers of the system such as 'the fraudsters club recruits we point to in
this page' and the persons named in the list at the bottom of most pages at this
web-site. READERS, RESEARCHERS and sucker-victims (accosted and being used by
fraudsters-club-recruits / encouraged to go for the carrot at the end of the line like
asses) consider the cost to the generations to come..... to be taxed FOR THE INTEREST
& CAPITAL REPAYMENT OF SUCH ARROGANT CONCEPTS & CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS ON THE ANNUAL
BUDGETS dear reader |
BELOW EVIDENCE RELEASED BY THE GOVERNMENT after we reported the fraudster and
lover of the system as is, Mrs Veronica Beryl Foden, for her blunt parts in the
constructive frauds through the courts AND HER EVIL ABUSE OF OUR TIME while
promoting false undertakings and alleged intentions TO EXPOSE THE OFFENDERS SHE WAS
WORKING WITH for the implementation of the 'intended and worked-for' rewards for MORONS OF
HER MENTALITY TO MR & MRS AVERAGE, the taxpayers. |
| TAXES for mistakes & errors, ? |
in one year,
including the type of rewards to stooges & charlatans we point to and expose in this
and other pages.
|
Do read this entire page and consider the arrangements by the controllers / creators of
such facilities. Consider then the £12.3 billion covered in the article on the left. Press
releases to soften the blow OR to prepare the citizens for the skeletons in the family
closet? Read the article and then read the explicit affidavit
we publish in this page. It was called for because of abuse of the courts' facilities in
the promotion of Housing Benefit thefts & conversions.
READ and consider the scenarios we cover in this page. Access the
explicit page covering the fact that an alleged victim, Mrs. Veronica Beryl Foden, who was
introduced to *human-rights* had been involved in many a theatrical production. The person
was simply promoting, through crocodile tears, her devastation at the hands of the legal
circles. However, through many a default and omission the alleged victim was seen to be
party to the scams until, eventually, her true colours shone through. We simply reported
the scam to the Treasury and we have since begun to publish the evidence that establishes
her parts in the constructive frauds we cover in this and other pages. (*F2) |
| Institutionalised & Organised FRAUDS,
as recognised 34 years earlier [*Link to FORGERY in
High Court case] |
|
The article on the left relates to Organised FRAUDS through
the institutions created and maintained by the European Union.[*Link to EU Law on Fraud]
Even the
person who was appointed to investigate the criminal activities was pressured to keep it
all under wraps and then transferred to another project.[*Link to the element of blackmail, that
victims of the abused court facilities are subjected to; also to other victims, and keep the taxpayers in
the dark] |
| The above realities, were reported by the media
consequential to our reports to The Treasury, to The Home Office & to The
Prime Minister. The reports and submissions were called for after a typical fraudsters
club recruit was caught at it and exposed as a participating play-mate in the constructive
frauds on the taxpayers through abuse of the courts facilities. [*Link to the page where we
published our explicit submissions to government, *Link to
the page where we published evidence of PERJURY BY A SOLICITOR which the alleged
victim of the constructive frauds through the courts shoved in the dark corners of her
corrupted mind. *Link to the page where we
published evidence when an abuser of judicial chair occupation arrogantly asserted
(indirectly) WE (the legal circles) have finished with you, in the United Kingdom, just
get on with it and seek your reward from the European Court of Human Rights..... hence
THE EVIL PERSON'S FAILURES TO MAKE PUBLIC THE FACTS OF LIFE and the activities she was
party to and a willing playmate in & for] |
| The development of and FOR THE RIGHTS
OF CITIZENS, in modern times begun with the Magna Carta, in England. Below, in as simple
as can be defined, the principles of rights freedoms and ,
as clarified by Mark Janis, (fellow) Richard Kay (professor)
and Anthony Bradley (professor). |
- 1. Men are born and remain
free and equal in rights; social distinctions may be based only upon general usefulness.
- 2. The aim of every political association is the preservation of the
natural and inalienable rights of man; these rights are liberty, property, security, and
resistance to oppression.
- 3. The source of all sovereignty resides essentially in the nation; no
group, no individual may exercise authority not emanating expressly therefrom.
- 4. Liberty consists of the power to do whatever is not injurious to
others; thus the enjoyment of the natural rights of every man has for its limits only
those that assure other members of society the enjoyment of those same rights; such limits
may be determined only by law.
- 5. The law has the right to forbid only actions which are injurious to
society. Whatever is not forbidden by law, may not be prevented, and no one may be
constrained to do what it does not prescribe.
- 6. Law is the expression of the general will; all citizens have the
right to concur personally, or through their representatives, in its formation; it must be
the same for all, whether it protects or punishes. All citizens, being equal before it,
are equally admissible to all public offices, positions, and employment, according to
their capacity, and without other distinction than that of virtues and talents.
- 7. No man may be accused, arrested, or detained except in the cases
determined by law, and according to the forms prescribed thereby. Whoever solicits,
expedites, or executes arbitrary orders, or has them executed, must be punished; but every
citizen summoned or apprehended in pursuance of the law must obey immediately; he renders
himself culpable by resistance.
- 8. The law is to establish
only penalties that are absolutely and obviously necessary; and no one may be punished
except by virtue of a law established and promulgated prior to the offence and legally
applied.
