WHERE IS JUSTICE? Read >>> "The court has inherent jurisdiction to stay an action which must fail; as, for instance an action brought in respect of an act of State" [*Link to founder's tribulations in 1972-75]
And by extension any act of any public servant who is appointed, retained and maintained by other public servants for all of whom, the state, as employer, is ultimately responsible, including abusers of judicial chair occupancy. Hence, the billions paid out as covered in the exclusive affidavit that visitors can link to directly from here. *Link also to the founder's conclusions as of 1972-75 when the great Metropolitan police were seen to be nothing but accessories to and abettors of the rampant fraud and corruption through the courts while Members of Parliament were -as they still do- promoting the waffle that amounts to nothing short of 'independence of the judiciary to act in contempt of ALL LAW (national and international) in a pseudo-democracy. With such a facility in place (the words we point to here) and arrogant abuse of public office, can anyone assert that Mr Andrew Yiannides, the founder of human-rights, was not right to determine that Justice has been abducted and that she is held captive in the dungeons maintained by her abductors who rape her daily in their courts? NOTE : ALL Member States of the European Union are subject to the ruling which visitors, readers and researchers can access in the explicit page /yourrights.htm [*Link to the realities - in due course also a link to the warning (indirect but nonetheless very clear) for thinkers to recognise >>> On 3rd March 2008 - someone's birthday <<< we released a House of Lords PRECEDENT CASE and reveal deliberations by their Lordships in respect of FRAUD - DECEPTION - CONSPIRACY & IMPLIED LIES BY KEEPING SILENT about any wrong imposed on any other >>> IN THE MEANTIME WE have been naming and shaming a number who know of & do much more than just approve wrongs imposed on millions of 'serfs' in our allegedly civilised country / state / province / district of the European Union that allegedly protects 'citizens from FRAUD & CORRUPTION. Needless to say the case entailed activities and practices by solicitors as Mr Andrew Yiannides was subjected to, decades later, by an old school friend, Mr Kypros Nichola of Nicholas & Co. in London. Mr K. Nichola bluntly abused the trust placed in him and indulged, in tandem with others, in criminal activities intended to cause the damages that were imposed on the targeted 'serf' by accredited - by the Law Society & Bar Council - allegedly Honourable Officers of the Supreme Court, the courts maintained by successive elected governments in the United Kingdom, one of many pseudodemocracies. In due course another revelation relevant to the arrogant 'inherent jurisdiction', through which to deny, obstruct justice & impose all manner of criminally created states on 'the serfs', who are taxed for the cost of maintaining criminals in public office, in pseudo-democracies]

RESPONSIBLE FOR THE STATE OF AFFAIRS, successive irresponsible Lord Chancellors and Home Secretaries who ignored all complaints and submissions irrespective of the evidence and the law pointed to, by the victims of it all, the citizens who are called upon to pay taxes for the maintenance of criminals in public office. [*Link to our exclusive page, covering confidential fraud as arranged THROUGH THE BEST KEPT OPEN SECRET in alleged democracies, European States. Elsewhere the foundations and corner stone upon which the operatives built the societies of their making using the bricks and mortar we cover in this and other pages. The visitor should not be under any illusion that the stars in the theatrical productions, covered in our pages were by any stretch of the imagination 'humans' who were / are gifted with any attributes that distinguish 'true humans' (thinkers) from animals]

* Information FOR victims who wish to co-operate by EXPOSING & CHALLENGING abusers of Public Office *

December 2006 - SUMMONS ISSUED & SERVED IN RESPECT OF FRAUDULENT & CORRUPT ACTIVITIES IN FAMILY COURTS [*Link from here to evidence. *Link also from here to a case when the abusers of the courts' facilities abandoned their plans for another targeted family]

IMPORTANT INFORMATION for all victims of malpractice - misconduct - negligence, etc. TO NOTE

In the civil justice system in England and Wales, a judge presides over the proceedings that are argued by the opposing sides through the adversarial process. The process enables the court, judge, to reach a conclusion as to the truth of the facts in dispute. Thereat it is for the judge to apply the law to the facts proven, established at court.

