RELEVANT Case Law - List
1. The use of Interrogatories
2. When Time/Date Immaterial
3. Fraud Vitiates Judgements
4. Public Office Misconduct
5. False Instruments & THEFT of properties / rights
6. <>

• Human Rights Articles covered / published as of July 1998. European Union Law and page in its present context introduced in December 2001.
• Individual victims informed of their rights as of late 1999 / early 2000.
• The leaders of LIPS(*Link) and individual members were informed of their rights as of February 1997.
• At the time a number received, by post an explicit invitation; they were asked to look up our pages and material; also to co-operate by returning a simple to complete (both sides of) an A4 questionnaire (ticks only needed) and to return the form to The CAMILA Project. However, no one complied.
• We wish to qualify, however, that three individuals had been co-operating in other issues, from earlier times.
• Also Mr Geoffrey Harold Scriven (with whom we had an excellent relationship between March 1999 until late December 1999), Mr Norman Scarth, Mr Paul Talbot-Jenkins [*Link] and Mr Maurice Kellett from even earlier times, were acting only as mischief makers [*Link].
• All were introduced or told to contact us from the LIPS crowd/mob quarters.
• The plans of the leaders of 'the group' were otherwise motivated than 'the complaints they were/are promoting and asserting'.
• All raise issues about the system in place'; all agree 'in private with us' that the unholy trinity, the TRIAD [*Link] instigates and maintains the system as is 'with and through public servants', with the blessings of such persons as the LIPS crowd/mob leaders/managers organise and control in tandem with their affiliates and associates who operate out of similar set-ups. [*Link to explicit references to such groups by a solicitor to client in March 2003].
• Such persons ate simply acting as maintenance engineers and they are running around promoting and working FOR the administration of the rampant fraud and corruption of society through abuse of the courts processes and facilities. [*Link].

ECoHR
(Access "The Convention In Legal Terms" as defined by three authorities)
&
European Union Law
(Specifically provides for the European Convention On Human Rights to be implemented and in force in all States of the European Union)

The European Convention on Human Rights (ECoHR) under Article 1 of the First Protocol Provides for the abusive use of any facilities that violate principles of INTERNATIONAL LAW. Through violations of this article the conversion of the assets (properties) of the victim-citizens, to allegedly legitimate legal costs. Public Servants, retained on behalf of the citizens by other Public Servants, indulge. Through arranged, as discretionary powers, the corrupt and the corrupters breach and violate the following provision:- " Every natural or legal person is entitled to the peaceful enjoyment of HIS possessions. NO ONE shall be deprived of his possessions except in the public interest and SUBJECT to the conditions provided for by law AND BY THE GENERAL PRINCIPLES of INTERNATIONAL LAW."  and  "The preceding provisions shall not, however, in any way impair the right of a State to enforce such laws as it deems necessary to control the use of property in accordance with the general interest or to secure the payment of taxes and or other contributions or penalties". Back to: CICA page,  Local Authorities (Pleaded by member of the CoL)

