
HELP US TO HELP YOU Please (*Link to plea). JOIN other Victims On Line. Publish your Statement of Facts and the Evidence you have.
Use your rights in law (link) and ACT with
others against the offenders. Join in joint actions if you have been fobbed off and have
had your rights obstructed to and or denied by the abusers of the legal system. ACCESS
& READ the explicit submissions to the Chief Executives of the Law Society and the
Office for the Supervision of solicitors. Elect to ASSERT YOUR
RIGHTS to challenge collectively the criminals who have been in control for millennia.
READ the words attributed to Jesus Christ according to St. Luke. (Link to the quotes page).
Affiliated Sites For 'The CAMILA Project' DATA Collection
& Activities
lbduk.org (*Link to update)
ukfathers.co.uk (*Link)
part 3
part 4
part 5
All SERIOUS offers from webmasters who are engaged in
publication of web-pages, web-sites will be welcome. We look forward to adding your site
to the above list and your readiness to co-operate in and for data collection.
LIST of leaders of groups and webmasters
who REFUSED/FAILED to co-operate. The same also arrogantly FAILED / DEFAULTED to address
the issue of Organised abuse of the courts FOR fraudulent conversion of private
(citizen's) assets and the fraudulent distribution of taxpayers contributions to the
national budget. Access the exclusive exposures where we point
to and publish the EVIDENCE of the facilities in place FOR the creation of societies of
fraudsters.
1. LIPS (*Site References)
2. UKMM (*Site References) 3. ELC (*Site References)
4. Families Need Fathers
5. Fathers 4 Justice
6. CASIA
7. Contempt of Court (*emails)
We dedicate the two images below to
all of the charlatans who came along, as stooges and lovers of the rampant fraud through
the courts. All indulged in many an act of fraudulent misrepresentation and EVIL
ACTIVITIES as part of their contribution towards the maintenance of the system in place.
We are to name every one of the idiots who were of opinion that they could make either the
law to appear to be an ass or the founder of human-rights, Mr Andrew Yiannides.
The above NOTICE was / is typical of the top cover sheets that
were / are attached to letters specifically addressed to Ministers. The notice was
intended for all senior Public Servants to consider. Our experiences over 21 years
by then, established that many have been and are followers of the EVIL TEACHINGS BY
EXAMPLE STATED in the most vile of works ever to have been presented to the sons of men.
(*Link to the most explicit and revealing lesson that no human = thinker,
could possibly overlook, or accept as promoted by the followers of such evil ways).
We dedicate the letter below to Mr Johan M.
R. Foenander an alleged Christian. He attempted to secure, from Andrew Yiannides, a
Statement with Half Truths with suppression of the core elements, relative to the
activities he was noted to have been a promoter user & an overzealous participating
fraudster in. He was working with others for the imposition of the constructive
fraud we point to and cover in our exclusive page.
Others were noted to be co-operating with him for and ONLY TOWARDS the IMPLEMENTATION of
the blunt and arrogant constructive frauds, on the taxpayers, through abuse of the courts,
as covered in our pages. [*Link from here to the page
where we cover his parts & point to relative evidence. *Link from here to another page where we cover his part in
the creation of material he & his partner asserted was intended for use at court,
when in reality it was all but a smokescreen and blunt misrepresentations & a case
of 'Dust in your eyes, suckers', for the persons targeted with such ploys'.
In 1996 the letter below was confirmed
received, after pointing out past failures by the Home Office / Secretary to concern
themselves with the issues raised. Read the letter and relate to events and activities
you, visitor / victim may have experienced personally.

Q: WHO responsible for the police?
A: The Home Secretary.

YET we have charlatans and mischief makers promoting whatever the managers &
controllers of CIUKU Enterprises pre-ordained for the serfs. [*Link from here to an example from and about an alleged victim and
how he acted and behaved towards us. The documented evidence ESTABLISHES that he was
more than just selfish for IF HE WAS GENUINE he would have co-operated instead of running
around promoting the powers that be, the abuse of judicial chair occupation by the type of judges he allegedly was complaining
about when IN FACT PROMOTING THE EVIL ACTIVITIES the alleged victim had been subjected to,
allegedly yet not WILLING TO EXPOSE & CHALLENGE IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN, like the rest of
the fraudsters he was rubbing shoulders with and collectively promoting the practices we
are exposing and challenging in our pages). |
KEY to page
& site
Page CHANGES - List
Letters TO - List Page&Site Letters FROM List Page&Site
News ARTICLES - Page List
Page IMAGES - List
Human Rights Act Introduced
LAW Convention Rights
LAW European Union Rights
The page - ISSUES
This Page - QUOTES
The SITE - PAGES
Site QUOTES - page
VICTIM Let down by
the H.O.
OTHER SITES - Short List
REPORTING CRIMES - List
part 4
part 4
Euro Convention
Rights
Article 6.1 Court Hearings
Article 6.2 Court Hearings
Article 6.3 Court Hearings
Article 8.1 Respect 4 Family
Article 8.2 Family Rights
Article 9 Free TO THINK +++
Article 10 Free to Share Info
Article 11 Free Join Assemble Article
13 About Officials
Article 14 No Discrimination
Article 38 Double FRAUD
Letters TO -
List
1. April 2003 Frank Field MP
2. Dec. 1999 Prime Minister
3. Dec. 1998 Home Secretary
4. Mar. 2003 Law Society ++
5. August 2003 ECourtHR
part 3
part 4
part 5
Letters FROM
- List
1. Part- SOLICITOR To Client 2. Prime Minister Nov. 1999
3. CEO Haringey
Council 2001
4. Haringey Council Dreamer
5. Police Promoting Just LIES
6. Scarth Seeks Information
7. LCD Expose Police LIES
8. An Illiterate LCDpt. Officer
9. ECourtHR September 2003
10. Lord Chancellor's Dpt.
<>
Page NEWS
Articles - List
1. L.E.S by David Blunkett
2. D. Mail Free For All 2001
3. CHANGES - List
<>
Site NEWS
Articles - List
1. L.E.S by David Blunkett
2. D. Mail Free For All 2001
3. D. Express Boys Records
4. PM. Global Role For Britain
5. No Need to Raise TAXES
6.The Times-Plato
Not Prozac
<>
Page IMAGES
- List
1. LES by David Blunkett
2. CHANGES - List
3. House of Lords RULING
4. Letter to Prime Minister
5. PM Sends Submit. to H/O
part 4
part 5
Quotes
-This Page
1. Democracy
Is In Mortal Danger, so long as...