The system as evolved is covered in the page 'English Legal System' and remains the same after the Woolf reforms.

others On Line and work with others for and in the necessary challenges and exposures for the common good. Link to Information Page

UPDATE. The person named in this page 'elected to leave the United Kingdom' following a number of peculiar states and scenarios that were and remain inexplicable. Visitors are requested to access the introduction on the right, and to await further revelations in respect of the developments as of the moment Mr Dave Ellison (the controller of the lbduk.org) contacted us. We have not heard from Mr Len Miskulin whose lack of consideration and failures to follow up on the issues he discussed with us, prior to his departure, need to be attended to. In the alternative it shall be for the visitors to draw their own conclusions as to the true scenario being related / stated in this page.

IMPORTANT:The visitor's attention is drawn to the words of Jesus Christ, as attributed to Him, by the editors / creators of The Gospel according to St. Luke. Access His words to the lawyers almost 2000 years ago. Many the dignitaries over the two millennia who shared His views (*Link). The exclusive material and elements we point to, arising out of an extract from the Old Testament we reproduce in our pages is a must for ALL VICTIMS OF THE LEGAL CIRCLES, THE COURTS  & THE POLICE. The element we point to IS the common factor through common connections

Images of the EXPLICIT LETTER

Page1 of the challenges

Link to start of text P1.

Page2 of the challenges

Link to start of text P2.

Images of an EXPLICIT FAX

Below the images of the fax / letter as settled for Mr Len Miskulin for submission to and challenges of HH Judge Charles. The content very clear and to the point. Page1

Page2

Below, in this page we reproduce the text in HTML from and to which links may be created by us for any other victim of the criminals who are in control of the courts and the police to link to from their pages. (*Link to the HTML text).

Guidelines on Navigating through the extensive material: access instructions.  The first step for visitors to acquaint  themselves with the extensive material should be to use the SEARCH FOR facility. Just type in any word or combination of words / issues that are of concern / interest or need information and our views on the issues. Remember that our views rest on factual experiences and research with evidence in support. We urge visitors and in particular victims of the legal circles and the Law Enforcement Agencies to access the introduction page to the Community on Line (*Link).

As part of the reconstruction process our new pages and pages where changes and additions have been implemented (the improved / amended pages) are endorsed with the link 'Page Changes and the date of the last changes. The link takes visitors to a List of the changes implemented in the page. These include new material and links from relevant paragraphs to other or new relevant material in other pages. For further clarification email: webmaster@