• NOTES - A:- The above provision in International Law is the most frequently violated right by public servants in the United Kingdom. In particular by the Legal/Judicial/Police TRIAD that operates freely care of the much promoted and revered independence of 'judicial chair occupants'; persons who act injudiciously as exemplified in "The Downing Street Years" and in "The Breeding grounds-case". Also in:
• "The Paul Talbot-Jenkins - case, "The Maurice Kellett - case", "The Baldwin De Castilo - case", "The William Spring - case", "The Jim Hulbert - case", "The Builder's - case" and the many other cases that we provide links to, in and through our pages. 
• "The Robert Owen - case" (lodged at the ECrtHR as of last year),
• "The Geoffrey Harold Scriven- divorce"(Link to in our pages, part of the early challenges), "The Johan Foenander - divorce" (an Appeal in our pages), "The Bryan Hudson - divorce" and "The "Norman Scarth - case", all four gone underground cases as with,
• "The Roz Kellett - case" who removed her extensive complaints and Statements of Fact from her pages & web-sites following contacts by the Litigants In Person Society; individuals from within the LIPS crowd/mob always in the background, interfering in our work, without any consultation and or reference to us. Her Statement of Facts supported with comprehensive evidence, she was encouraged, by us, to publish on the Internet, as we encouraged Mr Jim Hulbert to do. Citizens can put an end to all maligned comments from third parties, from persons who used to, and still, relish in vile opinions on the issue of corrupted and perverted justice by the TRIAD, in control of Law Enforcement in our alleged Democracy. We have been inviting the maligned mischief makers to access the */confraud.htm* file/page and to publish their views on 'The Rampant Fraud' through the court service and legal system. We dare anyone to ignore the facts and the realities covered in the aforesaid page and to consider the elements that arose out of the conduct of another LIPS introduction we caught in bed with those she was complaining about for over 15 months. All the while she was promoting and making many a false assertion about her intentions, and securing assistance as a result of fraudulent in intent misrepresentations to us.(Link)   
• In "The Mary Winch" (case reported by Marie Claire and covered also in two TV documentaries). Also in "The Gerald Adshed" case (stated as a precedent case in the Divorce Appeal case (Link)) both persons were driven to an early death, like many others.
• Special mention to persons who contacted us at the directions of others. They merited attention and benefited from work done such as the Divorce Appeal in our pages no one can ignore. Abusing our time, as mischief makers with other agendas, which facts, the transcript we publish in our pages evinces (Link). They, who elected to ignore "OUR AIMS" and 'engaged in undisclosed arrangements with others' will be afforded the rights and opportunities covered in the aforesaid page. More details we shall provide in due course. Some of the work is already published, as agreed or as our rights (copyright) and as the law commands because of the crimes perpetrated and the public interest element.
• The public at large, the citizens of the world, need to be informed and protected from Organised Institutionalised State Approved/Endorsed Crime, through politicians who ignore their duties to the citizens. Visitors to these pages should note and marvel at the capabilities of those who systematically misuse their public office in contravention of every principle of law. Through breaches of criminal law and violations of International Law the offenders Misconduct in Public office* indictable offences! (No one above the Law? We address the deputies of the people and the citizens of the world, everywhere).

And (the very ECoHR ) under Article 2 of the First Protocol Provides: "NO person shall be denied the right to education. In the exercise of ANY functions which IT ASSUMES in relation to education and to TEACHING (this includes ALL established practices and examples set by public servants and or officials), the State SHALL RESPECT THE RIGHT OF PARENTS (do note PLURAL) TO ENSURE SUCH EDUCATION AND TEACHING IS IN CONFORMITY WITH THEIR OWN RELIGIOUS AND PHILOSOPHICAL CONVICTIONS.  (i.e:not as imposed and or determined by quangos and or political animals, WRONGLY MOTIVATED individuals and amoral atheists. Or by persons who have no respect for the rights and the WILL of the citizens they choose to treat as morons and or as illiterate serfs of the middle ages and or as persons, who the impostors believe, follow and practice the very principles of the IMPOSTORS themselves. Modern day Lords & Masters imposing their DICTATES(Q4) on the citizens in an alleged Democracy, such as the United Kingdom proclaims itself to be.

Article 2. "Everyone's right to life shall be protected by law. No one shall be deprived ....." WE MAINTAIN that the proviso assures citizens of the right to a life WITHIN THE LAW. So long as the citizens do not infringe upon or violate the rights of any other citizen. No matter how low the standing of any citizen in the community the right should and must be applied in line with the dictum: "All men are created/born equal". The right odd never to have been, be or let alone contemplated by anyone such as the abductors and rapists of Justice and Democracy have been indulging while 'serving as alleged public servants' only to behave as the citizens Lords & Masters. (© AY 1993). (Pleaded by member of the CoL)

Article 3.   "No one shall be subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment". WE MAINTAIN that the proviso is grossly breached by the TRIAD (legal/judicial/police and their stooges) through breaches of and misconduct in public office, such as the practices by the Rampant Corruption Jockeys in charge and in control of the courts.  (Pleaded by member of the CoL)

Article 5. "Everyone has the right to liberty and security of person. No one shall be deprived of his liberty save in the following cases and in accordance with a procedure prescribed by law. (Link to Convention site). HOWEVER we can assure you that no procedures prescribed by law, that would be in line with the simple declaration under the introduction to the article, AUTHORISE the abduction of the life of victims of the legal(1), judicial(2), police(3) = TRIAD.  ??????, the Greek word (TPIADA), covers the Holy and not the unholy trinity that is in control of our country. In the UK, citizens, on a regular basis, are led in the beehives where the legal circles thrive, as in 'The Breeding Grounds - case. Citizens are forced and or caused to take up issue with the fraudsters, the corrupt and the corrupted who flourish unhindered and unchallenged. Citizens DO HAVE THEIR LIBERTY STOLEN from them through such impositions. The RIGHTS of the citizen, as provided for under this Article, ARE VIOLATED. Citizens are deprived of the 'right to lead a life as they have the right to plan for in a free democracy'. The citizens although not serfs, nonetheless are FORCED TO LABOUR OVER LEGAL MATTERS. They SLAVE over papers and FIGHT in the courts FOR THE RIGHTS DEPRIVED OF THEM BY THOSE WHO TARGET THE CITIZEN'S who created and own properties (including peace of mind). The citizens' properties are stolen through the activities that members of the Community On Line members COLLECTIVELY cover, as in our pages. The criminals who flourish in our society, through control of the 'services' the TRIAD maintains, are challenged to argue their vile activities and to defend the defaults of the public servants retained in the circles the TRIAD 'maintains' in an alleged democracy, allegedly founded and resting on law and order.    