2. Days of the Blind Deaf and Dumb
Media Are Over
3. Most abused & Breached piece of legislation by.....
4. The INTERNET is here and so is Freedom Of Information
& Exchange of Ideas.
5
Page CHANGES
List
1. Added Letter to MP
2. Added Law Reports
3. Edited Introduction
4. Added Ab. Lincoln's Quote
5. Importance of Publication
6. Added Articles 13 & 14
7.20 April 2005: IMPORTANT ANSWER to the question posed under Article 13.
8. Added letter to the Home Secretary, Michael Howard in 1993 relative to
abuse of the Court facilities & BREACH OF DUTY BY THE POLICE.
9
10
Page ISSUES
- List
1. Implementing security and rights assured in law.
2. Members of Parliament and other Public(!)
Servants(?). Their retainers command other than the defaults and omissions they
indulge in.
3. Democracy IS in mortal danger.
4. Home Secretary Acted
5. HOW the dictatorship through the back door has been and is being imposed in all
pseudo-democracies : The ANSWER and ploys used.
part 6
part 7
CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES REPORTED TO :-
1. The Rt. Hon. Frank Field Minister
for Social Security [*Link to page where we
cover the reports]
2. Social Security Fraud officers / HQ
- Leeds. [*Link to the page and an explicit
letter covering the arrogant fraud]
3. The Prime Minister at his Private Office.
The Prime
Minister acted in accordance with his duties to the citizens, to the law and to his own
conscience. 
We thanked
him. 
However, some junior in
the post room at the Home Office assumed that he had higher authority than the elected. Established practices as organised by CIUKU Enterprises.
Public(!) Servants(?) So long as MP's the Media Barons and all who dangle on the
strings of the puppeteers ignore it all, it should be all right; so CIUKU rules provide.
After all, ALL LAW IS PUBLISHED IN invisible ink for the sighted & not in Braille for
the blind. No one, therefore can read ANY Act of Parliament or Articles that Government's
subscribe to under International Treaties & Accords. [*Link to the problems created by
Public Servants after judicial chair occupants 'ELECTED TO ACT IN CONTEMPT OF THE
LAW", specifically when the legal circles indulged in the use and promotion of a
FORGERY in the course of High Court proceedings].
BUT as can be deduced from
the letter below, a junior at the Home Office (post room) indulged. Noting but the usual
invisible services and waffle created by the lowest of the low of Public(!) Servants(?). A
person retained by CIUKU Enterprises, operating as an invisible services fraud of a public
servant APPARENTLY IS BETTER EQUIPPED THAN THE PRIME MINISTER and his personal
team/advisers at 10 Downing Street. Marvel at the waffle from a button pushing automaton: 
Visitors are urged to access the background to it all [*Link]
and recognise WHY IN OUR LETTER to the Rt. Hon. Frank Field MP, ex-Minister, we did point
to 'the facility for gross dereliction of Public Office through DELEGATION TO UNSUPERVISED
JUNIORS. And along come fraudsters club recruits promoting such rubbish as the above
letter (*Link to a challenge that was warranted
after such a charlatan denied us the right to a copy of the rubbish he was promoting).
ABOVE EVIDENCE of
letters and exchanges with Central Government in respect of the arrogant abuse of Public
Office FOR the imposition of the RAMPANT FRAUD on the citizens through abuse of the courts
facilities. BELOW a list of sites and pages where references to the law and such reports
to government and public servants - From Police to Ministers / Members of Parliament. In
our pages a challenge to assertions and proposed illegal activities by the UK section at
the ECoHR when they were caused to abandon proposed activities.
REPORTING
CRIMES - List
1. This Page - a letter
2. Letter by a Fraudster
3. A Conscious Fraudster
4. A Conniving Dreamer
5. Dr A. Adoko of same
mind
6. xxx
For scanned letters:
PLEASE go back and finish the rest of the text you were
reading. Very important elements are covered.
BELOW SOME
OF THE CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES Organised By Public Servants & THE LEGAL CIRCLES.
Everything is permissible when it leads to theft of Properties & Denial of Rights,
that the Courts impose on 'the serfs' (List)
1. FORGERIES AT COURT
2. Housing Benefit FRAUD
3. Ditto with False Instrument
4. Ditto with Blunt Forgeries
5. Ditto Using Refugees
6. Ditto Relying on Judges
7. Ditto Daily Mail Acted after repetitious reports
8. Using Asylum Seekers
9. xxxx
List of ATTEMPTS TOO
1.
3 images below
are of a letter sent to the Home Secretary in 1993. Part of ongoing reports and
complaints, to the right Minister and Ministry in respect of blunt abuse of the
courts' facilities for the imposition of bluntly organised FRAUD ON THE SERFS, Mr &
Mrs Average in our allegedly civilised democracy, one that allegedly rests and is founded
on principles of Law & Order. Page1
Page2

Page3

*Access from
here the content of the letter in HTML format for links to and from the text. |
|
|
 |
Page
Revised: August 14, 2008. ADDED
: New introduction & links to the other pages + at Footnote 2 - introduced copy of a letter to the Home Secretary in 1993. |
| Site
under re-construction with ongoing additions from new pages and links to and from pages
also to other web-sites |
VISITORS ARE URGED to access and READ THE IMPORTANT update and ADDENDA we were obliged to introduce in January 2002. We had no
choice but to REPORT THE CRIMES TO THE TREASURY; our
observations and knowledge of the constructive frauds made us accessories if we kept
quiet, like the alleged victims who work towards the implementation of the schemes by the
abductors and rapists of Justice, the Goddess. You will find the addenda statement
at the top of the Updated Pages File. We are sure that you will share with us our concerns
and most profound disappointment at and with persons who adopt and promote activities
which they know are nothing but downright crimes. We refer to
our exclusive page where we expose (as conscientious law abiding citizens) the Confidentiality Between Fraudsters that
exists care of the BEST OPEN SECRET. |
| Guidelines
on Navigating through the extensive material: access
instructions. In the alternative IF looking for any specific issue/issues USE the search facility. |
| As
part of the reconstruction process our new pages and pages where changes and additions
have been implemented, the improved / amended pages are endorsed with the link 'Page Changes and the date of the last changes. The link takes visitors to a List
of the changes implemented in the page. These include new material and links from relevant
paragraphs to other or new relevant material in other pages. For further
clarification email: webmaster@ |
The Home Office
and the Home
Secretary
- Responsible for the security of and for the implementation of the rights in law assured to
ALL and 'for each individual citizen'.
