12 June 2003

ILFHR-UN

Mr Nicholas Stamoulakatos
Shelbourne Road
London - N17 9YH

My Ref: 12AJNNEI
Your Ref: Bulletins / Fears / Inexcusable Misrepresentations

Dear Mr. Stamoulakatos & Miss Tambor

I enclose my letters of (see-attached list) and the relevant copy-attachments referred thereto. I forward these now that you are 'back to your normal working, environment'. In putting together my concerns and thoughts I bear in mind your suggestions / invitation / proposition that I should take an interest / over the case that caused me to write to you in no uncertain terms. I refer of course to the attempts to implicate me for the umpteenth time in matters that were and remain the creations of fertile imaginings and false account by the authors.

I refer you to my extensive communication of 12 April 2002. I was caused to settle (as briefly as was possible at the time) and to forward copies of that long communication to both of you personally (using the proof of posting facility) and to the ILFHR-UN using the Recorded Delivery facility. THE EVER PRESENT attempts to impose on and for me concocted fabrications about my person, since I was introduced to you, were and remain unacceptable. Mr Stamoulakatos ever since you sought contact, through suspect quarters (*F2), with someone who would be in a position to translate 'your books' from Greek to English, the machinations never ceased. The attempts to impose 'your plans for / on me', have been an endless tirade of wild schemes to which there appears to be no end.

MY LETTER LAST YEAR, to which I refer you, appears to have merited no consideration, by you. I made it very clear that I objected to the attempts to implicate me in a claim for alleged liabilities founded on fictitious work and allegedly, contracted retainers. MY OBJECTIONS TO THE FABRICATIONS WERE VERY CLEAR and your submissions to Edmonton County Court and in particular to DJ Silverman intriguingly clear (*F3). Nonetheless you carry on as if you were and have been addressing an illiterate in law and or a person who is prone to partake in fraudulent claims and or activities. Can you please write back and justify such activities? You should send also a copy of your explanations to your favourite court and judge, as you did last year. The judiciary, are of opinion that the citizens in the United Kingdom are serfs of the Middle Ages and many a promoter of such mentalities still dwell in that era, Mr Stamoulakatos. Such Public(!) Servants(?) who defraud their Masters of their properties (including their rights in law) are being exposed on the Internet for and because of the criminal indulgences the SERVANTS OF THE CITIZENS appear to relish in unchecked, unsupervised and uncontrolled by a non-elected Minister who is in charge of the 'free to act, as they please (and or as used by the state and politicians) judicial chair occupants, through contempt of all law; acting as dictators and the tools of politicians via the much revered 'independence of the judiciary' promotions, when in fact it is clear that the promoters know that they mean 'independent of the restraints of law' - licensed criminals', in a pseudo-democracy. You should refer to THE APPEAL that is published by *human-rights* on the Internet, covering aspects of how the manna providers steal with the help of such criminals from the citizens who pay taxes for the cost of retaining criminals as their servants at and in law. The copies of the letters that I enclose, to:

1. The Chief Executive and to
2. The Social Services Department at Haringey Council, with
3. The other attached copies of communications

ARE NOT NEWSPAPER CUTTINGS but intellectual property covering facts, realities and the law applicable to factual scenarios from within the Borough of Haringey.

I refer you to your recent communications ALL FOUNDED AND RESTING ON YOUR FEARS, about
(End of Page 1 text - Link to image) - (Below start of Page 2)

what MIGHT BE DONE to you during medical examinations and tests at the North Middlesex Hospital. In one of your communications, you WRONGLY ASSERTED that I had been at the same hospital and that I had stayed in after the tests for three days. YOU, Mr. Stamoulakatos, had been told very clearly that I had to undergo similar tests at St. Bartholomew's Hospital in central London. I clarified that I had gone to the hospital (for the investigative tests) one late afternoon and stayed overnight. I qualified that the tests were carried out the following day and that I was awake, throughout, watching everything on a VDU (TV screen) because local anaesthetic was used. I further clarified that I stayed in hospital for that night as well (just over one day by then) and that I was released/allowed to go home, the following morning. THE SCENARIO that you elected to create and to misrepresent to the North Middlesex Hospital authorities / officials was just another figment of the type of theatrics and UNTRUTHS THAT EMANATE FROM YOUR QUARTERS RELENTLESSLY. Where on earth, and HOW did the North Middlesex Hospital feature in the events that I spoke of, to you, in respect of similar tests, to/for me at the BARTS, as the hospital is known for short?