Article 6.  "In the determination of his civil rights and obligations or of any criminal charges against him, everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an independent and impartial tribunals established by law. Judgement shall be pronounced publicly but the press and public may be excluded from all or part of the trial in the interests of morals, public order or national security in a democratic society, where the interests of juveniles or the protection of the private life of the parties so require, or to the extent strictly necessary in the opinion of the court in special circumstances where publicity would prejudice the interests of justice". (For more relevant sections access the Home Office page. For the full list access from this page the official ECrtHR web-site). In the meantime DO NOTE the following: Facts Stated & Violations Pleaded as settled by Mr. Andrew Yiannides for a member of the CoL and submitted to the European Court of Human Rights can be accessed at this web-site).

• 1. "RIGHTS" as well as obligations ARE COVERED by this provision.
• 2.  "PUBLIC" as well as fair "HEARINGS" (you can address the court and you ought not to be treated as an underdog) ARE PROVIDED FOR.
• 3. "Within REASONABLE TIME ", means without prevarication and no meandering through inexcusable time-wasting and costs creating theatrical productions that warrant appeal, after appeal, after appeal. Such activities are created and necessitated because of abuse of the courts' facilities that include the BLANK CHEQUES INDUSTRY - need to appeal and better still the need to seek LEAVE TO APPEAL the doomed for dismissal insecure scenarios solidly founded and resting on WILFUL FRAUD ON THE NAIVE & GULLIBLE SUCKERS, 'the serfs who are called upon to pay taxes for the salaries of abusers of public office and trust'. Nothing but fraudulent in intent 'use of the bend it, facilities, with the rules in place'. We refer to rules that are used by the manipulators who put such facilities 'on call' for the rampant corruption and fraud to flourish, as in the National Scandal pages we cover. Read the explicit Appeal that covers FORGERIES used for thefts and reliance on alleged court orders issued WITHOUT ANY HEARINGS as provided under these provisions, the alleged orders themselves IF THE OFFENDERS dare produce them, just forgeries, intended for pecuniary advantage if the targeted victim has no choice but to turn to members of the TRIAD in control of CIUKU Enterprises.
• 4. "IN THE INTEREST OF MORALS", is covered by the Article. We challenge the abusers of public office and judicial chair occupants, to a private screening of "smalljustice" the acclaimed documentary from the USA, and to justify allegedly legitimate hearings within the context and intended safeguards of the provisions under this heading. We invite the mothers of sadistically and sexually abused children everywhere and in particular the mothers who organised themselves under the banner of LASA (League Against Sadistic Abuse) in the United Kingdom to publish facts and realities and challenge the abusers of public office who know not the meaning of 'JUDICIOUS, let alone IMPARTIAL' rulings.

Article 8. (1). "Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home and his correspondence. (2). There shall be no interference by public authority with the exercise of this right except such as is in accordance with the law and is necessary in a democratic society in the interests of national security, public safety or the economic well-being of the country, for the prevention of disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals, or for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others. (Pleaded for the member of the CoL)

Article 10. "EVERYONE has the right to FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION....to HOLD OPINIONS...TO RECEIVE AND IMPART INFORMATION AND IDEAS without interference by public authority and regardless of frontiers..... (with provisions attached to) maintaining the authority AND IMPARTIALITY(*D1) of the judiciary".

Article 11.2. "NO RESTRICTIONS shall be placed on the exercise of these rights other than such as are prescribed by law and are necessary in a democratic society in the interests of national security or public safety, for the prevention of  disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals or for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others. This article shall not prevent the imposition of lawful restrictions on the exercise of these rights by members of the armed forces, of the police or of the administration of the state.