- 9. Since every man is
presumed innocent until declared guilty, if arrest be deemed indispensable, all
unnecessary severity for securing the person of the accused must be severely repressed by
law.
- 10. No one is to be disquieted because of his opinions, even religious,
provided their manifestation does not disturb the public order established by law.
- 11. Free communication of ideas and opinions is one
of the most precious of the rights of man. Consequently, every citizen may speak, write,
and print freely, subject to responsibility for the abuse of such liberty in the eases
determined by law.
- 12. The guarantee of the rights of man and citizen necessitates a public
force; such a force, therefore, is instituted for the advantage of all and not for the
particular benefit of those to whom it is entrusted.
- 13. For the maintenance of the public force and for the expenses of
administration a common tax is indispensable; it must be assessed equally on all citizens
in proportion to their means.
- 14. Citizens have the right to ascertain, by themselves or through their
representatives, the necessity of the public tax, to consent to it freely, to supervise
its use, and to determine its quota, assessment, payment, and duration.
- 15. Society has the right to require of every public agent an accounting
of his administration.
- 16. Every society in which the guarantee of rights is not assured or the
separation of powers not determined has no constitution at all.
- 17. Since property is a sacred and inviolable right, no one may be
deprived thereof unless a legally established public necessity obviously requires it, and
upon condition of a just and previous indemnity.
Consider the above in the context of our founder's proclamation on
true Democracy and do not fail to note, above, the obvious: Society, CITIZENS
HAVE THE RIGHT TO REQUIRE OF EVERY PUBLIC AGENT AN ACCOUNTING OF HIS / HER ADMINISTRATION. The *human-rights* DECLARATION challenge, was born of the above principles and the
most fundamental principle of and for unadulterated 'Justice', the principle of "JUSTICE TO BE SEEN TO BE DONE" as clarified
by the European Court of Human Rights. |
NOTE:The affidavit below was settled and lodged at court when CHALLENGING the
rampant free for all (*1) in the thefts, the
misappropriation and the organised constructive frauds instigated by the staff and
officers of Local Authorities (*2). Visitors, readers
and researchers should note that the staff and officers at the local county court simply
indulged as promoters and accessories of the criminal activities (*3). Obstructing 'Justice' and denying / violating the rights
(*4) of targeted citizens, the main thrust of the
'enterprising' (*5). And the police (*6), beneficiaries in the Housing Benefit Scams, also
breaching their public duties and acting in contempt of the law, through blunt defaults
and omissions (*7).
The affidavit (as
published below) was sent to certain 'victims' whose activities and defaults
indicated they were only interested in joining the fraudsters club (*1), as opposed to 'reporting and exposing apropos' (*2) the criminals who were and are in control of the Law
Enforcement Agencies that successive governments have maintained in the United Kingdom, at
the expense of the citizens (*3).
Promoting and ignoring the
arrogance (*1) of the police who fail to prosecute
criminals, as we cover in our pages, was and remains the central and pivotal argument and
script 'the new recruits' of 'the fraudsters club' relentlessly recite. All produce,
interestingly, unchallenged communications which 'instruments' only a few follow up (*2) through and at the offending beehives (*3).
Contempt for the law and
all evidence (*1), for the promotion of CIUKU Enterprises
is but the cornerstone of the society the corrupt and corrupters have been creating for
centuries.
The clearly pleaded BILLIONS by way of compensation under the counter, as provided
for and clarified above, should cause the maligned hypocrites and sycophants to land on
terra firma. Their main pre-occupation had been and was to obstruct the truth from being
told and the realities from being exposed to the world. Their only aim: "To join the
fraudsters' club and 'To use the system of operations', as we cover in our explicit 'two
LIPS talking' page, for personal gain, through fraud endorsed and acquiesced.
Consider that since
we reported to the TREASURY the blunt arrogance and
rampant fraudulent activities as entered into by the legal circles in January 2002, and
thereafter much has been released to the press by way of 'activities and propositions as
well as acknowledgement of 'white collar fraud'. Activities as entertained by 'public
servants' who purportedly are 'serving justice' are nothing but constructive frauds on the
budget - TAX PAYERS as we cover in this file/page. Access the report (*1) and the words we
link you to (*2). Then recognise why the Rt. Hon. Paul
Boateng was moved to the Treasury after our succinct submissions there and to the Prime
Minister following the events covered in the exclusive page/file we link you to (*3).
| GENERAL FORM OF AFFIDAVIT
PLAINTIFF Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
DEFENDANTS: Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
Sworn by:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx This is the FIRST Affidavit
filed on behalf of THE DEFENDANTS by the Deponent on.................
In the Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Case No. xxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
I Xxxxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, of XXxxxxxxxx
XXXX in the Xxxxxxxx Borough of Xxxxxxx, legal author and lecturer of law MAKE OATH and
say as follows:-
1. I was born in Xxxxxxxx in the village of
Xxxxxxxxx in the district of Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on XX Xxxx 1936 and have resided in the
United Kingdom as and of 5/11/1979 and as a citizen of the United Kingdom as of 19/7/1997.
2. In my early years I served as a shepherd (looking
after the family herd) followed by studies at a hieratical seminary; and following
military studies I served as a commissioned officer in the Xxxxxxxxx National Army.