I am obligated to address the melodramas and the fears you relentlessly promoted in your recent communications to the North Middlesex Hospital and to many others. I ELECTED NOT TO address the issues there and then, as I was perfectly entitled to do in view of the untruths that you promoted about my person, for the umpteenth time. I did so BECAUSE I DID NOT WISH TO ADD TO YOUR DISTRESS AND WORRIES / CONCERNS about the 'possibilities' you were alluding to.

HOWEVER, you must compare my considerate approach with your attitude towards the circumstances that you witnessed and got to KNOW OF in late 1996 and early 1997:

1. With a contract on my life,
2. With my mother's heart condition and her health in a deteriorating state and in hospital.
3. WITH A BEREAVED SISTER, whose daughter was caused to take her own life, because of her father's mentality and his lack of consideration FOR HER NEEDS.
4. With that very same 'male chauvinist Scrooge of a penny pinching animal' seeking to have my sister certified as mentally disturbed / unbalanced.
5. And the very same Scrooge of a man behind the 'whatever it takes, get rid of him' ( Όσα, Όσα ) contract on my life. (Aiding advising and abetting him in all of these YVA : see AoAO)

ALL YOU COULD MANAGE / ARRANGE / COME UP WITH (as a Human Rights Activist and challenger of the evil mongering, that you speak of in private ONLY, including court appearances under the same guise) was for you TO MAKE FUN OF ME AND TO IGNORE IT ALL. (Human Rights?)

To the above lack of interest and or concerns by/from you and the organisation that you lead', I must add the fact that you were MOCKING ME, just like the police about THE VERY REAL CONTRACT ON MY LIFE. It was not a case of imaginary lethal injections or possible arranged accidents, as you were promoting recently about your person and YOUR FEARS, but a very real contract on my life, with a witness to it all, in existence. WITH THE POLICE LAUGHING AT AND MOCKING ME INSTEAD OF INVESTIGATING THE COMMISSION FOR A MURDER! ALL you contributed at the time was to make fun of me! And you did so, simply because of my fears and sentiments about the tragic loss of a life, that of my niece, and my concerns for my sister and what the penny-pinching chauvinist was planning for my sister.

Out of necessity, I have to remind you that it was WHEN I BECAME AWARE that the Scrooge of a man who had been boasting that he could buy any service (the police in his palm, etc.) was benefiting from 'Lack of any issued or served Summons'. Such assertions by the Magistrates Clerk, EVEN THOUGH A HEARING DATE HAD BEEN FIXED by the Criminals in Control of Haringey / Highgate Magistrates Courts! That my niece was caused to take her own life (by the generous buyer of services from and by criminals' was not enough for 'cold blooded and cool thinking you', naturally! All was noted, however.

TO CAP IT ALL UP, when a new hearing had been arranged, Wendy turned up late, WELL AFTER THE CONCLUSION OF THE ADJOURNED HEARING, with an excuse that you were held up in another case/hearing/court. So much for your interest in the serious issues you had witnessed!

• No Summons ISSUED ?
• No Summons SERVED ?
• And the court HAD invited the victims, to their theatres !