Introduction to Len Miskulin and developments thereafter

• Associate of Len Miskulin contacted the founder of human-rights, Mr Andrew Yiannides and stated that he 'was impressed with the content at the *human-rights* web-site. (GO FIND OUT how the initial contact came about and who set the wheels in motion)
• He then introduced Mr Yiannides to a victim of the divorce industry, Mr Len Miskulin and Mr Yiannides to Mr Miskulin's work for www.lbduk.org stating in the process that his discovery of the uk-human-rights.org web-site will be made known to all other groups of victims, in order that common goals and aims should be promoted collectively.(*lbd stood for Live Beat Dads in the UK naturally)
• Enters the scene a third party, Mr John Charville, an alleged legal guru. He exchanges private emails with Mr Yiannides and he promotes / relies on irrelevant and inapplicable legal cases and arguments; he, Mr Charville, is pointed to the UK's commitments founded on membership of the European Union and as a signatory State to the European Convention on Human Rights, among other pertinent realities. Mr Yiannides does so because Mr J Charville persistently promotes and refers to divorce cases and judgements by judicial chair occupants in the United States of America.
• Mr Charville subsequently initiates group postings directed to Mr Yiannides, who welcomed the open dialogue while expecting of the 'guru' to keep in mind the legal position and the realities he had been pointed to, earlier. (*Reprogramming a robot would be easier - it was clear he came along with a specific agenda and it sure was not a case of collaboration but one of 'kill the goose' that provides the true legal position).
• Enter the scene a fourth 'activist', the chairman of the UKMM (United Kingdom Men's Movement) Mr George McCauley. He 'welcomes the initial dialogue' (the email exchanges between John Charville and Mr Andrew Yiannides) and writes of the anticipated co-operation that everybody is expecting. (*Facts about the UKMM sucker-serfs should acquaint themselves with, in due course)
• Like all others, however, he enters into ostrich acts, when subsequently Mr. Charville (the 'legal guru') sets about assaulting the work of Mr Yiannides and the material at this web-site.
• Mr Charville's blunt attempts to discredit and offend Mr Yiannides WHILE one and all contemptuously ignored the submissions and the LEGAL ARGUMENTS that were settled, by Mr Yiannides, for Mr Miskulin, who lodged the pleadings and submissions at court, conveniently to be buried / ignored by all three challengers (Mr. Dave Ellison, Mr. George Macauley and Mr Len Miskulin). The CONTEMPT OF THE LODGED PLEADINGS by allegedly concerned leaders of the victims of the divorce industry, WAS MORE THAN ENOUGH TO INDICATE WHICH SIDE OF THE FENCE THEY HAD BUILT THEIR NESTS & WERE GRAZING TO THEIR HEARTS' DELIGHT. 
• The submissions and legal arguments (and challenges of the abusers of the courts facilities) were and remain VERY CLEAR. It was a case of 'Heads I Win' & 'Tails You Lose' for the legal circles and their army of associates in the rape of families through abuse of the courts facilities. The issue of fraud on the men-suckers by the allegedly weaker sex AS USED BY the abductors and rapists of Justice and humanity, could not have been clearer, when one considered the denial of rights to 'the victim', for far too long.
• Not one of the leaders of the fathers' / men's groups (who were pointed to the challenges from the founder of human-rights, as published at www.lbduk.org by Mr Miskulin) ever contacted us, with the exception of Mr Anthony Pace (*Link to email exchanges). However, even he announced, some time later, that he had joined the UKMM, the sham of an alleged group that allegedly 'fights for the rights of the men-victims'.
• Most notable was the fact that although Mr Charville's offensive postings were posted through the lbduk.yahoo.groups, which Mr Dave Ellison and Mr Len Miskulin were in control of as the registered co-ordinators, neither bothered to post (through THEIR group) Mr Yiannides' responses and submissions to Mr Charville's intentional diversionary tactics and offensive rubbish. Neither recognised that by NOT REGISTERING as a member of *t*h*e*i*r* yahoo group* Mr Yiannides very simply cast his nets. Their failures to even post Mr Yiannides' responses to the rubbish from Mr. Charville made it VERY CLEAR WHERE THEY STOOD in the field of war against the abductors and rapists of Justice. Their failures also evinced that THEY WERE RAPING DEMOCRACY by ensuring the victims who were in contact with them and part of the sham they were managing were not made aware of the responses and challenges to Mr Charville.
• Mr Charville's wilful defaults to address or even mention (among others failings and maligned defaults) in his postings the first legal challenges he received from Mr Yiannides (in the course of the private exchanges Mr Charville instigated) were indicative of the aims of Mr Charville and the possible plans / schemes in the background by the silent one's, Mr Dave Ellison & Mr Len Miskulin, the victim himself.
• Although both Mr Dave Ellison & Mr Len Miskulin acknowledged the logic of the legal arguments (that rest and are found on the facts of the case AND EXISTING LAW) neither joined in or contributed any thoughts of theirs in the OPEN, through *t*h*e*i*r* lbduk.yahoo.groups list.   
