|
Crime - Organised
-Institutionalised - Corruption - Fraud - Exposing Violations World Wide
 Page Revised: May 27, 2009.
All underlined text with an
asterisk indicates a LINK at the bottom of the page
MAGISTRATES
COURTS
Under Home Office
supervision
Read this true and hilarious story, of RELIANCE on officers at the Magistrates Court
THE DENIAL OF RIGHTS
AND JUSTICE
"The
police SUMMONS THE VICTIM"
The vile practices and the foul liberties indulged in -
The Police
and Justice SYSTEM in operation and AT THEIR
MAGNIFICENT BEST. What our Law Enforcement Agencies Excel at.
1. An inebriated person, who is failing to control himself
and the car he is driving, forces me to pull over and stop. HE CAUSES extensive damages
to a company van I am driving. HE FAILS TO STOP and carries on. Multiple
offences IN LAW, police duty to investigate.
2. I report the event to the police station. I DO NOT
HAVE MY DRIVING LICENSE with me but I do produce evidence that I HAD LOST IT AND I HAD
APPLIED FOR A DUPLICATE. I am issued with the usual '5 days to produce slip'. I do
produce letters cheque stubs, etc. as proof of application with DVLC and their letter
acknowledging application, evincing also driver and driving Licence number.
3. Five days later I attend the police station to produce the
slip again and another letter from DVLC clearly endorsed with licence number, etc.
DVLC advising me to produce that letter when / if asked for my driving licence.
4. TWO months later a letter from the police station invites me to
attend there that evening; they need to see my documents. I attend and re-produce
everything, I produce more letters but no licence, as yet. The DVLC SWANSEA failures are
NOTORIOUS. I ask for and secure a signature for my attendance. (safe & sure ?
WAIT FOR IT !!!)
5. MONTHS later FIVE SUMMONSES ARE SERVED ON ME. The victim who did
his duty as the LAW provides, allegedly has:-
(a) NO licence !
(b) NO M.O.T Certificate !!
(c) FAILED To produce M.O.T Certificate !!!
(d) NO Insurance Cover !!!!
(e) FAILED to produce Insurance Certificate !!!!!
(Back to National Scandal: CRIME ...
everywhere Haringey: police activities)
NOTE: If you
wish to find out HOW the courts treat the VICTIMS OF THE POLICE read on
6. IN the meantime - complete and utter
indifference to the crimes the police should have been investigating, notwithstanding
the fact that full description and adequate particulars of the offending vehicle and
driver had been given to the police.
7.
A solicitor I contact, in order to defend the wrongful Summonses
(persecutions) requests for FIVE HUNDRED pounds as an advance. Glad to do so BUT HE
MUST EXCHANGE LETTERS TO THE EFFECT THAT HE WILL BE PREPARED TO ACCEPT INSTRUCTIONS AND
TAKE LEGAL action against the police after the charges are dismissed. I DO HAVE ALL THE
EVIDENCE to discredit and quash the false allegations and wrongly issued
Summonses against me. HE IS NOT PREPARED TO GIVE SUCH AN UNDERTAKING!!!! It would be
cheaper to submit guilty pleadings to the Court and forget THE INCOMPETENCE OF THE
POLICE.AND SO I inform the solicitor, the police partner in Law busting and rights denial
practitioner.
8. I act myself and I plead / submit NOT GUILTY
documents to the Court (all five Summonses of course). NO CONFIRMATION FOR AN ADJOURNMENT
reaches me by the date stated on the Summonses when served (the prescribed and normal
practice is ignored). In the circumstances I have no option but to attend Court on the
stated date. I am / will not provide any one the opportunity to enter judgements against
me on grounds that I failed to attend Court (I have such a case in my files). AN
ADJOURNMENT is proclaimed ON THAT DAY. MY DAY WASTED !!!!!!!
