- This is the original page (lilac colour background) as published by *human-rights* when
Mr Scriven was introduced to Mr Yiannides, by the LIPS crowd/mob, in early 1999.
- Attention is drawn to the fact that this case was being treated, by us, as one of the
intended Citizen's Alternative Precedent - cases; one of many C.A.P's, it was anticipated.
The case was used when challenging the usual 'divorce industry frauds through the courts',
in July 2004; visitors/readers can *link to the
explicit challenges, which we published in our NEWSLETTERS page for obvious
reasons.(Visitors/readers should do well if they read all of the Newsletters published in
the page).
- However, the managers and controllers of the Litigants (Loonies according to the legal
circles) In Person Society, proved to have been nothing else but a bunch of 'sold to the
double constructive frauds on the taxpayers', stooges. No wonder the legal circles
referred and refer to such persons as loonies.
- Only idiots fall for and in such traps with their eyes open, yet shut their ears to the
'considered and reasoned views of others', such as the founder of *human-rights*.
- The visitor is urged to read our submissions and the email exchanges with such stooges
in exclusive pages (*Link 1, *Link
2, *Link 3, Link 4, *Link 5, *Link 6, *Link
7, *Link 8, *Link 9, *Link.10, *Link 11, *Link 12, *Link 13, *Link 14, *Link 15, ).
- Many the PERSONS WHO MADE IT THEIR PRIORITY & BUSINESS to invite and entice every
'other victim of the legal system / circles' whom they contacted and contact or they
were/are pointed to, into the world of intrigue, deceptions by the score and fraudulent
misrepresentations, they joined.
- Such were the scenarios in 1992 when the managers and controllers of the LIPS crowd/mob
contacted Mr Andrew Yiannides. It was AFTER he submitted the explicit Appeal that visitors
should access in order to acquaint themselves with the material facts pleaded and the
violations that were being challenged by 'the targeted non-entity' / 'serf'.
- The dreamers and 'sold to the system as is stooges', set out on their journeys of
deception (dreamers) and to abuse the assistance and support they benefited from, as
covered in our pages.
- Odd it was not, that some charlatans from the UKMM (United Kingdom Men's Movement) also
contacted Mr Andrew Yiannides in late April 1998, with a concocted scenario of their own
making.
- They were challenged to explain their unsolicited invitation to Mr Andrew Yiannides, but
they failed to comply.
- The simple fact was and remains that ONLY information imparted to the controllers /
manager of the Litigants In Person Society and passed on to the charlatans 'misleading the
suckers they are pointed to or are sent along by their partners in deception and
fraudulent misrepresentation aplenty. (*Link to a page where the evidence in support of
the aforesaid realisations).
<>
Above the essential intoduction
to the page. It was called for after the theatrical production at the R.C.J, in
February 2000. At the time many of the LIPS crowd/mob, and their affiliates, exhibited
their true colours (*F***). Below the original page
All underlined text with an
asterisk indicates a LINK at the bottom of the page
The Geoffrey
Harold Scriven - case
(C.A.P)
The FIRST CASE to
reach us whereby the resolve of one courageous and fighting fit victim HAS PRODUCED
RESULTS commanding attention. THEY HAVE SINCE TARGETED this victim and have been doing
their damnest best in the theatres of their corrupt world through misconduct in public
office to cause as much damage as they can. INDICTABLE OFFENCES for the
directors rest on "Misconduct in Public Office". With
intent they abuse public office in order to "TORMENT AND TORTURE"
the citizens on a pseudo-democracy, with the blessing and acquiescence of no others but
the third arm of the TRIAD, the police of course; The last, evidently, cannot read
Parliament's Law because it is published, alas, in invisible ink, not even in Braille
thereby denying our blind judges access to the laws they are meant to apply in all cases
that appear before them. (*Link to judges' duty).