3. As of 1960 I have been a practising lawyer and
have been serving as a reporter; I have published books and works on legal matters,
dissertations, treatises, reports, and have submitted opinions on legal matters.
4. I served with the United Nations Organisation
(1979) the European Common Market, at the European Council, as the attorney-at-law of the
"Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Xxxxxx Xxx Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx of the United Nations", a Non
Governmental Organisation the legal status and persona of which has been recognised by the
European Commission (Strasbourg) as of XXxx Xxxxxx 1986.
5. As of Xxx Xxxxx 1984 I am the President and legal
adviser of the aforementioned N.G.O and as of XXxx Xxxxxxx 1995 I am a member of the Union
of Lawyers of London (membership number XXXX).
6. Following written submissions
by The CAMILA Project on Xxxx Xxxxxxxxx 1997 and on XXxx Xxxxxxxxxx 1997, the
administrative council of the XXXXXXXX (N.G.O - paragraph 4 above) through its directive
1-126 instructed me to submit legal opinion in the matter of an Order/determination by
District Judge Xxxxxxx sitting in private in the case XXXXXXXXXX on XXxx Xxxxxxxxx 1997
issued on the day while neither party to the action was present and or took part in the
proceedings; I submit hereto below my opinions and findings.
7. Upon reference to International
Treaties and Conventions, case-law, precedent cases on International Justice, etc. I
determined that the above stated decision/ruling/Order of District Judge Xxxxx is null and
void, unenforceable, false and or a forgery, unprecedented, and a by-product of
"XXXXXXX" practices within the Judicial Services/System maintained by the United
Kingdom and that it constitutes an insult in the annals of Justice, to the integrity of
Justice, the intelligence of the citizens and that it makes mockery of the United Kingdom
Parliament, the European Parliament, the European Union and the Council of Europe all of
which legislated and ratified Treaties and International Agreements, and because:-
(1) It contravenes and breaches
articles X-XX of the "International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights" that
was ratified by the United Kingdom at the United Nations in 1966, (New York).
(2) It contravenes and breaches
articles X-XX of the Universal Declaration of the United Nations which were adopted on
10/12/1948 by the U.N.O following the establishment of the United Nations on 26th June
1945 in San Francisco.
(3) It contravenes and or breaches
articles X-XXX of the Treaty of Rome as was entered into on 25th March 1957 by the
participating nations of the European Economic Community, and subsequently were endorsed
by the United Kingdom.
(4) It contravenes and or breaches
articles X-XXX of the Mastrich Treaty as was adopted on 7 February 1992 and amended on 16
July 1997 and has been in force as of 1 November 1993.
(5) The Order specifically
contravenes and violates articles X-XX of the European Convention of the Council of Europe
that was adopted in Rome on 4 November 1950.
(6) The aforementioned Universal /
International Declarations, Conventions and Treaties have been endorsed, adopted and or
ratified by the United Kingdom (as of 10/12/1948,14/1/1966, etc.) and prevail over all
conflicting and or contravening United Kingdom Statutory Act, Law and or any Order arising
out of the United Kingdom Constitution of 1764 (or of any other individual member of the
U.N.O) such as article 103 of the U.N.O Charter (26/6/1945) article XXX, paragraph X of
the European Economic Community and articles X, XX, XX, XX, XX of the above Treaty, X (X),
specifically provide.
(7) As of 14/1/1966 to-date the
United Kingdom has been caused by the European Commission on Human Rights to accept that
some 1200 violations lodged with the Commission were well founded and accepted by the
United Kingdom without reference to the Court itself and or were determined by the Court
of the Commission to have been proven; and the (uninformed) citizens of the United
Kingdom, en masse, as revenue providers have had to make good damages and or to compensate
the victims of British Judges in the sum of some f 4,500.000,000 because of similar practices and or orders such as the one
appealed against by the Defendants in the action XXXXXXXXX which was referred to me, which
Order in any event,
(8) Is null and void because it
was entered into in the absence of both parties; and because District Judge Xxxxx through
silence endorses the Claim yet seeks to suppress the Counterclaim thereby provoking the
Defendants and Justice itself; also because on the one hand the Judge declares neither
party was in attendance yet on the other asserts that the matter before the court was an
ex parte application, as if one party was present. (as a test to students of court
practice ?).
(9) and furthermore, even if the
Counterclaim was deemed vague and or was rejected on grounds that Court Fees were not
remitted, on its own the Order is null and void because the Judge failed to state the
grounds upon which he quietly endorsed the Claim yet rejected the Counterclaim in
accordance with the provisions of Section 10 of the Tribunals and Enquiries Act 1992.
(10) and finally the proceedings
were null and void because the Defendants were not Summonsed before the Court; presumably
forged proof of service was used (a criminal offence).
(11) District Judge Xxxxx
specifically violated section X(X) of "The European Communities Act 1972" which
specifically provides that all of the aforementioned Treaties, Conventions and
International accords as under paragraphs X(X) through to X(X) above specifically provide
that the provisions referred to above and herein supersede and override all National Law
and that Judges must discipline themselves and uphold the provisions of all Law and
accords which successive United Kingdom Governments endorsed and ratified on behalf of the
citizens whose rights the Judges are meant to protect against all, irrespective of
position and without discrimination.