You must have recognised that it was a case of 'further indulgence and to have fun at and with the victims. Just like you mocking me because of my fears for my life and what the male chauvinist man my sister married might proceed to do to her, had his contract on my life materialised. (Human Rights?)
(End of Page 2 text - Link to image) - (Below start of Page 3)

I never asked for any proof of 'the other hearing' because by then I had enough about your plans for me, especially with the never ending attempts to implicate me in other plans than the work for translation of non existent books which you had/have been talking of as work that has been ready for PUBLICATION (at least in Greek) ever since you sought contact with a person to translate(?) the works(!).

YOU caused me to get in touch with the Inland Revenue not long after I was introduced to you, Mr Stamoulakatos. I did so because of an indulgence you embarked upon WITHOUT ANY REFERENCE TO ME, even though it entailed use of my residential address. YOUR PLANS FOR THE TRANSLATOR TO BE TAKEN IN (and for a song / ride) FAILED. You should have recognised then and have known of it, ever since, that I am no fool or some 'mug' who can be made to fall in any trap because of 'financial gains' through fraudulent schemes and promotions, such as you have relentlessly been 'giving birth to via imaginary scenarios'.

1. I never contacted you for the publication of any of your non-existent works / books.
2. I simply contacted you for 'your asserted needs' for someone to translate from Greek to English, such books as I WOULD ENDORSE AND APPROVE OF, as I qualified at the time and in letters ever since.
3. NO BOOKS - were ever referred to or handed over to me, to read, approve of and endorse 'for translation' with any possible input from me, SHOULD I HAVE AGREED to enter into such an agreement with you, as co-author'.

YOU KNOW WHY I ASKED FOR THE CONSTITUTION / Articles of Association of the ILFHR-UN. You know that it turned out that it was a joke of a laughable translation from Greek to English, as I read through it. You should or MUST HAVE RECOGNISED that I WAS NO SIMPLETON who would ever be likely to ENTERTAIN SUCH RIDICULOUS PLANS, AS YOU CONCOCTED FOR AND ATTEMPTED TO IMPLICATE ME IN. The simple fact that an alleged Human Rights Organisation IMPOSES, through its Constitution / Articles of Association, A DICTATORIAL REGIME, is an insult to humanity. IMPOSING on the naïve, the gullible AND THE VULNERABLE, who join such a set up and sign away THEIR 'RIGHT TO DISSENT', was and remains the most vile of insults to any intelligent person who knows of and values his rights from within any Democratic State. Your Socialist / Communist Ideals, and background, may have been of influence on you, when you first set about drafting such a constitution / Articles of Association. That factor alone was the only reason why I looked upon that vile and CONTEMPTUOUS OF HUMAN RIGHTS LAW and breaches / violation AS SHEER STUPIDITY. Yes, stupidity and I choose to I allow myself the same freedoms and liberties as you have been doing for years. ANYONE who approved the ILFHR-UN Articles of Association and Constitution AND ANYONE WHO ENDORSES SUCH PROCLIVITY has no rights to refer to himself or themselves as Human Rights activists and or promoters.

Your activities behind the scenes, as of the onset, disclosed and exposed much. Only a dreamer could have come up with the invitation and the contract that you concocted in the first instance, without any proofs of any works or books, in Greek, from and by you. Proof of such works, was and remained for years YOUR FIRST PRIORITY, if you genuinely sought contact with me for such translation. Producing, to me, such work was ALSO WARRANTED UNDER MY PRE-CONDITIONS to any agreement with you IF I WAS TO UNDERTAKE and contract for such work with you.

You even ATTEMPTED to 'engage me' in your plans TO IMPOSE ON ME, a contract which I rejected outright. YOU KNOW PERFECTLY WELL that I did so, because it was a case of YOU seeking to IMPOSE ON ME the role of a publisher and distributor, in contempt of the offer that I had agreed to call upon you and to discuss with you; simply TRANSLATION….. TRANSLATION…. TRANSLATION.