- Rights secured through
Acts of Parliament and Security Guaranteed Under International Treaties and Accords, when
reported breached or violated, responsible for investigations leading to prosecutions, the
police UNDER SUPERVISION & GUIDANCE by the Home Office, the Home Secretary, the
Minister responsible for the implementation of the state's DUTIES & OBLIGATIONS to the
citizens. Responsible for the protection of the citizens who are called upon to pay taxes
for the performance of the aforesaid services to the taxpayers / electorate in any
civilised and properly constituted Democratic State. [*Link from here to the
principles upon which Democratic governance proper should be resting]
- Rights and Security to
person should be applied to all citizens, by Public Servants; indeed their retainers and
the law command that they do so and not as they determine through defaults, omissions and
as operatives / executives of CIUKU (Crimes
Incorporated UK Unlimited) Enterprises. [*Link from here to a page where we publish a precedent case
relative to a police officer who defaulted / failed to execute his duties as an officer of
the law - Justice & when he was pronounced guilty of misconduct in public office,
he appealed but failed to have the court's decision reversed]
- Duties and obligations
under the law should be adhered to by all other citizens, on the basic tenet that no one
shall violate the rights of any other. (*F2 - )
- We are to release
more evidence in respect of complaints, used only as promotional material by fraudsters
club recruits [*Link
from here to the cause and foundation for the
definition],
persons who fell in love with the system of operations as organised and managed by the
controllers of CIUKU Enterprises.
- One and all named and shamed /
exposed, by us, for ever promoting their alleged complaints & producing copies of such
to victims they target. The copies promoted as alleged deliveries to public servants, to
Ministers, as documents and pleadings lodged at court, etc.
- One and ALL asserting and
promoting obstructions by the system's operators who fail to grant or hinder hearings
before Juries.
- YET ALL RECKLESSLY IGNORING WITH
CONTEMPT THE JURY AT LARGE, the citizens of the world while complaining in private circles
about the failures of reporters and the media editors to report their complaints without
suppressing anything.
- MOST OFFENSIVE, however, THEIR OWN
SUPPRESSION OF THE TRUTH OF THE MATTERS they allegedly have been complaining about, while
using their alleged complaints as bait in order to suck and draw into the operations of
CIUKU Enterprises new intended / targeted for conversion to the system of operations they
fell in love with, victims of the legal circles and public servants.
|
In 1993 the
letter below to the Home Secretary, the Rt. Hon. Michael Howard, with compliments to the
maligned we name and expose in our pages. The content should clarify, to all 'fraudsters
club recruits', that submissions and challenges to Ministers and successive Lord
Chancellors had been ongoing, long before the submissions, in 1995, that caused the Leader
of the Opposition, the Rt. Hon. Tony Blair and New Labour's Spokes Person on Legal
Affairs, in the House of Commons, the Rt., Hon. Paul Boateng, to acknowledge the element
of FRAUD IN THE LEGAL SYSTEM. Every one we name and expose, set about interfering in the
background either as stooges who were / are acting on instructions from the agents of the
BLUNTLY ORGANISED & EXECUTED (through abuse of the courts facilities) FRAUD ON THE
TAXPAYERS, INTENDED TO LEAD, ALSO, TO THE CORRUPTION OF NON-HUMANS, NON-THINKERS, the
ill-educated and the ill-informed who act as slaves to their own greed for silver and evil
power over others. As typical 'sons of men' THEY ADOPTED THE DIFFERENT TONGUES SCENARIO
which the illiterate 'serfs', of the latter part of the 4th century B.C., were in no
position to recognise, as the targeted who were subjected and conditioned to ongoing
'doctrine from above'. The very doctrine from the merchants of folly, the creators of the
alleged Holy Scriptures they were promoting in order to subjugate the 'sons of men',
through the creation they first delivered to mankind as an alleged translation to Greek,
for reasons best known to the peddlers who never ceased creating alternative scenarios for
distribution to the ill-educated and ill-informed targeted 'sons of men'. [*Link from here to the 3
images of the letter, and from there to the content in HTML format, lower down this page,
for links to and from the text] |
Above and below evidence relative to challenges and submissions to the elected
'representatives of 'the serfs' who pay taxes for the retainer and maintenance of lousy
actors in public office. All the while 'the serfs' : taxpaying suckers, are milked of 'the
assets they create through labour and honourable creative enterprise / ingenuity', by the
parasites appointed and maintained, as alleged servants of the public and the law : Public
Servants. Also, in the forefront misrepresented Social Services Operators who engineer and
promote the creation of the states which the Media Barons and the Intellectual Prostitutes
they retain and maintain, arrogantly promote as civilised societies. |
- On the right, a letter and succinct submissions to the Home
Secretary in 1996, part of ongoing challenges attached to and arising as of the first
experiences when Solicitors, Barristers & Judges indulged in the creation, promotion
and USE of a FORGERY through which the intended milking of the cow and THE ARROGANT
CORRUPTION & BLUNT PERVERSION OF JUSTICE, ,
from within the legal services & THE COURTS. (*F6)
- All the while the criminal element, in control of and
supervising the activities of the disgraced Metropolitan police, contemptuously ignoring
the damages caused and imposed on 'the targeted serf'; one and all acting in contempt
of the provisions in national and international law. [*Link to a news article and acknowledgement
of the corrupt within the high and mighty abusers of office & trust]
Following on from the above stated criminal
activities, the imposition of allegedly legitimate legal costs for the intended / targeted
serf in contempt of an existing Court of Appeal ruling that was upheld by the House of
Lords as of 1939/1940. [*Link from here to Footnote 3 for very important information].