• The NOTED INDIFFERENCE to the intentional diversionary tactics was intriguing. There was only one oral comment to Mr Yiannides' observations, when Mr Len Miskulin told Mr Yiannides that Mr Dave Ellison had expressed the view that Mr Yiannides had the right to reply (AND WASTE HIS TIME) while the instigator of the assaults was benefiting FROM THE SILENCE OF THE OSTRICHES, the bystanders : Mr. Dave Ellison and Mr. Len Miskulin.
• YET ANOTHER SCENARIO was in the pipeline. Apparently Mr Dave Ellison had been in regular contact and there had been ongoing exchanges, negotiations and dialogues with Dr. Kartar Badsha of the ELC (Environmental Law Centre) in Southport, Merseyside.
• Three-way meetings followed in London. The discussions (between Dr Badsha of the ELC, Mr Miskulin of the lbduk and Mr Yiannides of human-rights NGO) were focussed on the need to deal with ALL public relations and Press Releases through a common centre for ALL pro-active groups and individual challengers.
• Arrangements were made for a meeting at Mr Len Miskulin's residence in Debden. It was attended by a number of group leaders, movement representatives and individuals. Dr Badsha and an associate of his from Southport, left early because of the long drive back home. In the meantime the gathered group carried on discussing 'the constitution and aims of the INTENDED common centre' for promotion of the activities warranted to CHALLENGE & EXPOSE all abuse of Public Office by the citizens' servants.
• Among the early arrivals was Mr Shaun O' Connor who exchanged, with Mr Yiannides, views on the problems in and with the courts, with the legal circles, with the judiciary, with the police and with other Public(!) Servants(?). He expressed interest in the issues that were covered in letters and exchanges between the Prime Minister's private office and Mr Yiannides, copies of which he read with interest. He, Mr O'Connor was definitely to go on line and he would be contacting Mr Yiannides in order to secure and benefit from assistance. What followed was another scenario, however. Whether he was party to such activities, as pre-planned moves, or to the activities that followed was just *a sucked in stooge* is and stands as an arguable issue.
• Enter the gathering, one W.D who arrived late. He did not even bother to enquire as to any agreed issues or agenda and did not ask to read the minutes that Mr. Shaun O'Connor(!) was keeping(?). W.D. just proceeded to deliver a talk to the gathered 'victims of the legal system' as to HOW to apply and address the courts / judges. All the while he was tapping on a book that he was referring to, as he went along.
• Mr Yiannides tried a couple of times to intercept 'THE LECTURE that WAS NOT ON THE AGENDA for the meeting he was attending. Mr Miskulin rather forcefully blocked Mr Yiannides from raising issue and inquiring as to the reasons for the 'unscheduled (as far as he was concerned) development and THE LECTURE to the gathered / invited group of attendees.
• Mr Miskulin's obstruction led to a private meeting in the kitchen at the behest of Mr Yiannides, when Mr Yiannides clarified that he was not happy with the intrusion / arrangements he had NOT been informed of, hinting at the possibility that he had been invited to Mr Miskulin's residence under false pretences.
• With all others gone Mr Miskulin and Mr Yiannides worked late and among the issues of concern was the name by which the centre of operations was to be known as.
• As the initial idea was for 'a united front' for the groups and the individuals who embraced the original proposition, Mr Miskulin suggested Fathers United ...... and Mr Yiannides suggested Families United pointing out to the fact that Live Beat Dads, among its members and supporters, valued a mother / woman, and her very sound contributions.
• Both slept on the idea and in the morning it was agreed to settle for Families United To Unconditionally Restore Equality : *FUTURE*. Mr Yiannides informed Mr Dave Ellison by email as to the name and intellectual property; the latter issue was warranted because of past experiences with planted mischief makers and 'diversionary tactics manipulators' of which more than enough had already been noted and recognised as manifestations by and from the organisers and controllers of ALL FRAUD & CORRUPTION THROUGH THE COURTS. 
• TWO DAYS LATER, the telephone lines go hot.... and NO EMAIL EXCHANGES (most important the omission). Evidently Mr Shaun O'Connor and Mr John Charville had been running around and contacting persons who attended the meeting at Mr Miskulin's residence, with a view to 'taking over *FUTURE*, before it was even launched...!!!! The most intriguing bit of news, however, was the fact that Mr Shaun O'Connor did NOT forward copy of the minutes he volunteered to keep. There followed the allegation that the two were put up to the attempts to take over *FUTURE* by Dr. Kartar Badsha of the ELC.
• Mr Yiannides simply contacted Mr Dave Ellison and reminded him of the issue of intellectual property and that he (Mr Dave Ellison) should inform Dr. Badsha accordingly, if he was involved or had any influence on the two 'would be abductors'. Mr Ellison was also informed that a URL (domain name was already in place, and the site would be put in operation as and when the right conditions and developments were manifestly APPROPRIATE & RIGHT FOR IMPLEMENTATION. (*Link to an explicit email below)
• .