(12) District Judge Xxxxx ought
to have been dismissed as of 1993 after 10 Summonses were issued by the XXXXXXX (N.G.O,
paragraph 4 above) and especially after the police were called to arrest him because he
refused to remove himself from the bench (on substantive grounds, such as he was
implicated in a matter over which he could not possibly preside and or act as an
independent and impartial person) namely in the case XXXXXXXXX following an invitation by
my person for him to resign and remove himself from the bench.
(13) District Judge Xxxxxx has
been reported as a 'fascist', an agent provocateur of the Xxxxxxxxxxx and a complex and or
hang-up person who relies on another XX High Court Judges, reported Xxxxxxxxxxx (refer to
'The Independent' newspaper of XX/XX/XXXX) who act as such and not as true and unbiased
Judicious persons while purportedly serving as such in a Judicial capacity in the United
Kingdom.
(14) The Defence, Counterclaim
and in particular the Appeal submitted to the Court by the Defendants which has as yet to
be set down by the staff of the Court (the public servants who systematically and
habitually serve other purposes than their duties to the public at large) must be accepted
and set down by the Court in consideration of the amount claimed under the Counterclaim
without objections and or on any grounds even if the Court failed to invite the Defendants
to meet and or submit additional Court Fees following the submission of the Defence and
Counterclaim pleadings to the Court, even if any additional Court Fees were/are deemed
payable because the Counterclaim is higher than the claim, which the Court ought to and
must invite the Defendants to remit such Court Fees if deemed essential under the new
rules of the Court which its clerical staff ought to have invited the Defendants to remit
in the first instance.
| Sworn
at .....................................................in the county of
........................................
this .......... day of .........................1997
Before me .........…...................................... |
by...Xx
Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxof
...Xxx Xxxxxxxxxx Xxxxxx
........Xxxxxx XXX XXX
Officer of the Court appointed by the Judge to take
affidavits |
COPIES
OF THE ABOVE affidavit were transmitted by FAX to (a) Mr
Norman Scarth, (b) Mr Paul Talbot-Jenkins (c) Mr Maurice Kellett. Others, who were 'noted to be lovers of
the system as is', were handed copies or were pointed to the presence of the above
affidavit in the public domain (this web-site) at various times. The last two known to be
the most vociferous of Freemason bashers & activists in spreading the gospel in
respect of the powers that be. All three were & are benefiting from 'attraction'
to their promotional capabilities and known to be lovers of the system as is CARE OF
THE FACILITIES IN PLACE FOR FRAUD APLENTY and the corruption of morons who fall victim to
the practices in the courts, also to when
ignoring their obligations to the rest of society and the taxpayers in general. We
point to the simple fact that anyone conceding to & accepting the invitation to keep
quiet (hence the failures of one and all from within many an alleged group of challenging
activists, such as the LIPS crowd/mob, the UKMM, the fnf, the ELC, the f4J, etc.) who
nonetheless default / fail to publish in the public domain the facts of life IN THE LEGAL
SYSTEM / THE COURTS). Such persons recklessly ignore the fact that they render themselves
to be accessories and abettors to ACTS OF CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS ON THE TAXPAYERS. The first
two, named above, were also known to be active in USING OTHER VICTIMS FOR MORE OF THE
SAME : FOR THE , for
suppressing the true facts of life (in tandem with the media) in the legal system and the
fraudulent use of the courts' facilities, as covered in this page and acknowledged by two
politicians from a legal background. [*Link from here to evidence, above, relevant to
suppression of criminal activities] |
|
|
|
| THE FRAUDSTERS CLUB fraud= impostor
(noun), deceit, swindle, racket, sham, deception, duplicity, pretender,
misrepresentation.... [*Link from here to a page where we
point to the issue of 'recoverable proceeds of fraud' as determined by judiciary over the
years when the judges served the law and the citizens an no other interests]
OVER the years we have been
contacted by a number of shysters and fraudsters who fell / fall within the above category.
As of 1997/8, in particular, a number have used contact with us simply to bring about
pressures on the offenders, the abusers of trust, the abusers of public office and the
abusers of the courts' facilities. They promoted, to us, 'assertions of intent to
publish it all, facts and evidence, on the Internet. They were simply using the
'threat to publish it all, as the avenue through which to bring about settlement of
their cases under the facility / provisions we expose and
point to above. *Link from here to evidence
establishing the fact that such a shyster, one Johan Michael Richard Foenander, had
entered into negotiations with 'the authorities' for a settlement / reward under the table
as covered in this page, before Mr Peter Hayward the organiser of the LIPS crowd / mob
directed him to contact Mr. Andrew Yiannides. The letter from a solicitor who, to
all intents and purposes was acting for Mr Foenander at the time, had written to another
solicitor in order to turn down an offer from the other solicitor BECAUSE HIS CLIENT'S
CASE WAS NEARING COMPLETION at the European Court of Human Rights : In other words the
taxpayers' contributions -to the national budget- were to be used to reward his client for
playing the field, as an accomplished (sucked-in) fraudsters-club-recruit. The
principles of law violated through such 'provisions' are very clear. Only persons who lack
any knowledge of law cannot see through the crystal clear implications as to the tax
revenue targeted, stolen & misappropriated, because of blunt abuse of the legal system
and the courts' facilities'. We point all abusers of our time and goodwill, to the House
of Lords Precedent case we released particulars of on 3rd March 2008.