And Counsel responsible for the use of the BLUNT
FORGERY, rewarded with silk, made a QC within a short period. Subsequently appointed as a
High Court Judge sitting in Commercial cases.
- In short, the SYSTEM OF OPERATIONS : 'the
practitioners at their very best'.
- The icing on the cake, the subsequent PARTICIPATION IN THE SCAMS of abusers of public
office and services operating out of:
(a) the Inland Revenue,
[*Link to an
explicit letter to an accountant and note the implications in the matter of INEXCUSABLE
& FRAUDULENT DEMANDS by the Inland Revenue]
(b) the Local Authority maintaining the local police
who defaulted to bring about prosecution of the criminals,
(c) the Bank (*Link
to footnote *F4 below, for the bank's first offence)
and
(d) the Land Registry (*Link to footnote *F5
below for its officers undisclosed parts)
- In effect, the network spoken of, by
Christopher, to the late Stephen Knight when the latter was researching 'The Brotherhood'.
|
1996
- issues of denial of rights & obstructions to unadulterated Justice the core elements
as submitted to the Home Secretary - Conservative

References to the right to record proceedings in court without any hindrance or
obstruction in order that Justice be seen to be done as the principle of OPEN COURTS
STIPULATES. [*Link to
who abused trust for his evil ends and those of
his mates; also other groups of fraudsters club recruits who fell in love with the
arrangements in place FOR RAMPANT FRAUD ON THE TAXPAYERS though abuse of the courts
facilities -* Link] |
|
The above realities are but the practices
and the activities many complain of in private and or speak of to 'victims of the system'
whom they are pointed to (by the legal circles and their agents) and they target in order
to use them / put them on track FOR THE BENEFITS awaiting those who keep it all in the
family closet..... SUPPRESS IT ALL FROM THE TAXPAYERS!!! Such was and remains the
situation with those we are exposing, naming and shaming. Such, also, has been the state
with a multitude of others who seek to play the field as arranged by the legal circles and
alleged 'servants of the law and the public'. [*Link to a list of specific paragraphs
in pages where we cover the state of affairs]
The days of public servants relying on the BLIND DEAF AND DUMB MEDIA ARE OVER. The days when ALL relied on BLIND DEAF AND DUMB officers within the law
enforcement agencies are also over. This is the age of FREE exchange of information and
THE unadulterated FACTS OF LIFE within all states, so long as their citizens are free to
exercise AS WE DO, their basic human-rights which ARE GUARANTEED under the European Convention
on Human
Rights . (ECoHR) [Below the introduction of the Human Rights Act. From here *Link
to HOW and under what circumstances the government was caused to announce the
introduction of the Act in 1997. When there read ALL of the appeal and the explicit
affidavit in the page]
The Human Rights Act was announced in
1997, presented subsequently to the Houses, debated and was added to the Statute
books in 1998. |
- The attempts by Lord Irvine, the ex Lord
Chancellor, to create a supper Ministry WAS A DANGER TO DEMOCRACY and especially so, when
he was in charge of persons who were/are of the opinion that they were appointed, by
'their God' to be the modern day 'Lords and Masters' of 'the serfs', in this one's great
nation. [*Link to the
root of it all]
- We are in no doubt that such is the case in other lands, too. So long as our judges are free and shall remain free to indulge and
practice their corrupted law, unsupervised, unchecked, uncontrolled and acting, as they
please, in breach of the laws of our Parliament and in violation of human rights, Democracy is in mortal danger.
|
 |
 |
When the Act was introduced the promotional &
information literature that the government made available to the public, the two
Ministers responsible for the application of the law did get their heads together. The
preface page from the leaflet HRG1 10/2000, above, set the scene. It implied that the
rights of the citizens took precedent and the infighting' between the two Ministries was
to be relegated. [*Link from here to the introduction to this page where we applied ourselves
to more than the infighting].
When the Act was introduced the promotional &
information literature which the government made available to the public, the two
Ministers responsible for the application of the law did get their heads together. The
preface page from the leaflet HRG1 10/2000, above, set the scene. It implied that the
rights of the citizens took precedent and the infighting' between the two Ministries was
to be relegated. (*Link to the introduction to this page where we applied ourselves to
more than the infighting). |
From the
provisions of the European Convention on Human Rights (1948) we point to:-
Article 6.1. "In the determination of his civil RIGHTS and
or of any criminal charges against him, EVERYONE is entitled to a fair and public
hearing within a reasonable time by an independent and impartial tribunal ....
judgement shall be pronounced publicly but the press and public may be excluded
from all or part of the trial (hearing) in the interest of morals, public order or
national security in a democratic society ...interests of juveniles... protection of the
private life of the parties... where publicity would prejudice the interests of
justice." and under
Article 6.2. "EVERYONE charged with a criminal offence shall be presumed innocent
until proven guilty according to law." and under
Article 6.3. "EVERYONE.....
has the following minimum rights (a)
to be informed promptly.... in
detail ... nature and cause of charges against him .... (b) adequate
time,... facilities.. to prepare his defence.... (c) to defend himself in person or through legal
assistance of his own choosing free legal assistance in the interests of justice if he has
not sufficient means to pay... (d) to examine of have examined witnesses against him ..to obtain
attendance and examination of witnesses on his behalf under the same conditions as
witnesses against him; and (e) to
have the free assistance of an interpreter if he cannot understand or speak the language
use in court."
Article 8.1. "EVERYONE has the right to respect for his private and family
life, his home and his correspondence.
Article 8.2.