9. Prior to attending the
Magistrates' Court, on the subsequent date set for the hearings, I attend the solicitor's
office (the very person WHO WAS NOT PREPARED TO TAKE LEGAL ACTION AGAINST THE POLICE!!!)
with an AFFIDAVIT I had prepared. Attached to it are true photocopies of the exhibits in
support of my statements, the evidence upon which I am relying and can challenge the
wrongful summonses/prosecutions against my person. (I take along with me the originals in
order for the solicitor to ensure and to satisfy himself that I do posses such documented
evidence). The affidavit is an absolute must BECAUSE of practices I am familiar with.
Years earlier, and at the very Magistrates' Court I have to attend, in a similar case I
witness documented evidence that had been adduced to the court being ignored and shoved
under the carpet. As far as that court hearing was concerned, EVIDENCE did not exist, only
the allegations by the police merited consideration.
10. I attend Court on my own on the date
of the hearings BUT THE POLICE FAIL TO TURN UP!!!!!!! (solicitor/police CONNECTION ????).
I DID MAKE sure that the only person who knew of my Affidavit, and my defence tactics, was
that solicitor alone. NOBODY else knew; not even my wife. The police are so anxious to
prosecute, AND PERSECUTE ME, and yet they elect to disregard the hearings of their
allegations against me, the victim of crimes who went to report them to the police. The
crimes they should and ought to have been investigating were of no relevance; the law
abiding citizen WAS!!!!!! THEY RELIED ON OTHERS FOR THE PERSECUTION!!!!!!!
11. In accordance with rules of procedure I
apply and invite the Clerk of the Court, TO DISMISS THE SUMMONSES against me because the
police failed to attend Court. MY application is turned down. I point out to the clerk
that since the police were not there to produce ANY EVIDENCE in support of their
allegations, and to be cross-examined IN THE FIRST INSTANCE there is no way he could
proceed with any hearing PROPER. BUT HE INSISTS, at the behest of the Crown Prosecution
lady barrister who is acting for the police. She is fully armed ONLY WITH THE SUMMONSES to
back her up. FIVE unsubstantiated pieces of paper. I point out the rules of
procedure BUT I AM IGNORED. AND, I have to submit to demands made of me and respond to
"You are........ HOW DO YOU PLEAD?" FIVE TIMES, one for each Summons. AND this
notwithstanding the NOT GUILTY documents filed at Court, weeks earlier. ADHERENCE TO
PROCEDURE!!!!!!!!!(?) With no case established by the police, the Clerk enquires of the
victim and seeks with the Barrister appearing for the police to conduct a Defence cross
examination even though I have not been permitted to make any statements to the
Court!!!!! SUCH DEMANDS OF ME, THE VICTIM OF
CRIMES, could not possibly constitute any hearing. AND BARRISTER appearing for the police,
with no evidence but the allegations on pieces of paper, INSISTS AND PERSISTS on such
procedures!!!!!! The clerk even refuses to refer to MY affidavit and its exhibits. In
AGREEMENT with the other legally trained expert, THE C.P.S BARRISTER, they wish to and
attempt to procure -judgements through the usual theatrics and the habitual denial of
rights. In other words through utter disregard for all principles of procedure and the
Rights of the citizen, in International and National Laws.
12. Both are challenged to proceed as they
see fit, TO BE FOLLOWED BY APPROPRIATE APPEALS, NATURALLY, all the way to Strasbourg.