Following receipt of my letter of 12 April 2002 (to which I refer you) you wrote a letter to DJ Silverman at your favourite, local court about my person and the implications were obvious. I may have chosen to ignore the obvious, because of the questionable manner and the false assertions that were being put forward about my person in respect of the alleged claims for damages and alleged translation work. I suggest that you consider carefully the letters which I had no choice but to write to Mr Andy Constanti (dated 10th and 20^th April 2003) and to the letter that I wrote to and for you in Greek. Both of my letters to Mr A. Constanti are very clear in what they are intended to convey to that charlatan and abuser of my time. I suggest that you consider very carefully ALL OF THE ISSUES RAISED through the letter in Greek to you Mr Stamoulakatos. Do not fail to note that I WAS ABLE TO WORK OUT where he came from and WHAT HIS PLANS (with those who directed him to me) WERE. (Human Rights?)

You should consider ALL OF THE CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES POINTED TO:
(End of Page 3 text - Link to image) - (Below start of Page 4)

1. Through the two letters to Mr A Constanti, you should recognise that he simply 'set about to obstruct justice' and my rights and duties under the law! Such vile acts on top of all the abuse of my time and all of the other liberties he indulged in, while benefiting from much by way of guidance and assistance in the many problems he 'was facing' and had been referring to me. I need not remind you that he was NOT THE ONLY GREEK who sought to promote / sell a Trojan Horse to a person of Greek background. There was the introduction for and by the Loonies (that is how the legal professions refer to the Litigants) In Person Society, plans for victims of THE TRIAD: Legal / Judicial / Police (the unholy              TRIAD).
2. By considering very carefully the clearly stated facts to the Chief Executive Officer at Haringey Council, in my letter of 1^st November 1999. Gurbux Singh Esq. was responsible for 'THE BLUNTLY ORGANISED DISORGANISATION' and the fraudulent conversions of Housing Benefit funds. Nothing but sheer constructive frauds through pre-arranged 'CREATIVE ACCOUNTANCY SCAMS'. You MUST consider the fact that I exposed and I am exposing it all on the Internet. I caused the issues to be brought out into the open (local press) AFTER I WROTE TO THE HOME SECRETARY in December 1998.
3. BY ARRANGING to visit an Internet café, where you SHOULD ACCESS the letter to the Home Secretary (in 1998) AND POSSIBLY RECOGNISE the big difference between the 21^st century and the Middle Ages where you are still roaming and meandering.
4. BY CONSIDERING the submissions to the criminals at Haringey Council who sunk their heads in the sand, like ostriches, after receiving the letter dated 8^th June 2001. I SETTLED the legal arguments 'for the intended victims' and Mr. P. Nicolaou signed and ensured it was delivered to the dreamers / criminals. READ IT and CONSIDER THAT IT WAS INTENDED TO BE A LESSON IN LAW and that it was put on the table of the CRIMINALS IN CONTROL OF THE SOCIAL SERVICES and the LEGAL DEPARTMENT, at Haringey Council. Then consider my suggestions to you in the letter in Greek about 'the asylum creators and their partners in crime. I refer, of course, to those who welcome 'the created' asylum' seekers and THEN provide manna through thefts of the properties and the rights in law of targeted citizens, from within an alleged democratic state that allegedly rests and is founded on principles of law and order. (Human Rights?)

I hereby invite you to justify the alleged 'retained for and to remain as translator' in your letter to DJ Silverman. I am exposing the aforesaid judicial chair occupant, on the Internet. The stated facts, through the published appeal IN THE ONLY TRUE AND OPEN COURT IN THE WORLD are very clear. The legal arguments are founded and rest solidly on the stated facts, on the breached and violated rights in law, but most of all on documented evidence that many shoved in the dark corners of their perverted minds. (Human Rights?)

I hereby invite you to justify the implied assertion that the atrocious English used in the 'work' publication / yearbook / promotional work for the ILFHR-UN - come 'The Abduction of Abdullah Ocalan' was / is remotely connected to any alleged translation work by me.