"THERE SHALL BE NO interference by a public authority with the exercise of this
right ..except in accordance with the law .. necessary in a democratic society..
interests of national security... public safety... economic well being of the country...
the prevention of disorder or crime... the protection of health or morals or for the
protection of the rights and freedoms of others." This is the most abused and breached piece of legislation by the
organisers and managers of the CIUKU Enterprises:-
- Our Masters and Lords seek
to, and impose many a criminal act.
- They do so through breaches of national law.
- By relying upon, and using the 'subordinates
created by the state'.
- Those subordinates, as Public Servants,
are also independent of the law - criminals'.
- They are assured, by the controllers of it
all, that 'No prosecutions are ever likely to be instigated, against them'.
- Just AS IN THE NATIONAL SCANDAL scenarios.Forgeries used for the theft of funds belonging to third
parties with plenty of FALSE INSTRUMENTS that lack accountability, as issued by persons in
judicial office.
- Officers of Law bluntly endorsing and
promoting the criminal activities of public servants.
- Collectively acting in contempt of the law
as authorised and licensed, by our representatives in government, to act so, for the
implementation of CRIMES INTENDED thus LEADING TO THE NEW CODE OF MORALS, hatched up in
secret sessions by the abductors of Democracy, attended by
the MEDIA barons and their editors.
- The theft and misappropriation of Housing
Benefit funds.
- Criminal activities in pursuit of organised multiple frauds on the public at large.
- Forgeries used
and no prosecutions because of the plan and the funds needed in order to create a melting
pot.
- All through arrogant interference in the
affairs of other countries.
- Criminals who steal from their masters (the
citizens / taxpayers) in allegedly civilised states, resting and founded allegedly on
principles of law and order.
- Public SERVANTS indulging in blunt crime at
the expense of their employers, Mr & Mrs Average.
- And they dare determine how other countries
and nations should run their own societies and affairs.
- Our Lords and Masters wishing to play
Godfather to the world.
- They are not simply interfering in other
countries.
- As part of their master plan, THEY ARE
BREAKING UP FAMILIES THROUGH ORGANISED FRAUDULENT ACTIVITIES in their own countries.(*Link to site for connection to family issues).
- Plenty of breaches of national law and gross
violations of international treaties and accords. [*Link to PLEADED VIOLATIONS as lodged at the
European Court of Human Rights]
- Criminal activities by the very guardians of
'the Law', OUR SERVANTS, who are retained by our representatives in government, persons
who are 'elected, care of the media barons, 'through frauds'.
- OUR AGENTS acting and operating in
government and states, which they misrepresent as alleged Democracies that, allegedly,
rest and are founded on law and order. Public servants, acting, as ABSOLUTE DICTATORS, in
contempt of all law and the rights of the citizens.
- They do it all through the media barons and
their stooges, with plenty of theatre, from 'intellectual
prostitutes'.
To the well known quote by Abraham Lincoln
we add, for the benefit of the abductors of Justice and Democracy, our founder's
'addenda', the fourth, dimension below:
- "You can fool all of the
people for some of the time".
- "You can fool some of the
people for all of the time".
- "You cannot fool all of the
people, all of the time".
- We add "AND
there are some people YOU can
never fool at any time".
Article 9. "EVERYONE has the right to freedom of thought, conscience
and religion..."
Article 10. "EVERYONE
has the right to FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION.... to HOLD OPINIONS...TO RECEIVE AND IMPART
INFORMATION AND IDEAS without interference by public authority and regardless of
frontiers..... (with provisions attached to ) maintaining the authority AND IMPARTIALITY
of the judiciary".
Article 11. "EVERYONE has the right of freedom of peaceful
assembly and to freedom of ASSOCIATION with others.... rights to form and join ...
for the protection of HIS INTERESTS".
Article 13. "EVERYONE whose rights and freedoms as set
forth in this Convention are violated SHALL have an effective remedy before a national
authority notwithstanding that the violation HAS BEEN committed by persons acting in an
OFFICIAL CAPACITY."
Article 13 is VERY CLEAR. WHERE
IS THE NATIONAL AUTHORITY THAT LOOKS INTO THE VIOLATIONS judges in the United Kingdom
endorse, entertain AND INSTIGATE of their own? The question is simple and the Lord Chancellor with the Home Secretary should co-operate
and produce the formula under which the citizens CAN challenge activities that blatantly
breach national law and VIOLATE Human Rights. Converting the properties of others to
alleged legal costs attached to fraudulent court proceedings is the worst anathema the
United Kingdom is plagued with. One could not expect a clearer and more succinct a
situation of abuses of court 'facilities' than in the Geoffrey Harold Scriven cases. WE
have other cases on file. Where is the authority to investigate and prosecute the
offenders?
(Answer:
SUCCESSIVE GOVERNMENTS HAVE BEEN ACTING IN CONTEMPT of the provision, allegedly signed for
by OUR REPRESENTATIVES IN GOVERNMENT, as our agents on behalf of the Head of State, the
king / queen. We now ask you to READ OF THE, undisclosed &
unpublicised, ARRANGEMENTS IN PLACE, whereby judicial chair occupants ARE USED in order
to impose the state of dictatorships that the founder of
human-rights.org first spoke and wrote of, over 34 years ago. Such has been the case
in ALL pseudo-democracies where Intellectual Prostitutes* [*Link
to definition] are maintained by the invisible string pullers (of puppets) and
manipulators (of puppets) in order to misinform the ill-educated 'serfs' and 'shitizens',
NON-THINKERS who ARE SUBJECTED to permanent brain washing and subliminal indoctrination as
organised by the evil ones who have been in control of ALL pseudo-democracies for
centuries and NOW SEEK TOTAL CONTROL OF PLANET EARTH).
Article 14. "The
enjoyment of the rights and freedoms set forth in this Convention shall be secured without
discrimination on any grounds such as sex, race, colour, language, religion, political or
other opinion, national or social origin, association with a national minority, property,
birth or other status." |
| Many the 'victims of the system' who complain of contempt to their complaints, by the authorities and officials, who
invariably express their attitude and mentality to it all, through 'failures to
acknowledge or respond to / deal with the complaints diligently and as the law provides. [*Link to a list
of absolute essential provisions, warranted in and for the proper management of States
that constitute true Democracies] |
- On the right, print of an explicit
document attached ALWAYS at the top of submissions intended for any official, head of
government department, Minister, posted to or delivered by hand.