AND the prosecuting barrister is thus obliged to peruse the Affidavit and the exhibits. Upon
sight of the true photocopy of the MOT Certificate there follows an assertion
"It appears there was one, BUT IT IS ANOTHER MATTER IF HE EVER PRODUCED IT (the
reason for separate summonses, for the police must and should have their pound of flesh). I
tell the barrister to learn to crawl before walking let alone attempting to run. AND
the clerk to the court threatens and intimidates me with a custodial sentence for alleged
contempt !!!!!! I urge the prosecuting Barrister TO LOOK AT ANOTHER EXHIBIT. THE
FIVE DAY WONDER SLIP. LO and BEHOLD the MOT Certificate had been seen by the
police!!!!! What do you know???? Would you believe it??? THERE WAS even an
endorsement and signature at the back when the documents were seen again two months
later!!!!! At the request of the prosecuting barrister the Courtroom is vacated and there
follows a very long meeting between that person and myself. There follow attempts for over
an hour to cause me to accept ill-founded assertions that MY insurance certificate, the
one I submitted, was not covering the vehicle(?) I was driving!!! (Never mind "the
insured can drive ANY VEHICLE not belonging to him"). By design, I did not disclose
any insurance Certificate from the Company that owned the van in respect of which a Road
Fund license was in force; get the point?). The Barrister is challenged again to seek
and secure a judgement and fine if so desired (it DID HAPPEN IN THE OTHER CASE YEARS
EARLIER, hence the specific Defence tactics and presentation of Evidence on AFFIDAVIT). BUT
APPEAL(S) WOULD follow all the way to Strasbourg!!!! LO AND BEHOLD everybody is called
back into Court; there follow requests for the charges/summonses to be dismissed!!!!!!
13. The clerk is asked to award costs to the
wrongly PERSECUTED (choice of word deliberate) VICTIM. DENIED!!!!!! There was no need to
Appeal; that refusal (failure if you may) was and is enough to raise and establish the
habitual denials of rights. And that, setting aside the systematic obstructions and
obstacles to Natural Justice on selective grounds (in support of and for the police.
BLATANT BIAS, favouritism and discriminations against the citizen).
14. WOULD YOU BELIEVE IT ??? It was not the end of
the matter!!! The Court failed to confirm dismissal of the charges/summonses/allegations
against me. The chief Clerk, who was invited to do so in a letter, failed to comply. LO
AND BEHOLD!!! A Woman Police Constable (known to my children, through her work and
presentations at their school) RE-SERVES, ON ME (in the presence of my son) the very same
FIVE SUMMONSES, and, by the state of the envelope containing them it was evident that it
must have been in her (or someone else's ) pockets for months.
15. Another letter to the chief clerk at the Magistrates court
produces a reply; BUT IT IS NOW ALLEGED THAT DISMISSAL of the Summonses was, to all
intents and purposes, on the very grounds as the declined application from me at the onset
of the hearing(?) on the day in Court. THE FAILURE of and by the police to attend and to
produce and or support their allegations against me. NO EVIDENCE BY AND OR IN SUPPORT OF
AND FROM THE PERSON who had filed and laid down forgeries (the Summonses) resting on
alleged police records proper. FORGERIES!!!! that is what false statements alleging
failures to adduce and or posses documents amount to. FORGERIES, with intent to deceive
the Court AND TO DEFRAUD the victim (any citizen who cannot act as I did). THE DOCUMENTS
WERE SEEN AND THERE WAS EVIDENCE TO THAT EFFECT. Presumably it had been hoped I, the
victim, had lost the 5 days to present slip). Nothing but reliance on the Court and its
clerk could have secured Judgements on forgeries, as indeed was attempted; AND IT WAS
ATTEMPTED IMPROPERLY. False statements intended to mislead; False statements founded on
alleged properly kept police records. FORGERIES wrongly RELIED UPON TO SECURE FINES AND
FINANCIAL GAINS FOR THE STATE. The State THAT MAINTAINS SUCH INCOMPETENT AND WRONGLY
MOTIVATED INDIVIDUALS AND OR GROUPS OF….. Seeking and securing fraudulent financial
impositions on private citizens through incompetent servants who become and are nothing
else but aided and abetted criminals, when INTENT EXISTS from the onset, be it to bolster
success rates for the police and or for funds for the state through abuses of an
independent(?) judicial system.