Article 13. "EVERYONE whose rights and freedoms as set forth in this Convention are violated SHALL have an effective remedy before a national authority notwithstanding that the violation HAS BEEN committed by persons acting in an OFFICIAL CAPACITY." (Pleaded by member of the CoL)

Article 13 is VERY CLEAR. WHERE IS THE NATIONAL AUTHORITY THAT LOOKS INTO THE VIOLATIONS judges in the United Kingdom endorse, entertain AND INSTIGATE of their own?  The question is simple and the Lord Chancellor with the Home Secretary should co-operate and produce the formula under which the citizens CAN challenge activities that blatantly breach national law and VIOLATE Human Rights. NOTE PLEASE:  We have on record a high court case where the Judge made an issue of the serious ERROR of judgements (practices in our view) by the Local Government Ombudsman. All is not as the public is told; the multitude of documented facts we publish PROVE SO BEYOND ANY REASONABLE DOUBT to the average citizen. The citizens demand that they be treated no more as  illiterate serfs of  the middle ages and or as subjects to the whims and or the abusive dishonesty of so called 'public servants'; the 'alleged servants of the public' who serve other ulterior motives*, which they fail to declare.

Article 14 provides that: "The enjoyment of the rights and freedoms .... shall be secured without discrimination on any grounds such as sex, race, colour, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, association with a national minority, property, birth or other status". (Pleaded by member of the CoL in submissions to the ECoHR)

Article 34 provides for Individual applications: Chart of Declarations under former Articles 25 and 46 of the ECHR "The Court may receive applications from any person, non-governmental organisation or group of individuals claiming to be victim of a violation by one of the High Contracting Parties of the rights set forth in the Convention or the protocols thereto. The High Contracting Parties undertake not to hinder in any way the effective exercise of this right. [An OPEN CHALLENGE directed to ALL of the charlatans and fraudsters club recruits who are running around promoting and selling (to the naive and gullible tax-paying suckers) such letters as the letter we refer to in a direct challenge (*Link to the challenge) to the European Court of Human Rights, to publish the rubbish (which they use and promote) in the public domain. We ask also that they forward to us copies of such letters from the ECrtHR), for obvious reasons. Such persons apparently, if not familiar with the provisions, simply shoved the provisions in the dark corners of THEIR CORRUPTED MINDS].

European Union Law

• Article 29 of the Combined treaties, of the EU, provides
• (for protection from Fraud & Corruption):
• "Without prejudice to the powers of the European Community, the Union's Objective shall be to provide citizens with a high level of safety within an area of freedom, security and justice by developing common action among Member States in the fields of police and judicial co-operation in criminal matters and by preventing and combating racism and xenophobia.
• That objective shall be achieved by preventing and combating crime, organised or otherwise in particular terrorism, trafficking in persons and offences against children, illicit drug trafficking and illicit arms trafficking, corruption and fraud through: [*Link to rights assured to individual citizens & to rights under tort for state breaches]

Public servants appear to relish in Institutionalised Crime, as Organisers and Promoters through their alleged inability to even prosecute criminals who use FALSE INSTRUMENTS and blunt FORGERIES in the execution of the CIUKU Enterprises. Sufficient evidence is published in our pages covering the realities suppressed by the media barons and ignored by the promoters of CIUKU. The criminals who default to prosecute their 'brethren in arms' and those who maintain them in office, as in the Haringey page and associated pages we cover, are typical examples. Citizens ARE coming forward, despite the maligned activities of ill motivated and self proclaimed challengers and exponents of institutionalised crimes.The hypocrites and sycophants: a perfect example can be found in the 2 LIPS talk page (link) ignored our rights as the European Convention and the Universal Declaration afford decent citizens who refuse to join them and their masters and lords in the promotion of and perpetuation of the CIUKU Enterprises.

OUR AIMS were made clear as of 1981 (The CAMILA Project). Others have since joined in THE DEMAND to have all court hearings and proceedings recorded with automatic copies (as provided by law under the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984) to the parties in ALL instances. IT IS TIME to treat all humans as subject to the very same frailties without discrimination because of assumed 'faultless and impeccable character'. As our Judges often declare NONE IS ABOVE THE LAW. NONE should be exempt. There were/are prosecutions in the USA ....... that IS Democracy,  'The LAW' in action. Not so in our country. The Independence of the judiciary a vehicle for many a theft of rights through false instruments issued by abusers of public office.  