- We request of visitors, readers and
researchers to access the page, the 'background' to it all. The *Link from here takes visitors to a statement founded
and resting on assertions and promotions that always are disseminated and promoted through
the media, to the taxpaying 'serfs', from the offices of politicians, in particular
persons who hold Ministerial office after some questionable activities surface or are
exposed.
- We publish below, in the left margin
window, copy of a letter received from the Prime Minister's private office in December
1999. We publish also copy of a letter from Mr Andrew Yiannides, who thanked the Prime
Minister for forwarding the submissions and the evidence (received by the Prime Minister)
to the Home Secretary because the matters reported to the Prime Minister pertained to
criminal activities. [*Link
to the two images / letters in the left margin / window]
- Genuinely concerned citizens, serious
readers and researchers should use this next *link and
read of the steps taken in order to ensure that 'eventually, matters reported to the Prime
Minister were referred, by him and his private office at 10 Downing Street, to the right
Minister, the Home Secretary.
- We point to the fact that a junior public
servant, at the Home Office, DECIDED that the Prime Minister and his private office staff,
erred. Apparently the junior was better equipped in law than the Prime Minister and his
staff. The Home Office junior, therefore re-directed the submissions and the material to
the Lord Chancellor's Department.
- We telephoned the Prime Minister's office
and queried the action of the Home Office post room junior. We never heard from the Prime
Minister's office on the developments and in the circumstances we simply assumed that the
question in the background to it all page, had benefited from the correct reply /
conclusion 25 years earlier.
|
Explicit
STIPULATION

Combating the usual promotions and
arrangements for the protection of irresponsible Ministers, who always assert 'failures by
their subordinates to inform them (Ministers) of any and ALL serious issues reported to,
and intended FOR the attention of the Ministers, as was the case with Mr Yiannides'
submissions to the Rt. Hon. Frank Field when in Ministerial Office. |
| Above, we refer and point to the practice of using and blaming
juniors / subordinates for failing to inform (allegedly) the irresponsible in high office.
Through such inexcusable promotions they would have all citizens believe (such be their
intentions) that 'juniors are running the country. In the letter we publish, below,
references to such issues to the Rt. Hon. Frank Field MP. When, Minister, his staff and
office failed to acknowledge submissions posted for HIS PERSONAL ATTENTION after he was
instructed by the Prime Minister to 'think the unthinkable'. [*Link from here
to the page where we publish an explicit letter and relate the blunt fraudulent activities
instigated and taken to fruition by and through alleged servants of the public] |
- BUT... as can be deduced from
the letter on the right, a junior at the Home Office (post room) indulged.
- Noting but the usual invisible services and waffle
created by the lowest of the low of Public(!) Servants(?). [*Link from here to the citizen's
conclusions back in 1975, on the very issue / practice]
- A person retained by CIUKU Enterprises, operating
as an invisible services provider, a typical lap-dog.
- An alleged public servant who APPARENTLY WAS /
IS BETTER EQUIPPED THAN THE PRIME MINISTER and the Prime Minister's, the
government's team /advisers at 10 Downing Street.
- Marvel at the waffle from a button pushing
automaton:
|
 |
| Below in HTML (for links to and from) the
letter that CAUSED the government to act. Read it, access the facts and the evidence
pointed to the Member of Parliament (ex-Minister) and then read the article, by the Home
Secretary, we reproduce below. |
THE FULL TEXT OF THE
LETTER to the Rt. Hon. Frank Field MP
29th April 2003
The Rt. Hon. Frank Field MP
House of Commons
Westminster
London - SW1A 0AA
My Ref.: A03EATTP
Your Ref.: ‘Think /Do the unthinkable’ brief.
OPEN LETTER
Dear Sir
Re: Human Rights and the duties of Ministers / MPs in a Democratic State
I beg to refer you to my letter of 18th December 1998,
published in the public domain at:
(a) http://www.uk-human-rights.org/natinscan.htm#page_1
(URL changes as of March 2006 to http://www.uk-human-rights.org)
The above letter was posted to the Rt. Hon. Jack Straw, Home Secretary
at the time. On that occasion it was noted that the government acted promptly.
The stated facts of life, relative to our pseudo-democracy, as covered
in our pages, are clear. The realities and realisations to the point. Included, in the
stated facts, references to letters that I was caused to send, to you, in connection with
the rampant fraud and corruption covered in our pages. The Free-For-All organised,
always, by Public(!) Servants(?). Crimes seen to be endorsed and acquiesced,
through blunt defaults from and by other public(!) Servants(?). The latter retained and
maintained by other Public(!) Servants(?) to serve the citizens by applying their presumed
knowledge of law to the facts known or stated to them and or raised with / brought to the
attention of such Public(!) Servants(?).
The references to the letters that were sent to you can be accessed in
the same page/web-site file at:
(b) http://www.uk-human-rights.org/natinscan.htm#Ostrich
acts (URL changes as of March 2006 to http://www.uk-human-rights.org)
I will appreciate an acknowledgement to this letter, by return post. A
response proper, as soon as possible, is deemed essential because of the serious issues
that my enquiries, now, and the matters that my communications, past and present, raised
and raise with you. Indeed, others in public office, during, before and after my original
submissions to you, personally, received substantial information and documented evidence
in support of my submissions.
Please note that as part of the preparations for the publication of the
facts of life, in the public domain, and the raising of the issues of ‘who are
responsible for the rampant fraud and corruption through contempt of all law, as Public(!)
Servants(?) indulge’, an explicit practice and ploy is pointed to by me, in the
pages published by and at *human-rights*.
In respect of other facts, realities and convenient arrangements
(pointed to by me at *human-rights*) I wish to enquire of you, if you are aware or
were informed of the fact that the victims of the ‘Arms to, and for, Iraq’ fiasco:
including the costly theatrical productions (court presentations), the torment and torture
(through the court proceedings / charges / allegations) imposed on the victims of
Public(!) Servants(?) received compensation, not long ago, running into millions of pounds
sterling? ALL AT THE EXPENSE OF THE PUBLIC PURSE – the taxpayer : Mr & Mrs Average!