I pointed you to the realities and the facts AS THESE ARE DEVELOPING NOW. I gave to you a copy of my letter to the Rt. Hon. Frank Field MP - ex Minister and you should consider attending / going to an Internet café for access to ALL OF THE MATERIAL POINTED TO the MP through the text of the letter. Then, I expect of any genuine challenger and exponent of the law on human rights to cease all ostrich acts and to act for and in the interest of the 'serfs'.

I conclude by pointing you to the words of Heraklitos which the creators/editors of the Gospel according to St. John set off with. The Greek, gentleman who was introduced by the Loonies In Person Society, when asked if he had any books in his collection about the work of Heraklitos, came up with a beauty of a 'mbourda', "I was never interested and have no interest in sculptors and sculpture". I would have expected such an answer from the charlatan A. Constanti who grew up in the United Kingdom, but not from somebody, who was born, grew up and was educated in Greece to, at least, College level.

Sincerely

Andrew Yiannides
ENCL. As text and attached list.

Back to letter images

You were irate, very angry and ….. And all because I gave Chief Inspector Harris the two telephone numbers where he could contact you; at work during working hours and in the evenings at home. YOU ELECTED TO OVERLOOK THE REASON AND THE PURPOSE of that gentleman's interests in my/our family and the matters that caused me to make complaints about the police in our area in the first place. Let me enumerate: -

A neighbour attacks me, causing grievous bodily harm, simply because I parked a car in front of the flat he lives - parking in front of our house occupied by another citizen's car. I have to attend hospital for months because of injuries sustained as a result of that attack. And our local police default to prosecute the criminal because HE IS ENGLISH and I/we am/are not.

A builder contracts to do necessary work to the property our family benefits from (investment for specific purposes) but he fails to act in accordance with that agreement. He seeks to defraud me, threatens my life and properties and when the police (at Holloway) are called they default to execute their duties properly. Encouraged by the police failures to act in accordance with the law, THAT BUILDER COMES TO OUR HOUSE, THREATENS ME to begin with and whilst I, the person who abhors physical violence, am telephoning the police HE IS THREATENING YOU AND OUR CHILDREN TO BURN US ALIVE IN OUR SLEEP. You know what followed and how I fought for my/our rights until eventually all those who were supporting and aiding in the denial of rights to us, as a family. YOU KNOW that those, in charge of JUSTICE, who had themselves denied rights to me/us were caused to review their tactics and vile practices. YOU KNOW that a judgement for a substantial amount of money WE COULD DO with was awarded to me against the fraudster ONE AND ALL WERE AIDING AND ABETTING. Money is not as important to me as my family's well being and I did not proceed to execution of that judgement because I am no fool. THE POLICE HAD YET AGAIN DEFAULTED TO TAKE ANY APPROPRIATE ACTION against the fraudster and criminal one and all were assisting, aiding and abetting again because that fraudster was/is English and I/we am/are not.

Our son's bicycle is taken at knife point from him (on a specific date I am sure YOU will never forget without help from anyone); and the only step taken by the police was by the initial w.p.c who attended our house in the presence of a neighbour and her son; she simply took the details of the crime (time, place, what, how I SUPPOSE). Thereafter nothing. AND YOU KNOW that our son takes to carrying knives himself because he feels, and erroneously thinks, he is more secure and safe. I am the idiot who points out to him that such possessions could and will lead to him being involved in more violent crime than simple fights. YOU KNOW that last summer in the course of the last few days at school our son is involved in a fight and he is alleged to have used a knife/piece of metal. You know that at the beginning of the present school year, September 1994, we had to attend a meeting at his school because of that incident. You know that our son asserted and claimed in the presence of Miss Coghill (his teacher) that he did use a piece of metal and went on to assert and claim "he believes he had no choice but to use whatever to protect himself BECAUSE NO ONE CARES".