[*Link from here to the deliberations by their Lordships -as long
ago as 1939-1940- when they covered issues of recklessness by solicitors and unsupervised
juniors; in the instance at all manner of deficient pleadings -such as a defence suspected
to be false- and erratic submissions to the court were part of 'the constructive frauds on
'the serfs' who were represented by persons, licensed by the Law Society, to operate
collectively as *The Cancerous Growth Industry* that Mr Andrew Yiannides first wrote of in
1970-72.
Consider the facts published and to be
published in these pages. Simply consider the evidence published and to be published as
part of the *2lipstalk* page. You can then draw your own
conclusions as to the only possible scenarios the evidence supports. Undisclosed secret
arrangements by self-appointed 'gurus' in legal matters and court procedure, nonetheless
end up lodging applications to the Strasbourg, after failing to challenge the abductors of
Justice appropriately. We publish in this page a letter that Andrew settled for two
victims of abuse of office. The abusers, none other but the police. The prosecution urged
by the police to proceed against the targeted victims even though the Crown Prosecution
Service told the police there was insufficient evidence for convictions on the issues the
police were urging for a prosecution. The police and the CPS failed to make a case against
the targeted citizens who then instituted proceedings against the police for damages. The
damages claimed attached to the manner with which the police brought about the prosecution
and arising out of the failed prosecution itself. To proceed with their case the victims
of abuse of public office were obstructed with their rights at and in law. The letter
below clarifies in a nutshell HOW public servants, who are retained on our behalf to serve
the law and Justice engage in the usual tactics and practices for the promotion of the
self perpetuating cancerous growth industry. Read the letter and recognise how the law is
breached and how rights at and in law ARE violated by the servants of law and justice.
Nothing could be simpler.
Such persons running around asserting and
alleging that their cases were not addressed by the European Court. That we are familiar
with the provision we draw your attention to through these page, we simply state:-
"Care of Article 38, all is suppressed; and the victims who, allegedly were let down
by the courts in the United kingdom and the European Court on Human Rights, 'appear to be
happy to let things be'! The very same persons brandish about letters from Members of
Parliament and the police authorities. They even BLAME THE MEDIA for being wets and or for
their downright indifference to 'their personal catastrophes'.
The vast majority of victims simply lodge
complaints founded and resting on 'unfair hearings'. In fact much more than that single
element can be claimed. The two typical examples we cover in the Appeals published in our
pages support most that we publish in this page:-
1. In the matter of the rampant
Housing Benefit FRAUD through DOWNRIGHT THEFT and MISAPPROPRIATION of the housing benefit
funds did not end as the offenders had set out to do. The crimes indulged into with
the blessings of the police, who systematically fail to prosecute those who create,
procure and promote FORGERIES for such crimes, did not culminate as the offenders set out
to do. The crimes endorsed, acquiesced and promoted by the staff and officers of the
'relevant courts' (who issue and serve court orders without hearings, and even post them
late, to persons who were/are party to the organised / institutionalised crime') did pay
attention to the submissions filed at court and as delivered to the Lord Chancellor.
Letters and documents to the Law Enforcement Agencies will now be published as we have
secured more than enough evidence as to who responsible. Some of the principles were
covered in the letter already published. We refer you to the content of the letter of 18
December 1998 to the Home Secretary. Consider the speed in which action was taken by
the government, the councillor that ignored us for over four months and the local press
that were ignoring it all for almost four years. We are to publish now an explicit letter
to the Lord Chancellor covering another case. The letter covers earlier attempts, when
reliance was placed on the same persons who were/are operating from within the same county
court but seen to be offering their assistance and illicit services to another Local
Authority. That case is partly covered in the affidavit published in *thefacts.htm* page.
2. The divorce proceedings
victim, was the person who instigated the undisclosed, to Andrew, telephone exchanges. The
content, published in the *2lipstalk.htm* file evinces the
frame of mind in which the caller approached the person he called. In the meantime the
operators of the Housing Benefit constructive frauds industry, after exposures we
published in our pages, after gearing up for the conversion of one targeted property, and
following APPROPRIATE CHALLENGES we shall be publishing, the owners were permitted to
exercise their rights to sell the property. |
| Two images below of a
letter delivered in May 1999 to the Head of Exchequer at Haringey Council, North London.
Attached to it THE LAW applicable to the issues the Council's
OFFICERS had been aware of while they all carried on IN CONTEMPT OF THE LAW, naturally
because of their reliance on the most offensive of facilities FOR the rampant fraud from
within all public services. Below the two images an introduction to the 'The Daily Telegraph' main article that covered the very issue two years
later. It came about after we reported the constructive frauds, through the courts to the
government, as covered in our pages. (*Link to the page where
we publish copies of faxes to the government) |
| EXPLICIT
letter to Haringey Council, staff & officers of which, were noted to have been acting
in contempt of the law. All simply were relying on abusers of judicial chair occupation
and the police to negate in the execution of their public duties and to similarly indulge
in contempt of Parliament's laws. Protection of the citizens as Parliament's law and
International treaties assure all, were simply relegated to the trash cans in the Republic
of Haringey, as in many a state where pseudodemocracy is promoted as the if the genuine
article. |
Page1
|
Page2
|
For
further information on the activities of the staff of Haringey Council (as in other
councils) readers & researchers should access the following pages: 1. natinscan 2. haringey 3. hbappeal.