THEY WERE CAUSED
TO LISTEN, to REFER TO THE EVIDENCE. Believe it or not they ARE CAUSED to refer
to PRECEDENT cases OTHERS HAD shoved under the carpets and 'in the family business
closet'; wished out of existence by those who were in pursuit of their dishonest goals at
the expense of their victim. A citizen who paid to maintain THEIR theatres through taxes
in the first instance. The victims pay for their own destruction, to put it bluntly.
Read of the facts of life; from the second
citizen to go public with HIS cases AS these ARE NOW. WE BRING TO YOU the FACTS
because you deserve to know of such harsh realities in the UK. To his credit the much
tried and tested Mr Geoffrey Harold Scriven HAS been fighting for his rights for years. HE
is not likely to be one to accept a 'quiet non disclosed settlement'. HE knows that of
such practices the dishonest ARE ENCOURAGED and 'protected' simply to carry on in the
minefields within the confines of our judicial theatres. For far too long the
directors, from within the courts maintained in the United Kingdom were/have been
unsupervised, were/are uncontrolled and had/have been let loose on a helpless
public. Not any more; at our disposal we have at
the touch of a button information technology; it provides us, and the public, with
the facts and the evidence the media barons and their editors would normally SUPPRESS for
their very own 'private' reasons and who cares about the national disgrace our founder
wrote of decades ago?
READ the affidavits and the Statement of
Facts by the victim. No solicitor and or Barrister, that we know of, would plead the FACTS
as this citizen DID. They were/had been seeking to destroy and ruin their targeted victim,
financially, through bankruptcy proceedings, constructively engineered. They felt free to
act outside the law; they abused the facilities at their disposal. Through such practices
the legal/judicial/police Mafia cause and impose stresses on their victims and many an
ailment that send most to an early grave* Much to his credit Mr Geoffrey Harold
Scriven, and others like him, DO STAND UP for their rights. We now
have a government that promised to act; it appears to be acting in the interest of the law
and sanity. THE GREED* of the legal professions was/is matched only by the
greed and ego trips of those who entertain the dishonest and the abuses of the Court's
processes arrogantly. All done with a tongue in cheek impunity and mentality that has seen
no parallel in the annals of man (as in humans) and modern history. Their activities
belong to other eras and or times, such as they are trying to emulate and or follow.
Treating citizens and Parliament's law with the same contempt just as when they removed
Queen and faith from the Court's documents. NOTE that for lack of a better description the
victim simply refers to the 'licensed criminals' as the organised legal/judicial/police
MAFIA. WE publish the incredible FACTS. Acquiesced crimes, aided and abetted by
officials through misuse of and misconduct in public office. Refer to the documents we
publish and USE the following:-
Bankruptcy, they planned it all for
him. He fought back with a succinct four page affidavit* that speaks a lot and does
credit to the victim who fought and IS FIGHTING BACK as a true Honourable citizen, and son
of Boadicea. Mr G. H. Scriven was and is not one to end where the criminals intended. His
tenacity and sense of citizenship is admirable. The Court's Order clear UPON READING
THE EVIDENCE. Within the confines of our judicial halls (theatres), weekly, if not
daily, thousands of citizens,are faced with theatrical pre-scripted scenarios and with
arrogant contempt for the EVIDENCE and the LAW. One need only consider the extent of
the activities by the dishonest legal/judicial/Mafia at work. They generate false
documents, FORGERIES in law* by the score; just to generate work and
income through CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS as the legal/judicial circles indulge in. Converting
the assets and the properties of others through 'alleged legal costs' to themselves (as Mr
Geoffrey Harold Scriven deposes) is their game. Officially acknowledged crimes*,
are under ongoing investigations* by the Yard, and we look forward to the
'results and pronouncements. And in the process the peace of mind and the health of their
victims, suffers and deteriorates. Thus THE legal/Judicial MAFIA provides for the National
Health Service 'victim/patients' by the score; their victims to be the subject of.... as
in the Mary Winch Affair and the ongoing saga of Mr N Haralabidis additional violations
and denials of rights.