16. Would you believe it ???? The information that the police
had served again the five Summonses the Chief Clerk, to the Magistrates Court, responded
to in a letter and he had the nerve and the audacity to suggest that the re-served
Summonses could have been for other offences!!!!! He, evidently, was gifted and a psychic;
I was (am I?) an illiterate peasant. ADDING INSULTS TO MY INTELLIGENCE AND TO MY
INTEGRITY, on top of the injuries consequential to the denials of RIGHTS by another
incompetent and or criminally motivated Public Body, through its servants. ALL knowingly
and CONSCIOUSLY were acting outside and above the law, National and International, with
blatant INTENTIONS.
INTENT is the operative word.
The police systematically fail and raise objections to demands from citizens who
seek copies and or access to records and documents perused and relied upon by the police
when asserting and relying on records without substance. An Inspector (Wiggins) in
the course of a meeting (warranted because of False Records by the police, in another
case, as in the above case) flatly and adamantly declined and objected to the victim
inspecting and or having copies of the FALSE RECORDS THE POLICE MAINTAINED AND WERE
RELYING UPON in their representations to the victim. True to
their practices which the above case qualifies. THE police failed to
follow up on a violent crime; the detective assigned to the case never called upon the
victim; when asked why, he asserted that he had in fact visited and interviewed the
victim; the victim most emphatically and categorically stated that no one ever attended to
him apart from the initial woman police constable on the day of the violent crime. The
detective insisted he had and gave a date which he stated he had entered in the police
records; the date the detective gave as the date he allegedly called upon the
victim was FICTITIOUS because the victim was away on holidays. On BEING
CORNERED as to the initial fabrications! (FALSE records = FORGERIES intended to mislead
anyone referring to FALSE RECORDS, the police amended the initial entry made by the
detective and attempted to justify the new falsification as a copier problem. Waffle and
FORGERIES by the police to explain away breaches of public duty and reckless abuse of
office).
One need be no Einstein to recognise the
reasons why COPIES of police records are not available to the citizens, the victims. The
FIVE WRONG SUMMONSES, at the expense of the targeted victim, in the above case proves more
than enough. There exist escape routes because others, not as parliament through its laws
enacted, SO DETERMINE AND ARRANGE. Our Law Enforcement Agencies ASSIST EACH AND ONE
ANOTHER TO DEFRAUD THE PUBLIC OF THEIR RIGHTS IN LAW. IN THE PROCESS DEFRAUDING ALSO THE
PUBLIC OF THEIR FUNDS TOO, as was contemplated through the FIVE WRONG SUMMONSES the victim
in the above case was served with, TWICE.
It should be perfectly clear where
the Law Enforcement Agencies and the legal professions stand in the United
Kingdom. Justice, is treated as a Blind Deaf and DUMB non entity. Precisely as they
treat the citizens, because, our LEA's and our presumptuous 'knowledge classes' have so
determined. The media and the 'knowledge class' barons, from within their confines remain
as blind and indifferent to the facts of life that many a victim, of the corrupted legal
system, have been reporting to them, over the past thirty-three, plus, years that our
founder observed and noted after falling prey to the use of FORGERIES and FALSE
INSTRUMENTS that are the favourite and most common tools of the Legal / Judicial / Police
/ TRIAD. Evidence will be published in our pages as we relate the realities and the
practices. You are invited to access a blunt FORGERY created/procured and
introduced in High Court proceedings by te Legal boffins FOR THE INTENDED CORRUPTION
& PERVERSION OF JUSTICE - the court proceedings against criminals who amass fortunes
through 'fraud they can indulge as freely as their supporters, the legal circles and like
minded judges in our country. And THE CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES of ni concern to the third wing
of the TRIAD, the Legal/Judicial/Police corporation managing and controllin CIUKU*
Enterprises. (*Crimes Incotporated
United Kingdom Unlimited).
(Back to National Scandal:
Link to: Home Office CAP's
h-rHome
Page Violations LATEST Media
Link to: Police UPDATED PAGES
Corrupt Britain Corrupt Court/Law
Link to: Lord Chancellor Solicitors
Revised: May 27, 2009.
Back to HomePage
| 