4. benfraud 5. scamlocal
6. theyknow 7. free4all
8. thefacts 9. abuse
For further information on criminal in
intent activities, routine defaults and arrogantly reckless contempt for the law by the
police (as a body corporate) retained and maintained by the Republic of Haringey, readers,
researchers and concerned citizens should access the following pages: 1. crimesin 2. forgeries 3.
Additional material inclusive of court
proceedings (attempts to abuse the courts facilities) for and in connection with
fraudulent demands, harassment and intimidation, visitors, readers and researchers should
access also the page:
http://www.government.uk-human-rights.org/Local/Council/Enfield/workand.htm
THERE read the letters to the Minister & to Local Authority staff / officers who
were operating out of Haringey Council, also Hackney Council and, as the affidavit
published in this page (*Link)
establishes, as other alleged 'servants of the public' similarly indulged out of Enfield
Council. |
FOOTNOTE
Footnote eXtra:
Visitors/readers are urged to read first the article published in the London Evening
Standard, as settled by the Rt. Hon. David Blunkett, Home Secretary in 2003 [*Link to the
article we reproduce for obvious reasons]. While there, above it, the explicit letter to ex-Minister, the Rt. Hon.
Frank Field MP, delivered a few days earlier. Accessing the material pointed to from the
letter (URLs) is of utmost importance. It should assist 'recognition of the citizen's
rights at work', when called upon properly in truly democratic states. The above in 2003;
there were other 'submissions' and among such civilised and, within the law, approaches by
citizens that led to the right actions by governments, the explicit challenges when we set
about exposing one of the most evil of alleged victims of the legal circles to have ever
contacted us [*Link to our explicit
submissions to (a) the Prime Minister, (b) the Chancellor / Treasury, (c) the Home
Secretary. WE acted so after we had secured more than enough evidence about the parts of
an alleged victim whose only interests were (i) the rewards under the table FOR KEEPING
QUIET about the ORGANISED FRAUD THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS' FACILITIES and (ii) her parts
in blunt attempts that were intended to discredit the person she was sent along to mess
about with, Mr Andrew Yiannides].
Access please the letter to the Home Secretary, the Rt. Hon. Jack Straw, in December 1998 [*Link to the letter] and note the results evinced in the
newspaper article (Hornsey Journal) also within days of the letter reaching its
destination. Many the charlatans and stooges -lovers and 'promoters of the system as is'- on the
job for decades; one and all acting as sold souls always do [*Link to the evidence we
point to relative to the parts of one of a number of sold to the system fraudsters who
were sent along / introduced to Andrew Yiannides by the managers / organisers of the LIPS
crowd / mob].
1. FOUR COMPARATIVE
CASES, proof of ORGANISED FRAUD THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS FACILITIES & the
fraudulently misrepresented *independence of the judiciary* who
are free to indulge as they determine to suit pre-arranged plans for 'the serfs' who pay
taxes for the salaries of licensed by the state 'criminals'. The authorities
and the media, between them, have ensured in an alleged democracy, one that ALLEGEDLY
rests and is founded on law and order, that for ALMOST SIX DECADES NOW the citizens,
THE 'SERFS' ARE KEPT IN THE DARK. Read about secret meetings (*Link) where self appointed gurus, in the use and
distribution of resources, INCLUDE 'THE SERFS' WORK AND WEALTH CREATING CAPABILITIES IN
THEIR CONVERSION OF ASSETS PLANS. CONVERTING IT ALL TO THEMSELVES & THEIR PARTNERS IN
CRIME AS THEY GO ALONG, care of the fourth quote (*Link) in our HomePage, is their main
pre-occupation.
(Case ONE) The realistic conclusion you read of in our HomePage, over TEN
YEARS BEFORE THE SEQUESTRATION of the assets of the National Union of Mineworkers through
the official services and instruments at the disposal of the Rampant Corruption Jockeys
(do look up the word 'jockey' in a decent Dictionary of the English language). Free to
indulge as they please (or as appointed / directed / retained for) judicial chair
occupants (*Link to definition) act as administrators of
everybody's rights to their properties, INCLUDING RIGHTS IN AND AT LAW.
(Case TWO) The very same administrators ('public
servants' (?)) could not use the same facilities to recover the STOLEN (criminal offence)
FUNDS from the MIRROR GROUP PENSION FUND (!).
(Case THREE) The very same 'public servants' (?) could not use the same
facilities to trace and recover the BILLIONS IMPORTED & MISAPPROPRIATED (distributed)
through the POLY PECK plc FINANCIAL FIASCO. Obviously, WHEN TARGETING ASSETS
anything and everything is possible; everybody knows 'the ropes to use'; but WHEN CRIME,
by the institutions is at the root of it all, NOTHING EXISTS TO BRING ABOUT SIMILAR
SUCCESSES. Precisely the same rules apply WHEN IT COMES TO THE ASSETS THAT ARE TARGETED
FOR CONVERSION OF THE 'SERFS' / 'SHITIZENS' PERSONAL ASSETS TO THE
SELF-APPOINTED 'LORDS AND MASTERS' in charge of CIUKU Enterprises [*Link from here to definition]. As controllers of it all,
through abuse of the legal system and the courts' facilities, they act as they please. WE
URGE YOU TO READ THE WORDS STRAIGHT FROM THE HORSE'S MOUTH, as reproduced in our pages [*Link
from here to the page) and consider the role of the
media in the cases we point to and briefly cover in this footnote.