Link to the Appeal to the Crown Court,*
because of wilfully engineered abuse of the law and the Magistrate's Court's processes.
When IT SUITS THEIR PURPOSES, the police CAN and DO prosecute. EVEN when there is no
justification and or reasons for them to do so UNLESS it serves the purposes of their
circles; the LEA's and.......
Read the Affidavit or Statement of Truth in
support of the Appeal to the Crown Court*; FIVE REVEALING and
explosive PAGES. The pleadings to the point. No one to supervise the free to
indulge judiciary. The deponent recognised and pleaded the fact that one is not dealing
simply with isolated cases but organised deceptions, theft and fraud on a national scale. Our founder formed such an opinion some 30 years ago. To his credit
the Right Honourable Paul Boateng was prepared to write of the practice of fraud
within the legal system and the government in waiting, through his letter,
DID GIVE an undertaking, to our founder, that New Labour WAS to DEAL with the problem, as
indeed it appears to be doing. National disgrace, our founder wrote
of, many years ago; may we see the end of it and many more judges prepared to fight back
like the Honourable Judge Colin Willis. Moving the Rt. Hon. Paul Boateng to the
Home Office as Minister of State, with SPECIFIC BRIEFS, was the best act our Prime
Minister, the Rt. Hon. Tony Blair, entered into; moving him to another important post
within the Home Office, enhances the resolve of New Labour to keep its promise. It is in
the best interest of the UK to put an end to organised CRIME through the courts'
facilities. The destruction of morals, ethics and contempt for the law. All SPRING
directly from the very Law Enforcement Agencies; the judiciary and the police. May the
lead of the courageous be followed by many more.
The Order on Appeal to the Crown Court*,
clear 'Appeal allowed'. Conclusions founded on the FACTS and the merits of the
case at hand. The hand written note in red ink clearly defines the feelings of the victim
of the abusers of 'judicial chairs' and link now to misconduct in public
office*; those who daily ruin many a life and FAMILIES. MALICIOUS
PROSECUTION, etc.
Link to the challenge, to Mr G. H.
Scriven's explicit two page letter to John Abbott Esq. QPM., the Director General of the
National Criminal Intelligence Service (NCIS*). The United Kingdom's FBI equivalent.
It is for that body and all professionals under the command of the Director to act; to
bring about prosecutions AS WE SEEK AND DEMAND in The Stephen Lawrence affair; all the
agony and pain because of the reckless defaults by public servants in office. The 1988
Criminal Justice Act is clear in its provisions and Parliament's intentions ought not to
be ignored; there ought not to be any room for VIOLATIONS OF ARTICLE
14 of the ECoHR let alone abuse of the Court's 'facilities' to impose alleged legitimate
legal costs on targeted victims WHILE VIOLATING the provisions of Article 1 of the First
Protocol of the ECoHR. The police were keen and
happy to prosecute Mr Scriven; they were ready willing and able to abuse the Magistrates'
Courts facilities and time, as in "The Police Summons the victim - case"*.
It suited the dishonest they work with and for; it suited the criminally motivated schemes
of all at the expense of the targeted citizen. THEY abused, unjustifiably, provisions of
Parliament's law. THE LAW provides ALSO for all the ills the criminally motivated public
servants, and the legally trained, indulged in their free for all theatrical productions.
THEY ALL KNEW and know the law (CERTIFIED to practice) and they often enough proclaim "Ignorance of the law is NO DEFENCE. THEY HAVE NONE
but the criminals above them through whom to be absolved(!) as in the case of the police
who forged 'statements'. Nothing unusual; the Court staff, the solicitors and even judges
use FORGERIES systematically and habitually in the United Kingdom. All ACTING outside the
law, as if above it, when 'none IS' or could claim to be. At least none should be,
let alone the Dictator Pinochet. It is a well known dictum that CRIME IS NOT STATUTE
BARRED through lapse of time. Also NO law or Act of Parliament can be applied
retrospectively.