Here in the United Kingdom our government interrupted/stopped the trial of a judge who indulged in downright fraud on financial institutions. For decades, as our founder knows of, our judiciary systematically absolve the financial institutions and the legal professions of similar and worse crimes. Fraud is rampant and forgeries the favourite tools for transfer and thefts, endorsed and promoted by the very persons who are retained to protect society from crime.

By far the worst offenders are members of the legal circles and the judiciary; the last relying on the police to ignore the crimes they endorse while the Minister, accountable for the judiciary and the Court Service, the Lord Chancellor, through juniors in his office appears to acquiesce it all with blunt impunity and reckless abandon to the whims of the dishonest who misconduct in public office.

Judicial chair occupants, in the United Kingdom, BREACH THEIR PUBLIC DUTIES and through contempt of 'The Law' and 'The Judicial Oath' they systematically choose to ignore evidence presented to them. And juniors in the lower courts bluntly ignore the rulings of Higher Courts and even the provisions of International Law and Treaties that our government ratified over 50 years ago; illiterates in Law?

How dare our leaders assert that we are a Democratic State founded and Resting allegedly on the rule of Law and Order when judicial chair occupants appear to have carte blanche to ignore ALL LAW, acting in the process as bandits and or as licensed criminals?

We recognise that the vast majority of victims in the UK have suffered from loss of property. Do note that the word covers much more than the tangible, such as peace of mind, and YOUR time, the right to engage in other gainful activities instead of chasing after and swimming in the corrupted minefields of our ABUSED legal system, through the usual manifestations the legal 'boffins' thrive in. In the circumstances we draw the public's attention to the provision of the ECoHR above, as an assurance that the law is not an ass. Our founder has maintained, for over forty years, that an ass is the person who believes such assertions and ILL conceived notions. Further evidence that the Law is no ass has now been provided by the ruling from the House of Lords in the farcical Pinochet hearings. Their Lordships determined that the costs in that case MUST BE MET from public funds because one of their Lordships, sitting in on the case, FAILED TO DECLARE his connection and interests in Amnesty International. WHAT about the judges failing to declare their interests AND THEIR PART in the corrupt practices of the legal boffins, in every case we draw attention to?

IF you have reasons to believe that your rights HAVE been violated and in particular by and through abuse of the legal system / courts service COMPLAIN through your Member of Parliament to the Lord Chancellor's Department. Report also your complaint and the reasons WHY and HOW to the police. Point out the Court of Appeal ruling / proclamation we publish under the heading FRAUD VITIATES JUDGEMENTS*. Link also to, and read the 'Theft and Counterfeit' (forgery) provisions in The Law* document we publish*. Download it, read and digest the full scope of the various sections. Consider 'The Law'* in the light of YOUR own experiences with public servants such as the police and judges who may have 'failed' you. Apply knowledge of facts to 'The Law'* and remember that crime is for the police to investigate and prosecute. You may e-mail brief details to:< violations@human-rights.demon.co.uk > if you propose to Act by Joining the * human-rights.org * Community On Line *