(c) Read also of the foundations and the corner stone upon which they, the criminals in
control, have been building the societies of their own making for centuries / millennia.
They are only acting in accordance with the teachings they follow [*Link from here], as taught by their 'God' and through the scheme
and arrangements we cover AND EXPOSE IN THIS PAGE. Many the converts to their world of
evil-mongering via dishonesty, deceptions
and fraudulent misrepresentations aplenty.
(Case FOUR) We add, the creme de la creme, to the above. It was alleged
and promoted by one and all (the media in the forefront) that as the front-man and
controller of operations (in the Poly Peck plc. fiasco) 'conveniently escaped to the
unrecognised haven of the occupied Northern part of Cyprus', there was nothing the masters
of ceremonies (on the world stage) could do. BUT, when the authorities in the United
Kingdom were caused (by the brother/sister/family of murder victim Michael Menson) to
INVESTIGATE & ACT PROPERLY in that instance, somehow they were able and succeeded in
securing the co-operation of the unrecognised (?) stage managers in the occupied Northern
part of Cyprus. SPEAK OF SPLIT PERSONALITIES & ORGANISED MASTER-CRAFTSMEN IN THE ART
OF DECEPTION & FRAUD on the world stage! Between them, the first and second place
holders for violations of human rights in Europe, they sure made a mess of things for any
thinker to note.
2. From here *Link to a page where
we expose Mrs Veronica Beryl Foden's parts and REAL OBJECTIVES (note plural) when she
suppressed & did nothing about the Perjury by a solicitor she was working with for far
too long. All the while, she was of opinion that by abusing the time and patience of
Mr Andrew Yiannides (as the typical fraud of a 'human' that she was) she could carry on
proclaiming her assertions about the criminal activities in and through the courts imposed
on the serfs', care of her type of subliminal indoctrination inputs to the ploys created
& used by the organisers of it all. HER CONVENIENT DEFAULTS & HER MOST DIRECT
OF INVOLVEMENT and CREATION (by her) of the very activities she was engaging in, simply
exposed her parts as just another stooge who was sent along (by the LIPS crowd mob and
fraudsters) to engage in abuse of the trust she was gracefully afforded by Mr Andrew
Yiannides. IN FACT HER PARTS WERE NOTED FROM THE ONSET, specifically when she indulged in
the applications SHE ALONE INSTIGATED which one and all (of her associates & their
affiliates) were of opinion could have been used to discredit Mr Andrew Yiannides. AS A
FRAUDSTER WHO PARTICIPATED IN THE SCAMS & THE ORGANISED THEATRICAL PRODUCTIONS the
dreamers wrongly presumed that hers / their aims care of and the parts and the convenient
defaults she engaged in, could not be recognised as blunt contributions (by her) for and
towards the constructive frauds, leading to rewards for the participants through the
abused courts facilities. All too obvious as of the activities, the defaults and HER
FAILURES TO RAISE ANY ISSUE after the solicitor submitted the PERJURED AFFIDAVIT to court;
the objective of one and all simply to generate ADDITIONAL COSTS ORDERS AGAINST THE
ALLEGED VICTIM, as p[art of the money laundering facilities for the stolen taxpayers
contributions through the usual fraudulent court proceedings = theatrics].
3. *Link from here to a page
where we publish a letter sent to Mr Andrew Yiannides by such a person. The link takes
one directly to the letter and the challenges made of the dreamer who had been abusing the
goodwill and patience for far too long; having stretched Andrew's tolerance to its limits
over a span of well over 7 years. Abusing the time, testing the patience & tolerance
limits of the one whose stance and presence never failed the self-proclaimed 'hero' was in
the order of the day, as the wily Norman Scarth indulged for years. The 'hero' who (a)
decided to join the club of fraudsters, (b) never to disclose
his deceitful plans with others & his intentions to the person he looked to and relied
upon for suport for years and (c) had been working in tandem with
others ONLY TOWARDS THE PLUNDERING OF THE TAXPAYERS CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE NATIONAL BUDGET
was in the order of the day as the craft-y product of the abused courts facilities carried
on, had been and weas engaging with others in the creation and execution of the
scenarios we cover, point to and expos in this page. Readers, researchers and victims of the rampant
fraud, through the courts imposed on the taxpeyers, are urged to read all of the letter we
point to; all should note the challenges & the submissions to the fraud of a human
(thinker) and all should access other material and evidence pointed to in the page
or other pages. It is befals upon the WELL INFORMED to draw relevant
conclusions and to consider the issue we point to in another page in consideration of an
element and promotions the Freemasons also promote in connection with their
'contributions' through history to the development of modern pseudodemocracies and other
states of government for the management & control of 'the serfs', the sons of men on
planet earth. [*Link
also from here to a page where
when the theatrical production for the day was but a run of the usual constructive frauds
on the taxpayers. NOTE HOW & WHY A DISTRICT JUDGE WAS CHALLENGED TO
STAND DOWN. Note also the give-away signs that exposed the true colours of the stars of
the scenario / production in that instance. NOTE also the blunt discrimination by the DJ
who DID NOT RESPOND APPROPRIATELY TO A POLITE REQUEST but simply wished to carry on WITH
THE INTENDED END PRODUCT FOR THE DAY. Carrying on as pre-arranged / organised by the
criminals in control with the objectives for the day, was the only issue at hand as far as
that District Judge was concerned; Justice had been dispensed with by the abusers of
judicial chair occupants at the Employment Tribunals].