An explicit letter to abusers of the courts facilities

24-Oct.- 02

To:
The court manager
Principal Registry of the family Court
High Holborn London

Case number ED00P01206

For reference to and the attention of District Judge Green

Dear Sir/Madam

I beg to refer you to my facsimile of 14^th of October 2002 to and for which I have as yet to receive acknowledgement let alone the necessary response.

I acknowledge receipt of a document from your court purporting to be a legitimate court order proper.

I point to the following:

1. Under M & F, Pr. ACT 1974

Assignment of Circuit Judge to matrimonial proceedings

The jurisdiction conferred by the preceding provisions of this part of this Act on divorce, County courts, so far as it is exercisable by judges of such courts, shall be exercised by such CIRCUIT JUDGES as the Lord Chancellor may direct.

2. When the direction is given pursuant to part III of the family law Act 1969 for the use of blood tests in proceedings in the Family Division and divorce County courts the arrangements for the taking and testing of blood samples will be made by the solicitors for the party on whose application the direction was given.

The above make it abundantly clear that the document is a false instrument even if the case was legitimately and properly within the jurisdiction of "your court". In the premises the alleged order is null and void.

I must therefore insist that on the basis of the above you withdraw the false instrument and apologise for the attempt to abuse the courts processes and facilities with fraudulent intents.

I submit three documents downloaded from the Internet that qualify my rights as established by law, Statutory and Common:

     3.  18/9 clarifying the right to plead any elements during proceedings at any time.

Below the text of page 2 (refer to image in left panel, above)

4. 18/12/11 establishing the rights to plead intent when the occasion demands it and evidence to support the pleading exists.
5. 18/8/4 pleading fraud when there is clear and sufficient evidence to support it.

On the basis of the above and in particular 1 and 2, the rights under 3, 4 and 5 are crystal clear. In the circumstances I am confused as to how legally trained persons appear to be indulging in contempt of 1 and 2 above unless self assured perpetuation of established practices has made them feel invincible when in contempt of the law.

As pointed in my previous communication, my Application was placed before the court and had been on record as of August 2001. Also on record is the application of the respondent's solicitors (to my Application) seeking and securing the transfer of the case to the Chancery Division, RCJ, Strand.

Defaults to deal with my Application, irrelevant if arrangements between the Respondent's solicitors and the court, were and remained in contempt of the rules of procedure for well over a year. The aforesaid facts and the realities were and are in contempt of rulings of the European Court of Human Rights.

There was no application and certainly no consent would have or could have been secured from me for the transfer of the case back to an inferior court and, most certainly, NO right would have been granted to any abuser of public office to indulge in the creation of the false instruments such as the document posted to me by your court. Further to the aforesaid, there subsists the element of HH Justice Charles (RCJ) granting rights to the solicitors acting for the Respondent to be in command of MY rights whereby they had free hand to issue directions as they determined. The need to appeal the abuse of the courts processes and to grant freedom of action (to my opponent's solicitors) in respect of MY rights further enhances my claim of 'intent to defraud'. NO PERSON IN HIS/HER RIGHT MIND WOULD HAND OVER THE MANAGEMENT OF HIS ARMY (RIGHTS IN LAW) TO THE GENERALS OF THE ENEMY AND THIS MAKES LAUGHING STOCK OF JUDGES WHO ARE MEANT TO BE NEUTRAL, IMPARTIAL AND INDEPENDENT OF ANY OTHER INFLUENCES.

In view of the above, copy of these submissions are to be delivered to:

1. The Lord Chancellor who is responsible for the courts and those running, managing and acting as officers of the courts.
2. My member of parliament.
3. Home secretary in view of the announcement last May (Re: white collar fraud).
4. The press/media and
5. Published on the Internet, the only true open court.

I conclude by qualifying that I expect and demand of your court to return the case to HH Justice Charles of whom I expect proper attention either to my rights or the forwarding of the demanded, by me, an order directing that transcripts of both hearings before him be made available and the right to appeal on the basis of the objections (served on him) to the railroading and hijacking of the case by the Respondent's representatives in law.