The succinct and explicit realities covered in the page:
(c) http://www.uk-human-rights.org/confraud.htm
(URL changes as of March 2006 to http://www.uk-human-rights.org)
and the fundamental realities / practices covered in the other explicit
page:
(d) http://www.uk-human-rights.org/chaldep1.htm
(URL changes as of March 2006 to http://www.uk-human-rights.org)
led to the submissions last year to:
- The Treasury
- The Prime Minister
- The Home Secretary
And the submissions are covered at:
(e) http://www.uk-human-rights.org/theyknow.htm
(URL changes as of March 2006 to http://www.uk-human-rights.org)
I am preparing for the release and publication, in the public domain,
of the acknowledgement by the government in waiting in 1995, relative to THE SERIOUS ISSUE
OF FRAUD IN THE LEGAL SYSTEM. I feel it my duty to draw your attention to the aforesaid
facts. You were acting for the government you represent, at the time of my submissions to
you. It is, therefore, incumbent upon me to enquire of you and to seek assistance, from a
Minister who was caused to resign, in order that I may present a clearer picture on the
issue of the melting pot. The criminal activities, by persons who ‘arrange world events’
through secret meetings and undeclared by government policies, lead to the citizens being
defrauded of their properties and their rights in law. The activities also lead to the
taxing of Mr & Mrs Average for the experiments in social restructuring by non-elected
‘criminally motivated / trained / tutored’ individuals, who abuse public office.
I need only remind you that the victims of such public(!) servants(?)
have families and offspring to care for. The citizens also have the inalienable right to
plan for their futures and those of their children. The criminal activities that we cover
in our pages, endorsed and acquiesced, as these are through the courts, amount to nothing
short of ‘’. When an elected government turns a
blind eye and or ears to the evidence that no one can shove in his/her private or family
closets, nor shove it all under the carpets of the salons the offending public(!)
servants(?) frequent, the issue of:
'WHEN WILL THE GOVERNMENT that made promises
in 1995 [*Link] put an end to
the abuse / use of the courts for the imposition of ‘the creeping dictatorship’,
that I recognised as long ago as 1972/1975? The background and the evidence to/for
the conclusions, then, is published at:
(f) http://www.human-rights.demon.co.uk/courts.htm
(URL changes as of March 2006 to http://www.uk-human-rights.org)
The false
instrument published in the page, was made even falser after the criminals ‘goofed’.
It was created / procured years after the events that led to the institution of court
proceedings. The architects (legal circles) with the defaulting public(!) servants(?),
(the police and judicial chair abusers) established beyond any doubt the rampant fraud and
corruption through the courts. The Lords & Masters mentalities towards the citizens (‘subjects’
to the whims of the corrupters of societies) whom the offending public(!) servants(?)
treat as serfs of the Middle Ages, was also born out of those events. I draw your personal
attention to the fact that Lord Jeffrey Archer ended up behind bars while the architect
and promoter of a false instrument FOR THE PERVERSION & CORRUPTION OF JUSTICE was
rewarded with silk and subsequently appointed to ‘judicial chair occupancy’. With
criminals in judicial chairs how can any government that knows of or becomes aware of ‘the
facilities at / through the courts for RAMPANT FRAUD AND CRIMES ENDORSED BY THE LAW
ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES justify or assert ‘government founded and resting on law and order’?
Your response proper on the issue of the submissions that were ignored by your office
/ private staff (you?) are deemed essential. In the event that some subordinate or junior
may be presumed responsible for suppression of my letters to you, I request that you
access the page:
(g) http://www.uk-human-rights.org/background.htm (URL changes as of
March 2006 to http://www.uk-human-rights.org)
There, the questions (in
red): "WHO governs ? And How ?"
Also: Is the answer
"Through Juniors and dereliction of Public Duty ?"
Andrew Yiannides
Founder / President
human-rights.org (NGO) |
| READ BELOW the article that
was published within days in the London Evening Standard.
Consider our submissions above to the
MP, Frank Field Esq. ex-Minister who had been caused to resign years earlier.
The first letter we pointed to above should
also be read by ALL who access this site.
Every considerate human (thinking and
feeling animal) should then consider WHERE BE THE DELIVERY OF JUSTICE to the British
people, the taxpayers as we have been demanding for decades?
Can any housewife who does not keep a clean
home, ever really assert or assume the right 'to clean up another's home'?.
FOOD FOR THOUGHT, dear
Members of Parliament. Cease all manifestation inherent in puppets and act as the
representatives of the citizens and not as the manipulated 'slaves of the operators who
organise and control CIUKU Enterprises. |
| Evening Standard Monday, 12 May 2003 Page 11The
Home Secretary has irked the judiciary by seeking stricter sentences for murder. Here he
insists that courts must take more notice of the public
I won't give in
to the
judges
By David Blunkett
Home Secretary
MY announcement of
new sentences for murders – so that life means life – provoked the latest wave of
media coverage on my so-called war on the judges". I can see why. It is easy to
caricature any disagreement as the hot-tempered working-class Sheffield boy taking on an
icy-cool retired judge pontificating from his Surrey drawing room.
Yet I am not "at war" with judges, barristers or the
rest of the legal profession. I believe strongly in a politically independent judiciary,
the rule of law and due process. But I also believe in Parliament and a healthy democracy
where people vote in elections because their vote can make a difference to the world they
live in, through the politicians they elect. Surely it is possible to have a strong and
lively debate about how Parliament and the judiciary fit together without it always being
portrayed as a brawling slanging match?
This is not some dry debate in Westminster. Confidence in our
criminal justice system is at an all-time low. Public respect for judges, politicians and
lawyers alike is equally low. Up and down the country the experience of victims and
witnesses is too often a poor one where they are treated as bit-players in a system which
sees process as being more important than justice, where technicalities are more important
than the truth.