And you know that because he had earlier used that argument with me AND BECAUSE all of you had declared the police never bothered to come to us in furtherance of any investigation proper, for the violent crime OUR SON WAS THE VICTIM OF, I decided to take matters further. YOU KNOW the police asserted and alleged they had allegedly visited YOU on one date and OUR SON (in your presence) on another date. Both YOU and OUR SON had/have been insisting no such visits took place and I am left with no option but to challenge what are falsified police records. NOTHING UNUSUAL; remember the five Summonses I had to fight after we were the victims of a hit and run accident because of a drunk driver? When the police failed to investigate those CRIMES and subsequently charged me, THE VICTIM?? One's again our brilliant police were proving themselves what they stand for and how they deal with crime in our area. Nothing had been done about our son and his bicycle; nothing in respect of that violent crime; nothing but falsified records such as the ones that produced FIVE SUMMONSES AGAINST THE VICTIM OF THE HIT AND RUN ACCIDENT!!! (and we are not the only victims to be ignored, believe me).

AND A SENIOR POLICE OFFICER (from our local police station) who attends our house brings along copies of records he asserts are the factual visits; the visits YOU AND OUR SON ADAMANTLY STATE NEVER TOOK PLACE. It so happens that the two dates recorded are a month or so apart; AND YOU (with the children) HAD GONE OVERSEAS FOR YOUR SUMMER VACATION THAT YEAR. I point out to the senior officer the improbable visits because of your (plural) absence out of the country. AND THE FOLLOWING MORNING HE HAS THE AUDACITY TO TELEPHONE ME IN ORDER TO SUGGEST HE HAD MADE A MISTAKE. And he proposes a date a month later for the second visit/meeting ignoring in the process the fact that I myself HAD BEEN LOOKING AT AND REFERRING TO THE COPIES HE HAD BROUGHT ALONG THE PREVIOUS DAY. WHAT THAT SENIOR POLICE OFFICER WAS PROPOSING ON THAT MORNING was the solicitors, the barristers and the police themselves, favourite pastime: - Forgeries and falsified records in furtherance of cover ups, in legal terms 'breaches of public duty', setting aside the law on forgeries and falsification of records WITH INTENT to mislead and to deceive. And in this instance, as with most, when forgeries are resorted to, the element of intent is paramount. If there be no intent there is no need for such criminal activities.

P.S.
I did give the police your evening / flat telephone number; the choice where and when they contact you was theirs. Any subsequent need to meet with you and take your statement(s) is and should be subject to mutual agreement. Ones again I apologise you have to meet with the police, but as I stated above you did not object to such meetings when it suited your plans.

Victims, readers, researchers and students of the New World Order Code of Ethics can access from here the page where we publish a letter from the Inspector who 'conveniently was removed from the case warranting and commanding investigation as to WHY THE POLICE LIED & FAILED TO ACT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THEIR RETAINERS, IN RESPECT OF THE CRIME MR ANDREW YIANNIDES' SON, TEENAGER ALEXANDROS KIMON YIANNIDES, WAS THE VICTIM OF. All should be prepared to read of the commitment by Chief Inspector Harris and ponder as to 'the reasons', WHY THE MOTHER OF THE VICTIM CONVENIENTLY WAS NOT PREPARED TO CO-OPERATE AND SUBMIT / PROVIDE THE NECESSARY STATEMENTS TO THE POLICE.

• The three pages, on the left are of a FAX / letter which Ms Marisa Sarda sent to Mr.Patrick Cullinane, a victim of the Inland Revenue.
• Most interesting the fact that the authoress of an intended FALSE INSTRUMENT (created by agents / or tutored stooges who operate as lovers of the system as is) failed to send/deliver the same instrument to the person it was being addressed to.
• Anyone who knows of the whereabouts of the authoress should contact her and ask her one SIMPLE QUESTION: "Why did she fail to fax her response to the person she allegedly was responding to?"
• At the same time the maligned & crafty (both) should also state THEIR PERSONAL REASONS as to why they set about to create the false records they wilfully intended to suppress from the target of their fraudulent activities.

Reference to the date of the above letter assists in recognising why the allegedly destroyed FAX  was resurrected in 2004 by Mr. P. Cullinane.