Yours truly

L. Miskulin

Encl. As text

An explicit email that was called for when the true colours of alleged victim-challengers shone through
    Dave & Len
     the copy paste below more indications AND PROOF of what *human-rights* 'IS' all about.
     No copy-cat monkey business; no parrot renditions INTENDED TO IMPRESS the 'uninformed and gullible' AND NO OSTRICH ACTS.
     Grappling with 'the wild horse' and galloping on, by mounting it, is a matter for those who wish to reach another destination than the one OTHERS ARE LEADING THEM TO.
     I trust that you recognise the fact that *human-rights* will be moving on whether FUTURE or yesterday are alive and kicking. I never liked being in limbo just because others relish in such situations and or love stagnant waters.
     As of April and May the government made moves. All I have been faced with was a planted mischief maker [*F6] and many a silent onlookers, while the parrot would mess around with INEXCUSABLE & UNJUSTIFIABLE, even worse, all sorts of IRRELEVANT issues: I explain, 'No one has uttered a word about the STATED FACTS & THE PLEADED VIOLATIONS already REGISTERED at the European Court of Human Rights. It is as if no one suffered from similar practices.
    The last words above RAISE A VERY SIMPLE QUESTION:
    "If there be no common causes, WHY THE NEED for any grouping let alone the proposed and adopted FUTURE, now on ICE?
    My best to you and yours. Time to get on with what has to be done OFFICIALLY at government level, as in the courts.
     Andrew
12 August 2002
===========
     Go to:
http://www.human-rights.demon.co.uk/2lipstalk.htm#clear (routed to another server)
     Read the succinct introduction that covers maligned interference by the instructed. READ THE VERY ISSUES (police defaults and court fraud) that you have wasted too much time over, REPETITIOUSLY. NOTE THE CONTENT OF THE LETTERS that others, including Ebert, who acted like all others who set themselves up as sole saviours of abducted Justice WHILE PRESENTING THEATRICAL PRODUCTIONS WITH OTHERS BEFORE THE ABDUCTORS & HIJACKERS, to impress victims who as suckers got raped in the process by actors of the worst denominator in the presence of the directors of the shows - the rapists of Justice.
     READ OF THE co-operation that existed between Norman Scarth and *human-rights* before he sold his soul to the devil FOR THE GLORY AND POWER he sought, as 'our hero', the sole and soul of the 'resurrected legal aid scheme under another name and with the new partners, as *human-rights* covers in the exclusive page:
http://www.human-rights.demon.co.uk/confraud.htm (routed to another server)
     To the page I MOVED (from previously un-linked material only available to pro-active embers in the CoL) and PUBLISHED IT FOR ALL TO ACCESS.
READ of: "The Convention in Legal Terms". Copy of the part of the page you received yesterday and IF YOU USE IT AS I ASK, it is simply a matter for you and you alone.
You will receive tonight copy of exchanges with other groups and you will no doubt NOTE my present attitude about persons who fail to act as the occasion , FACILITIES & DEVELOPMENTS COMMAND & INDICATE VERY CLEARLY.
---
webmaster [*Link to the FOOTNOTE of the page /lawcompi.htm where more details & developments as of contact are laid bare]

An e-mail intended to put on notice persons who were serving other agendas, than they had been asserting orally.

Whether the other agendas were on the cards as of first contact, or 'evolved' subsequently through the involvement of others (a known user of the system in place, for personal advantage and pecuniary gains) was irrelevant. However, the failures to move on, promote the challenges lodged at court, when added to the convenient silence & failures to get on board and to address the rubbish from the mischief making John Charville, were MOST REVEALING.(*Link4more)

Filed at the Family Registry covering the rights under the law, for BOTH SEXES, when all relevant law is taken into consideration, with EQUALITY being of the essence. The submissions were settled by Mr Andrew Yiannides, for Mr Len Miskulin who lodged them, as his challenges to the High Court, meant to be published at http://www.lbduk.org

• On the right three images of the final draft (with minor corrections) as settled for Mr Len Miskulin who submitted / lodged the pleadings at  court.
• The pleadings / submissions were to be used later by Mr Andrew Yiannides, who had prepared for such challenges years earlier but for later use with additional submissions founded / resting on fact & law.
• The submissions were / are intended for use by victims of the arrogant abuse of the family courts for assaults on the institution of 'family commitment' with the attached 'plundering of family assets'. [*Link to LAW]
• The assaults, always through encouragement and or use of naive / greedy women, as happens to be the case always.

• Practices & arrangements resting and founded on the creation of false records & pre-scripted scenarios as in the case of pre-trial meetings between judicial chair occupants in the Foenander -v- Foenander divorce case. [*Link to such facts which the corrupted moron did not wish to expose]
• No prizes, for those who read his solicitor's letter to another solicitor, as to why the convert to / lover to the system of operations HAD NO INTENTION TO MAKE PUBLIC, like the rest of the LIPS crowd/mob, the arrogant abuse of the courts' facilities for fraud aplenty.
• One and all relying on the promotion of incompetent and inexcusable assertions about the defaulting media lap-dogs and corrupted / corrupt police officers.
• Each and every one ACTING IN CONTEMPT OF THEIR OBLIGATIONS TO THE REST OF SOCIETY, to the 'serfs who are called upon to pay taxes for the maintenance of arrogant criminals in public office'.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE             

PRINCIPAL REGISTRY

BETWEEN

WITNESS STATEMENT AND ARGUMENT OF AND BY

Len Miskulin

a) 

I beg to draw attention  to the following:-    

7. 