4. Thinkers : 'humans who use grey matter' should consider "Why
fail to refer to the Proceeds of Crime Act and implement Parliament's intentions, in
the first instance, especially since the rogue businessman, had been found guilty of the
crime of FRAUD? Why did Lord Woolf fail to refer to such provisions by Parliament in the
Palmer case, the fraud on old age pensioners? Worse WHY DID THE REPORTER / EDITOR of the
'news-print / waffle' BESIDES IGNORING PARLIAMENT'S PROVISIONS, which we elect not to
overlook, simply promoted 'the take it as delivered by faudsters in judicial chairs?
Also, why ignore the principles of justice, such as *FRAUD VITIATES JUDGEMENTS*,
that we point to through the Court of Appeal precedent case in the page linked to from here? XXXXXXXwords of Victims of the abused court
facilities -by licensed criminals- MUST ACCESS and consider the 'duty of any judge, in any
civilised state -Democratic or not society- as qualified & clarified in the page all
visitors, readers and researchers should link to from here, IF THEY CARE about the direction
& paths, allegedly civilised states have been placed on by the criminals who set out
to take control of all and everything on planet earth.
5. *Link from
here to the foundations of the most obvious of arrangements in place, as organised by
followers of the most vile / evil of frauds on mankind. We urge victims, especially,
not to reject out of hand what they are pointed to, each owes to his descendants duty of
care, in more ways than ordinarily spoken of. Andrew Yiannides recognised as of
a young age what had been, has been and is. Readers and researchers we know
will reach for the material they are pointed to and look further into the elements young
Andrew never cast aside. Visitors / all may or may not have heartd of all manner of
promotions and allegations by other victims; more specifically they may have been
bombarded with assertions and aspersions by pewrsons who simply act as 'subliminal
indoctrination operatives' for and in the interests of 'the fraudsters who organise and
re-arrange, as public servants, of the lives of 'the serfs' in our pseudodemocracy, one of
many and a typical example of such states. . and xxx
6. xxx
7. xxx
8. xxx
9. xxx
10. xxx |
|
| Pages where we expose known lovers
of it all, users and maintenance engineers of the system as is |
| .org/2lipstalk.htm |
.org/4deceit.htm |
.org/actors.htm |
.org.actors2.htm |
.org/adoko.htm |
.org/beware.htm |
| .org/blunket1.htm |
.org/chaldep1.htm |
.org/convicti.htm |
.org/confraud.htm |
.org/contract.htm |
.org/courts.htm |
| .org/corruptcourts.htm |
.org/evilones.htm |
.org/govolso.htm |
.org/len.htm |
.org/media.htm |
.org/solfraud.htm |
- ALL of the persons we
expose in the above pages elected to ignore THEIR OBLIGATIONS TO REPORT (to 'the serfs' =
taxpayers ), THE ABUSERS OF PUBLIC OFFICE & PUBLIC FACILITIES.
- They all did so because of
their love for the rampant fraud on the national budget (the uninformed taxpayers) as
covered in the exclusive page, which page ONE & ALL SIMPLY IGNORED.
- Not one ever bothered to
address the issues we expose in the explicit page, despite the fact that we have been
pointing all of our contacts, since May 1992, to it all.
- Visitors, readers and
researchers are urged / invited to access and read the letter which the Hon. Secretary of
the Litigants In Person Society, Mr. Norman Scarth sent to the founder of human-rights,
Mr. Andrew Yiannides, reproduced in the page .org/4deceit.htm.
- The author's statements,
such as 'what for and why he sought additional assistance', spell out his parts as a lover
of it all.
- Common sense dictates,
that he should have directed his request to his partners in deceptions aplenty, all of
whom engage in fraudulent misrepresentations AND WILFULLY TO HAVE BEEN SUPPRESSING, FROM
THE TAXPAYERS, THE FACTS OF LIFE RELATIVE TO THE RAMPANT ABUSE OF THE COURTS FACILITIES.
- All the while one and all
were / are engaging in the scenarios we cover in the exclusive page, which page the
author and his partners in fraud aplenty, simply shoved in the dark corners of his/their
perverted / corrupted mind(s).
|
*Link from here to extracts from 'Dancing Alone',
the work of Frank Schaeffer: - "The Knowledge Class even audaciously proposes to solve the very social
pathologies they themselves often contributed to creating. They continue to demand that we
give them more money, more time, and even allow them to raise our taxes again and again to
underwrite yet more utopian experiments in social engineering and state-sponsored
"virtue," in spite of the fact that the least productive people in our society
are often those with whom our social engineers and their government programs, have had the
most to do........."
|