Link to: Misconduct in
Public Office The
solicitors The Judiciary The LAW
Link to: Fraud
Vitiates Judgements Torment and Torture Forgeries in law
Link to: He
fought bankruptcy Acknowledged crimes Under ongoing investigations
Link to: Appeal
to Crown Court Contacting NCIS Police summons the victim Greed
WARRANTED, as of April 2003, NOTES:
(1). The links above were pointing simply to the page (top) and NOT to any
particular element covered at the pages. The objective was simple: "Any genuinely
concerned person who had been / was or is a victim of the rampant free-for-all THROUGH THE
COURTS (We refer to assaults on the assets and the properties of 'the serfs', the
shitizens' and the transfer of such assets as arranged by abusers of the facilities of the
courts, to their circles; we hasten to add 'not simply the legal professions').
(2). The objective was also a test for any, GENUINELY
CONCERNED, challenger. Such persons should be bothered with the revelations pointed to and
exposed in our pages. Genuinely concerned and 'law abiding citizens' WOULD BE USING THE
ELEMENTS, instead of shoving them 'in the family closet'. Our reference to 'the family'
relates to 'the circles from within which such persons were introduce or or sent/send as
victims(?) of ongoing abuse of the courts facilities. Such persons came/come along to test
our understanding of the workings in the courts and to test our RESOLVE TO EXPOSE THE
CRIMINALS WHO ARE IN CONTROL, in pseudodemocracies that allegedly rest and are founded on
principles of law and order. We maintain that, at the very least, as tax-payers, one and
all would have acted and be seen to BE ACTIVE in challenging the rampant CONSTRUCTIVE
FRAUDS THROUGH THE COURTS. Reference to 'OUR AIMS', that all
were/are referred to relate to the activities in and through the courts and cover the
facilities available to the genuine victims / challengers. None of the persons we
name-to-shame could ever excuse themselves for their evil recklessnes and their 'apparent
reliance on the criminals in control' to protect them from the obvious: 'the activities we
cover and point to in our pages endorsed, approved and used by such stooges and sold to
the rampant fraud through the courts activities', charlatans and fraudsters club recruits.
(3). The arrangements in place, which we exposed to the world in the
exclusive page [*Link to the exclusive exposures]
constituted and happen to be 'the acid test' for and about the victims who came and come
along as victims(?) who allege concerns about the problems which they and others face/are
facing in and through the courts. Each and every person named in our lists of: (a)
Fraudsters Club Recruits,
(b) Maintenance Engineers of the system as is,
(c) Users of the arrangements in place, for more of the same,
(d) Charlatans who are asserting of their own or being promoted by the
circles of the Fraudsters Club Recruits could/can never excuse or justify their convenient
contempt of the exposed realities which they shoved/shove in the dark corners of their
minds. Their perverted views on issues of law and morals, as LOVERS OF THE FACILITIES FOR
RAMPANT CONSTRUCTUVE FRAUDS THROUGH THE COURTS should be unacceptable to all citizens (who
are made aware of the free-for-all facilities through the courts.
(4). The element of the charlastans and stooges who were introduced
or sent along to test our stance and understanding of the activities and the facilities
arranged through the courts WERE THE MAIN CAUSE FOR RESEARCH & INVESTIGATION, for Mr
Andrew Yiannides as of 1992. The element and issues surfaced soon after the
managers/organisers of the LIPS crowd/mob stated their own plans for the victims of the
legal circles/system and THE LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES. Odd it may have been that the
founder of human-rights was contacted after the developments on 'The Breeding Grounds -
case' [*Link] because of a flyer for 'The CAMILA Project' was
referred(!) to them. They were informed that Mr Andrew Yiannides first got to know of the
criminal activities in and through the courts in 1969 through to 1972.
Back to HomePage
|
Site under reconstruction - ongoing
additions and improvements