 STATEMENT OF TRUTH

I believe that the facts stated in this witness statement are true:

Signed ......................................................................

Len Miskulin

FAX to Len Miskulin, evincing clearly stated issues of relevance

The draft of the letter as settled and submitted to HH Justice Charles, in HTML

http://www.uk-human-rights.org

MESSAGE

In the circumstances I will appreciate acknowledgement of this communication. I will also appreciate recognition of my inalienable right to fair audience and to the right to appeal your endorsement of the attempts by the legal team of my opponent. (*F5)

ENCL.

A second FAX to Mr Miskulin, 4 days later and documents transmitted for use in the course of the hearing as listed in the Witness Statement & Legal Arguments / Submissions, in support of the rights and facts pleaded / lodged at court soon after he was introduced to Mr. Andrew Yiannides. Access the heads I win & tails you lose challenge to the abusers of the courts facilities, above. Not one of the allegedly concerned 'leaders of organised men's groups bothered to refer to or address the issues founded in law & resting on court practice rules.  

• Note what was involved and how Len Miskulin was assisted.
• Consider what other forces and elements were at work while millions of 'serfs' out there were and are subjected to the same treatment as Mr Len Miskulin had been.
• Many were sent along or introduced as 'challengers, ready to WORK WITH & FOR OTHERS.
• Access the web-site Mr Miskulin set up; click on the Holocaust link in the left pane / window. Look up the state he ended in after two months of HUNGER STRIKE, because he was denied access to the two boys taken away.
• Ask, 'WHY did Mr Miskulin 'run away'? Above all, who has been MAINTAINING THE WEB-SITE for over three years since he left the U.K? And WHY did he negate on his promises to co-operate with us for and in respect of THE RIGHTS OF THE TARGETED VICTIMS OF THE DIVORCE INDUSTRY?
• Access and read the events covered in the FOOTNOTE at the page http://www.uk-human-rights.org/lawcompi.htm
• Stated there enough; consider the ever-present 'offers which many a ruined victim, cannot refuse when all they care about / are after is some financial gain & NEVER MIND if their children will inherit & benefit from the very same practices. And SUCH PERSONS run around proclaiming themselves to be 'loving, caring fathers, yet somehow all appear never to have heard of the word 'CONSIDERATE' of the future for the very children!

The issues we point to above must be considered by genuine victims who wish to USE their legal rights WITHOUT ignoring their OBLIGATIONS to the rest of society, present & future. Visitors, readers and researchers will be reading of and about *FUTURE* in the footnote pointed to above. *FUTURE* being an acronym for Families United To Unconditionally Restore Equality.

Covered below the facts and activities that led to the challenges in the letter we publish above in respect of the issues that Mr Len Miskulin raised with the founder of *human-rights*. The legal arguments were called for, after his associate Mr Dave Ellison contacted Andrew Yiannides in order to introduce him to the www.lbduk.org and to the creator of the site, Mr Miskulin. It was a case of just another irrelevant male / father. Mr Miskulin was  targeted [*Link to another victim-case] by the abductors and rapists of Justice. An application for DNA tests and other relevant challenges had been lodged with the court and it was noted that among other issues, not one of known & notified leaders of  male / fathers / divorce industry groups had taken any interest in the legal RIGHTS OF THE TARGETED SERF. Most intriguing was the arrival on the scene of an alleged legal boffin who subsequently engaged in more than the usual waffle from planted mischief makers [*Link to plans for the use of such creations] and maintenance engineers of the system as is. At the very least it was a case of another 'peacock showing off his plume' [*Link to how and when such a person moved in only to move on after failing to impose the ways the person was promoting as an alleged legal guru].