When politicians make these points we are not seeking to wind up
the legal profession for the sake of it. We are doing our job and speaking up for the
public we serve. There are no newspaper editors, columnists or opinion formers living in
my inner-city Sheffield constituency. If I don't speak about the experiences of my
constituents and millions like them, they have no voice at all in the public arena.
I WANT to improve this situation and to get reform in the
criminal justice system that brings the legal profession with us. To do this, we need a
long hard look at the constitutional relationship between Parliament and the judges and be
clear how it has changed.
This relationship has changed beyond all recognition over the
past 30 years, thanks to the use of judicial review - the process by which an individual
can ask the court to overturn the effect or implementation of a law on their individual
circumstance. Judges now routinely use judicial review to rewrite the effects of a law
that Parliament has passed.
This isn't just my view, it is endorsed by some of the most
distinguished legal minds in the country. Professor Sir William Wade - the author of
Administrative Law – has written: "The judges have established judicial review as
an almost boundless jurisdiction over almost every kind of governmental activity".
Lord Beloff QC has said that the activities of the judiciary have infringed the
sovereignty of Parliament".
Lord Beloff also points out that in the 1950s, judicial review
was confined to fewer than 100 cases a year relating to maladministration of government.
Now, there are thousands of cases every year in every field of
commerce; construction, aviation, and IT, all inviting lawyers and judges to find ever
more ingenious ways of getting what they want from the law Parliament has passed.
Added to this have been a rash of high-profile cases brought
under the 1998 Human Rights Act which incorporated the European Convention on Human Rights
into British law.
I believe most of these cases would have ended up in Strasbourg
anyway, if we had not taken the step of building the ECHR into our legal system. But it
has undoubtedly encouraged some in the legal profession to see a further way of rendering
ineffective laws they don't like.
In my area, the impact of judicial review has been most visible
in several high profile asylum cases on fast-track claims at the Oakington centre and cash
payments for late claimants.
In both cases, the Home Office eventually won the legal
arguments but not before a major tussle which resulted in plenty of premature headlines
about our reforms being squashed.
These perceptions are vital to the health of our democracy. If
people believe that Parliament has no power or influence and that whatever promises we
make will eventually fail, how can we persuade people to vote, stand for elections and be
involved in democracy?
People have to believe that Parliament genuinely speaks for them
if they are to vote, and this can't be done if large parts of the legal system believe
that it can seek to undo Acts of Parliament without any consequences for the health of our
democracy.
This is not the same as saying that public opinion, however raw,
should become law which is the way some commentators have interpreted my murder sentencing
principles. Parliament's lawmaking process is usually a year of intense deliberation over
finely worded, complicated pieces of legislation. This is the job of work which MPs and
peers do, day in, day out.
We have to move away from a stand-off mentality in which parts
of the legal profession respond to politicians with a "what's it to do with
you?" attitude. I honestly believe that most lawyers and judges do want to see
justice, not just procedural Pyrrhic victories.
I want that, too, as well as a system where judges can interpret
the laws which have been clearly set out by a democratically elected Parliament.
AT the moment, we all too often have the worst
of all worlds in which Parliament deliberates for months over laws which are then
systematically undermined by overly aggressive judicial review decisions. There is a way
forward here. The legal profession must embrace reform of the criminal justice system, not
carp from the sidelines. Like most people, I respond better to an honest dialogue than to
being shouted at.
A better relationship between the judges, barristers and
politicians has to recognise our mandate as public representatives and not treat public
opinion as something inherently disdainful which has no role in the formulation of law.
We all have to pause and draw breath at the scale and scope of
judicial review and interpretations of the Human Rights Act if we are not to have spat
after spat about the consequences.
A mature, clear legal system is one of the foundations
of a democratic society. We all have a responsibility not to destroy the ground all of us
want to stand on.
We have
to move away from a stand-off mentality
in which parts of the legal profession
respond to politicians with
`What's it to do with you?'[*Link to Footnote - reality]
© Associated Newspapers UK
London Evening Standard – May 2003 |
Below a House of Lords
ruling that could not possibly have ignored the principles covered in domestic and in
international Law, Conventions, Treaties & Accords, which our representatives
in governments introduce and or subscribed to, ON BEHALF OF THE CITIZENS, from time
to time. Such
realisations from within an alleged Democracy. One that is sold to the world by the
abductors, of the very Goddess, the media barons with their stooges, the editors acting as
blind deaf and dumb monkeys or as the Intellectual Prostitutes
that an insider spoke of, when he was moving out of the firing line. The offenders attend
conspiratorial & secret meetings with self-appointed Gods who have no scruples or an
ounce of morals among them. All preach to others that which they, as sycophants and
hypocrites, do not adhere to. [*Link] |
We refer and draw attention to the simple fact
that IN ESSENCE only the whole, of any publication, evinces THE PURPOSE & INTENT
OF the AUTHOR and CONTRIBUTORS TO the publication. That aside, the MORE IMPORTANT
ELEMENT (for victims of the free-for-all as practised in the courts and by the courts'
service, is the issue of CONTEMPT FOR STATUTORY LAW covering the criminal activities,
indulged into or entertained by judicial chair occupants. Reference to 'THE WHOLE' IS
COVERED in the Court of Appeal report in the lower part of the scan, of 'The Times' Law
Report. DO NOTE the words:- ".....in a reference by the Home Secretary
under.....". DO refer to the four letters (images) we publish in the exclusive page / file where
'promoters of the practices from within the Law Enforcement Agencies are exposed. The
promoters DO NOT CHALLENGE the criminal activities and they decline or FAIL to provide
copies of any letters they PROJECT & PROMOTE with arrogant affront & intent in
contempt of the law. THUS THEY ARE SEEN / ACT as PROMOTERS of WAFFLE & or FALSE
ASSERTIONS even letters by the POLICE, etc. They do so WITH INTENT in order that new
victims swallow such ill-directed and maligned promotions as a fait accompli situations.
They do so only as converts to and supporters of the rampant fraud through abuse of the
courts facilities. Such persons ACT ONLY FOR THE |
 |
|