• NOTES - B: - (1) Contributions or penalties does not include abuse of the court's processes by the dishonest criminals who have free access to and use of all court facilities at their disposal*.  Even on a Saturday, when the courts are closed, as Mr G H Scriven points out in his affidavit.
• 2.1 The uncontrolled and unsupervised, in our alleged democracy, ought not to be allowed to corrode and 'corrupt Britain', trumpeted Paul Johnson *, the foundations of it. Democracy must be seen to be resting and founded on the rule of law.
• 2.2 It cannot be allowed to be a monocracy where the lowest of the low, in any public position, feel free to act outside the law* assured that along the line others will seek to absolve them through misconduct in public office; if anything for fear of exposing the depth of the rot in our society the media are aware of.
• 2.3  When the rot is in the foundations nothing but a rebuilt structure will do.
• 2.4  The architects must either abandon the old tools of their trade or they must be replaced with persons prepared to built 'anew'.
• 3.1  The provisions ARE CLEAR. However, if a citizen is subjected to abusive use of official facilities re:- taxes and other penalties imposed, leading to abuse of the exceptions above provided, the question arises of HOW FAR and HOW DEEP the organised institutionalised DEPRIVATION AND VIOLATION OF RIGHTS?
• 3.2  There exist citizens in the United Kingdom fighting the very issues and the violations of their rights in law*.
• 4.1  Inevitably power corrupts. Let loose and free to act outside Parliament's law and the provisions of INTERNATIONAL LAW.  Abuse of the independence of the judiciary principle has been allowed to take over from the rule of law.
• 4.2  Misconduct in public office and violations imposed through alleged legitimate legal costs leading to and followed by DEPRIVATION OF RIGHTS TO AND PROPERTIES, and no remedy in law because the law exists not for criminals.
• 4.3 The Lord Chancellor, as Minister in charge of the Judiciary, failing to oversee and investigate complaints about the conduct of 'judicial chair occupants'.
• 5.1 No facility to comply with the provisions of Article 13 of the ECoHR.
• 5.2  No AUTHORITY PROPER TO OVERSEE AND SUPERVISE the judiciary; therefrom the officially accepted and established rights of the judiciary to railroad and hijack* court actions as they please or as they are allowed to 'practice' and or as they are instructed by the state to do.
• 5.3  The state always absolving itself on the very grounds of the much revered, promoted from within, and ABUSED 'independence' of the judiciary 'principle'; the freedom to abuse facility.
• 5.4 Judiciary who consciously and with intent misconduct in public office* and enter not into JUDICIOUS rulings founded and resting on the facts and or the evidence of each case before them but only on what they choose and can use FOR the benefit of the circles from within which they arose to public office.
• 6.1 Judiciary that SIMPLY GENERATE INCOME and MORE court cases (from appeals to new actions) to which naturally are attached alleged legitimate legal costs.
• 6.2  THE ESTABLISHED MILKING OF THE COW PRACTICE. Graphically depicted in the cartoon that adorns the walls in every barrister's chambers. The creator of that cartoon failed to place a judge in the clouds above acting as self appointed GOD stretching out his arms HOLDING IN PLACE the two litigants who are fighting over the cow being milked dry by the legal professions.

The Above: Food for thought for the present United Kingdom government that made specific and clear promises when in opposition through its spokes person on Legal Affairs, the Rt. Hon. Paul Boateng, now Minister of State.

WE publish below a letter Andrew, our founder, sent to 'The Times' newspaper. IT WAS NOT PUBLISHED by the self appointed CENSOR and promoter of the ills the society in the United Kingdom is faced with. The editor, and others, HAVING predetermined WHAT society they ARE CREATING there was and there is no cause to pretend to know of the rights of parents UNDER INTERNATIONAL LAW.

LINK from here to 'educating children the Politically Correct way' (by State & Local Authority puppets) and a concerned father's way. The father had been prompted to write to the editor of 'The Times' (the prestigious) because of ongoing concerns regarding morals and education, in the m id-1990s. In the same page an example of how the same father 'set about to educate secondary school children' by examples stated, at a time when the issue of PERSONAL RIGHTS was challenged through a 'case stated, relevant to family and by extension to the CONSIDERATIONS APPLICABLE TO SOCIETY AS A WHOLE.

THE PUBLIC, the ordinary citizen, MUST BE PROTECTED from the rogues who operate illegally within the legal system.

In 1975, Andrew read the following: "The Court has inherent jurisdiction to stay an action which MUST fail (upper case by human-rights); as, for instance, an action brought in respect of an act of state;...".The words clearly evincing existing arrangements between the Executive and the allegedly independent, of any influences, judiciary who should enter only, 'judicious and untainted rulings'. The explicit words, contemptuous  of the proclamations and principle. The quote is from the Rules of the Supreme Court, and we publish it in the Public Domain for doubting Thomas' to search for it. In so far as we are concerned it constitutes PROOF & IS the corner stone upon which ALL FRAUD & CORRUPTION rests. The performance of Public servants, in the service of Justice, left the founder of human-rights, Mr Andrew Yiannides with no other option but to conclude as published in - the fourth quote in our HomePage. RECKLESS fraud on the public by the criminals who have been and are in control of CIUKU Enterprises. MOST CERTAINLY Andrew's own experiences pointed to the free-for-all the legal circles had been and are benefiting from. The conclusion some three years after the legal circles introduced a Forgery, as the defendants' evidence, in support of an indefensible case of commercial fraud. For over three years, the police and the criminals in control of the courts established, without any doubt, that the judicial chair occupants were but directors of the most vile of crimes, in an alleged democracy. One that is sold to the world, by the home tutored media, as one that rests and is founded, allegedly on law & order.

LIPS : Litigants In Person Society. First contacts with Mr. Andrew Yiannides and The CAMILA Project : 1992, within weeks of the lodging of a explicit appeal at BOW COUNTY COURT (*Link to  the appeal & briefly stated case).