With links to and from page images, also to other material

• We request of and urge visitors, readers of this page to access the web-site created by Mr Len Miskulin http://www.lbduk.org. It was maintained by him until he decided to disappear and contact only selected 'associates and mates' of his, with whom he shared more than the elements he raised with us and for which we worked in order to challenge all offenders within the context of the law. (*Link to the explicit page where a professional, a barrister, exposed his part for and in the usual activities attached to deceitful and fraudulent misrepresentations. Read of invitations intended for the naive and gullible who fall to such idiotic schemes & scenarios. Many the lovers of the system as is, who engage and partake in such vile activities while asserting and alleging to be 'challenging victims' WHEREAS SUCH PERSONS ENSURE THAT THE PUBLIC IS OFFERED ONLY PART OF THE PICTURE by suppressing the most important elements).
• It is imperative and of paramount importance that the reader / visitor should be acquainted with the forces and the influences at work, when considering THE FACTS & THE REALITIES we are to cover and expose in this page. (*Link to the parts and activities of another 'victim' of the courts and legal circles and HOW that fraudster abused our time and readiness to work with and to assist 'victims').
• It is also most important that visitors / readers should access the following pages:
  Con of a Victim (/convict.htm) - Primed For Deceit (/4deceit.htm) & Actors & Fraudsters at work (/actors.htm).
  The realities and realisations covered in the aforesaid pages should assist the reader to draw the right conclusions as to the inferences drawn out of the behaviour of victims-come-challengers (as they misrepresent themselves) YET CONVERT-LOVERS and maintenance engineers - users of the system as is for more fraud on the tax-payers, hence their assaults and evil activities in the background in propping up the ORGANISE FRAUD ON THE TAXPAYERS).
• We expose, in our pages, the root to it all, the foundations and the corner stone upon which societies have been and ARE being built for such 'victims' by abusers of public office. (*Link).
• All is achieved care of 'the teachings by examples noted, observed and mimicked by automatons, non-thinkers, STOOGES who succumb to personal greed and simply ignore all others. Such persons either 'submit to blackmail by or with help and or coercion from agents and or lovers of the system as is'. Thus they act as 'maintenance engineers of the arrangements in place' through reckless defaults and omissions. Their contemptuous mentalities to others, including their their 'false or abandoned promises', if not vile misrepresentations as to the elements that caused them to contact human-rights are but the elements that extend the hold on 'the serfs' as organised by the controllers of CIUKU (*Link to definition) Enterprises .
•  

FOOTNOTES
   1. Late delivery of the Order to the party. Had the Order been pronounced in open court and the party was present (or his/her agents : solicitors and their agents : Barrister) in court, at the time of the pronouncement, THEN the time for appealing would start as of the pronouncement. In the instance at hand, it was a case of EVEN MORE IMPROPRIETIES & FOUL ACTIVITIES as the settled letter pointed out. "Letting the generals of the enemy's army to direct one's soldiers / army was but an insult to the intelligence of the targeted victim.
   2.Applications lodged at and filed with the court. Simply pointing out to the Court the fact that there existed on file the Application for DNA tests, in order to establish Article 8  VIOLATIONS (because of denial to normal contact with the two boys) and or FRAUD BY THE GESTATION VESSEL should she have deceived the targeted 'serf' into believing he was the father of both boys when / if such was not the true state.
   3.  Another citizen was caused to submit to another court. The text as settled for submission (by the targeted serf) to the court WAS ALSO INTENDED as part of the education the targeted serf was receiving IN RESPECT OF HIS RIGHTS. And, more so, in respect of the anticipated and expected FROM GENUINE VICTIM CHALLENGERS who were to benefit from the creation of the Citizen's Alternative Precedents (CAP data) such as the cases we point to in our pages and the obstructions to 'due process' as covered in the letter/FAX. In the instance at hand Mr Miskulin received copy of the FAX COMMUNICATION (exchanges) WITH THE FRAUDSTER Veronica Beryl Fodden and he was fully aware of her idiotic excuses for suppressing the realities from the public (her failures to act as had been agreed from the onset to publish it all in the public domain). The FAX can be accessed from here. Visitors, readers and researchers should READ ALSO THE EXPLICIT CHALLENGES relative to ARROGANT PERJURY BY A SOLICITOR, for which matters Mr Len Miskulin had no time or opinions. All the while he was complaining about the solicitor who took his money and did nothing in return, as the explicit letter settled by Andrew Yiannides, in another page, covers.
   4.  Parrot renditions relates to the usual promotions of anything else, JUST EVADE ISSUES OF ESSENCE & RELEVANCE. These happen to be the most pronounced elements used by the idiots & the morons who are accosted by the agents of the system's organisers / controllers. Of such capabilities the programmed robots and the conditioned non-thinkers who are drawn into the scheme of things. They simply act as 'diversionary tactics'